US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Biden didn't really have any baggage walking into the 2020 elections, at least with Democrats. He was billed as Biden's best friend near the end of 2016 and liberals remembered him fondly as a slightly kooky old dude that was part of Democrats' favorite administration. Say what you will about Obama, and there's plenty to say, but his base looked upon him as a god.
Biden was forced to drop out of the 1988 Pres election for lying and plagiarism. He's been a bad pathological liar his entire career and has a ton of baggage.

Biden as VP was Obama's Kamala Harris.
 
Biden was forced to drop out of the 1988 Pres election for lying and plagiarism. He's been a bad pathological liar his entire career and has a ton of baggage.

Biden as VP was Obama's Kamala Harris.
Hilariously, of all groups, he thought the best people to poach speeches from was the Labour party of the 1980's.
You know, when they were getting reamed nonstop by Thatcher, even moreso than Reagan was doing to domestic Democrats in the same time frame.
 
the role of VP could handle that better then a series of different roles, right?
VP is in no formal hierarchy except succession to the presidency, I want the man in charge of purging commies to be directly in the regular chain of command at whatever alphabet soup agencies he's purging, up near the top
 
This is how I see it:

View attachment 6151049

Trump still wins because of everything flipped in the midwest and NE, but this creates such a glaring problem will illegals and voter fraud it will be a consistent 60/40 approval for all of Trump's actions. Trump has the mandate mandate fruit.
Thats like a map in a tv show that tries to look "impartial". Texas blue but Maine and Virginia red? Are you kidding?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Harvey Danger
Anyone know when candidates generally announce their VP picks? I don't really recall off the top of my head, as I never really gave a shit about VP.
VP announcements are usually the day of or day before the convention. That's when they leak anyway. Campaigns love to have that anticipation to start the convention.
 
So they want to replace Biden with Kamala, the one person even more boring and unelectable than he is.
The only reason she's even VP is because he wanted a black woman and since she only looks black she was a safe bet. Problem is in her career she hasn't accomplished anything other than jailing more black men and sucking off more powerful men to get a better position in life.
 
So they want to replace Biden with Kamala, the one person even more boring and unelectable than he is.
The only reason she's even VP is because he wanted a black woman and since she only looks black she was a safe bet. Problem is in her career she hasn't accomplished anything other than jailing more black men and sucking off more powerful men to get a better position in life.
They don't have a choice. If it's not Biden it has to be Kamala if for no other reason than money. If it's anyone else virtually every penny the Biden campaign has raised so far (3+ years!) has to be returned to the donors and most of that has already been spent. Nobody is giving the Biden campaign $100 million or whatever now to return to previous donors after this. Even if that money could be raised it's money that won't be spent on the new candidate's campaign. The new candidate would be starting at $0 with three months until election day.

The Dems are right and proper f*u*c*k*e*d.
 

link to the tweet. Damn it. I hope it is real though. Flynn would be the best choice.
I won't pretend to know everything about the guy, but given the other options
-pajeet
-women
-niggers
-guys who shittalked Trump a few years ago
And he's been persecuted righted along with Trump since 2016. The military background is good I guess, idk how much that would translate into the VP's day-to-day duties.
 
I'll take your clocks if I'm late with this observation but  if the Dems have to ditch Joe from Scranton, plugging in Kamala will be a masterstroke (apart from being most obvious).

1) The obvious: By not doing so, you anger all the loyal wine aunts and sheboons and soybois you need.

2) The masterstroke: Since Kamala is unlikely to ever be elected to any office ever again, running her in a losing effort in 2024 wastes her as "the rightful heir" candidate in 2028, clearing the detritus from the path for Gavin Bateman, who absolutely won't want to wait until 2032 to lay claim to the throne to which he feels Hillary-levels of entitlement to.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back