Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

[DumbDude43]

what Yuro country are you in where they even have the competency to do that bro I've posted allover without vpn no Gestapo came for me yet

I'm there it's fine lol no point pearl clutching, just don't be a dumdum posting with your real name or with your business account
Defamation and harassment are legitimate reasons to give someone a slap on the wrist

from "it doesn't happen, they don't do this" to "they have legitimate reasons for doing it" in just one page
a classic

 

[Miquella]

from "it doesn't happen, they don't do this" to "they have legitimate reasons for doing it" in just one page
a classic

For defamation and harassment dumbdude43 slow down there horsey

 

[Ewan McGregor]

I'm there it's fine lol no point pearl clutching, just don't be a dumdum posting with your real name or with your business account
Defamation and harassment are legitimate reasons to give someone a slap on the wrist

What are you even doing here? You are aware that this place wholesale falls into the 'defamation and harassment' definition, don't you?

Are you aware that if Null wasn't a stubborn autistic lolbertarian muhrican, he'd have surrendered all the info about you necessary to get you in a life of pain?

 

[Higgs Bonbon]

For defamation and harassment dumbdude43 slow down there horsey

The definition of those has turned into either mild insults or criticism (harassment) or spreading around legitimate dirt a la the Farms (defamation)

Are we really defaming Dong Gone Jones or The Fart Queen, or are we a hub of people who just value the truth?

 

[Ewan McGregor]

The definition of those has turned into either mild insults or criticism (harassment) or spreading around legitimate dirt a la the Farms (defamation)

Are we really defaming Dong Gone Jones or The Fart Queen, or are we a hub of people who just value the truth?

Pretty much anything that is saying bad things, or things that make uncomfortable, about anybody who isn't a white, christian, straight male is liable for these charges.

Geez, I truly hate how much of a /pol/ NPC I'm forced to end up sounding like.

 

[bile demon]

When are people going to realize that making new subreddits is a good thing

 

[DumbDude43]

For defamation and harassment dumbdude43 slow down there horsey

look at this excerpt from the nyt article i linked:

[...]
The Internet Police

Red evidence files fill the hallways, bookshelves and desks of the special task force located in a converted courthouse in Göttingen. The files are full of printouts of words and images that no one sharing them probably ever imagined would be collected by government prosecutors in real life: Facebook comments, tweets and Telegram posts depicting antisemitism, racism, violent threats, insults and more.

“This person was only 17 years old,” Ms. Meininghaus, who works in the unit, said as she thumbed through more than 20 pages of abhorrent images and memes, some lionizing Hitler, others making jokes about Anne Frank.

No national figures exist on the total number of people charged with online speech-related crimes. But in a review of German state records, The New York Times found more than 8,500 cases. Overall, more than 1,000 people have been charged or punished since 2018, a figure many experts said is probably much higher.

some teenager posting hitler quotes and anne frank memes isn't harrassing or defaming anybody. no, this shit is very clearly and very obviously about using criminal prosecution as a tool to crack down on political dissidents.

 

[Miquella]

What are you even doing here? You are aware that this place wholesale falls into the 'defamation and harassment' definition, don't you?

Are you aware that if Null wasn't a stubborn autistic lolbertarian muhrican, he'd have surrendered all the info about you necessary to get you in a life of pain?

Idgaf what Null thinks I'm here to laff

The definition of those has turned into either mild insults or criticism (harassment) or spreading around legitimate dirt a la the Farms (defamation)

Are we really defaming Dong Gone Jones or The Fart Queen, or are we a hub of people who just value the truth?

I'm talking about IRL stuff online shit really doesn't land you in prison there's usually aggravating factors. There is a legal process, not like they're just fucking you in jail but like I said all of that is easy to avoid just don't be a dummy online and hide everything behind reasonable lols

 

[Higgs Bonbon]

I'm talking about IRL stuff online shit really doesn't land you in prison there's usually aggravating factors. There is a legal process, not like they're just fucking you in jail but like I said all of that is easy to avoid just don't be a dummy online and hide everything behind reasonable lols

 

[Ser Prize]

I know you're being funny, but what I mean is they don't understand what force really is like, the way men don't understand what giving birth is like. They can be on the receiving end, or have it deployed on their behalf, but they aren't physically capable of exerting real power.

Just look at the current governing order. The reason we have to accept women's power is there are men willing to go to battle on their behalf to preserve it. If I were to get a job with the elections board and start discarding women's votes, men would arrest me, and men would put me in prison. Women can't establish or run the state.

I mean it makes sense from an evolutionary sense. When a tribe gets conquered it's men who wind up not passing their genes on, whereas women still end up doing so. Probably primed them for being more agreeable in the face of conflict.

 

[David Kirk Ginder]

I mean it makes sense from an evolutionary sense. When a tribe gets conquered it's men who wind up not passing their genes on, whereas women still end up doing so. Probably primed them for being more agreeable in the face of conflict.

If for most of history, it was a constant process of:

1. One tribe conquers other tribe and kills the losing tribe's men
2. Losing tribe's women surrender instead of fighting to the death.
3. The winning tribe takes the losing tribe's women as spoils of war and fucks them and impregnates them.
4. Repeat process.

Would you say that based on evolutionary biology, natural selection, etc, the females that have been "selected" and survive long enough to spread their genes are females that are "agreeable"? Because the based and patriotic ones have already been killed while the "traitors" live on. eg. French women spreading their legs and getting impregnated by the Nazis. Not only does it not seem like a forced situation, of French women being violently raped by far right extremist Nazis, but they seem to enjoy it (receiving the seed of the victors, the handsome Aryan Chads of Germany).

The fact that most women (compared to men) vote liberal, the fact that most women are "agreeable" and "non-confrontational", the fact that most women are not as nationalistic or patriotic compared to men, the fact that women are more pro-immigration than men, the fact that they'd rather concern themselves with international issues than local issues etc...
The reason women are the way they are is because evolutionary biology "selected" women that have these traits to survive, over centuries of "the tribal conquering process"? While the women who would die for their country... well... they died.

Finally, it seems like women have an incentive to be "traitors". They can continue to live under the man's world, doesn't matter if it's controlled by local or foreign men. Whoever wins the war, women will just adapt to the new society, whether it's a left-wing progressive utopia or a patriarchal Islamist religious state under Sharia law. While men are expected to be "patriots" and serve and die for their country. The sexes seem to be at cross-purposes here. Is there an end goal or vision? Or will it just be an eternal process of tribes conquering tribes?

 

[Higgs Bonbon]

I will not schizopost about in-vitro gestation

 

[Ultrapenguin]

If for most of history, it was a constant process of:

1. One tribe conquers other tribe and kills the losing tribe's men
2. Losing tribe's women surrender instead of fighting to the death.
3. The winning tribe takes the losing tribe's women as spoils of war and fucks them and impregnates them.
4. Repeat process.

Would you say that based on evolutionary biology, natural selection, etc, the females that have been "selected" and survive long enough to spread their genes are females that are "agreeable"? Because the based and patriotic ones have already been killed.

I'm not a historian, but I think that's probably an oversimplification of how it worked. I'm pretty sure it's more common that they'd take them as slaves basically, just thinking back to some biblical examples.
I'm sure plenty of children resulted from having female slaves because obviously, but that would be considered illegitimate and their children wouldn't be accepted in society. Any given culture is going to place far greater value on the women (and children they bear) of their own ethnic and national in-group vs. an inferior conquered one.

Essentially if the option is literally either dying or shacking up with the enemy then it would be more advantageous to do the latter; on the other hand, you could even argue that women would have even more reason to be patriotic and invested in their community (especially outside of wartime) since they're even more reliant on a social support.
Basically the only ones who wouldn't be that affected would be those who were already socially ostracized and of very low station.

Point is they might be somewhat less likely to die due to their sexual value depending on the cultures and conflict involved, but I'm confident that in any period of history their side losing during war was something most women didn't want to happen.

The fact that most women (compared to women) vote liberal

The thing with a lot of modern liberal women is that they aren't even agreeable, they're awful harpies who push what they do out of a sense of maliciousness.

That's why it's mainly unmarried women who lean really heavily liberal. If women aren't accepted into the fold and start to feel insecure or rejected they tend to make a menace of themselves, because if they aren't happy they need to make sure everyone else is unhappy too.

I don't know if that's so much of an evolutionary issue so much as it's about a sense of disenfranchisement in modern day. There were loads of times in the past (back when community was still a thing) where women were the main drivers of very conservative moral/social movements. It wasn't always like this.

 

[Night Raiders]

Geez, I truly hate how much of a /pol/ NPC I'm forced to end up sounding like.

I cannot understand the bitching on this site about pol.

 

[IMadeThisToLurk]

Shitposting on a shitlib's site is not interesting enough to justify creating new accounts and email addresses every day.

Indeed not. But it you’re banned daily you’re on a new plane of shitposting existence.

A slightly less frequent habit is a good idea at any rate, oh shitlord king.

 

[Chunky Salsa]

I cannot understand the bitching on this site about pol.

Virtue signalling because - despite /pol/ being fucking right 70% of the time - people don't like them. It's actually quite annoying, it's like when you see these lefty faggots walk over to the right after some 'life changing' event in their 40s. They don't come, on their hands and kness, apologising. It's always grudging and eyerolling and mealy mouthed to the tune of "Oh, I guuuuessss you were right." Like, motherfucker! Yeah? You dipshits had been fucking up and making things worse for like 25 years, but now you want to sit at the table going "Awwww shucks! No hard feelings pals?"

No.

Faggot! Necklace thyself.

Spoiler

/pol/ is for retarded faggots now though lol.

 

[DumbDude43]

despite /pol/ being fucking right 70% of the time

thats not why it is disliked
it is disliked because the combination of its subject matter (politics, which always gets people riled up and angry) and its host site (4chan, the most trollish site on the web) results in a culture of extreme contrarianism, shit stirring, bait, seethe, paranoia, schizophrenia, and just general insanity

 

[Chunky Salsa]

thats not why it is disliked
it is disliked because the combination of its subject matter (politics, which always gets people riled up and angry) and its host site (4chan, the most trollish site on the web) results in a culture of extreme contrarianism, shit stirring, bait, seethe, paranoia, schizophrenia, and just general insanity

My urge to be contrarian is rising as I read this. Which makes me think you wrote this directly attacking me for my diagnosed schizophrenia.

But in all seriousness I wasn't saying that they were disliked because they were right. I was saying that they are bitched about because it's a form of virtue signalling on here because they are disliked. KF likes to whinge about /pol/ in some weird way of 'shooting right' to 4chins. Even if 4chan itself is more like a burning retard tire fire than anything actually right wing now. /pol/just happens to be right a lot of the time, even if every other time it's batshit insane.

 

[IMadeThisToLurk]

View attachment 6161268

My point is to make it harder for Jannies. Reddit should be replaced or simply destroyed and keeping the trannies whack-a-moling is an amusing way to undermine it.

 

[Ewan McGregor]

I cannot understand the bitching on this site about pol.

Because they are dumb.

It doesn't matter whether if what they say is right or wrong. It is just a circle jerk where they are just repeating the same stuff over and over to each other, forever. I don't think they barely process any information. They just know what they have to say and they say it, and when they inevitably troon out, because they're all hypocrite degenerate terminally online failures, they'll know what they have to say too, and they will move to X to the troon circle jerks where they will be saying the same shit over and over and over, forever, without a single actual thought ever blooming in their heads.

A good chunk of troons are former /pol/tards, make of that what you will.

Also, it is doomer central and prolonged exposure can cause suicidal thoughts.