Crime How 10-year jail for break-ups under new law has experts worried - Saar do not redeem purple pussy saar

Section 69 of the new Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita has provision for up to 10 years' jail for sexual relationships by deceit, including on the pretext of marriage. Experts worry that Section 69 could be used to harass and jail men for breaking up with their partners. Here's what experts have to say about the new law.​


Saar do not.JPG
Section 69 of the new Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita has provision for up to 10 years' jail for sexual relationships on false promise of marriage. (Image: Generative AI by Vani Gupta/India Today)

Priyanjali Narayan
New Delhi,UPDATED: Jul 2, 2024 18:12 IST
Article

In Short​

  • Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita criminalises sex on the pretext of marriage
  • Experts are worried that men might be harassed if a relationship doesn't work out
  • Police personnel say it will be difficult to build a watertight case in court with evidence
Relationships, consent and marriage have always been tricky terrain for law enforcement. This tricky terrain is back in focus as the new Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) replaced the 164-year-old Indian Penal Code (IPC) on July 1. Among the provisions of the BNS, Section 69 has experts particularly worried. Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita states that if a promise to marry is made without any intent to follow it up and a sexual relationship is established, a person can face up to 10 years of imprisonment.

"Whoever, by deceitful means or by making a promise to marry a woman without any intention of fulfilling the same, has sexual intercourse with her, such sexual intercourse not amounting to the offence of rape, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years and shall also be liable to fine," reads the Section 69 of the new Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.

Section 69 is new and unprecedented as the Indian Penal Code did not have a specific provision for sexual intercourse by concealing facts or by deceit.

Earlier, such cases were tried under Section 90 of the IPC, which mentioned a woman could not have consented to sexual intercourse if there was a "misconception of fact".

There have been cases where women alleged rape when a relationship fell through, but with Section 69, women can claim to have consented to sexual intercourse upon false promises.

Section 69, in a way, makes break-ups illegal, and men in relationships prone to being harassed if the relationship doesn't end in marriage.

Section 69 has been brought in to address the issue of marriages undertaken by concealing identity or suppression of facts. This could also be used in cases where there is complaint that marriages, especially interfaith marriages, have taken place where the man concealed his identity.

Deceitful has been explained in the Section as "inducement for, or false promise of employment or promotion, or marrying by suppressing identity".

"The promise to marry" part of Section 69 opens a Pandora's box for people in relationships and law enforcement officials.

The imprisonment for the "promise to marry" aspect of Section 69 has got people in relationships worried that men will get unfairly targeted as a result of the souring of relationships. Lawyers say an intent to deceive could be established if the relationship ended for other reasons, but the male partner could face grave consequences. Police officials say Section 69 of the BNS might make arresting men easier without credible evidence.

'INTENT IS SUBJECTIVE,' SAYS LAWYER ON SECTION 69 OF BNS​

Lawyers are worried about how they fight a case where there are several grey areas.

"The intent [to marry] is subjective. How one can prove that there was genuine intent if the marriage does not take place is not clear yet," Ghaziabad-based lawyer Arvind Singh told IndiaToday.in.

"Relationships can end for several reasons, even when there is an intent to marry. Proving somebody intended to marry but could not for whatever reason will be difficult," Singh added.

It could take months or years for the lawyers to prove their case, and it could cause immense damage to a person and his reputation and their overall lives.

"While we do not know how such cases will turn out to be, an inability to prove such a thing will have grave consequences. A man can end up in prison for 10 years. His whole life can be affected," Singh added.

A WOMAN'S WORD CAN GET EX-PARTNER ARRESTED, SAYS COP​

Issues with Section 69 of the BNS do not end here. Arrests can be made after an initial probe by the police. However, making a watertight case with evidence in court would be a completely different matter.

"The court works on evidence. We will have to produce circumstantial evidence that there was a promise to marry, and the sexual intercourse happened under guise or pretence. This is very difficult to prove," a senior police official with 30 years of service told IndiaToday.in.

Here, text messages, call recordings and pictures might be used as evidence of breach of promise. However, it might still be difficult to infer that a sexual relationship was established on the grounds of a promised marriage.

"Messages, calls and pictures will be taken into account here. They will set the premise for the relationship and if marriage has been discussed. Even then, we might not know if a sexual relationship was established only under the promise that a marriage would take place," the senior police officer said.

Faster arrests, quicker action, but it might not serve the purpose of justice.

"In the cases under the Section, the man might be arrested just on the word of the woman. The arrest will be faster, but the court will still need evidence and that is where it is going to be a problem," they added.

This provision might lead to unfair arrests, years of court cases and damage to several aspects of a man's life.

PEOPLE IN RELATIONSHIPS SCARED OF NEW LAW​

While the law enforcement faces the issue of applying Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita to practice, it is the people in relationships who are more worried about what this law might bring.

"A woman knows while consenting to sexual intercourse that there is a possibility that the relationship might fall apart. If two people want to be together, they don't even need marriage or a promise of marriage," Sujata, a 27-year-old woman from Delhi, who has been in a relationship for two years, told IndiaToday.in. Her name has been changed to protect her identity.

"People might get worried about getting intimate with their partners due to the fear of imprisonment," she added.

Relationships end for many reasons and now men are scared they will face dire consequences for breaking up with their partners.

"What if due to some of my family reasons, I cannot marry her. Or she cannot marry me. We cannot make it work, and then she files a complaint against me. How will I save myself," a 26-year-old man from Delhi told IndiaToday.in.

Many questions are being raised about Section 69 of the new Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. Only time will tell how the law is enforced and if men stand being harassed.
 
Relationships, consent and marriage have always been tricky terrain for law enforcement
If you stopped being simps it wouldn't be "tricky terrain".

Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita states that if a promise to marry is made without any intent to follow it up and a sexual relationship is established, a person can face up to 10 years of imprisonment.
Absolute insanity. I can see with a culture like this why Indian men are so rapey. Society doesn't give a shit about you, why should you give a shit about society.
 
I don't get the prison sentence. This seems like an ideal situation for a fine, if the deceit can be proven.
It's the theft of her virginity and the fact she's unmarriageable now. It's a jail sentence because it's an honour crime. I look forward to the Pakistani version attracting the death penalty.
 
Absolute insanity. I can see with a culture like this why Indian men are so rapey. Society doesn't give a shit about you, why should you give a shit about society.
It makes some more sense in the context of that culture and the significance placed on marriages/dowries/etc. but it still doesn't make sense to send them to prison for it. If there was some kind of other fraud or crime, yeah that deserves prison and this should enhance the sentence due to the fraudulent deception.

Justice aside, I can't see India having enormous amounts of free prison capacity for men who back out of marriage either.
 
It's the theft of her virginity and the fact she's unmarriageable now. It's a jail sentence because it's an honour crime.
>has sex willing
>theft

Do you know what words mean? Even assuming this is the reason, why are the soon to be wed allowed any unchaperoned contact.
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: FierceBrosnan
>has sex willing
>theft

Do you know what words mean? Even assuming this is the reason, why are the soon to be wed allowed any unchaperoned contact.
It is theft in Indian culture. The boyfriend has stolen something he and his family should have paid for; the use of a woman. Now she is left economically on her dad's hands as she has no value as a bride. Her parents weren't asked if they consented to this sex out of marriage, were they? The man has obtained a material advantage by deception; that's why it's treated as a fraud.

I don't make the rules of Indian culture or Indian law, this ain't on me.

They are out unchaperoned because their parents want them to work for money. Women can't feasibly be chaperoned at work. Were you chaperoned at all times before your marriage? Would it even have been possible for your parents to do that?
 
It makes some more sense in the context of that culture and the significance placed on marriages/dowries/etc. but it still doesn't make sense to send them to prison for it. If there was some kind of other fraud or crime, yeah that deserves prison and this should enhance the sentence due to the fraudulent deception.

Justice aside, I can't see India having enormous amounts of free prison capacity for men who back out of marriage either.
Iirc there have been a lot of feminist overcorrection laws in India in part because Indian men are demented rape apes. There was a case a few years back where 4 Indian men gang raped a woman to death on a bus and a bunch of politicans and media figures made excuses for them.
 
India has began ita feminism arc. It will be hilarious and will involve cow feces in the future at some point.
Began? India is and always has been the single most feminist country on the planet. A woman can stab her husband to death and the cops are completely powerless to stop her unless there is a female officer to arrest her. The men cannot lay a hand on her. If that means she flees and gets away, she can and will and it has happened several times before.

The lawyers in India had to unionize and BEG the courts to stop allowing rape accusations without evidence because they have the highest rate of false accusations on the planet. Some of the lawyers had up to at least 60% of their cases being false rape accusations that were completely made up.

In India, if you divorce she gets everything regardless of any circumstances and you have to pay for her lawyer. She can cheat on you and you are not allowed to tell anyone, or you go to prison. You cannot damage a woman's reputation in India in any, way, shape or form or it is a criminal act.

India is a country that hates it's men and they should rebel and burn their government to the ground and execute their politicians. They do not serve them and never have. Their culture is completely fucked.
 
They are out unchaperoned because their parents want them to work for money. Women can't feasibly be chaperoned at work. Were you chaperoned at all times before your marriage? Would it even have been possible for your parents to do that?
If their old enough to work, their old enough to marry. India is an insane nation.
 
Iirc there have been a lot of feminist overcorrection laws in India in part because Indian men are demented rape apes. There was a case a few years back where 4 Indian men gang raped a woman to death on a bus and a bunch of politicans and media figures made excuses for them.
The entire continent of India just needs to go. They have out of control rape due to having the strictest and most bat shit insane relationship and family laws on the planet. Just fucking nuke this place already.
 
Back