Outdoor Recreation Isn’t Free – Why We Need to Stop Pretending It Is

When I spent a summer as a river guide, I met three people who’d abandoned their homes to live on the Rio Grande.

One lived out of a bus, another in a tent, and the last in his station wagon. They spent their days off rafting, kayaking, and hiking.

None of these men seemed to have much money.

They’d managed to live the dirtbag lifestyle many nature lovers dream of, leaving modern conveniences behind to pursue their passion: being outside. It’s easy to think that if these guys could make an outdoorsy life work, anybody could.

Unlike going to the movies, eating at a restaurant, or other “luxuries,” spending time in nature seems free. But not everyone has equal access.

As with travel, marginalized groups face a lot of barriers to outdoor recreation. This leaves the different types of outdoor fun to privileged folks.

Take race, for one. A 2016 study shows more than three in four US young adults who participate in outdoor activities are white. Nearly 80% of National Park visitors are, too.

In fact, I’m white. So were most of the people I raft-guided with.

I’ve built trails, sprayed noxious weeds, and cleaned up camping sites with a ton of white people over four seasons with the US Forest Service and a state park.

Like a lot of white people, I learned to ignore the whiteness of myself and other outdoor enthusiasts around me. I didn’t hear backpackers saying overtly racist things or see jerks physically blocking people of color from the trails, so I paid the homogeneity no mind.

It’s easy to overlook inequality when it’s systemic. It’s even easier when we benefit.

Ambreen Tariq runs Brown People Camping, an Instagram account that promotes diversity in public lands. She says she can feel like an outsider hiking and camping as a Muslim woman of color and immigrant.

“I felt like I had to establish myself – ‘Yeah, I’m a camper, I’m a hiker’ – that other people don’t do as much because they don’t have to question their belonging in that space,” Tariq tells Outside.

“Not only did I not have an authentic background doing activities in the outdoors, but my family didn’t do it, and I don’t have the legacy of being connected to a piece of land because we were always moving.”

We need to acknowledge outdoor recreation’s lack of diversity and inclusion.

Without understanding what’s keeping folks home, we blame oppressed individuals for “not taking initiative,” rather than addressing what may be preventing them from participating in certain activities.

To encourage people to take their own adventures, we might say well-meaning things like, “Anybody can do this if they’re motivated enough.”

This can be inspirational to someone who has the resources and leisurely time to explore the outdoors and needs a kick in the butt to do so. However, the message can be draining for folks who are raring to explore, but can’t.

We forget that society’s hierarchies of race, gender identity, sexual orientation, body size, and economic class don’t magically disappear in the forest. We deny that society actively discourages millions from playing outside, possibly stopping budding conservation activists.

As Tariq notes, “The more of us who can connect to it, the more we can protect it together.”

Here are a few barriers that marginalize people have to overcome to experience nature.

1. You Need Equipment

Our society treats nature as something we can enjoy independent of capitalism.

Theoretically, we go there to escape, and all we need are some sturdy shoes and maybe a sleeping bag.

The reality is more complicated. In the United States, outdoor recreation is a $646 billion industry. Open the pages of outdoor magazines, and you’ll find $150 trail running shoes, $500 tents and $4,000 mountain bikes.

We’ve created a culture of elitism around the outdoors, led by wealthy gear heads.

The Minnesota Land Trust’s Hansi Johnson, who’s white, recalls how he used to see people wearing jeans and flannel cross-country skiing growing up – a rare sight today.

Even if folks push past mainstream narratives and seek more affordable gear, cost is still a factor for low-income people.

If deals on used equipment or borrowing from a friend aren’t feasible in someone’s area, gear for a no-frills camping trip can still cost $500. Forget the cost of a car and gas to get to the campsite.

While do-it-yourself fixes for gear do exist – anybody else try cooking on a beer can camp stove? – they’re not universally known outside of backpacking circles. Ditto on cheap gear websites.

Those who make outdoor activities cheap often have a support system behind them.

As a freelancer with a college education, I’m perpetually broke, not poor. I couldn’t camp comfortably if I didn’t have the gear my parents gifted me back in high school.

No wonder 40% of participants in outdoor activities make $75,000-plus salaries a year.

The paradox that being poor is expensive is true: If you want to participate in a no-cost outdoor activity, you need to have money to invest in the gear initially.

This system reveals deeply entrenched classism. Ignoring it isn’t going to make it go away.

2. Outdoor Gear Doesn’t Fit Everyone

Cost is just one hurdle. Outdoor gear needs to fit.

Fitness culture overall reeks of fat-shaming, for one, which is reflected in workout clothing offerings.

Ultra-marathoner and cross-country coach Mirna Valerio says on Fat Girl Running that she struggles to find functional, flattering outfits that don’t pinch or cost a lot. In fact, most sportswear goes up to just a size twelve.

For those who’d prefer cycling: Only last year did anyone think to build a bike for someone who’s heavier than 300 pounds.

As with disability access, if the equipment isn’t readily available, people aren’t as likely to think that the outdoors are theirs to explore.

If we truly believe that everyone should be outside, we need to hold companies accountable for their limited views on body size.

3. Access to Natural Spaces Is Tangled in Historic Privilege and Oppression

In principle, public lands belong to all of us. In reality, select people get to enjoy it.

Carolyn Finney, geographer and author of Black Faces, White Spaces, explains about how national parks contribute to a larger story about who we are as a country, which historically excludes Black folks.

On Tavis Smiley, a PBS show hosted by Tavis Smiley, Finney reminds us that people of color do have a connection to natural spaces, but some of that land was stolen from them:

” …whether it’s the 400,000 acres of land that were originally given to freed enslaved Africans and then taken away, whether it’s all the native people that had to be removed from land in order for the Homestead Act to make sense, and then give it to European immigrants so that they could have their own plot of land.”
Finney continues, “This is part of the legacy of who we are and our issues of land and ownership and connection.”

Today, 80% of communities of color live “in areas where the proportion of remaining natural area is lower than the state average.” According to a study in the American Journal of Preventative Medicine, low-income neighborhoods are four and a half times less likely to have recreation facilities like parks in some states.

Furthermore, what we consider “untouched wilderness” is anything but.

As Kimberly Fanshier notes for Everyday Feminism, this concept centers around white people’s perspective and erases Indigenous populations who lived there for centuries before.

Many national parks and public lands were built on colonized lands. Even US National Parks reflect colonialism, where white leaders ignored Indigenous people in the area to establish.

Our society leverages natural spaces as a tool for capitalism and colonialism, while at the same time touted them as apolitical, free, and pure.

This erases our culpability for upholding the current system.

4. You Need to Know That Outdoor Recreation Is an Option

Families pass down their love for hours spent in the woods, including mine. It can be hard to try a new sport without that preexisting support.

Media paint a homogenous picture of who enjoys the outdoors, as well. They’re typically white, male, cisgender, slender, able-bodied, and assumed straight. Lore about Daniel Boone and mountain men perpetuate this image.

As Tariq notes to Outside, “It’s hard to see yourself in the outdoor community if you don’t physically see others like you, and you definitely aren’t seeing it in advertising.”

Other barriers stand in the way of people’s motivation to go outside.

For example, society doesn’t socialize women and femmes to be physically strong like it does with men. This reflects toxic binary expectations we have about gender that need to be changed.

I’ve had several close friends who’ve said their families actively discouraged them from playing outside growing up.

They had to move to a state with a more outdoor-focused culture to learn that, yes, they could rappel into caves and bushwhack through the wilderness with a full pack.

5. The Day-to-Day Culture Around Outdoor Recreation Is Exclusive

Society’s hierarchies don’t disappear at city limits.

Even when folks manage to go out and climb rocks, kayak a river, or bike down a mountain, people are still subject to unfair stereotyping and microaggressions.

Think of a group of women professors who went to Yosemite a few years ago. A handful of them write in Al Jazeera how park staff waved through those who were white and Latinx, but questioned all four Black professors at length.

They write:

“One of the Black professors was questioned about her college degrees, the title of her research project, and her university affiliation, and was asked to provide a faculty ID. The agents appeared incapable of imagining that a Black woman could hold a PhD and visit a research station for a scholarly event…This is heartbreaking, not least because Buffalo Soldiers, members of all-African-American regiments of the US Army, were among the nation’s first park rangers and built the first marked trail at Yosemite. Today only one percent of the park’s visitors are Black.”
On top of racism, rape culture persists.

Many outdoor jobs, like wildland firefighting and logging, remain hyper-masculine and painfully heteronormative.

The Department of Interior found evidence last year “of a long-term pattern of sexual harassment and hostile work environment” in the Grand Canyon’s River District. Female workers with agencies like the Forest Service across the country have revealed similar grievances.

***

The barriers to outdoor recreation are very real, and as with most things, marginalized folks suffer the most.

For those of us who manage to get outside, we need to go beyond calling ourselves lucky. We need to understand ourselves as privileged.

Nature doesn’t have to be a rich, white playground.

However, structures humans put in place – capitalism, colonialism, racism, sexism, and ableism – allow some people to access the outdoors and force others home.

Groups like Outdoor Afro, The Trail Posse, Brothers of Climbing, and the Venture Out Project are already doing heavy lifting to include people of color, queer folks, and others. We need to follow their lead.

We also need to celebrate marginalized people who enjoy the outdoors in their own way.

As Finney notes, we don’t hear enough about Black people’s stories. Consider the late conservationist John Francis who walked across the US and took a vow of silence for seventeen years to promote environmental stewardship.

There are histories that are rendered invisible as Finney points out:

“So part of it is the people who are in the position of power in terms of deciding what the ‘correct’ relationship to have to the natural environment can’t see us there doing the things that we do, whether we’re having barbecues, or we’re fishing, or we’re just hanging out doing whatever it is we do. We’re often not seen even though we’ve always been there.”
Tariq talks about how she’s gotten backlash for car-camping as “cheating.” Let’s acknowledge that there’s no single, right way to camp and the notion that there is, is part of the problem.

My favorite memories are outside.

I remember skating on a black, ice-covered lake for miles. Eating marshmallows on a ridge at midnight with my sister. Sleeping under the stars on a beach after a day rafting the Snake River.

Let’s work harder to fight inequity, so everyone can enjoy that privilege.

 
The reality is more complicated. In the United States, outdoor recreation is a $646 billion industry. Open the pages of outdoor magazines, and you’ll find $150 trail running shoes, $500 tents and $4,000 mountain bikes.
It depends on what you do, and this is a problem you see in places like Japan; where when first starting a hobby or something, they'll buy all the gear to look the part. It's silly, because you'll have gym rats over there, in some basic shorts, a wife beater, and maybe a pair of gloves putting up weight; while all the natives are in full Under Armor gear, with their fancy water bottles and other stuff, practically scared of the barbarian who can out perform all of them while dressed in practically rags (as barbarians should). And the truth is, when it comes to gear, you don't need all the fancy shit, and most of those costs are inflated because it's an Trail-Bike or something. When you're starting off, a pair of basic sneakers will work for running; you can get the fancy shit when you're built up enough to do a marathon.

Fitness culture overall reeks of fat-shaming, for one, which is reflected in workout clothing offerings.
Outdoor recreation burns calories, even basic walking/hiking; fat people don't do much of that. See above about gear, you don't need Under Armor and $200 pair of shoes, you need a $30 pair of sneakers and sweats and you'll be fine.

In principle, public lands belong to all of us. In reality, select people get to enjoy it.
You're correct, but not for the reason you think. Park campgrounds have limited spaces and aren't always open year-round, some take reservations, some are first-come-first-serve, and a host of other reasons. The other problem is most darkies are city bred, they enjoy the chaos and annoyance of the cities and aren't into the outdoors unless it's hitting the B-Ball court. I'm sure there's a snide way to mention gear and Jordan's, but I'm not that smooth, but know it was on my mind. As an aside, I dare say going to the ocean/lake/etc is an outdoor event, and every time I see recent Spring Break videos, it's harder and harder to spot whites, and it's often accompanied about reports of people being shot and the police having to disperse crowds.

For example, society doesn’t socialize women and femmes to be physically strong like it does with men.
You're out of your fucking mind; girls stay fit to make sure they look hot in yoga pants, it's mostly biology that stops girls from bulking like guys to, socialization has nothing to do with it.

I’ve had several close friends who’ve said their families actively discouraged them from playing outside growing up.
Were they in the ghetto or hood, where looking at the wrong person would get you shot? Because something tells me if these people really do exist, they probably existed in like late 1980's to early 1990's Los Angeles which may as well have been a fucking warzone.

Many outdoor jobs, like wildland firefighting and logging, remain hyper-masculine and painfully heteronormative.
Because someone has to do it, and the modern woman won't; retarded fucking cow.

As Finney notes, we don’t hear enough about Black people’s stories.
Have you tried talking to the average black person? Not those with education, not those of wealth and privilege; take the mean, median, and mode of black people and find the average or every day black... now try talking to them about experiencing the national parks or other outdoor activities. I'm sure most would tell you Yellowstone is a tv series about cowboys, and the Great Redwoods is the Indian slang for BBC.
 
This may be the stupidest article I've ever seen on here, and that's really saying something.
The "Horse Helmets Don't Accomodate Black Hair" was the one for me. Horse sports are literally the fucking pinnacle of cost, because you're literally taking care of a horse; and some fucking darkie is bitching that the standard helmet for drossage events and shit aren't build to accomodate large volumes of hair. Literal rich fucking black person bitching about the only sport that's below Falconry when it comes to being a fucking snob.
 
Every time I hear about activist blacks and browns enjoying nature it's through being a nuisance. There's the muslims who want to ram signs pointing to Mecca everywhere instead of using, idk, a compass. And the black groups that disturb the area by playing loud music, then claiming racism when people asked them to stop.
This dumb cunt is a simpering white savior racist anyway. Actual black/brown outdoorsmen are already enjoying camping and fishing without the white man's handouts.
 
My thoughts exactly. I dont think this author has actually spent time around black people because if she did, she would know they are mystified as to why white people like the outdoors, extreme sports, wilderness, etc etc. They think those are foolish white people activities and they have no interest.
If I wanted to get crazy biological phrenology level racist, I could say it's evolution.

Sitting here in my house, I got a shit ton of things to do today. Mow the lawn, laundry, a hard stop time when I am headed over to a friend's place for a BBQ.

But there is a part of me, a restless part, that says, "But wouldn't it be nice to get in my car, find some hike on Alltrails I've never been in, and just explore the woods and see something new?"

That part is always there. I can be at work and think of how that would be great. And I'm not even a big hiker or outdoors person.

It's the same thing where in the rare times I play vidya, I can walk around an open world game for hours exploring and seeing what's over the next hill.

Now if different human types are truly evolved or bred in certain ways and develop innate traits, my ancestors were the ones who wanted to explore and leave Africa, and blacks were the ones who stayed behind.

On the other hand, if blacks are 14% of the population, and it's only a subset of whites who want to get outdoors, then statistically you won't see a lot of them hiking or camping if the same percentage of their smaller population likes the outdoors as whites do. And there are tons of whites who want nothing to do with nature.

And of fucking course a guy who dresses like this:
6151635-3aaa75dd447f38dc249b2edde77b6ddc.jpg

is going to think you have to spend a minimum of $1000 on top shoes, backpacks, clothing, etc.
 
Brother, I was conceived in a hand hewn hut in the bush, by a fur trapper and a homemaker.
Summers were spent in an old canvas tent by the ocean, and it was weeks of well I guess il go walk up that hill again. Because it was almost free.

But I guess that's my white privilege in effect

(you can't access that beach any more as the natives have dug up and blocked the road with burnt out cars, if you park your car there and walk it they set it o fire too. The area that my father trapped and hunted had its control handed over to the natives as well, they burnt down every government built hut so tough shit if you are hiking and need shelter, and they abandoned the pest control program, which does make for better hunting I guess, but it's put back 30 years or regeneration, the place is pretty sparse now)
 
The "Horse Helmets Don't Accomodate Black Hair" was the one for me. Horse sports are literally the fucking pinnacle of cost, because you're literally taking care of a horse; and some fucking darkie is bitching that the standard helmet for drossage events and shit aren't build to accomodate large volumes of hair. Literal rich fucking black person bitching about the only sport that's below Falconry when it comes to being a fucking snob.
Which, outside of shows where having the "Correct" outfit is part of the scoring? You are under NO obligation to wear anyway.

If you're just out for a pleasure/trail ride, you can get away with a cheap bike helmet. Most people I see do.
 
People, I've been watching this movement for awhile and I don't think it's about encouraging brown people to get out there, I think it's about further demoralizing people who enjoy free things and freedom.
We still have my husband's tent from Sears that his mother bought him in 1978. We bring it on trips where we don't care about weight so that we give our ultralight gear a break. We have expensive gear because we can. You can walk as far or a short past the trailhead as you want with nothing but a secondhand backpack and some work boots if you want.
The fat people pandering at REI is ridiculous. I have seen fat people make it to the top of some boulder, decked in every outdoor accouterment you could think of. Meanwhile I have never run into fat people 30 miles away from civilization. Fit elderly people? Yep. A Christian youth camp? Yep. A dad taking his kids to the secret trout spot? Mm hmm.
I grew up around regular black people and they do not want to do this stuff. They find it boring and austere. People will take all the at risk youth on some camping adventure and the kids don't end up liking it. It's just not their thing.
Here's my backup conspiracy theory: they know this is yts last bastion for peace and seclusion and they're hoping to get a bunch of feral humans out there to blast their shit music to bother us.
 
I can go to about 5 different places in my city and find a minimum of 10 black people fishing. I've never seen any hiking but I'll see them on milder walking trails. Niggers aren't exactly an alien race, just poor and stupid.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: KiwiFuzz2
Sounds like someone needs to watch the hundreds of dollar store camping challenges on youtube.
My first fishing rod cost me $12. There's basically an infinite amount of free bait available.
I've never bought special hiking shoes, even for long hikes. People who are stuck up about gear and need the latest shit to show off are retarded and should get eaten by bears.
If people are too stupid to figure out how to go outside, it's probably better if they stay at home.
 
Here's my backup conspiracy theory: they know this is yts last bastion for peace and seclusion and they're hoping to get a bunch of feral humans out there to blast their shit music to bother us.
Like the first videos of joggers finding out about skiing/snowboarding; loud, obnoxious, not putting their gear on the tram properly, and one video I remember there being a lot of "Wow, thousands of dollars of gear unguarded, just laying around."
 
Back