Steve Quest (p/k/a Montagraph) vs. Nicholas Robert Rekieta & Rekieta Law, LLC (2023)

i still can't believe nick hasn't settled this by now. even if he's delusional enough to think he's in the right the fact that he has a serious criminal case hanging over his head yet he's still wasting money on the most expensive lawyer he can find on this bullshit is unconscionable.

his family should either cut him off or get him an actual tard wrangler because he's just gonna end up wasting their money.
 
i still can't believe nick hasn't settled this by now
If my memory serves, Montagraph hasn't made any settlement offers and therefore Nick doesn't see it as an option. Nick certainly won't initiate the settlement negotiations himself and there's no indication that Montagraph would entertain them even if he did.
 
It seems that Nick has not paid that $300 dollars he owed Monty
Does anyone have an idea of what his angle is here? Nick is smart enough to know that fines don't just vanish, and that they can accrue. He (assumedly) still has the money to pay. Is it defiance? Why wouldn't he just settle these small payments quickly and neatly, considering he has much bigger problems to deal with right now?
 
After the revelation of all the unpaid speeding tickets, I'll be surprised if from here on out Nick ever willingly pays any expense involving a court, especially to a man he can't stop calling a pedophile. Nick may have rich parents and a trust fund but in spirit and mentality he is a deadbeat wigger.
this is the kind of shit you see with a trust fund man-baby who has never even seen the mailed parking tickets, because his family and pet lawyers continue to wipe his ass at 45.

something happened a few years ago (maybe the vic case blowing up) and the buttwiping stopped
 
and there's no indication that Montagraph would entertain them even if he did.
Sure. but there's no indication that he wouldn't either. The two things he seemed to be interested in were for Nick to renounce his statements, and to get some cash. If Nick agrees to both, I don't see why Monty wouldn't agree to it, even if the sum is less than he originally would have wanted (especially considering Minnesota caselaw is hostile to cases like his).
 
You can no longer find the Nick appeal by name or by casenumber. You have to have a direct link which then gives you an option to return to the case
Screenshot 2024-07-05 211705.png
 
Does anyone have an idea of what his angle is here? Nick is smart enough to know that fines don't just vanish, and that they can accrue. He (assumedly) still has the money to pay. Is it defiance? Why wouldn't he just settle these small payments quickly and neatly, considering he has much bigger problems to deal with right now?
I don't think Nick gives a damn about anything that isn't getting high, fucking April, and keeping Kayla distracted. Everyone can go fuck themselves. He's sitting there with his fingers in his ears yelling "I can't here you" like a child. He is the almighty Lawpope and he'll do whatever the fuck he wants.

You can no longer find the Nick appeal by name or by casenumber. You have to have a direct link which then gives you an option to return to the case
View attachment 6158181
Scandinavian incel prudes are itt.
 
Is he trying to pull the Dankula gambit? Not paying a court ordered fine in the hopes that he will be imprisoned for a small crime like a martyr, highlighting that the government is out to get him. Well with Dankula they just directly took the money from his account and called the it settled.
 
Is he trying to pull the Dankula gambit? Not paying a court ordered fine in the hopes that he will be imprisoned for a small crime like a martyr, highlighting that the government is out to get him. Well with Dankula they just directly took the money from his account and called the it settled.
The court is planning on sending people to enforce that debt "herein the amount of $300.00 as costs and disbursements in this cause, and that execution may be issued for the enforcement thereof"
 
Honestly as someone who just and to pay 149 dollars so I could start defensive driving because a fucking cop was waiting right in front of a 75 mph sign in a 55 at 2am. I can't even blame the guy for just wanting to ignore a ticket and blue ball the local court. What am I supposed to cheer on the local traffic cops who just sit around and ambush people to act like state supported highwaymen?.

I mean knowing Rekieta it was probably a DUI or something shameful like that and he deserved it. But I get not wanting to give the court a fucking dime.
 
Racketa is such a piece of shit who belongs in prison, but straight up not paying the courts... I can't bring myself to think that's bad. Fuck the courts. Has anyone ever tried his innovative legal strategy of just not paying? They say they are going to send enforcement but it's 300 bucks. Are they really gonna send someone to go get his ass over that? The police are lazy retards with more important shit to do.
 
After the revelation of all the unpaid speeding tickets, I'll be surprised if from here on out Nick ever willingly pays any expense involving a court, especially to a man he can't stop calling a pedophile. Nick may have rich parents and a trust fund but in spirit and mentality he is a deadbeat wigger.
Unlike the traffic court, which is taking a blase approach to the matter, I could easily see Monty levying on his bank account for the $300 plus whatever it cost to collect it.

And as for the traffic tickets, at some point, they're going to pull him over, have a warrant on that, and chuck him in a cell until he coughs it up.

What an infantile, spiteful little manbabby.
But mainly, no, he can't fire Nick just because he thinks he won't get paid.
He can if he has good cause for that belief, like Nick outright telling him he won't pay. That's an anticipatory breach and almost certainly justification for withdrawing representation under whatever retainer they have.

Randazza isn't going to be held to the same standard as someone with a layperson as a client. Nick is an attorney himself, whatever you may think of his abilities in that regard. He is presumed to know lack of payment is good cause for withdrawal.

I would think a lawyer with a layperson as a client would at least be required to stick around long enough to ensure an orderly transfer of responsibilities, but I don't think Nick is entitled to that as a lawyer himself.

(The relevant RPC is 1.16 and also allows for withdrawal if the lawyer believes his client's conduct regarding the case is criminal or fraudulent, which considering Nick's current insanity, is entirely possible as well.)
 
Last edited:
Back