Considering how he had to be told by the jannies to stop posting instructions on how to make industrial chemicals and explosives in the UK news thread, my money's on it being autism.
Is this true, haha? :-)
If it is, I can only imagine the absolute headache that retards like us give good ol' Joshua, as thanks for his efforts to create this bastion of shitposting. Telling about one's aversion to the typically female nature is one thing, but detailing how to make industrial chemicals and explosives in the UK has to be another (!). Good thing the man has found administrators on this site to help him sort out the rampant retardation. I know that assholes like me are not exactly helping, but it's good to know that the farms is still ooperating functionally.
Regardless, I see a couple of users detailing their realization of how "women" at large are incompatible with modern society. What you're all referring to is the "modern day gender gap", or at least it's called as such in swedish. I'm lazy enough to not be bothered to find out what the english translation is, but it basically details the modern finding of how men and women vote on
radically diffent political parties and policies, seemingly on account of solely their genders. Men vote more conservative, whereas women vote more "cultural marxist-ish", for a lack of a better term (I really can't say they vote more "liberal"). This is all generally speaking though, and shouldn't account for all individuals, obviously.
This, in turn, ties into what is known in the "manosphere" as "redpill rage". It's the "rage" that accompanies the realization that the "blue-pilled" worldview is false, or at the very least faulty. This is typically known as a mental condition that should shift from "rage" to "acceptance" quickly enough. If it doesn't, you have some behaviour to correct, since mindless, actually misogynistic rage benefits no one.
The part of "acceptance" is about accepting the nature of women at large, and the fact that they can't help their biology, much like men can't help their biology. Of course, humans aren't merely beasts who act on instinct, but the ramifications of our lizard-brain is fundamental enough to understand our behaviour at large. We understand that women are more "emotional", and men more "rational", generally speaking. As the adage goes: "men test ideas, whereas women test men". I do believe this to be true, except perhaps when dealing with the odd genius like Marie Curie etc. (I don't know if Marie Curie was a histrionic mess, but from what I've read so far, she wasn't).
What is happening in the world in regards to the relationship with men and women, and its political leanings, are the result of technological advancements — the ramifications of which we are ill-equipped to adapt to. The technological advancements which allow us to have fresh water from our taps, daily servings of meat in the super-market and the ability to sneed on the Kiwifarms are joyful, of course, but not necessarily conducive to our deeper human nature, where the relationship between men and women is to be found.
It will be very interesting to see where all of this leads. Not enjoyable, perhaps, but interesting.
