Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They were probably waiting on orders of what to do. They have to do this shit on command not on their own independent decision making. If they did, all sorts of agents would always be doing wild ass shit and it'd be chaos. At least, that's my understanding of how this shit works.If I'm a sniper on a roof charged with protecting the fucking President and I see a guy with a rifle aiming at him I'd dome the fucker I wouldn't wait for him to shoot first.
Theres video of the snipers behind Trump and people warning them and they react, they just didn't shoot until he already fired.
They fucking saw him take the shot and only responded afterwards.
Yes, mainly because that bullet is contempt, contempt for you, what you believe in and your future.I don't know about the rest of you but this event has probably destroyed what's left of my political filter. I have a lot of good friends that I like very much who I have tolerated for years while they spout off their retarded takes. I'm done with it. I'm throwing my useless blue state vote toward Trump and I'll tell anyone that brings that shit up.
Probably should have done this a long time ago.
Was the shooter in a crowd? I can understand being a bit hesitant to shoot if you could end up hitting people behind him.If I'm a sniper on a roof charged with protecting the fucking President and I see a guy with a rifle aiming at him I'd dome the fucker I wouldn't wait for him to shoot first.
Theres video of the snipers behind Trump and people warning them and they react, they just didn't shoot until he already fired.
They fucking saw him take the shot and only responded afterwards.
Those plots basically solve themselves tho, people ranting online and to all and sundry ?That’s because you don’t hear about the plots that are uncovered before they get a chance to carry them out unless the FBI have set them up.
Do you:
A)
A. I would do A. What would the choice be if it was the incumbent president? It absolutely would not be B.B) Have the sniper hold fire so the person can be intercepted by the plainsclothes agents in a much more low key, the rally continues uninterrupted, and you don't have to wonder if the sniper mis-Identified a camera or toy as a gun.
No, he was just jacking off on a rooftop aloneWas the shooter in a crowd? I can understand being a bit hesitant to shoot if you could end up hitting people behind him.
Like somebody said earlier, PA has closed primaries. That is, you can only vote in a primary if you're a registered member of that party. (Independents can't vote for either.)Sorry, clock me if you must, but is there any confirmation on the "registered Republican" aspect of this? If the dude is really 20-21 years old, he could only have registered in the past 2-3 years, which would put a confusing spin on things.
It's not like he would have been around to vote for any other Republican in his life, why would he register as one, assuming he wasn't a fan of ol' Don, the most probable candidate for the party?
He couldn't just shoot the sniper before knowing their preferred pronouns.If I'm a sniper on a roof charged with protecting the fucking President and I see a guy with a rifle aiming at him I'd dome the fucker I wouldn't wait for him to shoot first.
Theres video of the snipers behind Trump and people warning them and they react, they just didn't shoot until he already fired.
They fucking saw him take the shot and only responded afterwards.
Its 100% easy and clear:
You are government bureaucrat sitting in the air-conditioned partyvantrailer. You have gotten important enough to sit in the big boy chair during a political rally. You have a report from a sniper of a man with a gun getting into position on the roof. You have plainsclothes agents already moving in verify and deal with the threat. You also have no reports of dangerous political idealogues at the rally.
Do you:
A) approve the sniper to fire, will will not only result in the person being killed but also triggering the close-in protective detail to protectively tackle the candidate on stage and get them to the safe zone, ending the rally in a newscycle worthy event to which you will be very attached.
B) Have the sniper hold fire so the person can be intercepted by the plainsclothes agents in a much more low key, the rally continues uninterrupted, and you don't have to wonder if the sniper mis-Identified a camera or toy as a gun.
Remember, there's also the possibility of indecision by the higher ups. The sniper on watch could be listening to his superiors arguing where to GO and take him out, all while his scope was on him. Never underestimate the capabilities of people to take the safest route, which is do sit on their thumbs and do nothing.A. I would do A. What would the choice be if it was the incumbent president? It absolutely would not be B.
200ft away? Through a rifle scope you can see very clearly what he’s carrying.
There was significant time between the people in the crowd spotting him and him shooting. No one was dispatched there to check he he had a gun or a camera. They let him get up there. Why were there no people on that roof anyway? Looking at the aerial picture it’s not a big are to secure. Why wasn’t it secured?
yeah i really don't see this narrative penetrating msm sources unless we have a manifesto or some hard evidence of left-wing politics.closed primaries, they were voting for nikki haley or however her name is spelled
unsurprising that media outlets are just forgetting this happened
Yes. Unless he could be 100% sure there was an imminent, immediate threat - which is why he fired the second shooting started.Do they need to wait for authorisation? If so did he ask and who was on the other end of the line?
New Trump tweet:
View attachment 6189586
Source (Archive)Thank you to everyone for your thoughts and prayers yesterday, as it was God alone who prevented the unthinkable from happening. We will FEAR NOT, but instead remain resilient in our Faith and Defiant in the face of Wickedness. Our love goes out to the other victims and their families. We pray for the recovery of those who were wounded, and hold in our hearts the memory of the citizen who was so horribly killed. In this moment, it is more important than ever that we stand United, and show our True Character as Americans, remaining Strong and Determined, and not allowing Evil to Win. I truly love our Country, and love you all, and look forward to speaking to our Great Nation this week from Wisconsin.
DJT
Brb gonna go dig for all the corporate media articles telling lefties to do just that in case some retard thinks you're full of shit.It's not unlikely that someone who would try to Kill Trump wouldn't also register as a Republican to vote against him in the primary.
Bruh A&N has been like this since it was called A&H, when I got here. It's the whole draw of the place - or used to be, A&H is a bit calmer now and Mass Debates has taken its place but still, it's why it's the autism "Thunderdome".it's wild to see this site like this for me. Everyone accusing everyone else of mental illness whilst having a breakdown themselves.
Well, were I that sniper I’d be putting my testimony on record about who I spoke to and what they said today, now, and I’d be very clear indeed that I wasn’t at all suicidal.He didn't adjust aim that I could see. It looked like he had the shooter in his sights and didn't fire until the 'tard did.
From LEO I've interacted with he was probably waiting for someone to give the go-ahead to shoot.