Has search gotten worse?

Is the quality of web search results getting worse?

  • Yes

    Votes: 1,184 94.3%
  • No

    Votes: 19 1.5%
  • IDK

    Votes: 52 4.1%

  • Total voters
    1,255
When did Google get rid of that number of results counter?

Seems all the Google services keep getting ever suckier...
And it's not just the results counter, they've removed their cached versions of their web results. The wokescold search neutering annoys me to no end as well.

Youtube has introduced artificial slowdowns ( false buffering icons, arbitrarily stopping playback) on playback of random videos, with a popup notification nastygram telling the user of Youtube's certified HD capable networks. This slowdown effect immediately goes away when the video is loaded from somewhere else without a genuine browser id, like Freetube. Maybe they just don't like Thorium, but it just teaches the user to hate anything google. The only reason why I know any of this is because Google forced this pajeetified shit on me earlier today.
 
Last edited:
And it's not just the results counter, they've removed their cached versions of their web results.
I knew about the cache thing gone. And Bing, DuckDuckGo, and Yandex also seem to lack the results counter. Yahoo! and Yahoo! JAPAN still have that counter though. And Bing and Yandex still does caching. But just like tech companies copying stupid crap by Apple (like the lack of a headphone jack), they could copy Google with stupid search BS.
 
Last edited:
Was looking at Google Images for that "bender oh wait you're serious" meme, and at least the first page had too much of "My Little Pony" and "Orange Man Bad" crap.

(doublepost because older post too old to edit)
It's gotten to a point where adding the names of websites is basically mandatory, if you added 'know your meme' to the search term you might have better results
 
one tile just has handlebars in it
Seems I almost always "fail" those stupid "select all parts with [thing]" or "select until there's none left" captchas at least once.

I have the right to exist in this world too.
It's gotten to a point where adding the names of websites is basically mandatory, if you added 'know your meme' to the search term you might have better results
If there was any doubt left that search results can be manipulated to try to "socially engineer" people to be SJW, it's sure out now.

By the way, SJWs like to pretend it's still before the Civil Rights movement, even though it seems they want to "gaslight" all into thinking it's always been Current Year.
 
Last edited:
  • Feels
Reactions: Michael Jacks0n
Was looking for "anime to photo" AI converter to mess around with out of curiosity. And yet all I could find was the other way around ("photo to anime"), sites with that nonfunctional "sign in with Google" BS, or sites where one has to pay for it. What irritating BS!

With all of that endless incompetence and scams and advertising BS, it's no wonder it can be so hard to find anything online anymore.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Michael Jacks0n
Had a phrase from a pulp novel stuck in my head "where the purple empire of Cathay dreamed away the centuries" but couldn't remember where it came from. Tried the usual search engines: Google, Bing, duckduckgo, brave. All they returned was a bunch of results about ancient China and Total Warhammer 3. Finally tried yandex and boom, first result is exactly the book I'm looking for. I guess what's sad isn't that that Google et al is shit, it's that they had an amazingly good search engine and then deliberately ruined it.
 
My old not-smart TV remote suddenly stopped working except the power button the other day.

Despite knowing the remote model # for attempts to pair it back with the unit again, all normie avenues of search were all fucking useless: YT, Brave, Google, Bing, Mojeek, Yandex, etc.

YT wouldn't stop showing me videos for some sort of FIRE Smart TV.

All of the search engines were filled with SEO AI and Indian written DIY stubs that were generic and useless.

Most of the actual model # hits were from URLs from the aughts that wouldn't open.
 
Last edited:
Often search with Before:[Add Year] at the end if you want to know which old media you're looking for. For Example. "abandoned Geauga Lake before:2015]

Helped me find this video I thought would be completely lost knowing how far it is buried in the search results.
 
Oh fuck off google niggers. "Troon memes" doesn't bring up this faggy notification thankfully. Screenshot_2024-07-17-22-15-24-861_com.android.chrome-edit.jpg
 
Why does Google seemingly have a vendetta against discussion boards? Recently searched for something on Yandex and found much more links to forum threads than on Google.

Oh fuck off
I've seen that "warning" too. Never saw it before sometime after 2020.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Staffy
Search definitely seems to be sucking over time.

I still use an old program that hasn't been updated in years and seems to be Abandonware that might not work on the latest version(s) of Windows. Searching for potential replacement software returns hits for online apps and web design and nothing related to the particular type of software I'm looking for apart from the old program itself.

On a nostalgic note, I remember the days when the site dogpile dot com was a search site that collected results from a number of other sites and made them available in one place. With search in general much worse now, I'd imagine it's not as effective any more assuming it's still even up and running.
 
Why does Google seemingly have a vendetta against discussion boards? Recently searched for something on Yandex and found much more links to forum threads than on Google.
If Google just finds you the answer on some old forum, you'll click the result and that's that. No ad revenue, and worse, you leave the google sphere. However, if they serve you a handful of garbage that just happens to have Google's tracking script embedded, you'll earn them some money, and then go back to search with slightly adjusted terms a couple times.
Being a good search engine just isn't profitable enough any more, C-suite staff must see the lines go up. Engagement and ad revenue at any cost, who cares if it kills your reputation? I've tried a few paid search engines, and while they're better than Google or Bing, they're still not as good as Yandex.
 
Being a good search engine just isn't profitable enough any more, C-suite staff must see the lines go up.
In a better world the internet would run on the free software and open source mentality and value free speech.

Seems at least the Western internet is run more and more by "diversity" hires and soys who oppose such ideals.

"Freeze peach" is an old one but I'm now seeing "open sores" for open source.
 
In a better world the internet would run on the free software and open source mentality and value free speech.

Seems at least the Western internet is run more and more by "diversity" hires and soys who oppose such ideals.
Computers and the Internet have been steadily spiralling down since the 90s, when microcomputers were widely adopted and governments introduced computer literacy courses. Enshittification is a natural consequence of computer systems becoming more widely available, more widely used, and more widely monetised. When computers were sufficiently rare that corporations could afford a few minis at most, only the people truly fascinated with the subject would get involved, and the personalities at campuses like MIT AI Lab created a whole subculture about using computers to do fun and interesting things rather than just figuring out how to make money from them. As that diffused, the "hacker ethos" retreated into organisations like GNU, where isolation and bitterness was free to corrupt them and bring them further away from the rest of the IT industry, rather than making their thought a fundamental part of the computer user mindset.
Just to compare, the early timesharing system Multics was developed primarily by corporations, specifically GE and Bell. The result was strict access control, strict user hierarchy, and strict (for the time) security. That would become a core part of timesharing systems, which were promptly introduced wherevery they could be because it makes better use of the limited resources available. Timesharing basically just means "multiple users simultaneously", but by implication that also means "multiple programs simultaneously", ie timesharing means multitasking. When MIT students were introduced to their new Multics-running computer, they threw a fit and developed their own counterpart, ITS, which had just about zero security. Anyone with a terminal could dial them and log on, even without a user account. The result was a long list of important technical achievements, as well as several productivity softwares and games that would quickly become mainstays. Thanks to ITS we got free/open-source software ideology, open design movement (current counterparts would be things like the 3D printer community or github, where projects are publicly available and anyone who wants to can learn from others, or help improve the projects), which when combined with the hypertext movement led directly to wikis (Wikipedia has many issues these days, but the core concept is incredibly important). What did we get out of Multics? Ken Thompson's deep-seated frustrations with the project led him to create UNIX, but "this thing was so shit that both MIT and Bell had to start over from scratch and make something actually usable" isn't high praise.

I actually take some solace in the fact that services like Discord and various social media are subsuming the normie internet. Once the general population are removed from it the web will be a much smaller community, but I think it will be a better one. Right now we just happen to be stuck in that awkward phase in-between, where the two sides are still forced to mingle.
 
Back