Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Long-time Lurker]

Lawyers are more-or-less preconditioned for becoming lolcows, because the entire structure of how a legal defense works is basically tiered cope and goalpost moving. They start with Defense Plan A, if that gets rendered non-viable by evidence or testimony they move to Defense Plan B, and so on and so on.

That may well be true in practice, I cannot speak to that. I will speak to my understanding of the theory.

You get one chance at trial. You don't know which facts will be accepted by the fact finder. In fact, you often don't ever find out which intermediate facts are found; juries do not have to explain their verdict.

Instead, you try to cover all your bases. Then the finder of fact can (in theory) determine which facts they accept and discard irrelevant arguments. If the finder of fact disagrees with one of your facts, then you still have arguments instead of the entire thread of logic falling apart.

 

[Vibralldo]

i know in the back of his brilliant coke-fried brain, Rekieta is thinking that since he is just a first time non violent offender, he will get a suspended/lenient sentence. I would love to see Rekieta's face when he is really sentenced to prison time because he pissed of the judge, jury (if it becomes a jury trial) prosecutor during his trial because of his arrogant answers to questioning.

Nick's a lolcow, and as we all know, lolcows are (almost always) immune to the legal consequences of all but the most heinous of crimes.

Based on what we've seen from Ralph, DSP, Chris Chan, etc. Rekieta will be found not guilty, serve 0 jail time, his kids, guns, and cocaine will be returned to him, and he will receive a personal apology from the judge.

It's God's way of keeping the content going.

 

[Goku 1000000 O]

Would it be possible for the state to subpoena the hair follicle test results?

 

[Strix454]

How do these alternative theories of events work with Nick's cokestream to a jury? "It wasn't my cocaine, I just did a lot of it." These explanations really seem like pissing into the wind for all the good they will do.

The only real question for the jury is "Was Nick legally in possession of that 26 grams of cocaine". Nobody has to prove that he is a cocaine addict. They don't have to prove that ever used cocaine. If he is found to be possession of the cocaine, he gets found guilty.

The coke was found in the bedroom which he helpfully admitted to the police that he sleeps in. The bedroom is in his house.

The "cokestream" could come up in terms of challenging the warrant and the probable cause behind the warrant with the judge. But all the police have to do is meet the very low burden of probable cause to sustain the warrant. They don't have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Nick was using cocaine on that stream. All they have to prove is that what was on that stream (and other things) was enough to legally justify a search warrant.

He is legally doomed on the possession charge unless the warrant were thrown out.
He is legally doomed on the charges to do with the children due to the one child testing positive for coke unless the warrant were thrown out.
The only things he could fight is over the official weight of the coke and the gun related charge.

 

[RodgerDodger]

Rekieta simply can't stay offline and shut the fuck up. As others have pointed out, he might be throwing out chaff to confuse jurors, making things so complex and convoluted that at least one person on that jury just throws up their hands, unable to differentiate between bullshit lies and straightforward matters of fact to the point of reasonable doubt. If Rekieta's attorney recommended this strategy and encouraged him to go online and muddy the waters, then Rekieta's attorney is secretly plotting his client's downfall since a capable prosecutor will have a point-by-point refutation for every bogus assertion made. From a prosecutorial perspective, these streaming appearances by Rekieta are a goldmine.

Yeah, in this sort of case attempting to confuse the jurors rarely works. Jurors (outside of Los Angeles) are quite good at seeing obvious straight lines. Like "they found 26 grams of coke not simply in your home but in a safe next to your bed. In the homeowners master bedroom" and "your 8-9 year old girl tested positive for weekly cocaine use". Yeah, the "Chewbaca was a Wookie" defense will just piss the jury off.

Dear Nick, your Jury is nit from Chicago and you're not black. There ain't nobody in your local community that is going to believe in your tale of church conspiracies, scandanavian incel prudes and lab errors.

This retard, who did a whole stream obviously whacked out of his mind on cocaine, and literally showed up on stream with cocaine visibly on his nose, expects people to believe he has never done cocaine.

He literally had cocaine visibly on his nose on stream.

This is what this faggot expects you to believe.

Doesn't Nick's public stupidity give the DA sufficient leverage to subpoena the drug tests Nick and Kayla did for CPS. That Nick then refused to turn over the results.

Unless the Cops bagged him driving while drunk stoned and being an asshole, they really have no mechanism to force a drug test. And they don't care. They are almost never charging for use. But LawCope here is publicly screeching "It's not my Coke! I never did Coke". Well asking a court for those test results seems a rather basic thing to do to dispute the cokeheads public claims.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

Would it be possible for the state to subpoena the hair follicle test results?

For what purpose? Consuming cocaine isn't one of his criminal charges. The state may require he provide it as a condition of returning his kids but that's going to be on Nick if he wants his kids back. Also, he has the results of that test. If it didn't make him look like a coke fiend, he'd have released it. What he doesn't want is KCCHS requiring him to attend rehab as a condition of getting his kids back which is what the hair test would trigger.

He also said he's given the state the clean urine tests. Contrary to his statements, he doesn't have an issue giving the state test results. He only objects to dirty test results.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

"It's not just me who has been charged with possessing the cocaine"
----This asshole might sell out his wife.

This isn't the win that he thinks this is. He was the kid's guardian. You are responsible for your kid. Being fucked up on booze and cocaine, then someone that you invite to your house, who drugs your children while you are passed out is the guardian's failure.

That is giving Nick the benefit of the doubt (lol). In reality he shouldn't be a guardian over his kids, even when he paints the picture to make himself look "good".

Even if that weird and absolutely obvious lie were true, this would suggest Nick is such an incompetent and pathetic parent that random people can just dose his KEEEEEEDS with cocaine, and he's completely incompetent to stop them, because he's just that worthless a failure.

Obviously, more competent people (that is to say anyone but Nick) should have custody.

He's completely nuked his own case.

What is the angle here? Throw Kayla under the bus because women get sentenced less harshly?

If they are angling to blame Aaron, then they have a HUGE timeline issue....

He's trying to claim that the CPS people lied about him cancelling consent for all drug tests.

So the court documents are just wrong and we are all CRAZY for believing them. GOVERNMENT CONSPIRACY!

That has to be true because (a) Nick says he never did cocaine and (b) he suggests that the substance in his house was not cocaine. Given that Nick is a christian trad dad who has never done drugs and never had drugs in his house, if she tested positive for drugs it just has to be that someone else gave them to her.

This is a clip timestamped to where he talks about the substance found in the house and how the substance has not been proved yet to be cocaine.

This is an insane claim. He is claiming that the substances were 'allegedly cocaine' only because the OFFICIAL test was not done yet. How often is the field test wrong? He is saying that NOTHING can be determined as fact until a court ruling or finding, but if they rule against him, he will claim it is wrong.

Its starting to look like Nick and his attorney might be preparing a Chewbacca defense.

They will go into court and present multiple alternative explanations of all the physical evidence attempting to confuse the jury into reasonable doubt.

This is ALL eh could be doing at this point--unless he makes it more retarded.

If Aaron's claims about Nick not even believing Vic's innocence are true, then you can basically write off his entire YouTube career as nothing but a great big lie. Everything, from the stories, the moralities displayed, the hundreds of hours of streams complaining about wife beating men not caring about Vic's well being, traditional values, everything.

Do we have a clip about this? I am working on a more long-form summary for the OP supplements, and this would be a HUGE undermining of his established image.

 

[Hyacinth Bucket (Bouquet)]

I was reading a book by the children of Goodfellas/Wiseguys gangster Henry Hill. His son, Gregg Hill, mentioned that when his father's druggie friends were over doing drugs, they'd offer him a bump.

He felt this made the entire experience weirder for a preteen or young teenager attempting to pretend that his parents were normal people and not complete degenerates.

Anyhow. Seemed relevant.

 

[RodgerDodger]

For what purpose? Consuming cocaine isn't one of his criminal charges. The state may require he provide it as a condition of returning his kids but that's going to be on Nick if he wants his kids back. Also, he has the results of that test

As a rebuttal to his public claims that the cocaine found in the safe next to his bed wasn't his. And he never did cocaine. This is why good lawyers tell you to shut the fuck up.

While they are not charging him with use. Showing he was in fact heavily using it is another rather strong link in the case for possesion of 26 grams of the shit. "Oh I thought that was the Nanny's non dairly creamer" isn't going to fly.

This is an insane claim. He is claiming that the substances were 'allegedly cocaine' only because the OFFICIAL test was not done yet. How often is the field test wrong? He is saying that NOTHING can be determined as fact until a court ruling or finding, but if they rule against him, he will claim it is wrong.

It's even more insane when you realize that it wasn't just a single field test. They found Coke all over the place. Both in the master bedroom and bath. And got repeated independent positive field test results. Each baggie got tested. All the paraphernalia got tested. April's Credit Cards got tested. Etc.

Can the field test be wrong? Sure with small sample sizes. But more than a dozen times? Guess what? The real formal lab is going to discover it's cocaine.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

What is the angle here? Throw Kayla under the bus because women get sentenced less harshly?

I think the prosecutor will offer them a deferred adjudication plea of a lesser amount conditioned on both taking it, rehab probation, etc. I could see them rejecting that and having one of them plead guilty, state the drugs were solely their own, etc, etc. The state could still try constructive possession on the other parent but it will be harder if one parent testifies it was solely theirs.

If the state is really lenient, they could offer the plea and drop charges against the other parent.

Considering Nick seems to be the only one with a lawyer, I suspect he's going to take the hit. The court wouldn't allow her to be steamrolled into anything other than charges dismissed. I'm still confused as to whether these are separate cases.

Nick will carefully craft a narrative that "lot's of people" plead guilty to stuff they didn't do to protect their families without actually stating that he didn't do it. He tried it out last night.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

Nick: "The gubbermint isn't alleging that I gave my kids drugs or there would be much different charges."

Well, that's missing a "yet". The discovery disclosure to Nick for his criminal case appears to reveal that Rekieta's in-laws and the old nanny have been interviewed.

The nanny would presumably not be worth talking to if all you were interested in was whether Rekieta possessed something in May. The case right now appears pretty open-and-shut.

From reading the thread, Rekieta apparently made a snide comment in his interview with Camelot about how the nanny wasn't being truthful. It's worth noting that Rekieta may have already taken the opportunity to listen to whatever she had said in her interview.

The kids are healthy and no one saw any behavioral issues

In the past, Nick and Kayla ON STREAM described their young daughter who (much later) tested positive for cocaine as violent and mentioned her behavioral issues. They both did!

He's trying to claim that the CPS people lied about him cancelling consent for all drug tests.

Everybody can figure out what happened. He revoked the consent for the hair follicle testing. That's in the documents. That's not something that they would make up.

Probably, he figured out that the follicle testing would be positive for much longer than the tests that he was being ordered to take and he is delusional enough to think that he can pretend that he was never on drugs and convince anybody.

Edit: He's admitted to drinking post-arrest but subsequently CPS said no to drinking. He said he's been clean since then.

Wait I thought he got rid of all the alcohol?

What happened?

I'm sure that's the case that he's stopped though. He definitely didn't move all the stockpile to "April's house".

Its starting to look like Nick and his attorney might be preparing a Chewbacca defense.

Who knows, but so far Frank the Barneswalker is doing something that I would have thought impossible.

He's making me think Nick might be better off going the pro se route.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Wait I thought he got rid of all the alcohol?

What happened?

I'm sure that's the case that he's stopped though. He definitely didn't move all the stockpile to "April's house".

He was definitely getting rid of it after the arrest.

Actually, he was just removing it as a theme from the show.

But you see, his bail conditions allowed him to drink.

Actually, CPS changed their minds! And on top of that, it is SO EASY for Nick to be clean of substances. He has never been addicted, ever.

Nick is a liar.

 

[Hyacinth Bucket (Bouquet)]

OMG this Camelot appearance is enraging.

Nick was a drunk with SO MUCH STRESS. What was his stress? His kids had the end of the school year!

No one has ever had five kids in June before! This is brand new! Of course Nick has been degrading for two years and it hasn't been June for two years. And 99.9% of people with five children manage June without cocaine. And without tons of money. And without a trust fund. And local family. But you just don't understand.

 

[feral cat #6385]

Can one of you Ai faggots do a Balldo man parody of this song? https://youtu.be/_bLRaGo-Qwc?si=hyQ3ITE1eyZKaW2a

You asked in a really "faggy" way so no.

 

[Strix454]

I was reading a book by the children of Goodfellas/Wiseguys gangster Henry Hill.

If you want to see a good simulation of what it was mentally like to be Nick and company on the day he was arrested, there is a sequence in Goodfellas that can give some insight.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

As a rebuttal to his public claims that the cocaine found in the safe next to his bed wasn't his. And he never did cocaine. This is why good lawyers tell you to shut the fuck up.

While they are not charging him with use. Showing he was in fact heavily using it is another rather strong link in the case for possesion of 26 grams of the shit. "Oh I thought that was the Nanny's non dairly creamer" isn't going to fly.

His public claims about the drugs are the same as his "not guilty" plea. They would not be admissible without his direct testimony. They might be admissible if he stated they were his. The videos that show "white poweder on his nose" are admissible because of the cops training and experience as PC for warrant.

While it's common sense that his drug test would tie him to cocaine, the state has to prove that the drug test ties him to the cocaine they actually found. Even a previous conviction for cocaine isn't admissible as it doesn't mean anything about the charge of possessing the cocaine they actually found. The hair test could show he used 1g a day for 90 days but they can't tag him for that amount. I would love to see it though. He would freak out.

 

[FuhrerMustang]

You asked in a really "faggy" way so no.

Forgiveness please

 

[SusanHassle]

Upside? His biggest supporters aren't taking him seriously.

"The frustrating part of [testing for alcohol] is that alcohol isn't part of any of the concerns that anyone has in our case."
- Nick at 55:35

Cody's reaction:


And later in chat...

 

[TexOffender]

"The frustrating part of [testing for alcohol] is that alcohol isn't part of any of the concerns that anyone has in our case."
- Nick at 55:35

He ditched all of the bottles so they didn't test for polysubstances.

 

[Null]

If Nick is claiming that nobody asked him to consent to the footage, he's either speaking about the county officials, or he's just lying. It absolutely would make things easier if he would sign an affidavit consenting to the release of footage. It's written in the statute that any party involved may do this, including April, Kayla, or any of the Police Officers. I aggressively tried to reach April thinking she would be done with them and willing to consent, but she's still in the balldo bunker. I was dissuaded from trying to contact the LEO.