Grace Lavery / Joseph Lavery & Daniel M. Lavery / Mallory Ortberg - "Straight with extra steps" couple trooning out to avoid "dwindling into mere heterosexuality"

Joe dreamed he was laughed at.
comedy dream.png
A thumbnail.
Prof. Grace Lavery @gracelavery - 6hr

Dreamed last night I was in a sketch comedy troupe, and when James Gandolfini showed up to our first night, I improvised an impersonation of Uncle Jun' and he laughed uproariously. Then I went to speak to him after and he was like "whatever dude, needs work..."

Prof. Grace Lavery @gracelavery - 5hr
posting my dream Ls :-(
 
Joe had to lock Tard Baby out so he could celebrate an important milestone in peace: Queen Terf has seen his name.

IMG_3955.jpeg

Senpai finally noticed me, but sadly only to rehash the bizarre pearl-clutching about an out-of-context (but also, completely harmless) line of mine. Context in image, link below: https://them.us/story/returning-to-france-post-transition

IMG_3958.jpeg

IMG_3959.jpeg


Aha! Fabricator of said shitty terf infographics admits having made these images while shopping. Definitely speaks to the quality of the research underpinning them, and the good-faith attempt at serious discussion.

IMG_3961.jpeg

it may as well be me
@foundeasily

The Andrea Long Chu quote is also so weirdly out of context and man, it would be so easy to find actual, in context, quotes from ALC that would make them mad. I wonder if there's any interesting theory text you couldn't pull a sentence from that totally changes it's meaning

Prof. Grace Lavery
https://twitter.com/graceelavery
Agreed. That’s one of Andrea’s subtlest lines of reasoning, I think. We gave talks together shortly after I came out, and she delivered a version of that part—it, and she, were absolutely brilliant.

link | archive

The person replying is exactly what you’d think

IMG_3963.jpeg

Oh no, Queen Terf was just shitposting a meme :( One day Joe she will retweet you with a cutting comment and you can finally feel seen.

I do like how the misogyny is well akshually part of subtle not at all misogynist theorising that us bimbos are too dumb to understand because we’re not stunning and brave.
 
View attachment 6228956View attachment 6228958
@daniel_m_lavery
each claims ti was an accident but both of my co-parents have locked me out of the house today...time to start building a siege engine in the garage
7:55 PM - Jul 23, 2024 - 3,214 views

I was just in the backyard!
It’s ironic to hear her refer to them as “co-parents” since that’s almost exclusively a term I hear when divorced parents or exes talk about each other.
 
Donner Party wasn’t misguided, just unlucky with a very early snowfall…the trouple on the other hand.
They were told not to take the unproven, untraveled shortcut. So that part was on them. But with Mallory getting locked out of the house, she's like the guy who got kicked out of the Donner train for stabbing people, which actually saved his life and helped him get (back) to Californee faster.

Joe had to lock Tard Baby out so he could celebrate an important milestone in peace: Queen Terf has seen his name.

View attachment 6229805

Senpai finally noticed me, but sadly only to rehash the bizarre pearl-clutching about an out-of-context (but also, completely harmless) line of mine. Context in image, link below: https://them.us/story/returning-to-france-post-transition

View attachment 6229829

View attachment 6229832


Aha! Fabricator of said shitty terf infographics admits having made these images while shopping. Definitely speaks to the quality of the research underpinning them, and the good-faith attempt at serious discussion.

View attachment 6229840

it may as well be me
@foundeasily

The Andrea Long Chu quote is also so weirdly out of context and man, it would be so easy to find actual, in context, quotes from ALC that would make them mad. I wonder if there's any interesting theory text you couldn't pull a sentence from that totally changes it's meaning

Prof. Grace Lavery
https://twitter.com/graceelavery
Agreed. That’s one of Andrea’s subtlest lines of reasoning, I think. We gave talks together shortly after I came out, and she delivered a version of that part—it, and she, were absolutely brilliant.

link | archive

The person replying is exactly what you’d think

View attachment 6229881

Oh no, Queen Terf was just shitposting a meme :( One day Joe she will retweet you with a cutting comment and you can finally feel seen.

I do like how the misogyny is well akshually part of subtle not at all misogynist theorising that us bimbos are too dumb to understand because we’re not stunning and brave.
Absolutely love how he constantly says he's actually more offensive than he is given credit for. What actual shock jock has to point out that people ought be outraged by them? It's so sad.
 
The "senpai" line is revealing, though Joe doubtless thinks of it is as cool irony. It's fascinating to see across the board how deep cognitive distortions go for pervs. They genuinely have no idea how obvious their motivations are. Let a pedo get his guard down and start talking, you see the same pattern. Defensive sperging at odds with actual behaviour, and at the same time they can't stop peppering even their "house manners" (as Mal would call 'em) with little invitations to agree with their real beliefs and therefore join their club.
 
Welcome to the ultimate beta male experience: being ignored and belittled by a partner who doesn't love you anymore. Hope it's everything you wished it was.

Also I love that Joe is the ADFesque, embarrassing tranny that gets wheeled out and used against the community. And also that joe now knows that if he wants that queen terf lolcow attention then he has to produce more milk.
 
>Called 'dude' in his dream
Damn, imagine getting misgendered by Tony Soprano.
Even better, dream Tony tells Joe, "Whatever dude, needs work".
Meaning Joe is having Freudian anxiety dreams, not just about being called a dude, but he's running out of money and literally DUDE NEEDS WORK. Needs work to feed the baby! They can't parasite forever off of the mistress's teaching salary, can they?
 
Tard Baby lives down to her sobriquet with some „gosh I’m just a silly billy” quirky girl drivel to announce the launch of her new website.

IMG_3971.jpeg
link | archive

At the end of the homepage, she doubles down

IMG_3972.jpeg

Tard Baby turns 38 this year. Her style of literary humour has always left me cold, but OK, whatever. It’s the constant childish incompetence uwu just a quirky girl trying to navigate grown up shit that is so exhausting and irritating. Tard Baby’s fear of responsibility, adulthood and mastery of herself and actual skills put her in this situation: a balding goblin playing nanny to her husband’s child with his mistress, living in the mistress’ house, with no assets apart from rapidly depreciating fugly clothes and a bicycle. BTW, imagine the novel a good author could write about that! Girl, you have got some great material there and instead you write about women when you claim not to be one #ownstories. Joe, for all his many faults, at least pretends to be an adult and expresses a confidence in his own opinions and choices, however misguided.
 
Tard Baby lives down to her sobriquet with some „gosh I’m just a silly billy” quirky girl drivel to announce the launch of her new website.

View attachment 6236446
link | archive

At the end of the homepage, she doubles down

View attachment 6236447

Tard Baby turns 38 this year. Her style of literary humour has always left me cold, but OK, whatever. It’s the constant childish incompetence uwu just a quirky girl trying to navigate grown up shit that is so exhausting and irritating. Tard Baby’s fear of responsibility, adulthood and mastery of herself and actual skills put her in this situation: a balding goblin playing nanny to her husband’s child with his mistress, living in the mistress’ house, with no assets apart from rapidly depreciating fugly clothes and a bicycle. BTW, imagine the novel a good author could write about that! Girl, you have got some great material there and instead you write about women when you claim not to be one #ownstories. Joe, for all his many faults, at least pretends to be an adult and expresses a confidence in his own opinions and choices, however misguided.
If Mallory ever gets her head out of her ass, leaves Joe and writes a book about her six years in a narcissistic troon’s “polycule” she might have a real bestseller.

Any time a post, or story mentions narcissism, there is a tsunami of long comments from women all talking about their relationship with a supposed narc. A book by Malory about her disastrous marriage to a MTF narc, and him starting a family with a new girlfriend, would print money. It would certainly x100 any insipid “trans parenthood” book Joe intends to write about himself.
 
Im a little tech illiterate but I cant find the Helen Rosner, The New Yorker quote that's on the Harper Collins website for Women's Hotel.
I cannot imagine a more perfect use of an afternoon than reading this book
The Kirkus review and the Publishers Weekly are there but not the The New Yorker.
Presumably it will appear in the Briefly Noted section at some later date?


Meanwhile Joe is writing 6 more books on is favorite V-Tubers, The Bee Movie, the intersection Libs Of TikTok and Jean-Luc Godard, a reassessment of the poetry of Jordan Peterson, trans expression in the novelization of the move Free Willy, and a selection of his best Instagram posts.
 
If Mallory ever gets her head out of her ass, leaves Joe and writes a book about her six years in a narcissistic troon’s “polycule” she might have a real bestseller.
No, because that would require writing skills and talent. She has neither one. Stephen King with severe TDS can write rings around this untalented and completely unskilled hack who lacks qualification to write a classified for the Thrifty Nickel weekly circular.

She just needs to gain skills working a traditional job.
 
Tard Baby has just tweeted a link to her thoughts on book blurbing and her novel.
What am I missing? The real "blurb" is the unattributed summary on the back cover. The other contributions are correctly labelled: "praise." Their task is not to re-summarise the novel, or substantively review it, but to sell it. I have no idea why you would take a potshot at someone willing to praise your book.
 
Meanwhile Joe is writing 6 more books on is favorite V-Tubers, The Bee Movie, the intersection Libs Of TikTok and Jean-Luc Godard, a reassessment of the poetry of Jordan Peterson, trans expression in the novelization of the move Free Willy, and a selection of his best Instagram posts.
Why I can't get behind "At least Joe..." posts. Asking who's better is a fool's errand. That said, give me an honest-to-God retard over the self-satisfied, feigned cunning of a malicious midwit.

I'm in a disgusted mood as I finally resign my dream to farm one small patch of Joedom, Pleasure and Efficacy (certainly a patch well-fertilised with utter shit). I've read his sources extensively. I love George Eliot. Joe can't really read, in the sense of extracting meaning. So I thought I'd be the right man for the job. And yet there are no lolz here. It's just fucking soul-destroying. He'll analyse a passage from Eliot with all the skill of a burnt out middle school teacher holding forth on Lord of the Flies, with all the same mediocre assumptions -- the author has a simple, easy-to-articulate goal, and achieves it in passage X using techniques X, Y, Z. It won't surprise anyone here that he doesn't have a genuine artistic bone in his body.

Originally I wrote out something like a refutation of his thoughts on Eliot, but why spread this virus? How can someone be so wrong and yet so boring?
 
Back