- Joined
- Apr 1, 2022
I was looking through my old posts and came across this. I'll take "Stuff That Aged Like Shit" for $200, Alex.
General Discussion for Virtual Youtubers / Vtubers / Chuubas - it's okay to be a simp for 2D, just don't thirstpost.
- Thread starter samuraicrack
- Start date
-
🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
Sunflower Samurai
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
to be fair the entire MV privating was such a large and sudden shitshow that had no real way of getting any info until the involved parties spoke
and when people spoke goddamn it literally collapsed an entire branch, wild way to end and start a year
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2024
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2023
Do you get $400 because she attempted twice?
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2019
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2017
New Kirsche essay just dropped in response to ArchCast.
https://x.com/TArchcast/status/1815810576419020853 (Archive)
https://x.com/KirscheVerstahl/status/1815913019999723960 (Archive)
TL;DR, Kirsche is angry at ArchCast for dicksucking SFO and being completely blind when skimming through the Google doc, and because of this she got the green light to unredact the screenshot of SFO lying to Arch about her. She also finally posted the full document onto Twitter.
https://x.com/TArchcast/status/1815810576419020853 (Archive)
https://x.com/KirscheVerstahl/status/1815913019999723960 (Archive)
TL;DR, Kirsche is angry at ArchCast for dicksucking SFO and being completely blind when skimming through the Google doc, and because of this she got the green light to unredact the screenshot of SFO lying to Arch about her. She also finally posted the full document onto Twitter.
I don't know what makes a man look at a 300 page doc with mountains of evidence of Dev lying, and then say "you know what, I think I'll defend that man and try to discredit the writer" but here we are;
"I responded by saying if Dev HAD said or done something in my DMs that was incriminating then I would be willing to share it, because Dev would be in the wrong at that point, but at this time that has not taken place"
I was not asking for incriminating evidence, I was asking for the DMs because I know Dev lied to you about the entire situation. This is what Dev does, again evidenced by how soon after our conversation he went to you to speak about it. Dev uses a "poisoning the well" tactic where he goes and gives his version of events to someone first, and then they don't care to look into it further. I have 2 years worth of screenshots pointing out his every inconsistency and lie regarding the situation. Also, the Arch of the past might not have believed me that Dev was lying and thus didn't find anything Dev said to be "incriminating", but the Arch of today now knows it was lies if he read through the doc, so why not post the DMs of Dev telling you about "my issues'' with him now, then?
"I will absolutely tell Dev when people are asking for our DM's because that is also wrong and anyone would tell their friend's when people are going around trying to dig up dirt on them."
I was not "digging up dirt" I was hoping you would understand how much of a lying manipulator Dev is and the situation I have been in. I went to Dev to talk about how I didn't feel comfortable going on Archcast if he would also be on at the same time as me- again, instead of you, to keep you out of the issues initially. At this point I had no problems with you or going on the cast, just did not want to be there at the same time as Dev due to him covering for his moderator's actions against me. To be explicitly clear, i never wanted Dev removed from Archcast, I just only was willing to go on during days Dev was not there due to these issues.
"The only reason anyone would "redact" this part of the conversation between Kirsche and myself would be to hide the fact that Kirsche was the one asking me to give her private DM's between myself and Dev."
It literally says in the screenshot you posted: "Kirsche reached out to Arch to ask if she would be able to obtain a screenshot of the DMs"
Why are you boldface lying?
I had redacted the screenshot by request in order to not implicate the party who gave them to me. I might not be a journalist but I take protecting sources seriously. I have provided enough material everywhere else, that a single "just trust me bro" should be fine to have. But after the release of the document, and now that you have decided to guard Dev's behavior, I have been given the green light from my source to release the screenshot.
"As our communications on the matter can simply be summed up as…"
"If Dev was talking to me about gayops, I would have no problems whatsoever with sharing that fact publicly."
SFO's moderator DFD, has been proven unequivocally to have attempted gayops against me and has been continuously trying to cause drama since 2022. SFO was – and still is – fully aware of these facts, yet claimed in the DM that he doesn't believe DFD is doing anything and tried to paint me as the one causing issues. It is not causing drama to defend myself.
I have tried the "ignore them and they will go away tactic" for over a year, but they refuse to stop instigating drama that I have never wanted any part in.
Trying the Enlightened Centrist™ path of "I won't pick a side between these fighting women" while sweeping for Dev's bad behavior is a very weird play.
I did not plan on tweeting the full doc, but in the interest of information at this point, here it is if you have not seen it already. Everything from 2022 - current day is documented within.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uXYkUFR5cPv9-MEG2cujVqGVS-BzIQcZuoUyx_nrPwA/edit
"I responded by saying if Dev HAD said or done something in my DMs that was incriminating then I would be willing to share it, because Dev would be in the wrong at that point, but at this time that has not taken place"
I was not asking for incriminating evidence, I was asking for the DMs because I know Dev lied to you about the entire situation. This is what Dev does, again evidenced by how soon after our conversation he went to you to speak about it. Dev uses a "poisoning the well" tactic where he goes and gives his version of events to someone first, and then they don't care to look into it further. I have 2 years worth of screenshots pointing out his every inconsistency and lie regarding the situation. Also, the Arch of the past might not have believed me that Dev was lying and thus didn't find anything Dev said to be "incriminating", but the Arch of today now knows it was lies if he read through the doc, so why not post the DMs of Dev telling you about "my issues'' with him now, then?
"I will absolutely tell Dev when people are asking for our DM's because that is also wrong and anyone would tell their friend's when people are going around trying to dig up dirt on them."
I was not "digging up dirt" I was hoping you would understand how much of a lying manipulator Dev is and the situation I have been in. I went to Dev to talk about how I didn't feel comfortable going on Archcast if he would also be on at the same time as me- again, instead of you, to keep you out of the issues initially. At this point I had no problems with you or going on the cast, just did not want to be there at the same time as Dev due to him covering for his moderator's actions against me. To be explicitly clear, i never wanted Dev removed from Archcast, I just only was willing to go on during days Dev was not there due to these issues.
"The only reason anyone would "redact" this part of the conversation between Kirsche and myself would be to hide the fact that Kirsche was the one asking me to give her private DM's between myself and Dev."
It literally says in the screenshot you posted: "Kirsche reached out to Arch to ask if she would be able to obtain a screenshot of the DMs"
Why are you boldface lying?
I had redacted the screenshot by request in order to not implicate the party who gave them to me. I might not be a journalist but I take protecting sources seriously. I have provided enough material everywhere else, that a single "just trust me bro" should be fine to have. But after the release of the document, and now that you have decided to guard Dev's behavior, I have been given the green light from my source to release the screenshot.
"As our communications on the matter can simply be summed up as…"
"If Dev was talking to me about gayops, I would have no problems whatsoever with sharing that fact publicly."
SFO's moderator DFD, has been proven unequivocally to have attempted gayops against me and has been continuously trying to cause drama since 2022. SFO was – and still is – fully aware of these facts, yet claimed in the DM that he doesn't believe DFD is doing anything and tried to paint me as the one causing issues. It is not causing drama to defend myself.
I have tried the "ignore them and they will go away tactic" for over a year, but they refuse to stop instigating drama that I have never wanted any part in.
Trying the Enlightened Centrist™ path of "I won't pick a side between these fighting women" while sweeping for Dev's bad behavior is a very weird play.
I did not plan on tweeting the full doc, but in the interest of information at this point, here it is if you have not seen it already. Everything from 2022 - current day is documented within.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uXYkUFR5cPv9-MEG2cujVqGVS-BzIQcZuoUyx_nrPwA/edit
Last edited:
Disastrously Dumb
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2021
Just something to take your mind off the doom and gloom.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2018
Papakin confirmed best girl.
Papakin cameo around the 48 minute mark.
Serbian Peacekeepers
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2020
I genuinely don't know what I am looking at and it's triggering my flight or fight instincts.
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2019
Brain damage
Disastrously Dumb
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2021
A simple Puta
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2022
Smiling Mooms
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2021
Apparently vtuber Callie Calico's sound setup caught a murder on of her recent streams? any of yall know anything about this
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2017
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2019
indeed, what's shocking here is siding with fucking twitch, the troon infested nepotism shithole known for not even following it's own rules, but it's ok when it happens to someone "I don't like/find weird and don't even watch".
congratulations, we have fully reached "niji did nothing wrong" levels...
Last edited:
All Smiles
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2023
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2019
this isn't even the longest thread if you count reboots/splits for shitposting or technical reasons (threads over a few thousand pages get unwieldy to moderate apparently).
EDIT: a lot of posters also left during the troon-cause, otherwise this thread would be even longer. it's slow compared to the "old days"
Last edited:
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2023
Brother, there's an entire splinter site that this thread split off of that has nearly 10k pages for just the General Discussion thread and 6.6k pages for Pippa discussions.
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2017
Special interest topic with a decent number of fans that doesn't have much in the way of thread drama that would cause it to be closed or moved to the Spergatory.