BaldAndMorallyBankrupt
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2022
I don't know man. Why has the US Army conducted more amphibious landings than the USMC? Why has the Russian Naval Infantry conducted more Airborne operations than the VDV? Why was the US Tank Destroyer Branch sidelined by the US Military and eventually shit-canned after WW2 despite having an objectively better track record in armored combat than US Armor Branch?Another Ranger thinking he is better than everyone else. Rangers also had 50 times as many casualties as those units. Probably a Nick Irving alt. Regardless of what you think about SEALs, the probable war crimes, etc. saying they are on the same level as a regular SWAT team is such an obvious lie. And again nobody can explain why SEALs were chosen for:
...
The idea that there is any sort of "meritocracy" going in the miltiary is a joke and it's a dead give away someone hasn't served a single day in their life. It comes down to three things. Availability, budget and how many strings you have to pull on. Who's in the area? Do they have the numbers and budget to conduct something like that? Do they have any friends in high places? The US TD Branch was expensive and made a lot of armor branch folks very butt hurt that they were getting showed up. Armor branch had broader support so TD Branch got the axe. Performance was immaterial.
Or to use an example that this thread might be more familiar with. Red Wings. The SEALs were in the area, they had access to more assets than the marines (namely SOAR) , and they had a more direct link to command ergo more friends than the Marines. So they got the mission.