How Great Salt Lake dust impacts people of color

1720392863788.jpeg
A new study from Utah State University says algal blooms can be attributed to blowing dust from the Great Salt Lake. (KSL TV)

BY AMY JOI O'DONOGHUE, DESERET NEWS
KSLTV.com
Jul 7, 2024, 12:14 PM

Editor’s note: This article is published through the Great Salt Lake Collaborative, a solutions journalism initiative that partners news, education and media organizations to help inform people about the plight of the Great Salt Lake.



SALT LAKE CITY — The 800 square miles of exposed bed of the Great Salt Lake is disproportionately affecting Pacific Islanders and Hispanics, according to new research by the University of Utah.

A study published June 21 in the journal One Earth suggests that restoring the lake to a healthy water level would reduce disparities in harmful dust exposure experienced by different racial/ethnic and socioeconomic groups, along with delivering other ecological and economic benefits.

“People here in Utah are concerned about the lake for a variety of reasons — the ski industry, the brine shrimp, the migratory birds, recreation — and this study adds environmental justice and the equity implications of the drying lake to the conversation,” said lead author Sara Grineski, a professor of sociology and environmental studies.

Grineski led an interdisciplinary team of Utah faculty associated with the Wilkes Center for Climate Science and Policy.

Researchers focused on dust impacts from wind events from 2022: April 19, 20 and 21 and May 7 when spikes of recorded PM2.5 coincided with high winds.

During dust storms, current levels expose residents to 26 micrograms per cubic meter, or μg/m3, of PM2.5 on average, according to the study, significantly higher than the World Health Organization’s threshold of 15 μg/m3. Were the lake to dry up completely, exposure could rise to 32 micrograms per meter, while restoring the lake could reduce exposure to 24 micrograms per meter during these wind events, according to the study.

Derek Mallia, a research assistant professor of atmospheric sciences, developed a model for predicting exposure levels in Weber, Davis and Utah counties with the potential to affect 1.8 million people.

“We have to use weather models, since we cannot physically go out to the lake and remove/add water to see how much more/less dust it would emit,” Mallia said. “Models like the one that I developed let us run these hypothetical scenarios.”

Under the scenarios, researchers looked at impacts from a totally dry lakebed, to very low lake level, to current lake and to ‘healthy’ lake level designated as 4,200 feet above sea level. The lake’s south arm currently sits at 4,194.4 feet, almost 6 feet higher than the historic low of 4,188.7 registered at the end of 2022.

Curing what can ail everyone​

According to the model, neighborhood disparities in exposure levels would increase when the lake level drops.

“We frame it the converse. Lake levels rise, overall levels of dust go down during the dust events and the gap, especially between Hispanic and Pacific Islander people, narrows with respect to the level of dust exposure for non-Hispanic white people,” Grineski said. “If we can take better care of the lake, the dust for everyone goes down and the gap in exposure between these groups goes down too.”

Due to drought and diversions, the lake has diminished to half its size, jeopardizing migratory birds, industries that rely on the lake and public health.

The lake is not only part of Utah’s cultural identity and history, but is an economic powerhouse, contributing an estimated $1.9 billion to Utah’s economy, according to the state’s website.

Over the last two legislative sessions, Utah lawmakers have dedicated nearly a billion dollars toward water conservation, with some of that attention directed to the largest saline lake in the Western Hemisphere and the eighth largest saline lake in the world.

Source (Archive)
 
Is it just me, or did this article explain nothing about how "POC" are affected more by the dust? Why not just title it "Why the Great Salt Lake should be filled"?
They naturally have larger nostrils to inhale all those particulates. They're also stealing all the White Man's air
 
What? Like, does the dust of the lake land in higher quantities specifically in areas with high PI and hispanic populations in Utah or something? I am so counfused
if i had to take a guess id say the poor neighborhoods where darkies live are downwind of the lake. and rather than move they just complain about dust. but this piss poor article doesnt really explain how, so this is just my speculation.
 
Lake desiccation is a global problem associated with increased human water use and climate change. Like other drying lakes, Utah’s Great Salt Lake (GSL) is producing health-harming dust. We estimate social disparities in dust fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposures based on four policy-relevant water-level scenarios. Dust PM2.5 exposures would increase as GSL levels drop (e.g., from 24.0 μg m−3 to 32.0 μg m−3). People of color and those with no high school diploma would experience disproportionately higher exposures (e.g., 28.4 μg m−3 for Pacific Islanders vs. 26.0 μg m−3 for Whites under very low lake levels). Racial/ethnic disparities would be reduced if GSL water levels rose. If the GSL vanished, racial/ethnic disparities between the highest and lowest exposed groups would be moderate (16.3%). If the GSL stabilized at healthy levels, those disparities would be smaller (7.9%). While all nearby residents face unhealthy dust exposures, findings reveal exposure disparities for socially disadvantaged groups.

Abstract doesn't say. I'm going to guess if your poor or black, you're magnetically attracted to dust or something. Must be part of that Mormon curse for those with dark skin.
 
They naturally have larger nostrils to inhale all those particulates. They're also stealing all the White Man's air
I think you are talking about blacks. And PI should have at least some resistance to salinity, with the whole, "living surrounded by seawater" and all that
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Pygmy Giraffe
"Thing happens, darkie most affected" articles seem to have been in vogue for the last few years now.
It's not as cynical as it sounds. A lot of how stuff like this works is
1. Research thing
2. Give findings to spokesperson
3. Spokesperson spins findings in any way that is currently in the public discussion to garner interest
4. Lobby for resources to address thing based on public support

Getting resources is really hard for researchers and scientists, so they will always use terminology they think will get support, regardless of their personal beliefs. Ends justify the means and all that.

I'll give you a really basic, small hypothetical example: you work at a warehouse where your entire job is to pick up boxes from a pallet, walk down some steps, and load them into trucks. This sucks ass, you'd much rather use a pallet jack to load the pallets directly into the truck, but there's no ramp. Knowing your boss is a money grubbing kike that couldn't give less of a fuck about how hard your job is, you tell him that it's an ADA violation to not have a ramp! What if someone is hurt and medical personnel need to get a stretcher inside? Someone could die and it would be a very expensive lawsuit! Seeing that getting a wrongful death suit or ADA suit is more expensive than installing a ramp, Goldman Shekelberg shells out the money to install the ramp. You proceed to use said ramp to use the pallet jack to load pallets into the trucks. You've won, you got your money and you accomplished the task. Are you really going to look that gift horse in the mouth?
 
A study published June 21 in the journal One Earth suggests that restoring the lake to a healthy water level would reduce disparities in harmful dust exposure experienced by different racial/ethnic and socioeconomic groups, along with delivering other ecological and economic benefits.
WE WUZ AFFEKTID BY DEM DUST LAEKZ N SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIET
Who's being more racist here, me or them?
 
Boy, the People of Complaining (PoCs) really like to Complain don't they. Fuck off Dung's Apotheosis, I will not worship you like the Jews want me to.
"Thing happens, darkie most affected" articles seem to have been in vogue for the last few years now.
Its amazing what can be done when nigger obongo kills Smith-Mundt for his masters allowing the state to flood the nation with colored bitching and dieversity articles by the digital train load using printable fiat notes.
 
Academia should be dismantled.
It just needs to be mildly defunded. All you have to do is make some sensible tweaks and force down the amount of administration and pseudo researchers. I'm not sure off hand what those tweaks should be but it would be very easy to gauge effectiveness. I would wager a guess that government funding is contributing to this nonsense to an outsized degree.
 
if i had to take a guess id say the poor neighborhoods where darkies live are downwind of the lake. and rather than move they just complain about dust. but this piss poor article doesnt really explain how, so this is just my speculation.
Like the entire south side and east side of The Great Salt Lake is developed; and there's Interstates that run east-west on the north and south side of the lake. It's not like there's purposely racially segregated neighborhoods in the some fucking blast zone; in fact, if it wasn't for the Air Force Base and the march of time with all the retardation, blacks and hispanics wouldn't be much of a population of the state. This entire article is just academic masturbation; fixing the environment and rallying non-whites. Don't get me wrong, there probably are environmental considerations to take with the Lake and areas surrounding it, but not like this.

“We frame it the converse. Lake levels rise, overall levels of dust go down during the dust events and the gap, especially between Hispanic and Pacific Islander people, narrows with respect to the level of dust exposure for non-Hispanic white people,” Grineski said. “If we can take better care of the lake, the dust for everyone goes down and the gap in exposure between these groups goes down too.”
They say it right here; "we're using a specific metric to create a specific problem."
 
“We frame it the converse. Lake levels rise, overall levels of dust go down during the dust events and the gap, especially between Hispanic and Pacific Islander people, narrows with respect to the level of dust exposure for non-Hispanic white people,” Grineski said.
This reads like it was written by a chatbot having a seizure.
 
Now now, let's not jump into conclusions; This may be just a regular example of niggeryapping, commonly found among niggers that support Black Lives Matter. Think before you speak, bigot ;)
She's a sociologist by trade, she needs to make up problems to get funding for retard solutions.


Sara Grineski is a Professor of Sociology and Environmental Studies at the University of Utah. Her research interests are in environmental health disparities, children’s health, and environmental justice. Her doctoral education was funded by a five-year National Science Foundation (NSF) Integrative Graduate Education and Research Training (IGERT) fellowship in urban ecology at Arizona State University. As a Master’s student, she collaborated with a neighborhood on a community-based participatory research project on children’s environmental health, an experience that set the course for Dr. Grineski’s future career. After graduating in 2006 with her Ph.D. in Sociology with a minor in Geography, she became an Assistant Professor in the Department of Sociology & Anthropology at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP). While at UTEP, she was a Principal Investigator (PI) on the Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (BUILD) award, which was funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). On this award, Dr. Grineski developed and directed the academic year and summer research mentoring programs for undergraduate student and faculty mentees, which spanned across 15 colleges and universities. Separate from the NIH BUILD award, Dr. Grineski has received external research funding as a PI or Co-PI from the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Institute of Health (NIH) and US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). She has published in outlets ranging from Social Science & Medicine and Social Forces to Environmental Research Letters and Environmental Research. Throughout her faculty career, Dr. Grineski has set as a top priority involving students in her research; over half of her publications involve student authors.
 
Back