Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 65 21.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 27.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 48 15.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 104 34.2%

  • Total voters
    304
I was curious who the random whore was because I don't live and breath these retards and would ya look at that, she's litteraly some dumb whore.
More horrifying, I heard her reference having a husband when she was on FNT once. She's one of the SSRI-eyed thots Chrissie Mayr keeps around for Simpcast. Aaron's co-host Keanu Thompson is another. And of course, April met Rackets on Simpcast before the comedy show. Nick clearly has a thing for trashy blondes (Also see: His low-key propositioning interview with Gothic Sushi during weebwars).
 
Was that not your coke? governments job to prove it. Our Wife was also charged. Not my burden to say anything at all.
"One of or both of us..."

Is he really going to throw Kayla under the bus? :story:

A sign out. 'Captain(?) have fun you're still gay'
What could he mean by this?

Discovery is where Nick will finally learn why talking about your own legal case on the internet is a very foolish. If he doesn't learn that in the Omnibus hearing or family court first.
He won't learn. He might comprehend that things went badly for him, but he will come up with an excuse about how whatever happened was unfair or otherwise not his fault.
 
Much ado about the meme magic behind Commissioner Jim Felt, Officer Joshua Monson, and CPS agent Alicia Sweep, but lost in this hilarity is Kayla's attorney being named Mueller.
MUELLER - Copy.png
 
Theyll know that 2 years ago mommy and daddy were kissing them goodnight and reading them stories, and now theyre passing out in their beds stinking like shit. Theyll know their comfy life where they go to school with their close childhood friends is collapsing because their parents are passed out and cant be roused from sleep, and theyll know that they were hungry and dirty in a manner they never have been before, because mommy an
Unfortunately kids are more likely to assume they did something wrong to cause this change in parents behavior.

Kids that are very perceptive to drug abuse by parents are because they get tipped off at some point. Maybe they had to go stay with grandma for a few months because mom was strung out. Maybe they over heard family members discussing Dad’s bender or arrest. Usually some one just directly tells them “mom/dad has a problem and needs help. They take drugs/drink and it’s bad”. After the tip off the kids are very perceptive but until some other adult they trust gives them the facts, or some authority intervenes, they can be utterly clueless.

Some of the kids might feel relieved being told about the drug use because they probably were believing mom and dad’s behavior was due to something they did. Kids really don’t understand they aren’t the center of the known universe so they tend to think everything happening somehow revolves around them or is caused by them. It’s why so many kids have the bizarre belief they caused a parents divorce.
 
I was curious who the random whore was because I don't live and breath these retards and would ya look at that, she's litteraly some dumb whore.
View attachment 6165588 and for fun, here's pre boob job whore View attachment 6165586

Edit* her name is xialand and all you have to do is Google image search to find ev-er-y thing. The internet was a mistake.
You can also buy things for her from her Amazon wishlist, oh what's that?
View attachment 6165775View attachment 6165776 surely its just a (((massage))) machine for "massages".

Edit: if you want a glimpse on what the fetish is she caters to that people obsess over, this is what came up when I searched her username
On various video platforms.
https://odysee.com/the-ultimate-xialand-burp-compilation#38611c153086d239ee0b36c7120afb58f45b976f
She also sells her used garments.
1720402359580.png
 
So is the current stratagem from Nick to deny everything and assume everyone has three second memory? Bold strategy.

I do like when Camelot went off script and Nick sputtered off a reason. He looked pissed during those moments that the pet retard axed him a candid question that he didn’t have a prepared statement for. I know he pre-plans these questions, but I have to ask is it a lawyer thing to make a 10 second response into a 5 minute long ramble? @waffle or @AnOminous is this why people hate Thomas? Because he hates long winded bullshit rather than solid theory explained plainly?
In general, it's best to be as concise as possible. You don't want to bury your point in a bunch of unnecessary bullshit because that makes it seem like you don't have a good argument. When you're trying your best to flimflam a bunch of retards online, talking in circles is probably a good strategy. I don't think anyone should judge lawyers by lawtuber behavior, they are literally entertainers. There's plenty of shitty real lawyers for that.
 
I was curious who the random whore was because I don't live and breath these retards and would ya look at that, she's litteraly some dumb whore.
View attachment 6165588 and for fun, here's pre boob job whore View attachment 6165586

Edit* her name is xialand and all you have to do is Google image search to find ev-er-y thing. The internet was a mistake.
>boob job
Many such cases.
 
Kids really don’t understand they aren’t the center of the known universe
It’s also literally unthinkable to a child that the people who are supposed to care for and protect them most in the world simply do not care about them enough to do so. The brain is very good at protecting kids from the emotional trauma that realization would inflict on them. That’s why coping mechanisms are literal survival tools in childhood. They work!
But when you drag them into adulthood with you, it doesn’t end well.
 
This first came up with Aaron's interview with the Kino Casino. The stream is already off Kick but that portion was clipped by Elissa:
The full stream would be on their gumroad, supposedly.

Aaron followed it up shortly after (a few days) on his show, but nothing about Vic's case that big was mentioned, at least the portions I listened to.

This is the clip I remembered. It does not seem to imply Nick doubted his innocence, however. I think the idea was inflated somwheat.

So is the current stratagem from Nick to deny everything and assume everyone has three second memory? Bold strategy.

Yes, it seems so. He is trying to spin a story assuming that people have the memory of metaphorical goldfish. It is dumb, but it works for people who want to believe it and have no idea of cognitive dissonance because of a lack of total braincells to process hypocrisy.

There is no Cody Dennison/Camelot331 thread, there were only these two failed attempts:

Horrible crappy failed thread
In Off-Topic, 1 page, now locked

I keep repeating this, but I hope he never gets one. Unlike Nick today, getting a KF thread would be exactly what he wants, and he could milk/grift the shit out of it. Talking shit about him in all the other places he tries to inject himself into is good enough imo.

His next stream would be 'I am 32 and being stalked by an internet hatemob who wants me dead!' and do that for 4 weeks. He might even fake a swatting with more stock photos.

Unfortunately kids are more likely to assume they did something wrong to cause this change in parents behavior.

Kids that are very perceptive to drug abuse by parents are because they get tipped off at some point. Maybe they had to go stay with grandma for a few months because mom was strung out. Maybe they over heard family members discussing Dad’s bender or arrest. Usually some one just directly tells them “mom/dad has a problem and needs help. They take drugs/drink and it’s bad”. After the tip off the kids are very perceptive but until some other adult they trust gives them the facts, or some authority intervenes, they can be utterly clueless.

Some of the kids might feel relieved being told about the drug use because they probably were believing mom and dad’s behavior was due to something they did. Kids really don’t understand they aren’t the center of the known universe so they tend to think everything happening somehow revolves around them or is caused by them. It’s why so many kids have the bizarre belief they caused a parents divorce.

This is sad and the true tragedy of the whole affair.

Pipa has dodged more bullets than were fired at the Verdun by staying away from these people.

Don't associate a pedo-apologist in with the men of Verdun.
 
Everything this balldo-wearing skeleton faggot says operates through multiple layers of homosexual technicalities.
>The substance wasn't cocaine
What he meant was they haven't proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that the substance wasn't cocaine. Did you know that Marquis Reagent Testing kits might not be 100% accurate?
>I was not tested positive for drugs
He's likely referring to a piss test, it could even be one of those even more unreliable tests.
>GC/MS isn't accurate
He might be referring to the method's ability to examine other contents, who knows? There's areas where it's accurate and there's areas where other tests are preferred, or accuracy is severely hindered by preparation methods &/or the instrument.
>I am removing alcohol as a motif from my show
Firstly, everyone who uses these fancy words in everyday speech are just obnoxious faggots. Have you heard a non-faggot use the word motif in normal speech?
Motif refers to the theme of a show, something that's dominant. This can basically be interpreted as "I will not be drinking 100% of the time, but 49.9999% means it's no longer dominant.
>I removed all alcohol from my house
What alcohol? Rubbing alcohol? Or he removed it from his house, technically, on that one day.
>I did nothing wrong
"I am innocent in the eyes of the court".
>There is a state conspiracy against me
The looser definition of the word conspiracy, seeing how it's used by political sperging morons nowadays could as well mean the process of building a case against this druggie skeleton freak.
>Drug usage isn't a crime and doesn't warrant a search!
Technically correct, that's why the cops showed up with a warrant for a welfare check on the children that could be in danger, no?
>Do you believe an 8-year-old can be a drug user [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]...[98459275]
Do I believe an 8-year-old can weigh out a line of cocaine, cut it, and then snort it up their nose? No.
See the sneaky term swap there? Drug user has a different legal definition or colloquial definition, Balldo can just choose one that's convenient to his case. As such, the term means someone who actively seeks out drugs and uses them properly and recreationally. Does an 8-year-old possess the knowhow for this? Probably not.

It's all layers upon layers of severe faggotry pilpulling from a skeleton drunken druggie freak that allowed his daughter to be tested with >5000pg/mg in a hair follicle test, akin to a recreational user. He could simply choose definitions that work in his favour and still be technically correct. He'd be high on his own farts masturbating to his linguistic literary virtuosity, however, we call this "being a smug fag".

That's what he is. A smug fag.
 
So I just checked and Nick still hasn't paid the fine for the traffic case decided on June 17.
Does he need family to pay it for him in person or something? Always possible he's just that lazy, I suppose.
"One of or both of us..."

Is he really going to throw Kayla under the bus? :story:
He's watched everyone else rail her, why not the gubment too?
 
Last edited:
You say "girlfriend" but the evidence is scant. Where are the mammaries? There is a distinct lack of mammary glands on this alleged female.

I would like to submit this as further evidence that Coomalot is in fact, Mac from It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia
Some women are just flat, mix with being a gym rat and you're going to need to use a tablecloth instead of a bra.

Your line of questioning has some merit however, because even going by a mix of low body fat and unfortunate genetics in terms of boobage I have to ask.

Where the hips? bitch is built like a twink.
 
Everything this balldo-wearing skeleton faggot says operates through multiple layers of homosexual technicalities.
>The substance wasn't cocaine
What he meant was they haven't proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that the substance wasn't cocaine. Did you know that Marquis Reagent Testing kits might not be 100% accurate?
My thought on this particular cope was he was trying to deflect to the 'unknown brown substance' that was mentioned, and he is coping "Nooooo incel prude, that brown substance is NOT cocaine, enjoy church incel."
 
Unfortunately kids are more likely to assume they did something wrong to cause this change in parents behavior.
There is a silver lining. The truth can be had which is very freeing and it's all thanks to our dear friend, Elissa Clips. They are more likely to have problems down the road due to the distortions of having lived under the immediate thumb of two likely narcissists longterm but thankfully most of it will be out in the public by the time they would be ready for it. There's also 5 children so each have 4 siblings potentially to compare notes with. If there are any realizations to be had, they have access to unprecedented amounts of information on their parents, for better or worse. I'd rather know the truth in full before I started having my own children, for sure.
 
That sounds like Nick revoked consent to the hair follicle test after he found out that he tested positive to more stuff than he thought. That would hurt his case with CPS, so he revoked their consent to see it.
I think he's playing word games. Just speculating: KCCHS uses a specific provider for drug testing. Nick revoked consent for that single provider (every med provider needs consent to release). As far as KCCHS is concerned, that's the only drug tests they will accept. Nick went somewhere else for urine tests. KCCHS says Nick revoked consent, Nick says he is providing drug tests but it's not a recognized provider by the state (probably because they don't watch him pee or something and he can fake samples).

Nick has the results of the hair tests and knows they are dirty or he would have re-authorized release to get his kids back. He's not a liberty crusader against Gubbermint as he is perfectly fine with giving them clean samples and says he has. He's a weasel.
 
Back