Woke activists oppose California bill making it a felony to purchase sex from children, claiming it will harm LGBTQ community, people of color - “The harsher penalties contained in this bill will disproportionately impact marginalized communities, particularly black and brown individuals who already bear the brunt of systemic biases within our criminal justice system.

original_wokeactivists.jpg

The Post Millennial
Jul 9, 2024

Legislation increasing penalties for people who solicit, agree to engage in, or engage in any act of commercial sex with a minor is being opposed by a group of activists, claiming that it disproportionately harms minorities and the LGBTQ community. The bill has also been watered down from its original punitive measures.

Activists opposed the legislation that would make a felony to purchase or solicit children for sex, claiming during public testimony on the legislation that “SB 1414 takes an overly punitive approach that fails to address the root causes of these issues and will not effectively stop sexual violence.”

1720669682692.png
Tweet (Archive)

“We are particularly concerned that the harsher penalties proposed in this bill will disproportionately impact marginalized communities, especially members of the LGBTQ community who already suffer from systematic biases within the criminal justice system, particularly when it comes to sexually based offenses,” the activists added.

The activists who spoke in public testimony claimed that LGBTQ people “are more likely to be charged with sex offenses compared to their heterosexual counterparts,” and that “measures like SB 1414 lead to higher rates of incarceration, longer sentences, and increased difficulties in finding housing and employment.”

Another activist said that they stand against “any punitive measure that perpetuates systemic injustices” and wanted California to instead invest in “community-based solutions.” One activist added that she was concerned about the bill impacting “black and brown individuals.”

Senate Bill 1414 passed a vote in the Public Safety Committee last week. State Sen. Shannon Grove originally proposed making it a felony for someone to solicit teenagers 17 and younger, however, the bill was watered down by the committee to exclude those ages 16 and 17.

The committee later revised the bill to include 16- and 17-year-olds, but with the caveat that prosecutors now must prove that the 16- or 17-year-olds were not only solicited for sex but also are victims of sex trafficking.

Grove told KCRA 3 that the change to put 16 and 17-year-olds back in the bill is just political showmanship. "I think Kevin McCarty is looking for a way to put 16- and 17-year-olds back in the bill and say he was successful, but he only damaged them further.” The question still remains as to what form the bill will ultimately pass.

Source (Archive)
 
California should be the canary in the coal mine for what gay-rights does to your legislative body.

1. Knowingly exposing others to AIDS/HIV lowered from a felony to a misdemeanor; in the name of gay rights.
2. Children of 14 years and older can have sex with an adult within 10 years of age, and the adult will not be put on the list; in the name of gay rights.

You see anyone with this phenotype, it's up to you to do everything in your power to stop them from assuming political office; because the above is what they bring to the table. If anyone says that LGBT rights is part of their platform, you should know what is coming. STDS and child fucking, you've been warned, don't fuck it up.
Scott Weiner.jpg

Another activist said that they stand against “any punitive measure that perpetuates systemic injustices” and wanted California to instead invest in “community-based solutions.” One activist added that she was concerned about the bill impacting “black and brown individuals.”
A community based solution for buying children for sex is to be elevated via rope with a light pole as the fulcrum.
 
California should be the canary in the coal mine for what gay-rights does to your legislative body.

1. Knowingly exposing others to AIDS/HIV lowered from a felony to a misdemeanor; in the name of gay rights.
2. Children of 14 years and older can have sex with an adult within 10 years of age, and the adult will not be put on the list; in the name of gay rights.

You see anyone with this phenotype, it's up to you to do everything in your power to stop them from assuming political office; because the above is what they bring to the table. If anyone says that LGBT rights is part of their platform, you should know what is coming. STDS and child fucking, you've been warned, don't fuck it up.
View attachment 6176483
Harvey Milk was the progenitor.
 
Just when you think legbutts' optics can't get any worse, they drop a banger like this.
Targeting LGBT is the justification they used to pass the law preventing chomos from being put on the list if their underage victim is at least 14 and they're within 10 years of each other.

I forget the exact words, but it was something like "The LGBT start young." Pretty sure they tried to say, gays experiment from an earlier age, but we know what it means; chomos aim for kids.
 
Harvey Milk was the progenitor.
Well AKSHUALLY Harvey Milk never fucked anyone under 16 and that was the age of consent in New York at the time so AKSHUALLY he's not a pedo checkmate homophobe!

That's what leftists actually believe. Thank God Harvey Milk joined his buddy Jim Jones in hell, because you know he'd be loving this perverted trash bill.
 
Here's a novel idea: don't have sex with anyone under 18 if you're over 18. If it's true love, you can wait until the other person is over 18. If it's just animal rutting, go find someone that isn't legally still a child. It solves the entire problem. I realize that means no instant carnal satisfaction, but thems the breaks.
 
Back