Still not as salty as Rapp, IMO. At least he keeps his FU tweets focused on one person as opposed to specific individuals with the most tangential of relations.
Armstrong was way too /fit/ to qualify as a nerd. By today's leftie standards, anyway.
I would say the reason for this was that the internet was new so it was harder to organize protests/find political circle jerks back then but also the election took like a month to be called so adrenaline from the election probably fizzled out by the time he was declared the winner.
If you think anyone who isn't an a-logging idiot is going to call on people to rape their opponents you have gone full exceptional.
Quick, gotta balance out the fairly reasonable articles that went up a few days earlier! We aren't running around screaming the world is LITERALLY GOING TO END like every other left-leaning site, we'll lose commenters!
Implying the world won't be full of a-logging idiots by that point at the rate we're going.
Dunno about pre-80s but we did have a man who entered office in '89 that (supposedly) said "No, I don't know that Atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God."
There are plenty of a-logging idiots out there.
You mean it already isn't?
The fact that Maddow has to point out that "yeah this sounds really stupid and neurotic, but no really it's super important you guys" (paraphrasing) emphasizes just how small and petty this reporting is.
I'm beginning to think maddow needs her own thread, she's always been retarded but she has really stepped up her game recently.
"How dare you go out and have dinner with your family without inviting us? I write lists for Buzzfeed, so you know I'm a pretty big deal, mr. Trump."
Trump literally steaks, Media literally shakes.
