ANTIFA / Antifascist Action / Antifaschistische Aktion - The anti-fascist gang with fascist tendencies

Fascism and Communism are both authoritarian, totalitarian ideologies that demand the entirety of society be tuned to their wavelength to achieve greatness.

Fascists just tend to be more realistic and honest about it. "Yes we will oppress the minorities and beat the fuck out of our opponents. Cry about it." Meanwhile communists spent 3 hours waxing poetic about dialectics, theory and minutia to say the same shit under a massive load of bullshit.

Communists are bad because they are communists. Simple as.
 
Communism isn't bad because its related to fascism, its bad because its the opposite of fascism: a godless, internationalist race and nation denying ideology. The "Fascism is when communism" libertarian boomer argument is retarded as fuck and needs to be buried. You will never "own" a communist by calling him fascist, just fucking call him a communist, its a way worse thing to be called, if you say "fascism is...le bad!" you agree with communists that nationalism, even if in its extreme form, is bad, and antifascism is therefor good, and you have just conceded them ground and weakened your own position immeasurably.
Fascism is just as godless; it's the nature of socialism.
 
"XYZ are the real fascists" is the equivalent of "Imagine if the roles were reversed". It has never worked, and it will never work. Loser's gambit.

"XYZ are the real fascists" is the equivalent of "Imagine if the roles were reversed". It has never worked, and it will never work. Loser's gambit.
More of trying to inexhorably link the two ideologies as nearly identical in the mind of the everyday normie.
 
Once again, it was tried extensively by conservatives in the 90s and 2000s. It didn't stick. The left isn't shamed by it, and the right doesn't care deeply enough or push hard enough to establish the association. It's a dead horse.

The "socialist = poor & failed" meme worked way better, but that was weakened by decades of relentless leftist propaganda to bury it. It can return, since a lot of people are starting to experience the effects of socialism in the US and the EU.
 
One way to push back is to inform people about the roots of fascism, its socialist origins. Georges Sorel and all that. Don't let them deny it, keep hammering it home, don't let them change definitions, attack nonstop.
cry more you cuckservative faggot
 
1718352106539.png
That's Trigglypuff. Is someone reposting these pictures as a joke, or is she still around posting her old OKCupid profile pics?
 
Another update on my pet retard Ilaria Salis.

She's back in Italy much earlier than expected, completely scott free, living her best life with her father in his Monza apartment. Now that the big bucks are going to come in from her salary, a few issues have become relevant again:
She used to squat with her antifa buddies. A lot. She currently owes 90000 euros (cca. 96600 bucks for the burgers reading this) of unpaid rent to a company operating social housing.

She has publicly announced that she won't pay, despite her roughly net 20k salary (including everything) as a MEP being more than enough to slowly pay off the debt, citing "occupying houses without hurting anyone else is part of the class war" as the reason why her debt is not valid.

Italian source
 
She currently owes 90000 euros (cca. 96600 bucks for the burgers reading this) of unpaid rent to a company operating social housing.

She has publicly announced that she won't pay, despite her roughly net 20k salary (including everything) as a MEP being more than enough to slowly pay off the debt, citing "occupying houses without hurting anyone else is part of the class war" as the reason why her debt is not valid.
Can't wait for her to fuck back off to prison or just get her shit garnished by force.
 
Getting paid 90000 Euros a month from a globalist bourgeois outfit like the EU is presumably part of the class war as well.
 
She currently owes 90000 euros (cca. 96600 bucks for the burgers reading this) of unpaid rent to a company operating social housing.

She has publicly announced that she won't pay, despite her roughly net 20k salary (including everything) as a MEP being more than enough to slowly pay off the debt, citing "occupying houses without hurting anyone else is part of the class war" as the reason why her debt is not valid.
How viable is it for her to be ousted from the position after she ends becoming a criminal in her home country due to non-payment? I'm guessing it's the kind of thing that will take 10 years or more to get near that point?
 
How viable is it for her to be ousted from the position after she ends becoming a criminal in her home country due to non-payment? I'm guessing it's the kind of thing that will take 10 years or more to get near that point?
Unlikely. She's been dodging debt for quite a long time, early 2010s, and the MEP mandate only lasts 5 years, I unfortunately doubt Lady Justice works fast enough to be able to have her way with her until that ends.

You also have to remember that she is essentially a left wing living martyr at this point, she's been politically imprisoned and tortured in an ✨evil eastern european nazi hellhole✨, I doubt Italian prosecution would want to step on this particular pile of dogshit.

If she managed to dodge the consequences of conspiring to commit deadly assault with weapons against innocent people in a foreign country she visited for the express purpose of committing this particular crime and nothing else, I have no doubt she has enough retard luck to keep falling upwards.
 
Last edited:
Fun fact: nobody remembers that faggot on the left, but everyone remembers that frog-faced fuckup Sartre.

What is wrong with the world?

A lot of Ernst Junger's works were never published in English, but he was actually quite popular in Germany and France; hence Sartre's seething. Junger wasn't an aristocrat, he was just a military man.
In Germany, Jünger is today a revered figure, seen as a modern-day Goethe, a Renaissance man who lived long enough to see his complete works published twice. In France, he has always had a substantial readership, especially for his wartime diaries; at one point, 48 of his translated books were in print there. In the English-speaking world, though, with only scraps of his outsize catalog in translation for decades, many otherwise literate people may not even have heard of him. I first read about Jünger via a 1981 profile by Bruce Chatwin. Over the years, I managed to pick up just two titles, both secondhand. His most renowned book, On the Marble Cliffs, was almost impossible to find and prohibitively expensive, even in paperback. Until recently, any kind of proper reckoning with Jünger in the English-speaking world had to be, of necessity, postponed.
Grave New World

Sartre, on the other hand, was a "public intellectual" and did all kinds of attention-grabbing stunts popular with the American Left, he was part of Russel Tribunal accusing the US of war crimes in Vietnam, and he did the traditional pinko intellectual rite of going to communist hellholes and praising them as paradise:
Shortly after taking power in 1959, Cuban dictator Fidel Castro took up Vladimir Lenin’s old strategy of gaining the support of “progressive” intellectuals in Europe and the United States. Lenin called them “useful idiots.” French writers Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir became Castro’s first marks.

The couple embodied the intelligentsia in its purity and perfection: they led a bourgeois life in Paris, they posed as revolutionaries, and they had a woeful record of predicting the future. During World War II, they never publicly denounced the Nazis and continued to publish undisturbed in France. After the war, they supported Stalin, then the Communists of North Vietnam, then China’s Mao Tse Tung. In 1960, they accepted Castro’s invitation to Havana, where they were received like royalty. They responded by publishing celebrations of the Cuban revolution. They never seemed to grasp that the Castro regime was a typical Latin American caudillist dictatorship, wrapped up in Marxist language to secure Soviet protection.
.....
I knew Sartre a little personally in the 1970s. I, too, made the pilgrimage to Havana, Moscow, and Beijing (though I went in order to denounce the dictators). It always seemed to me that Sartre placed himself above the revolution—and above humanity in general. He was a Machiavellian: he believed in one morality for the elites and another for the people. Castro understood that Sartre was moved by vanity. The dictator showered the public intellectual with honors and bestowed upon him hours of personal audience. Sartre was rich; he didn’t need to be bought, but his moral corruption was boundless.

Beyond Sartre’s case, which, to be sure, provides an archetype of intellectual idiocy, most of those who worshiped dictators have obtained the rewards they sought—recognition that they couldn’t find in their own countries. After Sartre came a stream of intellectuals from East and West. Susan Sontag led the way for the United States. Intellectuals of the Left have always lusted after power. For this reason, they detest materialism, capitalism, and the United States. Democracy does not accord power to philosophers.

In Cuba, Castro led idiots to believe that his revolution put culture, education, and health above material values—just what Sartre and company wanted to hear. Until recently, visitors to Havana were shown a hospital, a school, and a bookstore. I myself had the privilege of visiting these Potemkin villages. The hospital was a show pony reserved for the country’s leaders. The bookstore was devoted to the works of Castro. The school did nothing to improve Cubans’ educational levels, which, before the revolution, were the highest in Latin America.

Sartre couldn’t have cared less about this reality. He believed what he saw and heard, or he wanted to believe what he saw and heard, which comes to the same thing. Sartre wasn’t a humanist. The condition of humanity here and now had no interest for him. What pleased Sartre—and still pleases other Sartres—is the aesthetic of revolution. For intellectuals, revolutions are bullfights on a national scale. Naturally it follows that revolutions should be exotic, colorful, and even bloody. Sartre adored the massive parades of Cubans with flags, songs, and speeches, just as some French intellectuals of the 1930s were fascinated by the “virile” manifestations of Nazism and, in the 1960s, by the Chinese Cultural Revolution with its blood and ceremony.
No More Cigars

And participated in a petition to abolish the age of consent:
After May 1968, French intellectuals would challenge the state’s authority to protect minors from sexual abuse. In one prominent example, on January 26, 1977, Le Monde, a French newspaper, published a petition signed by the era’s most prominent intellectuals—including Jean-Paul Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir, Gilles Deleuze, Roland Barthes, Philippe Sollers, André Glucksmann and Louis Aragon—in defense of three men on trial for engaging in sexual acts with minors. “French law recognizes in 13- and 14-year-olds a capacity for discernment that it can judge and punish,” the petition stated, “But it rejects such a capacity when the child's emotional and sexual life is concerned.” Furthermore, the signatories argued, children and adolescents have the right to a sexual life: “If a 13-year-old girl has the right to take the pill, what is it for?” It’s unclear what impact, if any, the petition had. The defendants were sentenced to five years in prison, but did not serve their full sentences.

In 1979, Liberation published another petition, this time in support of Gérard R., a man on trial for having sex with girls between the ages of six and 12. It was signed by 63 people, many of them well-known intellectuals like Christiane Rochefort and Pascal Bruckner. It argued that the girls in question were “happy” with the situation. “The love of children is also the love of their bodies,” they wrote. “Desire and sexual games have their place in the relationship between children and adults. This is what Gérard R. thought and experienced with [the] girls … whose fulfillment proved to everyone, including their parents, the happiness they found with him.”
France, Where Age of Consent is Up for Debate

Meanwhile Ernst Junger's beliefs are difficult to quantify in modern political thought:
Jünger was 25 when his memoir appeared; he lived to be 102. When he was born, Germany was ruled by Kaiser Wilhelm II, the last German emperor and king of Prussia; when he died, Helmut Kohl was chancellor of a reunified Germany. Jünger was the youngest-ever recipient of the great Prussian military honor, the Pour le Mérite; in 1984, he spoke at the Verdun memorial, standing beside Kohl and one of his other great admirers, French president François Mitterrand. Does such longevity bestow unquestionable authority, tout court?

Jünger’s life straddled worlds. He was decorated by Germany’s last kaiser, and he socialized with Joseph Goebbels; he discussed art with Picasso, and he took one of the first LSD trips, with Albert Hofmann. He numbered among his Weimar-era friends the very right-wing Carl Schmitt and the very left-wing Joseph Roth. In 1985, the German state of Baden-Württemberg established the Ernst Jünger Prize for Entomology, for outstanding work in the field. He was “multidisciplinary” before that term had currency. He was a soldier, scientist, philosopher, ideologue, mystic, and the very model of a hungry autodidact. He influenced Martin Heidegger and was admired by Bertolt Brecht.
Grave New World

Although most people I've heard quoting Sartre just like the phrase "Hell is other people." A lot of them know nothing about Sartre, just that quote. Maybe Junger should have come up with more snappy catchphrases.
 
NOOOO, not the consequences of my own actions.

German anti-fascist extradited to Hungary


Maja T now faces 24 years in prison, accused of attacking neo-Nazis in Budapest​

Despite months of legal efforts and solidarity demonstrations, German antifascist Maya T. has been extradited to Hungary, where they face 24 years imprisonment. The non-binary activist was arrested in Berlin in December 2023, and charged for allegedly forming a “criminal organisation”, in connection with attacks on a neo-Nazi rally in Budapest in February 2023. They were held in extradition custody in Dresden prison before being taken across the border.

The Budapest proceedings, which began 10 months prior to Maja’s arrest, regard allegations against several anti-fascist activists accused of violence towards far-right groups during Budapest’s “Day of Honour” events. These events commemorating WWII veterans have been attracting neo-Nazi participants. German authorities were pressured investigate and prosecute these allegations through extensive surveillance and arrests. In two cases, the Federal Prosecutor’s Office attempted to increase the charges to attempted murder, which was rejected by the Federal Court of Justice. In Hungary, the existing charge for obliquely violent acts carries a potential sentence of 24 years imprisonment.

After being held in custody, the case was transferred to the Federal Prosecutor’s Office which essentially increased the likelihood of extradition to Hungary—known for its antagonism towards LGBTQIA+ individuals alongside substandard prison conditions. The country’s authoritarian regimes and human rights violations, present in the legal and penitentiary system, do not comply with European standards to the extent that the EU Parliament denied Hungary democratic status in 2022.

solidaritaet-mit-maja-gegen-die-auslieferung-nach-ungarn-06-29-2024-1536x1024-1.jpeg
Solidarity demonstration in Halle. Photo: Indymedia
On June 28th, the Federal Constitutional Court issued a temporary order to halt Maja’s extradition until a constitutional complaint could be reviewed. However, Maja had already been handed over to Hungarian authorities earlier that morning, just fifty minutes before the court’s order was issued. This action by the German authorities effectively circumvented the court’s decision.

German authorities (Dresden Prison, Saxony State Criminal Police Office, Berlin Public Prosecutor’s Office) have been criticised heavily for undermining Maja’s human rights as well as refusing to provide their family with information regarding their whereabouts—denying detention rights.

Maja’s planned extardition had led to a wave of protests spanning Germany. Last December, 200 demonstrators protested in the city of Jena, demanding freedom for Maja and other political prisoners accused in the Budapest trial. Alongside support and speeches from Hamburg, Maja’s father stated that he is “proud when Maja stands up against fascists”. On Saturday (29.6), following Maja’s deportation, over 100 anti-fascists demonstrated in the city of Erfurt, and solidarity actions have taken place elsewhere in Germany over the weekend
 
Back