US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

  • 🔧 Actively working on site again.
Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Explain the sudden arc in blue. You see how the blue line makes a right angle at the very end? What does that mean?
That's when they were supposed to throw in the mail-ins. Which I was afraid they'd do, they knew enough at the time to unleash it at the min.

Jeez, Vivek's thinking it's big mike and he has totally guessed everything right so far.

 
Checked and wow, Biden won a bunch of states overnight "somehow." It was surreal. If they try to pull it off again, who's not gonna notice?
Well, who’s not going to notice the obvious insider involvement in Trump getting shot in the face?

I think we’re rapidly approaching the fully mask-off event horizon for entrenched Washington. For me, it’s not a question about whether people with more than 100 IQ will notice, it’s a question about what the people who do notice will do about it. Will everyone put their heads back down like good little neighborcattle or will they (redacted)?
 
The other night I came across the recent Kill Tony with Shane Gillis doing Trump and Adam Ray doing Biden. It was good. The impressions were funny and on point. I'm trying to think what they would be with someone doing Harris. I honestly can't think what a person doing Harris would be and how it'd be funny. Which gets me thinking as to how well they've hid Harris. Sure she sounds like she's had too many glasses of wine at brunch on a sunny day. Sure she speaks nonsense world salad. I still can't think what an impression would be that is funny and not sad.

Unlike the Trump and Biden I just saw.

Which gets to the thinking, for as much shit she got when she ran in 2020. Them hiding her away has probably blank slated her to many people. Which will enable the massive shill and gaslighting. Although I fully expect she's going to do something like a disastrous press conference and go down in flames sooner rather than later.
 
You could've bothered to learn how elections work before. Or now, before the next election so they don't steal it too. Or not, that might interfere with the cope excuses.

Trump was ahead in more than one state that hadn't finished counting. Did they all count their mail-in ballots at the same time? Were close to 100% of those votes for Biden causing vertical lines in the graph?
 
Hell, they did the whole ballot stuffing thing for Hillary and she still lost. The idea that Kamala will somehow pull it off when she's less smart and less nice than the Shill is laughable to me. The Democrats will lose and lose hard with Harris as their candidate, the only reason why they should stick with her now is that they'll somehow lose even harder with someone else.
I've wondered whether WikiLeaks played a role in the failure to rig 2016. Assange was dropping tons of dirt on politicians and the Dems may have stopped all communications related to rigging because they were afraid the messages might be released. As a result the people working on the ground didn't know how many extra votes to add. Since then they've presumably revamped their communications as well as wiping out WikiLeaks.
 
@Gehenna any thoughts on the matter? Does this hurt the Democrats' chances? What might happen in regards to campaign funds and names on ballots?


Interesting how the decision was made last week. It's almost as if they let the shooter try to kill Trump, and now they need to change plans since that failed, although I suppose one could argue it was unplanned and they're just responding to it.
Oh -god- yes. So long as Kamala stays in the money will stay in her name. If they want to make it more democratic and keep the money then she can bring on whoever they vote for then resign herself... but that would require convincing her to. If they go full open convention and they don't do the above the money goes poof. Their only option to keep it in use is to refund it then redonate it all at once which... the FEC frowns on.

Now the really interesting thing is -voter depression-. Nobody voted for Kamala, and Kamala has a unique ability that every time she speaks support for what she is campaigning for goes down! Everyone do keep in mind that the reaction to her right now is one of shock and one of "Well of course I will be supporting the democrats!" This is a perfect example of why you should not look at any recent polls and wait a week because people's thoughts are going to take time to settle here... and then we get kamala actually campaigning. I would expect firm to mid support for her at first as the initial shock hits and then to -hemorrhage- that support.

Since there's no video evidence of Biden speaking as of yet, I am going to say that @Gehenna rumors might be accurate.
Who is laughing at the idea he had a stroke now!?

This thread is moving faster than an incontinent man who's just had a biriyani. Can you tell me what @Gehenna 's theory is? Couldn't see it in the prior couple of pages.
Short version, there is a persistent rumor that just before he went into seclusion for 'covid' he was seen wandering around like a legit zombie. -Nothing- going on upstairs. Rumor suggest stroke, I also suggested that it might have been a -severe- dementia moment, the kind you get right before death,

@Gehenna is gonna have some interesting second and third party stories from this once he is able to talk about it.
You have no idea...

If he says he didn't make that decision that by itself is an extremely strong case to reversing it

As for timing I don't know shit. @Gehenna might know
If Biden comes out and says he did not make that decision it is a direct declaration of FEC fraud. Their only option then would be to 25th him and claim he did make the decision and is just so fucked in the head he forgot.
 
Before anyone gets too excited about a Harris presidency, let's ask Chatgpt about some of the times she withheld exculpatory evidence from the people she prosecuted.
  • George Gage Case:
    • Background: George Gage, an electrician with no criminal record, was convicted of sexually abusing his stepdaughter. The conviction was largely based on the stepdaughter’s testimony.
    • Issue: During the trial, crucial evidence that could have undermined the credibility of the stepdaughter’s testimony was not disclosed to the defense. This included medical records and other documents that indicated she had previously lied to law enforcement.
    • Appeal: When the case was appealed, Harris's office opposed Gage's request for a review, arguing procedural grounds rather than addressing the merits of the withheld evidence.
  • Daniel Larsen Case:
    • Background: Daniel Larsen was convicted of possessing a concealed weapon, based on the testimony of two police officers.
    • Issue: Later, new evidence emerged, including witness testimony that Larsen did not have the weapon and that another individual was the actual culprit. Despite a federal judge overturning Larsen’s conviction due to inadequate legal representation and exculpatory evidence not being presented at trial, Harris's office initially opposed his release.
    • Resolution: Larsen was eventually released after significant legal battles and public outcry.
  • Johnny Baca Case:
    • Background: Johnny Baca was convicted of murder based on testimony that was later found to be false.
    • Issue: Despite clear evidence that the testimony used to convict Baca was fabricated, Harris's office fought against overturning his conviction.
    • Outcome: After a federal court ruled that Baca had been wrongfully convicted, Harris's office continued to challenge the decision before ultimately relenting.
Keep in mind the only reason why she relented on Baca's case was because she was running for the Senate and the judge threatened to "name names" if she kept fighting his appeal. She is genuinely a garbage human.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back