Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
What are you, 12? This is an adult webzone

Try blowjobs make it easy to manipulate men. Bouncing tiddies is enough to get a horny stare that's about it

Bouncing titties got guys to buy everything from Budweiser beer in the 1990s to Nier Automata in more recent years. They made Angelina Jolie a household name and are the only reason anyboy ever watched Baywatch. They made Amouranth rich and turned OnlyFans into a multi-billion dollar business. Boobs bounce, wallets open.
 
Last edited:
Bouncing titties got guys to buy everything from Budweiser beer in the 1990s to Nier Automata in more recent years. They made Angelina Jolie a household name and are the only reason anyboy ever watched Baywatch. They made Amouranth rich and turned OnlyFans into a multi-billion dollar business. Boobs bounce, wallets open.
oh no men pay a pittance to see bouncing titties. it's a pleasant, idle pastime

if some men are foolish enough to pay a lot of money, it's for the dream of being the man making the titties bounce. by railing the woman they're attached to. some men are fools, big fuckin deal. hell, a lot of them do manage to make the titties bounce themselves. by railing the woman they're attached to

men make a lot of women fools too, or take advantage of women who were already fools. not everyone can be a super smart internet pontificator
 
Yes, as I said, men are pretty easy to manipulate with bouncing titties. Make that lizardbrain think there's sex somewhere, and it suddenly wants shitty beer or weird-smelling body spray. We basically handed control of our entire system of government over to women because they bounced their titties at us.
 
Focus your mind, don't let the THOT dominate your thoughts.
205.jpg
 
Essentially if the option is literally either dying or shacking up with the enemy then it would be more advantageous to do the latter; on the other hand, you could even argue that women would have even more reason to be patriotic and invested in their community (especially outside of wartime) since they're even more reliant on a social support.
Basically the only ones who wouldn't be that affected would be those who were already socially ostracized and of very low station.

Point is they might be somewhat less likely to die due to their sexual value depending on the cultures and conflict involved, but I'm confident that in any period of history their side losing during war was something most women didn't want to happen.

I can buy the argument that women, especially Western women, can be invested in their own country/culture/men and have an incentive to see it continue. After all, Western civilization has granted women a lot of freedoms: they can pursue a career or become mothers, the choice to wear skimpy clothes or completely cover themselves up, the choice to be single or pair up with a man etc.

If I was a woman, I wouldn't want to lose those, privileges, yes, privileges.

But it's also hard for me to reconcile that with the fact that women are liberal to the point of suicide by supporting immigration which allows foreign men to rape and kill them or by traveling to countries like India (the Spanish woman gang raped while the husband watches) or Morocco (the 2 Scandinavian women who hiked to far into the mountains and got beheaded), not understanding that other countries are not quite as safe as Western ones.

The only explanations I can come up with is:
1) Woke brainwashing
2) Men = facts and logic, women = feelings and emotions
3) Society has become too safe that people don't recognize danger and evil

Regardless, here's a post that illuminates the general opinion of the scorned women that comments in the thread:

"I don't know if this something exclusive to gays and troons, I think it's just men.
Men are just, as a class, seemingly obsessed with fucking children, and, perhaps this is just me being cynical and jaded, but having watched numerous predator stings online, I rather suspect that most men would be paedophiles if they thought they could get away with it and nobody would ever find out. They might not be paedophiles by nature, but they could potentially become paedophiles by opportunity.
'Teen' is the most popular pornographic category in the world. I'm old enough to remember the sort of leering, sly winking jokes men on the Internet made about the kids from Harry Potter coming of age - there was literally a website dedicated to counting down the days until Emma Watson was legal. Then I saw it all again, with Millie Bobbie Brown and the Stranger Things kids.
Gay men are men, so they of course, have all the same sexual pecadilloes as straight men."

I don't actually disagree with the general assertions and observations in this quote. My issues are that:

1) Feminists want to water down the definition of the word paedophile the same way they watered down the definitions of "rape" and "sexual assault." And sexism and racism for that matter. If it was up to them, you're a paedophile if you find an 18 year woman attractive, or even 19 (nineteen is still "teen"). You're a paedophile if you find a woman with a youthful looking face attractive. You're a paedophile if your girlfriend has small breasts. You're a paedophile if you are White and your girlfriend is Asian.

2) Are feminists concerned with the welfare of children when talking about paedophilia? Or are they only concerned because they want to discourage men from hooking up with young women, instead of fat old miserable women? In this point, it's not about compassion for the weak, but a cynical attempt at turning the dating markets in their favor, the same thing with the fat positivity movement.

3) Because a fundamental tenet of feminist is "women victims, men bad," you will not see them taking accountability and putting the spotlight on the increasing rates of female teachers and underage young male student relationships because that would mean admitting that women can do bad things. The "Women good, men bad" feminist mentality is why female paedophile teachers don't get punished as badly as male paedophile teachers, is why "female gaze" is "safe horny" and "male gaze" is sexual objectification, and why "cougars" are women who know what they want and why male seeking younger wives are bad.
 
#Metoo completely broke women. Your average millennial to Gen Z women is basically a paranoid schizophrenic terrified to leave their apartments and so twitchy and paranoid they fear rapists might be hiding in their box of corn flakes.

Rape is obviously awful but like all violent crime its low frequency.
Still doesn’t explain why they want to let criminal rapists out of jail early or write fawning letters to serial killers. Most millennial and zoomer girls also toss their social conditioning out the window the moment they get muh tingles.

That’s why women never had any political rights up until 100 years ago: they’re a walking set of contradictions and the results of giving them any power speak for themselves.
 
If I was a woman, I wouldn't want to lose those, privileges, yes, privileges.

But it's also hard for me to reconcile that with the fact that women are liberal to the point of suicide by supporting immigration which allows foreign men to rape and kill them or by traveling to countries like India (the Spanish woman gang raped while the husband watches) or Morocco (the 2 Scandinavian women who hiked to far into the mountains and got beheaded), not understanding that other countries are not quite as safe as Western ones.
You are really underestimating the ignorance of "normies". Most people are just living their life and don't really follow news or politics. Nor do they care about it. The most they do is going vote every four years or so.
Rates of violent crime in the west are still low but rising. There is a lot of "lag" until an increase in violent crime actually starts affecting a critical mass of normies. Especially if the starting point was a historic low in most countries. It's a numbers game and unless you live in a hotstop you are super unlikely to be confronted with violent crime. In short, there isn't enough murder, terrorism and other violent crime for normies to care enough. If you want to win elections, inflation and loss of purchasing power is a way better topic because that is something even normies instantly notice.

The ignorance of normies also applies to the situation in foreign countries. Apart from the evergreens in the news (Afghanistan, Iraq and so on), most people don't know how dangerous some countries truly are. Especially if you end up in the wrong place at the wrong time.

I suspect the drift between male and female voting for "right wing parties" is almost entirely due to biological difference. Men are more disagreeable and voting for a so called far right party in Europe in 2024 is one of the most disagreeable things you can do. Add to that more in group pressure and you end up with the voting patters you see. Also most men are more in tune with physical violence since for them it's a real concern.

It will be interesting to see if the right in Europe ever figures out how to win elections. We have enough evidence now to say that the "oh no too much migrant rape" argument is not winning them elections.
That’s why women never had any political rights up until 100 years ago: they’re a walking set of contradictions and the results of giving them any power speak for themselves.
We shouldn't make the mistake of assumsing that just because a group doesn't have formal political power, they don't matter. You can bet that the wife of high ranking officials and royals in the past, had a lot of influence on politics.
Still doesn’t explain why they want to let criminal rapists out of jail early or write fawning letters to serial killers. Most millennial and zoomer girls also toss their social conditioning out the window the moment they get muh tingles.
"I can fix her/him" is not a meme. Violent men are extremely attractive as long as they are violent against the right person. Who better to make sure you and your offspring survive than someone that showed he can kill. It obviously never work out lol.
 
Still doesn’t explain why they want to let criminal rapists out of jail early or write fawning letters to serial killers. Most millennial and zoomer girls also toss their social conditioning out the window the moment they get muh tingles.

That’s why women never had any political rights up until 100 years ago: they’re a walking set of contradictions and the results of giving them any power speak for themselves.

Speaking of contradictions, here's a recent from hoemath about that.


tl;dw avoid women where their words contradict their actions, unless you want to risk jail or worse
 
The recent French parliamentary elections are peak women.

The right wing party made their entire campaign on how dangerous France has become for women and promising to deport and imprison rapists.

Instead women mass voted for the Communist party that promised to mass import more migrant rapists and they won in a landslide.
 
The recent French parliamentary elections are peak women.

The right wing party made their entire campaign on how dangerous France has become for women and promising to deport and imprison rapists.

Instead women mass voted for the Communist party that promised to mass import more migrant rapists and they won in a landslide.
That's a very limited read of the situation.
 
That's a very limited read of the situation.
Is it though?

Ultimately they picked the option that was the socially acceptable option that wasn’t mean. The arguments for women voting against their safety boils down to “well, they didn’t mean to do that, therefore it doesn’t count.” Okay, well, the most generous interpretation is that they feel other factors are more important than their safety. So the French girls who screech endlessly about muh incels hopefully put in their vote for RN, otherwise they should shut the fuck up.
 
Yes, as I said, men are pretty easy to manipulate with bouncing titties. Make that lizardbrain think there's sex somewhere, and it suddenly wants shitty beer or weird-smelling body spray. We basically handed control of our entire system of government over to women because they bounced their titties at us.
Oh man I never thought of it like that, buying shitty beer or weird-smelling body spray is basically the same as handing control of our entire system of government over

You're fucking retarded lol do you even read what you type before hitting that I'm a retard button (commonly misunderstood as the post button)
 
Back