Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 22.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 29.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 41 14.3%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 95 33.2%

  • Total voters
    286
How I'm reading the situation speculatively:

Barnes dick rides nick, says we want the bodycam footage for the kids.

Josh takes offence says on MATI he will blur them & we don't want the footage for that, considers filing an ethics complaint

Barnes is a fat retard.

Josh asks hardin to reach out to Barnes to clear up any misconception and not to erroneously say we want the bodycam for kids stuff and what the site actually represents.

Barnes is still a fat retard and responded in a unprofessional manner.

Barnes goes on Nick's show to ride his dick again in the hopes he can sniff Kayla's sweaty underwear.

Like I say this is all speculation, apart from Barnes being a fat retard.
 
Why does this freak seem to have kids of his mind?

First he insinuates Legal Mindset went to that country to fuck little children, now he thinks people here want the bodycam because we want to oogle children.

What is swimming in his head?
Confession through projection obviously, It's on his shirt. :smug:
 
Yes, and IIRC, @Null said it was ultimately pointless because the judge was set to rule in Null's favor anyways.

Bottom line is that Barnes sorta-kinda represented the Farm... but as more of a technicality.

If anything Barnes should just be thankful he got 5k from Nu and a tick mark in the W column (something he doesn't get very often), and then shut the fuck up.
The issue is that he framed it as a favor. When it sounds like Barnes took advantage of Null because Patrick’s filing was a joke. There’s a reason why ONA photoshopped a dick on the lawyers face.

@AnOminous or @Useful_Mistake do we have the filings for Patrick’s case with Null? Because I don’t remember it sounding like Barnes did that much for that case. If his appearance fee is $5K for a favor to a friend he’s an enormous cunt possibly fatter than Fatrick.
 
I'm actually convinced from both secondhand sources and my own minimal experiences that most people who commit a murder had a comprehensible reason for it other than just pure evil. Often it doesn't rise to the level of something that gives you an actual legal defense, but it's very often something that you could see yourself doing given a slightly different set of circumstances.
You have to remember that taking a life is in itself not an unjustifiable act. Most people accept that violence is justifiable in certain situations. For that reason murder is one of the the easier crimes to compartmentalize inside your mind since you can always spin it in some way to find some justification for committing the act.
 
Since I saw some people confused as to what was said or not in regards to Null and Barnes, I have taken the time to edit together the Robert Barnes side story of the Nick Rekieta tale.

Love it how he cries about threats while he threatened to "dig up dirt and investigate" Legal Mindset for soliciting child prostitutes in Thailand (Something that he hasn't done), easily the worst accusation to come from anyone on this sector, and threatened to sue Null. Really unprofessional behavior and unbecoming of a lawyer.
 
Last edited:
Several calenders, actually. One of the more recent ones brought in over $100k.

See for yourself:


She's not hot, but she's also not horrible looking, I guess. If nothing else, she did better than Nina Infinity. Nina's attempt at this was a disaster (because she's fugly).
I'm a bit surprised Disney hasn't gone after her for trademark infringement. Like, I thought they had "Star Wars" trademarked for everything under the sun, and I know companies like Google, Apple, or LEGO will smack people down for blatantly copying logos and using their name in even channel names (Less so Apple due to the generic usage of Apple.)

Typical noseguard behavior though, it's not even womanly behavior. It's weasel balldo behavior. The sooner these retards lose their audiences, the better.
 
@AnOminous or @Useful_Mistake do we have the filings for Patrick’s case with Null?
You'll have to ask the Tomlinson thread. I wasn't paying attention to it as it was happening.

Here's the docket, and here's the ~start of the case in the Tomlinson thread.
 
Didn’t Barnes charge like $5000 for his appearance? Wasn’t he that kind of asshole? His friends and family fee for telling Patrick Tomlinson to fuck off was something like that absurdly high?
That's actually pretty normal for an appearance. I'll talk shit about this faggot for a lot of reasons, but that's not one.
 
Why does this freak seem to have kids of his mind?

First he insinuates Legal Mindset went to that country to fuck little children, now he thinks people here want the bodycam because we want to oogle children.

What is swimming in his head?
faggots like him are such narcissists that they think it's actually impossible to disagree with them without being literally the worst thing possible. it's also why nick went straight to calling Monty a pedo.
 
Barnes heavily implied that Null was only requesting the bodycam footage because he's a pedophile who wants to see Rekieta's children.

He is a slimy fucktard. Never trust a bald man.
He really shouldn't be talking about a former client in such a way, it could easily be inferred that Barnes has privileged information and so any claims he makes against Moon and the farms could be seen as authoritative, even when he's speculating or bullshitting. A news site with no love of the farms could even quote Barnes as "Josh Moon's former Lawyer reveals"

Barnes needs to shut his trap about certain matters.
Confession through projection obviously, It's on his shirt. :smug:
What's with that anyway? does he think saying "No You" using bigger words is somehow clever? well I can say "No You" right back to him and where does that leave us?
 
I hope Null files a complaint. Barnes is disgusting.
It's probably a waste of time but I'm sure nool will take advice of counsel. If there actually is reprehensible to the point of sanctionable misconduct here, Hardin would be the best source of advice for that.

It should be sufficient to say that if you don't want a lawyer who will shit-talk you after you pay them, expecting loyalty of some sort, you would avoid a lawyer like this puffed-up popinjay.
 
Barnes is a narcissist clout goblin first and a lawyer second.

Is there a single YouTube lawyer who doesn't fall into this category? Look, I get it. Legal practice is hard. It isn't hugely glamorous. You aren't likely to get troons like MANdy flocking around your cock if you're just a common garden lawyer. But despite how disreputable it is as a profession, it's still a hundred times more respectable than being a performing YouTube monkey.

Barnes heavily implied that Null was only requesting the bodycam footage because he's a pedophile who wants to see Rekieta's children.

What's that thing that Viva Frei is always going on about? Confession through projection.

He needs to have a word with his co-presenter about how that looks.
 
Last edited:
And rumble has abandoned him. If he was a valued contract they would have at least tries to fix the supposed problem nick is having.

Also nick is on 1600 live viewers. More than his now new usual of 800, but people were streaming to near 10k or more just a day ago talking about Trump. Dough tennapel was streaming to 8k.
A slow and quiet night at his peak he'd still be streaming to 3-4K.
The last thing that faggots wife and little kid saw was this sick fuck roided out coming at them in a rage.
If there's a hell he's in it.
 
This fat bastard is threatening legal action against Josh because Josh is "lying" about him.
I've heard teh claims that Richard Barnes fucks small children, I've also heard the claims that Rekieta fucks small woodland creatures. I'm not sure it's true, but i've heard those claims. If those claims are true, I think both Richard barnes (suspected child rapist) and Nick Rekeita (suspected squirrel rapist) should be punished under the full extent of the law.
 
Nick Rekieta has never proven he hasn't raped a squirrel, and that's kinda weird.

I officially extend the request to Nick Rekieta to PLEASE prove he hasn't raped a squirrel.
I would have thought Nick would be more into Raccoons, since he loves hearing those gag reflexes as he drowns them.

We could call it "the Monty Standard" since it's the legal and personal standard Nick has set out for Montagraph. "prove you didn't rape all those theoretical boys Montagraph"
 
Back