Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You could just ask your Sec. of State's office in your state instead of guessing. That's exactly how it works.That's fraud. Their excuse is 'mail in's would come in last'. Sure. If anything they were pre-counted and ready to go so should've been FIRST
Joe Biden is a master of time and space. He managed to be sick in bed and working in the office simultaneously.I'm surprised the Bidens are going for this.
Maybe, I wouldn't believe them now either way on what they said though.You could just ask your Sec. of State's office in your state instead of guessing. That's exactly how it works.
Explain the sudden arc in blue. You see how the blue line makes a right angle at the very end? What does that mean?That's fraud. Their excuse is 'mail in's would come in last'. Sure. If anything they were pre-counted and ready to go so should've been FIRST
That's when they were supposed to throw in the mail-ins. Which I was afraid they'd do, they knew enough at the time to unleash it at the min.Explain the sudden arc in blue. You see how the blue line makes a right angle at the very end? What does that mean?
You could've bothered to learn how elections work before. Or now, before the next election so they don't steal it too. Or not, that might interfere with the cope excuses.Maybe, I wouldn't believe them now either way on what they said though.
Well, who’s not going to notice the obvious insider involvement in Trump getting shot in the face?Checked and wow, Biden won a bunch of states overnight "somehow." It was surreal. If they try to pull it off again, who's not gonna notice?
Everyone knew Hayley was a RINO, but being this open about it is nuts.
You could've bothered to learn how elections work before. Or now, before the next election so they don't steal it too. Or not, that might interfere with the cope excuses.
It stopped. Then suddenly went up. That'd not how graphs work.That's when they were supposed to throw in the mail-ins. Which I was afraid they'd do, they knew enough at the time to unleash it at the min.
I love how the felon shit is all they got
Wait... I thought this was a /pol/ op. You're telling me they're adopting the racial caricature themselves?It does actually exist, it apparently involves coconuts believe it or not.
I've wondered whether WikiLeaks played a role in the failure to rig 2016. Assange was dropping tons of dirt on politicians and the Dems may have stopped all communications related to rigging because they were afraid the messages might be released. As a result the people working on the ground didn't know how many extra votes to add. Since then they've presumably revamped their communications as well as wiping out WikiLeaks.Hell, they did the whole ballot stuffing thing for Hillary and she still lost. The idea that Kamala will somehow pull it off when she's less smart and less nice than the Shill is laughable to me. The Democrats will lose and lose hard with Harris as their candidate, the only reason why they should stick with her now is that they'll somehow lose even harder with someone else.
Oh -god- yes. So long as Kamala stays in the money will stay in her name. If they want to make it more democratic and keep the money then she can bring on whoever they vote for then resign herself... but that would require convincing her to. If they go full open convention and they don't do the above the money goes poof. Their only option to keep it in use is to refund it then redonate it all at once which... the FEC frowns on.@Gehenna any thoughts on the matter? Does this hurt the Democrats' chances? What might happen in regards to campaign funds and names on ballots?
Interesting how the decision was made last week. It's almost as if they let the shooter try to kill Trump, and now they need to change plans since that failed, although I suppose one could argue it was unplanned and they're just responding to it.
Who is laughing at the idea he had a stroke now!?Since there's no video evidence of Biden speaking as of yet, I am going to say that @Gehenna rumors might be accurate.
Short version, there is a persistent rumor that just before he went into seclusion for 'covid' he was seen wandering around like a legit zombie. -Nothing- going on upstairs. Rumor suggest stroke, I also suggested that it might have been a -severe- dementia moment, the kind you get right before death,This thread is moving faster than an incontinent man who's just had a biriyani. Can you tell me what @Gehenna 's theory is? Couldn't see it in the prior couple of pages.
You have no idea...@Gehenna is gonna have some interesting second and third party stories from this once he is able to talk about it.
If Biden comes out and says he did not make that decision it is a direct declaration of FEC fraud. Their only option then would be to 25th him and claim he did make the decision and is just so fucked in the head he forgot.If he says he didn't make that decision that by itself is an extremely strong case to reversing it
As for timing I don't know shit. @Gehenna might know
Before anyone gets too excited about a Harris presidency, let's ask Chatgpt about some of the times she withheld exculpatory evidence from the people she prosecuted.
Keep in mind the only reason why she relented on Baca's case was because she was running for the Senate and the judge threatened to "name names" if she kept fighting his appeal. She is genuinely a garbage human.
- George Gage Case:
- Background: George Gage, an electrician with no criminal record, was convicted of sexually abusing his stepdaughter. The conviction was largely based on the stepdaughter’s testimony.
- Issue: During the trial, crucial evidence that could have undermined the credibility of the stepdaughter’s testimony was not disclosed to the defense. This included medical records and other documents that indicated she had previously lied to law enforcement.
- Appeal: When the case was appealed, Harris's office opposed Gage's request for a review, arguing procedural grounds rather than addressing the merits of the withheld evidence.
- Daniel Larsen Case:
- Background: Daniel Larsen was convicted of possessing a concealed weapon, based on the testimony of two police officers.
- Issue: Later, new evidence emerged, including witness testimony that Larsen did not have the weapon and that another individual was the actual culprit. Despite a federal judge overturning Larsen’s conviction due to inadequate legal representation and exculpatory evidence not being presented at trial, Harris's office initially opposed his release.
- Resolution: Larsen was eventually released after significant legal battles and public outcry.
- Johnny Baca Case:
- Background: Johnny Baca was convicted of murder based on testimony that was later found to be false.
- Issue: Despite clear evidence that the testimony used to convict Baca was fabricated, Harris's office fought against overturning his conviction.
- Outcome: After a federal court ruled that Baca had been wrongfully convicted, Harris's office continued to challenge the decision before ultimately relenting.