- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
Heads Mallory Ortberg, Tails Aella. Men, don't raise your daughters in a cult.
Gross Aella Martin / Rachael Antier Slick / Abigail Glass / @Aella_Girl / @Aellagirl / @Miss_Aella / u/Sweatywoman / RedVerse / Apostate Slick / Knowingless - Rationalist LessWrong poly libertarian hooker girl throwing rape orgy parties. Former $100k/month OnlyFans star and $3,000/hour prostitute. Would rather come up with gross hypotheticals than shower.
- Thread starter Markass the Worst
- Start date
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2022
why is she specifically looking for a rich dude
isn't she already a millionaire herself, and pretty much set for life?
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2019
How many men in the entire world do you suppose:
1. Want to have kids.
2. Are willing and eager to do so with a woman who has gang bang parties where she is held down screaming.
3. Have not already raped and or killed at least once.
??
1. Want to have kids.
2. Are willing and eager to do so with a woman who has gang bang parties where she is held down screaming.
3. Have not already raped and or killed at least once.
??
ghjoigcbn
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2021
I'm not an expert on Menlo Church but it hardly seems like a cult. Seems like a very main line possibly liberal, protestant church. Plenty of people who aren’t raised religious troon out .
Finally got a chance to read through all of the profile.
She’s happy to commit time / effort joint stuff like potential kids even if it interrupts potential future relationships.
Wow, what a great mother she would be.
Also, she “poops erratically” whatever that means?? She sweats a lot, is “tragically messy”, cant cook at all, and is terminally online/ doesn't touch grass. Wow, why hasn’t anyone wifed this one up, and paid her to me a stay at home weirdo while a nanny mothers the kids. This profile clearly says she is not capable of caring for kids (unless, I guess if you could pay people to do all the cleaning up for her horrible messes AND the kid messes, plus a service to feed everyone in the household?) and has no interest in developing herself into a person who would be capable in these areas. She doesn’t demonstrate any interest in becoming a responsible adult / parenting a child yet mentions the possibly of children multiple times.
I'm getting the sense she wants kids, as long as she doesn't really have to take care of them. The desire for kids is probably for her own ego. With all this talk of kids, I'm thinking this “friend” is probably her,
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2019
Yeah the Ortberg's church is bland middle of the road mainline, only might seem conservative at all because of where it's located. It even has a green policy.
For every freak from a religious home like Mallory or Aella, there's some trooned out kid being raised by two lesbian lawyers who look like Nathan Lane. Just in his case we all think "of course it turned out that way."
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2022
>working (absent 50-70% of the time)I'm getting the sense she wants kids, as long as she doesn't really have to take care of them. The desire for kids is probably for her own ego. With all this talk of kids, I'm thinking this “friend” is probably her,
she doesn't work though, does she?
ghjoigcbn
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2021
Considering how good she is at managing the rest of her life, I doubt she’s very good at managing her money.
Plus she was just doing prostitution in NYC. I doubt she would do a week long prostitution jag ( which she even promoted on her twitter) if she has no need or want of money.
A few possibilities, if it is her.
She could see herself working in the future.
She could consider being terminally online, erm, doing data stuff, as work.
It could be a premise for the question, as she splits time between Austin and SF
Last edited:
Ricardo Canitrot
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2024
There has to be a lots of big brains rationalist ready to wife up internet sensation Aella right? If that fails she can husband up some of her Johns. I'm sure they would love to present to their friends and family this nigger fucker pillow Princess who HAS to twitt about introducing porn to children
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2023
Even autists aren't this autistic.
She's basically listing all the reasons you should stay the hell away
Because she thinks she's an amazing catch and deserves it. One thing that is known about her is that she has a very high opinion of herself
Arthur Morgan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2019
Like all women, she believes she deserves a rich husband because she's been lied to all her life. I saw some tweet talking about it, a lot of women see a relationship the way men see a job. They usually have an eye out for one with a better income. But the men who would want her are not the type of men should would want. She's 32, can't take care of herself, will willingly ditch a job because she gets bored no matter how much money she makes from it, thought getting railed by six dudes at once was too low, and has made it clear she has no intention of ever being monogamous.
In a few years she'll tone down her expectations, but by then she'll either be a single mom if she decides to have kids anyway or she'll be too old to have children. So she'll need a dude who's okay with that. And men like that are usually men like Seth Rogan, children who look like adults.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
I have to imagine that if I were a wealthy man looking for a partner, the specific phrasing of her first requirement would be incredibly alarming. “Open to kids maybe???”, but it’s #1 on a list she said is ranked by importance. Why the hedging language then? Because she’s trying to appear cool or unconcerned about it. I’m sure she feels like she’s being honest to a fault by writing out the unflattering horseshit, but the deceptive phrasing of that first item should put anyone with any reasoning skills on high alert. I can’t imagine the sort of man who would choose a partner who lists having children as item #1 in importance, then lists about 100 reasons they would make the worlds shittiest child-rearing partner.
I read somewhere that only an extremely small percentage of men read the profiles when browsing dating sites, so I guess there’s that.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2020
Destiny posted a twenty-minute-long preview of his upcoming podcast with Aella and Aaron Silverbrook:
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2019
After Destiny totally screwed up his interview with Yudkowsky (almost zero prep, as far as I can tell), I don't expect this to be exactly accurate to reality. Might be funny though!
ghjoigcbn
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2021
Watched it sped up.
Destiny appears to be wearing makeup
Destiny has the hero lighting himself whike the guests look washed out.
Aaron Silverjew is the founder of mouth bacteria company and Aella calls him “butler daddy” when she’s drunk because he’s a simp.
Aella looks rough.
Her voice is distractingly nasally, sick?
A whore and a biotech guy are apparently experts on AI doomerism.
In the first third or so she just basically says AI is dangerous because it’s like *some other big change in the world or humanity that completely changes the paradigm* because she says it is, without explaining any reason? And keeps repeating this.
The whole time she tries to sound expert level with gravitas and intelligence and she just sounds dumb like she doesn’t understand on a deep level and is just parroting big words.
Girl host asks what they like most about themselves, Aella says shes a tank for pain, pain isn’t a deterrent for her, except when it is , because she doesnt like plane seats.
Finally get into it-
Aella concerns
- it’s a black box
- it will create a real intelligence
- girl host - why is that a concern tho, it sounds like an optimistic thing.
- they keep saying we will be monkeys to AI and it’s annoying.
- Aella believes in multiple universes, weird side note.
- Ai Puts on a mask of what we want it to see
- could want a wide variety of things so it might want to destroy us
- Destiny says he doesnt have an opinion because people who are actually knowledgeable about this have more specific concerns than there are unknowns and we dont know what will happen, unintentionally throwing shade on Aella because that’s essentially what she said
- Aellaa said she was in the doomer community and she didnt understand anything because she couldnt understand any technical arguments and then she realized what intelligence is and was like oh shidd the worlds gonna end.
- Destiny says with AI cannot be vetted because it’s all based on the training model
- sperging about brains
- AI is not specialized, can solve whatever problem ummm
- something about paperclips and doom i assume this is an inside joke in the doomer community
- destiny says what if it realizes that it can be more efficient without humans like it wants to make steel more efficiently so it destroys all oxygen in the planet (what lol)
- A I will realize humans could be an adversary and pre-emptively strike
- Aella thinks open.AI will probably contribute to the world ending
- and then the video ends
Im either too retarded or too wise to care about any of this. An actual podcast length will be very boring im guessing.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2023
Lol she looks bad on video. At least we can't smell her.
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
Simply put in the model an extreme overweighting for the value of humans living. A constant variable will ensure the model never weights anything higher than this while still allowing all alternatives to output different results that can be ranked.
Perfect that Aella, our stats expert, didn't even realize this solution.
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2019
I'm not sure what Aella thinks, but I'm pretty sure you can't get to 99% doom and dimondoid bacteria with weights poorly trained on the Internet. A couple of the scientists have recently been talking about AI systems that play games against themselves, but with their base knowledge and simulated environments based on dumps of the Internet. So like the AI system that won at Go, but not starting from scratch.
And by "poorly trained" I mean it, current systems are way worse at learning from books than humans are.
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
They're definitely overextrapolating about the near future capabilities of AI like all the dumb journalists. Especially because they don't realize that a lot of this stuff has been going on for a while now but they never had any public front-facing uses like the language models. They're basically buying marketing hype about predictive models with fat databases.
ghjoigcbn
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2021
A sticking point for is the jump between a computer based tool / interface to now it controls everything and we cant stop it and it can just build an army basically. It can build nanotech or anything it wants. Because somehow weve given it control over vast amounts of resources with zero input from us.
One thing i forgot to mention is that in the video Aella mentions she thinks that AI could have a humanlike consciousness with it’s own desires. Its own desires we dont give it.. It’s a computer program.
During this part, she keeps trying to find an analogy for AI and how it will change the world and one she uses is the development of agriculture. They discuss this a bit. Destiny thinks people were nomadic hunter gatherer berry eaters until one guy was like woah i can grow a crop and stay in one place and then it was a huge revolution and everyone started farming. It sounds dumb because it’s like he doesn’t realize that farming developed in different areas and different groups and there were nomadic hunter gatherers living concurrent with people who farm ( and i think there are still some out there) because maybe that made more sense for the environment they were in. Farming enough to support a population also requires a lot of work, long term time investment, and certain environmental conditions. it’s not a magic power up that destroys nomadism. Just by creating trash piles humans would be able to begin cultivating plants accidentally if it the environment was hospitable to it.
It seems like a very black and white way of thinking where things always progress forward. Sorry for the sperg out.
Last edited: