Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

[draggs]

I understand it gets repetitive, but you really can't deal with the troon question without debunking the official mythology of the "civil rights movement" and the official mythology of WWII

Hitler wanted to replace Christianity with some volkisch pagan bullshit that Himmler wanted to turn into some weird ass Bohemian Grove style degeneracy. Nazism was fucking weird full of fucking weirdos who wanted the Aryan utopia to be full of weird shit

 

[Lone Wandering Courier]

Hitler wanted to replace Christianity

Honestly, Hitler was right about (((Christianity)))

 

[The Ugly One]

Honestly, Hitler was right about (((Christianity)))

And why do you think Churchill declared war on Germany?

 

[Pomniman]

I cannot understand the bitching on this site about pol.

A lot of the pre-2016 users are basically early 2000s era liberals whose worldview hasn't changed since the Bush administration. Though the rest of it is bandwagoning from women who just came here for the tranny bashing while finding everything else common to edgy present day websites to be icky. /pol/ makes for a convenient scapegoat because 4cuck has been indefensibly worthless by any metric for years and dismissing anyone with a generic edgy right wing opinion as a "/pol/ rapefugee" is an easy way to feel smug/intellectually superior to some faceless nigger who's realistically regurgitating shit they've seen on reddit, discord, or twitter at this point because /pol/ itself is 99% feds and trannies now.

 

[Lone Wandering Courier]

And why do you think Churchill declared war on Germany?

A bunch of jewish bankers gave him a bunch of money and shit in exchange for going to war with Germany.

 

[The Ugly One]

A bunch of jewish bankers gave him a bunch of money and shit in exchange for going to war with Germany.

It was a trick question. Churchill didn't declare war on Germany, retard, it was Chamberlain. Classic /pol/-tard rapefugee--wants to tell us the REAL story and DEBUNK THE MYTHS, doesn't even know who was Prime Minister in 1939.

 

[DumbDude43]

And why do you think Churchill declared war on Germany?

because the wrong man was king
i blame wallis simpson

 

[GunCar Gary]

I understand it gets repetitive, but you really can't deal with the troon question without debunking the official mythology of the "civil rights movement" and the official mythology of WWII

seems to me like looking at trannies and realizing they're repulsive freaks who want to have control over my life doesn't require hundreds or thousands of years of history

trannies are disgusting, so they bad. easy

you can judge pineapple on pizza the same way

 

[IMadeThisToLurk]

So am I. It's not an IQ issue. I know a woman with a PhD in physics from MIT who supports open borders and defunding the police for all the emotional reasons many other woman do. There's something about a woman brain that just doesn't "get" force.

I've been chewing on this. I cannot for the life of me figure out if this is because women are pressured by biology or society to 'think' emotionally, or enabled if they want to do so in addition to the pressure put upon women by wider society.

Women are clearly capable of thinking rationally and repressing impulse when they have to. Women also sometimes fail to do so - just like men. The issue is how much control they really actually lack on average. I increasingly think it's being enabled by the current zeit, mixed with a very strong desire to fit in, which is itself moderated by a fear of ostracism or social ruin. In pithy terms, it benefits them (as far as they understand it) to say the shit they say, due to the incentives they deal with in their lives. Add on top of that an inability to understand where things are going that many people seem to share and that explains it pretty well, I think.

On the other hand, the majority of women in my life that I am close to and open with are not open border, defund the police, ACAB spewing idiots, though this is my own selection bias for good company. Indeed there are men I keep at arm's length who are broken woke fucks who say such things.

I'd be curious to actually analyze this with actually conservative women but then you run right back into not being able to tease apart "social pressure" vs "innate biology." Then again, if an ideology can make people want to behave better, does it matter why it works?

 

[cybertoaster]

I cannot understand the bitching on this site about pol.

Pol is a honeypot, has been for years. The discourse is dumbed-down enough to attract any dissenters but not advanced enough to enact any change, its the perfect form of controlled opposition since they are scary enough to keep the normies out but too useless/inept to do any real damage. Anytime real consequential information gets posted there it gets drowned by waves of celsius temp IQ, and its always the same shit, the same memes, the same graphs and text and quotes, its all engineered to keep the people going there but never going out and doing anything.

"go back to /pol/" is quote literally a meme that originated on reddit on tankie/socialist subreddits like r/leftypol/ and r/cumtown. Kiwis that use that phrase unironically are telling on themselves.

Its literally "go back to reddit/plebbit" but as always the modern left can't come up with shit on their own and just steals and repaints other people's ideas like a stolen car.

In my five years here

Riiiight...

 

[draggs]

Honestly, Hitler was right about (((Christianity)))

yeah, replacing dead jew on a stick with the aesir and other proto-new age pagan theosophist nonsense and bringing back polygamy was really gonna put a stop to degeneracy

 

[Max Free]

Off-Topic, but I'm pretty sure many people on the forum hate /pol/ just because null does, and are unable or unwilling to form an opinion for themselves, as agreeing with just whatever the leader says is good enough to conform to forum culture. I personally never frequented it myself, but if it was like any other sub-board, you had to take anything said there with a huge grain of salt anyway, and definitely not take much things serious there.

 

[The Ugly One]

I've been chewing on this. I cannot for the life of me figure out if this is because women are pressured by biology or society to 'think' emotionally, or enabled if they want to do so in addition to the pressure put upon women by wider society.

Women react viscerally to images and sounds of crying children. To use a counterexample, my mother stopped watching TV news completely when they started running "kids in cages" footage because she knew that she was being emotionally manipulated to support something stupid, but despite this knowledge, could feel her own vulnerability to the propaganda.

Think about how easy it is to manipulate men with bouncing titties. Stimuli that hit the limbic system make us do stupid shit.

Women are clearly capable of thinking rationally and repressing impulse when they have to. Women also sometimes fail to do so - just like men.

I don't think the problem is logic. The problem is intuition and visceral reactions. I didn't feel anything when I saw the image of George Floyd on the ground. I didn't feel anything when that knucklehead got caned in Singapore back in the 90s.

On top of that, I can to some degree intuit what a criminal is. Males are far more violence-capable than females, even though 99% of us will never commit a violent crime. This makes me less vulnerable to silly ideas about "rehabilitation" and "therapy." Criminals need a rod on their backs, not kind words. Men are almost 1.5x more likely than women to support capital punishment, for example. (Source)

 

[Bungdit Din]

I've been chewing on this. I cannot for the life of me figure out if this is because women are pressured by biology or society to 'think' emotionally, or enabled if they want to do so in addition to the pressure put upon women by wider society.

Women are clearly capable of thinking rationally and repressing impulse when they have to. Women also sometimes fail to do so - just like men. The issue is how much control they really actually lack on average. I increasingly think it's being enabled by the current zeit, mixed with a very strong desire to fit in, which is itself moderated by a fear of ostracism or social ruin. In pithy terms, it benefits them (as far as they understand it) to say the shit they say, due to the incentives they deal with in their lives. Add on top of that an inability to understand where things are going that many people seem to share and that explains it pretty well, I think.

On the other hand, the majority of women in my life that I am close to and open with are not open border, defund the police, ACAB spewing idiots, though this is my own selection bias for good company. Indeed there are men I keep at arm's length who are broken woke fucks who say such things.

I'd be curious to actually analyze this with actually conservative women but then you run right back into not being able to tease apart "social pressure" vs "innate biology." Then again, if an ideology can make people want to behave better, does it matter why it works?

Women are sociopaths. (Or psychopaths, if you prefer). Without severe restraints on their behaviour, they act as if they have an anti-social personality disorder (APSD). Quick pasta:

Sociopathy Traits​

It is important to realize that people have many personality traits. Someone may exhibit selfishness or act aggressively, but that doesn't mean they have ASPD. Since many people who have ASPD don't recognize these traits as a problem, watching for consistent behavior patterns is necessary.
These are some common signs of ASPD:

• Lack of empathy for others
• Impulsive behavior
• Attempting to control others with threats or aggression
• Using intelligence, charm, or charisma to manipulate others
• Not learning from mistakes or punishment
• Lying for personal gain
• Showing a tendency toward physical violence and fights
• Generally superficial relationships
• Sometimes, stealing or committing other crimes
• Threatening suicide to manipulate without the intention of actually doing it
• Abusing drugs or alcohol
• Trouble with responsibilities such as a job, paying bills, etc.

/quote
Add by proxy to the violent aspects, and it rather fits, doesn't it?

 

[Chuck McGill]

Off-Topic, but I'm pretty sure many people on the forum hate /pol/ just because null does, and are unable or unwilling to form an opinion for themselves, as agreeing with just whatever the leader says is good enough to conform to forum culture. I personally never frequented it myself, but if it was like any other sub-board, you had to take anything said there with a huge grain of salt anyway, and definitely not take much things serious there.

It'll never not give me a chuckle to see the guy with the most right-wing podcast this side of The Daily Shoah turn around and shit all over /pol/tards for politisperging.

 

[bile demon]

Women are sociopaths. (Or psychopaths, if you prefer). Without severe restraints on their behaviour, they act as if they have an anti-social personality disorder (APSD)

These are some common signs of ASPD:

• Using intelligence

Wrong in every detail as always, stalker.

 

[Lurker Child]

Women are sociopaths.

Women are prone to oversocialization and fundamentally cannot grasp violence or the use of force, but I wouldn't say that.

Also, I'd like to take a moment to just say how demented the Lil Pooner meme is. I don't know who came up with it - maybe a man taking the piss - but it has that special dehumanizing charm I'd expect from a woman. Who the fuck thought making a fleshy snowman straight out of Cruelty Squad was a good mockery? You know what a pooner really is? An effeminate manlet with inordinately large hips.

Spoiler: Der Püner

THIS is the pooner - a sad woman raging against nature - a mocking concert of incongruousness. Not some aborted fetus pin doll. Lil Pooners is one of the few tranny things I can think of that genuinely disturb me (the other being that effeminate cop in the red dress from Deadly Premonition). I see it and I just think "This is mental."

 

[Unyielding Stupidity]

Off-Topic, but I'm pretty sure many people on the forum hate /pol/ just because null does, and are unable or unwilling to form an opinion for themselves, as agreeing with just whatever the leader says is good enough to conform to forum culture. I personally never frequented it myself, but if it was like any other sub-board, you had to take anything said there with a huge grain of salt anyway, and definitely not take much things serious there.

Most people on this site hate /pol/ because they're left-leaning and /pol/ isn't. That's literally it, if /pol/ was a left-wing echo-chamber instead of a right-wing one, most of them would consider it to be a great board. Also, one thing I've noticed is that most of the people that seethe about /pol/ on 4chan also insist that the site pre-2016 was some heckin' valid pro-tranny anti-racist website because some people said they wanted to fuck a trap once.

Also, I'd like to take a moment to just say how demented the Lil Pooner meme is. I don't know who came up with it - maybe a man taking the piss - but it has that special dehumanizing charm I'd expect from a woman. Who the fuck thought making a fleshy snowman straight out of Cruelty Squad was a good mockery? You know what a pooner really is? An effeminate manlet with inordinately large hips.

Spoiler: Der Püner

THIS is the pooner - a sad woman raging against nature - a mocking concert of incongruousness. Not some aborted fetus pin doll. Lil Pooners is one of the few tranny things I can think of that genuinely disturb me (the other being that effeminate cop in the red dress from Deadly Premonition). I see it and I just think "This is mental."

The people making fun of pooners just desperately wanted their own equivalent of the troonjak, but accurately drawing a woman pretending to be a man either ends up just looking like a generic scrawny soyboy, which doesn't have anywhere near the same impact as the troonjak, or some wide-hipped soft-faced 'femboy', which just ends with a large chunk of men responding with "would".
You can't make fun of how pooners look without using a grotesque caricature, as a woman dressing and acting like a man is fundamentally less revolting as a base concept than a man dressing and acting like a woman.

 

[Lurker Child]

The people making fun of pooners just desperately wanted their own equivalent of the troonjak, but accurately drawing a woman pretending to be a man either ends up just looking like a generic scrawny soyboy, which doesn't have anywhere near the same impact as the troonjak, or some wide-hipped soft-faced 'femboy', which just ends with a large chunk of men responding with "would".
You can't make fun of how pooners look without using a grotesque caricature, as a woman dressing and acting like a man is fundamentally less revolting as a base concept than a man dressing and acting like a woman.

That's understandable. The real failure to mock with pooners is how they cannot behave like men, no matter how hard they try. There's a dichotomy with trannies in that mtf trannies can act like women (gaudy bitches but still womanish) but can never look like women while ftm can certainly look like men (scrawny faggots but still manish) but can never act like men. If you mock a pooner, you mock them on their behavior. But it's hard to 'jak behavior, hence the issue. Lil Pooners are a solution sure, just not one I like.

Furthermore, it's interesting you noted 'wide-hipped soft-faced femboy'. I've personally come across TWO (to my disbelief) femboys who turned out to be natural women. So they're women pretending to be men pretending to be women. These were finnerroo (killed herself) and jcatboy.

There's also a point to be made about the incongruent tranny perceptions. ftm trannies are, largely, a joke. A mtf tranny is a man in a dress, a clear and present danger. But a ftm tranny? No clothes short of shariah will hide a (young) woman's feminity. So until they brutalize themselves to look like men, any men will instantly recognize the woman in them. When they do, they're just manlets or soyboys, irrelevant. They're only a threat insofar as they groom others to be like them.

 

[Chunky Salsa]

Lil pooners were made by pooners and it shows. They focus way too much on the things that Pooners themselves see, and hate about themselves. I actually find them incredibly interesting, because they are so violently self hating.