US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: ThisIsGonnaBeGood, The Shredder, ActualCracker and 120 others
Click to expand...
Calandrino said:
When the 5th or 6th guy with no internet history takes a shot at Trump, I might get a little suspicious
Click to expand...
This is unfortunately the level most normie neighborcattle are at. It won’t be until the accidental nuclear detonation over a Trump rally he wasn’t able to attend, due to divine intervention that they’ll finally put their hands on their hips and say “Something sure is fishy about all this!”
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Fatsuit Shinji, Hubelublub, Backpack Knight and 8 others
SaidNoOneEver said:
That's why I'll bet any amount that he does another, and soon. Because fuck them.
Click to expand...
I hope you're wrong. He needs to do closed door venues with metal detectors and zero vantage points for a fucking sniper. If his secret service and private security people have any sense, that's what they'll advise him to do
 
UnKillShredDur said:
If you're going to be racist, then go for it, but don't f**king censor yourself. That's nigger behavior.
Click to expand...
2 Points

1. I’m not a racist, per se. Sometimes I wish I was. I am a race realist.
2. Most negroes do not censor themselves. They constantly use foul language because their tiny brains do not have the vocabulary to express themselves in more intelligent ways. People who routinely cuss tend be closer to the low end of the IQ spectrum than more accomplished speakers and writers.
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Agree
Reactions: Taxidermied Rat, Casshern, Hubelublub and 20 others
FrancineCansMcGee said:
Biden just prematurely announced he is going to try to cuck the Supreme Court if he wins, including term limits and enforced ethics codes. Wonder what he tries if he loses.
Click to expand...
Wouldn't term limits (and probably "ethics codes" too, whatever that would entail) for SCOTUS necessarily require a constitutional amendment? You know, the thing that would require ratification by 3/4 of the state legislatures?

LMAO good luck with that in the current political climate.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: Hubelublub, spiritofamermaid, Vernon Dozier and 7 others
Fred Herbert said:
I like how not a day after the “let’s cool the rhetoric down xirs/xems” speech Biden and his team are back to calling their enemies threats to “””Democracy”””.
Click to expand...
There is one Hitler speech I caught a tiny part of in some trash documentary once, many years ago, and understanding German, it must’ve become subconsciously stuck in my head.

The reason I bring it up:
Every single time I read about threats to democracy, about how important our democratic values are, I become a tiny bit more jaded. And today it finally pushed that memory back to the surface, that short history channel background clip of angry Hitler giving a speech, and I had to look up more of the text. Unfortunately it puts perfectly into words whatever it is I‘m feeling whenever I see slimy parasites lamenting over the dangers to democracy:

What does democracy or an authoritarian state even mean to these international hyenas! That doesn't interest them at all. They only care about one thing: is someone ready to be plundered? Yes or no? Is someone stupid enough to hold still while being robbed? Yes or no? And if a democracy is stupid enough to hold still, then it is good. And if an authoritarian state declares: "You will no longer plunder our people, neither internally nor externally," then that's bad.

It’s so fucking perfect because that’s what they mean when they say „democracy“. They dont mean your right to put in a ballot every few years (they change the rules all the time anyways), and they certainly dont mean any of your constitutional rights.

Democracy to them means holding institutional power over you, it means their lifestyle being financed by you, it means being able to rob you blind while having the public discourse in a stranglehold so you must not even have the wrong facial expression during all of that.

That is what they mean by democracy when they say something is a threat to democracy.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Fatsuit Shinji, Lady Round Buns, Camillastampon and 148 others
Cornelius Pop said:
My brother. I’m sorry you took it as fedjacketing. I’m just saying my opinion and what I know in relation to it. I’m sorry you misread my glow comment. I’ll turn off the glowlight if living in the dark makes you feel safer.
Click to expand...
I give two fucks if you call me a glowie. And you sure as shit did, nobody misread your comment, you faggot.
It kind of sounds bright in here. Did you turn up the glow?
Click to expand...
Is just the same snide bullshit we've all seen in here before, complete with 'oh, you didn't read my comment right!!!!" backpedaling bullshit.

As for your link, it's talking about putting a former head of cyber-security in place on the board. He came into the picture earlier this year, only a few months ago.

As recently as 60 days ago you could get Chat-GPT to give you step by step instructions on making thermite powder then what you needed to turn that into a fuel air bomb, right down to ignition charge delay for optimum fuel dispersal. Hell, in Jan you could get it to teach you how to make mortar round propellant rings as well as how to make home-made mortar rounds complete with time delay or impact fuzes, then how to sight the mortar.

And nobody came knocking on your door.

I'm not saying the NSA didn't have backdoors into it from the get-go, but saying that putting the former head of cyber-security on the board makes it so the NSA instantly knew everything everyone ever put into Chat-GPT is widely over-estimating the NSA's abilities.

The NSA, like the FBI, the Secret Service, the Department of Energy, and other government agencies problem isn't a lack of information, it's an overload of information and too much GIGO.

But we're not going to agree on that, since you seem to think you know all the answers.

Of course, that doesn't go with the fact there's some guys with verified sniper chops that are online, including going live on CNN, and saying the whole thing stinks to high heaven.

The idea of the slope being 'dangerous' is fucking stupid. The government caring about someone's fucking safety? FUCKING LOL.

Then the whole "oh, the SWAT counter-sniper went inside because the roof got too hot..." bullshit. Again, you expect me to believe that the government gave a shit someone was uncomfortable?

The same government that will make you sit in a hole half-filled with water, in the cold and rain, watching a section of road for hours? Or sit in 120F heat while watching one fucking section of road?

The more they deflect and try to hide shit, the more this is starting to stink.

And the only reason they'd be hiding this is one fucking thing...

He had Antifa and Leftist contacts that would make the Left look bad.

Just like Vegan, the Poonah-Shootah, the guy who shot up the Congressional baseball game, and the rest.

They desperately want to memoryhole this before the story unravels.

I doubt it was a conspiracy of the government. Not enough moving parts, not enough stupidity.

But I think the real story could seriously hurt public perception of the left, so they're trying to erase it all.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: Confused Doggo, Fatsuit Shinji, Lady Round Buns and 103 others
quaawaa said:
I don't believe that he didn't have any social media presence. They just scrubbed it all before releasing his name.
Click to expand...
Absolutely, digital information is mutable and ephemeral, just like any information they've found on his phone. Physical information, such as handwritten notes, would have to be logged as evidence gathered during the search of his belongings, and thus we would at the very least have the knowledge that it exists if not its contents.

Any digital information found on his phone that speaks to motive might as well have never existed as far as the general public is concerned. You can also safely assume that it was damning to the libshit status quo.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Fatsuit Shinji, duckbutter&toejamsandwich, spiritofamermaid and 4 others
Reinhardo-sama said:
Nah, he's unironically right about it. The establishment consists of neolibs and leftoids. If it is true the assassin was a leftoid sperglord, what do you think rightoids and centrists will think of the left?
Click to expand...
I think that everyone past center looks at the left as a dead political basis and hopefully rational voters do as well. Obviously the shooter was a BlackRock funded sperg I’ve been saying it for days. What’s happened is symbolic of a rotted system from the old politics in modern era.
 
  • Like
  • Dumb
  • Agree
Reactions: Hweeks, spiritofamermaid, Melee Bouquet and 2 others
Jet Fuel Johnny said:
And the only reason they'd be hiding this is one fucking thing...

He had Antifa and Leftist contacts that would make the Left look bad.
Click to expand...
Maybe some Muslim or Iranian links from going too deep down the FREE PALESTINE rabbit hole. Not full on conversion and 72 virgins stuff but maybe groomed or encouraged a bit. I can imagine wanting to keep that quiet for various reasons.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Yamma Damma and duckbutter&toejamsandwich
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back