The nanny quit in February. So what’s the excuse as to why he wasn’t able to stream a full trial the year and a half previous to her quitting?
Shhhhh... Don't ask questions...
Everyone can see the tattoo, still being shitty and unfinished - many prison jokes to be mode about that. What's more puzzling to me, is what the fuck is happening on his arm, right here?
View attachment 6171716
Whole video, for different angles
Isn't it FUNNY and WEIRD that he doesn't have those marks before the last 1.5 - 2 years when the cause is an allergy he has had for almost the last 10? WEIRD and FUNNY indeed...
Minus Kayla, Nick would likely have been on the path to being a porn-obsessed incel or the sort of loser guy whose "relationships" are with sex workers. He would certainly have valued himself highly, but I don't think that much of anyone else would have. While I assume the parents were interested in supporting him as a family man with lots of kids, I think minus Kayla and kids that the family would have far less interested in supporting him at all. They would certainly I think not have funded him being a single degenerate.
Are you saying that without Kayla, he would essentially be a financially solvent Russell Greer?
The Nick and Russ dichotomy of outcomes based on skill, charisma, and legal know-how makes me wish that Ruds had sued Nick instead of Monty...
Let the LOLCows
fight sperg!
Read: Those who suck his dick, believe everything he says, and opine he will win and/or is innocent. Typical Nick expectations.
Which, in terms of lawyers, there is honestly probably not that many of them that would do that, I don't think. Outside of Barnes and Barnes skinwalkers. He hired the latter on the recommendation of the former.
Most of the rest of Lawtube is either shutting the fuck up, or hardly think his chances are very good.
Why would anyone want to watch him stream trials anyway? He doesn't even practice law. There are lawyers on YouTube who actually do, and can provide interesting insight into what's going on in a trial. Not only is Nick inexperienced, but he's often full of shit so you can't even trust what he's saying is true.
Nicky gonna lose out on this baldwin trial. I'll just watch branca.
Nick's strategy was to bully his way into collecting all the superchats by not sharing, and that ended up turning people against him by itself. I do not think he actually felt any fraternity with the other lawyers. He thought he could aleays swan in and keep above it all when the rest were organising and making things better. The system they have is not perfect, but it has more stability than a single ego and the power of cooperation.
I wonder if Nick's holdouts like Branca will end up insiting they stream on their own channel? It seems that Branca could have his own stream running and dip in and out without Nick being able to control it. Brana follows the money...
The problem with this is drug laws are like gun laws. Responsible, law abiding citizens -- the sort of people who wouldn't hurt others anyway -- are the only people who obey them. Irresponsible maniacs who have no sense of control or self restraint just ignore them and do what they're gonna do. And when it comes to enforcing those laws, the cops will go after the responsible, law abiding segment because they aren't going to engage in fisticuffs when you try to arrest them, or give you a follow home after work and threaten your wife and children.
That said, I do think there's an epidemiological argument for drug laws.
Fewer restraints -> more people using -> higher incidence of drug problems.
I think in the UK, we have the balance about right. Laws stay on the books. Possession laws are rarely enforced unless somebody's causing a problem. So you get the epidemiological benefits without having to fill your jails up with harmless people on ridiculous possession charges.
I think that the scope of drugs is too narrow to consider the efficacy of the UK's policy. You need to look at knife laws and other rife abuses to give them a fair grade and evaluate the wisdom of such a system. Where power is abused in one area, it will eventually be abused in another, as history has well shown.
Not to say that such a system CANNOT work, but it has requirements. For such a society to work it has to be morally (often correlated [causally and not] with 'ethinically') homogenous. Such a group allows a high-trust society to work, and the breakdown is what a lot of Europe is experiencing.
We could Euro-sperg over the why and wherefore of tbr decline of English law and society, but I think that given the present situation (barring mass deportations that no one likely wants to see of experience) the time for such policy's effectiveness is past.