US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Now Here's the million dollar question, who trained the assassin in sharpshooting? Someone earlier explain the stats of the shot and it seems improbable that a first timer or a learn it yourself was able to make that near miss shot. Did he have any military training?
"To successfully qualify a Cadets must hit at least 23 of the 40 targets that pop up in their lane. Targets are as close as 100 meters and as far away as 300 meters." - Army standard

Suggestion to KVAF members and associates (borrowed from elsewhere) is "hit half of however many shots you take at a cantelope sized target with a 30 caliber rifle". Be that an AR-15 with a 100 round double drum, down to a double barreled blackpowder rifle.

From my memory as a first-time shooter, wimping out and choosing a .22 to hit something at 100 meters felt depressingly like trying to use a Nerf rifle to hit the neighbor's window from across the street. It took quite awhile before I could hit that cantelope reliably - I even still have the target paper.

So the shooter either did a shitload of self training or had good teachers.
 
What do you think could have possibly been going through Thomas Crooks' mind when he missed that initial shot on Trump, panicked, and then turned his gun 20 yards in the other direction and started magdumping the only black guy sitting down at the rally? Like seriously what the fuck. It's so fucking morbid and everyone glosses over this.
 
It's a republican false flag?
This one may have some weight to it. The uniparty is done with Biden but doesn't want Trump, Removing Trump allows for a Republican candidate to swing in off the assassination that is compromised while moving the political dynamics to a more manageable place from the Trump dynamics. However even if done by a Republican no one is really gonna believe that considering how the Democrats act and talk about Trump. The democrats will take the heat for all of it anyways, losing their current political state, assuming a Republican wins (which they should or I think it would simply expose the uniparty as Republicans just shot themselves in the foot for their enemy and destroying the mask of the political divide of the parties). I don't think the Democrats will accept this as compromising with the loss of political state for a while could have been a strategy to deal with Trump in the first place as they could just try to fortify senate positions and stonewall his policies. I don' think this it nor do I think old guard of the Republicans actually have a candidate or policies they could run on that would be as successful as Trump currently is and they would have to center around Trump as a martyr anyways to make use of his assassination. It makes no sense then if they got rid of him just to distance away from him and if they pulled the rug out from his supporters after the election, the Republican party would implode. If you want to maintain that the Republicans are actually politically independent and not part the uniparty then their best option is keeping Trump even if they don't like him. So doing something like this just doesn't make sense.

Democrat political enemy assassination.
Kill Trump and you don't have to deal with him anymore. However people are so wound up that this leads to the legitimization of violence to achieve your political goals. These same issues occurs with the Republican scenario as well. You have to believe that people would even be willing to keep playing the game of democracy at that point when it has become apparent that shooting your opponent is as valid as checking a name off a ballot. I only see this as what happened if the Democrats want to push the country to civil war/police state using authority of government to protect their regime as they are the "legitimate" winners of the election and democracy and all dissenters are traitors, terrorists and extremists that need to be purged. However I don't think they are confident in facing such a situation as how I have seen them behave, if they could have done it already, they would have.
People like Soros and groups like the WEF want Chaos so they can re-arrange the deck chairs of society. Get society into such Chaos they can step in and save the day. By implementing a one world government. With soros, that also means bringing about a one world central bank.

They don't take into consideration Chaos Theory. That someone else can swoop in and take the reigns of society. They assume their people will remain near the top so they can help bring about their changes.
 
Yeah you just try to shoot everyone according to statistics. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/wh...extremism-related-us-murders-2022-2023-02-23/

Or run down as many as you can in cars... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlottesville_car_attack

How about you actually educate yourself before opening your mouth again you worthless inbred mongoloid? Better yet just off yourself and stop living off of my tax dollars. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_terrorism

Red states have always been the biggest welfare sponges, retard. You would know that if you worthless livestock fuckers gave a shit about truth, facts and having integrity. Keep shitting yourself and saying it's everyone else who stinks. it's funny. https://www.governing.com/finance/are-republican-states-more-federally-dependent.html https://www.businessinsider.com/red-states-are-welfare-queens-2011-8

I hope you get beaten to death by one of your precious minorities
 
You don't seem to comprehend that this isn't "just a thread" but rather a train wreck that's going to fuck over a metric shit ton of people, possibly cause political gang violence in the streets and just make life suck ass for everyone who wants no part of any of it. My man, the next couple years are probably going to fucking suck.
Lol calm down
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back