US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
It’s the (D) way, screech about equity while practicing none of it yourself. It’s why I truly don’t understand the ‘vote blue no matter who’ crowd when Newsom thinks of and treats them like their his paypig house niggers.
Vote Blue is a cult, enforced by Media and educational dominance.
 
...

Oh.

He was Antifa.

Lets assume he wasn't a glowy asset gone rogue, or someone they were grooming to a budget increase that got lucky. When I hear "encrypted messaging app" unless they're bullshitting, I immediately think of Antifa using Signal in their affinity group model to avoid crackdowns.

This would explain a bit of the hesitancy. If it became pretty damned clear to them that the not-domestic terrorists they've been allowing to burn cities down in the summers of love took a shot at the Once and Future President, all hell would break loose and there would be some seriously awkward questions for the left.
Makes a shit ton of sense but that doesn't entirely explain the fed phone data. Unless they have some sloppy or loose agents
View attachment 6229124


Nothing makes a side look better than responding to geopolitical crises with middle school pranks. Really conveys the seriousness with which they take all of this.

If they were really so very scared of these people, wouldn't they want to avoid the increased aggression and decreased decisionmaking ability that would result from sleep depriving them for a night? But they're not actually afraid, and they actually want to inspire more aggression. That's the whole point. Middle schoolers.
I mean.... Its a biblical reference. So kiddos to them for being creative actually.
"If we don't protect Israel, Iran will go on a world conquest run"
Oh fuck off. He's been trying to get us to invade Iran sense the 90s at least
lol bibi just got them all to clap for trump
Interesting. Trump needs to be very careful with him. It's practically a deal with the devil unless bibi really needs a way to get out of the war he's in. I've been hearing talk the Israeli situation on the ground is rocky at best. High casualties that can't be easily replenished and some discontent at home.
wouldn't that open them up to credit card fraud liabilities?
So what's to stop someone from joining up pretending to be onboard and just going nuts with there money? Or am I reading it wrong?
The site used to be the best place to follow the Ukraine War, too, until they "partitioned" the discussion into a couple of hug-boxes.
Russian hug box is more reliable friend.
 
Oh, I agree. I personally cannot name a single Democrat who isn't a sinister and horrible person at this point. lol. They've got nobody who has a clean slate that they can prop up. I just think that the Democrats are oblivious and egotistical enough to not be aware of that. As much as I hate to say it, I think that Newsom would be the most viable because of his speaking skills? But the dude is Patrick Bateman himself

Barack Obama was a great politician for himself, but he truly has the opposite of the Midas Touch when it comes to endorsing/selecting most candidates. Remember, it was under Obama's watch that the DNC basically went bankrupt by 2015 until the Clintons came in and were able to get some money to them (which is why Hillary was the chosen one in 2016). Obama bankrupting the DNC is probably what cost Joe Biden his Presidential aspirations for 2016, which ultimately led to the party "giving Joe Biden his long-awaited due" in 2020 by rigging the primaries for him ... And now we're here in this absolute clusterfuck of an election. lol.
I don’t think Obama ever was a great politician. I’ve come to the idea that he effectively was a collective effort by multiple parties. He was always artificially pushed forward by certain parties (Weather Underground members and Talented 10 niggers) going back to the 2004 DNC. It basically was another MLK Jr. where they made him the face of their movement, but more of a gay narcissist than a typical black preacher who’s more aggressively into swinging.

I think he’s a puppet who enjoys it though. To the point where he can dance on his own because he dances how they want him to dance regardless. He has power because he’ll do what people want him to do. Maybe @Gehenna has better rumors about how Obama is, but I always felt like he’s less of a Shogun and more the Emperor. He’s not the real power, but he’s been given the illusion of it in the party because the actual leaders don’t want the spot light.
 
"I did great. There are no wars. It'll be Kamala's problem soon. I'm going to cure cancer with moon shots. Later bitches."
That is bullshit. Wh have had troops in Iraq even after the withdrawal of US forces in 2010. Obama said the same lie that we didn't have "boots on the ground" we have like 7 army units getting ready to deploy before the end of the year overseas. Just because we aren't at war in no way means that we don't have troops fighting in north Africa or other places every day.

This is from 2017 but it explains it better then I can. Sorry.

"Thousands Of Troops Are Deployed To Combat Zones, But We Haven’t Declared War In Decades"

 
At this point I'm starting to think that the best thing for the Democratic party would be to take a massive L. Have them take a step back and look at all the reasons they fucked up that bad and reconsider some things. These narrow victories and losses the past few elections have gotten both sides content with their base and complacent. The Dems especially have a laundry list of shady shit and media lies that will dog them for years to come.

Their only hope is to reimagine what they're actually about and the only way that can happen is if they get hit hard enough. Really hard. I don't think it'll happen in this election though.
 
That is bullshit. Wh have had troops in Iraq even after the withdrawal of US forces in 2010. Obama said the same lie that we didn't have "boots on the ground" we have like 7 army units getting ready to deploy before the end of the year overseas. Just because we aren't at war in no way means that we don't have troops fighting in north Africa or other places every day.

This is from 2017 but it explains it better then I can. Sorry.

"Thousands Of Troops Are Deployed To Combat Zones, But We Haven’t Declared War In Decades"

Others called this out too. So you aren't alone in calling it bullshit. So know this: You aren't alone in this assessment. Like most of the time, he's just telling lies.
 
At this point I'm starting to think that the best thing for the Democratic party would be to take a massive L. Have them take a step back and look at all the reasons they fucked up that bad and reconsider some things. These narrow victories and losses the past few elections have gotten both sides content with their base and complacent. The Dems especially have a laundry list of shady shit and media lies that will dog them for years to come.

Their only hope is to reimagine what they're actually about and the only way that can happen is if they get hit hard enough. Really hard. I don't think it'll happen in this election though.
I agree, but it's hard to just "take" the massive L after riling up their voting base about how Democracy is on the verge of not existing by the end of this year, lol. They are telling everyone that it's the end of America as we know it, basically.

If Trump wins, and Trump wins big, then the stink of how the Democrats have acted is going to stick to them for years to come.
 
Mike, you're being a bigger faggot than Wii U. If he chooses to assimilate into society, not bother anyone with his choices, I do not give one solitary fuck. Most of the modern party doesn't give a fuck, either.

How do fags "assimilate" into polite society, pray tell? If they had even the slightest interest in restraint or compromise, you and I would not be subsidizing prophylactic AIDS pills on insurance.

And spare me the lolbert bullshit. Even if fags had not engaged in incessant activism for the past half century, leading to the present circumstances where children are given constant suggestions that they need to "question/explore their sexuality", propaganda about faggotry being high status, and explicit instruction on how to have anal sex, the very fact that fags are engaging in disease-mongering behavior and corrupting the morals of others is "bothering me".

As for purchasing children, no one should be able to purchase children, regardless of their situation. The Red Market is alive and well, it's horrifying that women are renting their wombs to pay their rents and feed the children that are already here just so others can avoid the unpleasantries of life. We don't allow people to buy hearts, why do we allow them to buy customized down-to-the-genome children?

Indeed, and the practice of adopting out foreign children is also disgusting, if not as unnatural. Children by rights should have a stable family, with a father and mother: you know, the one afforded by a real marriage.
 
If Trump wins, and Trump wins big, then the stink of how the Democrats have acted is going to stick to them for years to come.
In a sane world, they would be laughed at. In Clown World, they should still be laughed at.

The stink in question is already sticking, and the sheer insanity of things that have been happening probably put them under a lot more scrutiny. People in the thread giving their anecdotal evidence of the landscaping being done on Kamala isn't working, how they wouldn't vote for "that weird bitch," and now the FEC related lawsuit that puts eyes on the actual anti-democracy stunt they pulled priming her as the candidate.

There's only so much you can ignore, yeah?
 
I don’t think Obama ever was a great politician. I’ve come to the idea that he effectively was a collective effort by multiple parties. He was always artificially pushed forward by certain parties (Weather Underground members and Talented 10 niggers) going back to the 2004 DNC. It basically was another MLK Jr. where they made him the face of their movement, but more of a gay narcissist than a typical black preacher who’s more aggressively into swinging.

I think he’s a puppet who enjoys it though. To the point where he can dance on his own because he dances how they want him to dance regardless. He has power because he’ll do what people want him to do. Maybe @Gehenna has better rumors about how Obama is, but I always felt like he’s less of a Shogun and more the Emperor. He’s not the real power, but he’s been given the illusion of it in the party because the actual leaders don’t want the spot light.
Obama is an empty hat. The man mainly wanted the prestige of the presidency and was all too willing to be a puppet of the Uniparty. He was, in many ways, the perfect puppet and what the Uniparty was hoping to do, some fucking how, with Biden. A man who has charm in spades, could speak eloquently, hit the DEI boxes to show general 'progress', and who had no desires to actually rule himself. He was the greatest House Nigger to ever live.
 
I agree, but it's hard to just "take" the massive L after riling up their voting base about how Democracy is on the verge of not existing by the end of this year, lol. They are telling everyone that it's the end of America as we know it, basically.

If Trump wins, and Trump wins big, then the stink of how the Democrats have acted is going to stick to them for years to come.
I think that it could be a good move to let Trump win. You would think that it would be bad because of their hysteria, but this is the identical hysteria that happened when Trump beat Hillary, and wouldn't you know it, 4 years later their voter base plum forgot everything they said (including how they claimed it was election fraud). What it would do in their favor is energize the voter base by saying "we can't lose again!" Especially if they play it up so it feels unfair that they lost somehow. Then they can rage and riot for 4 years, blame that on Trump, and weaponize the frustration of losing with women twice to get any female candidate into office that they want.

The only reason I don't think they're going to do that is because why do that when they can just cheat.
 
Boogies Cancer said:
Does the federal government have the right to take your picture? Yes. Yes they do. It's not at all controversial (legally).

But does the government have the legal right to capture your image WITHOUT your consent and then do whatever it wants with that photo? Has it been tested in a court of law? Has Congress given that legal right to the federal government?

You don’t have to wear a tinfoil hat or be a conspiracy nut to see that there are WAY TOO MANY “coincidences“ involved in that shyte show in Butler, PA.


 
Last edited by a moderator:
You don’t have to wear a tinfoil hat or be a conspiracy nut to see that there are WAY TOO MANY “coincidences“ involved in that shyte show in Butler, PA.


View attachment 6232375
There was no shooter trumps ear just did that, all of it, including firing the bullets. Wray said "8 cartridges were recovered from the roof" which is the term for unfired rounds meaning the alleged shooter never fired. Also the "shooter" was gay and black according to the 23 and me they ran on his corpse.
 
My 2024 Election predictions:

1. Kamala Harris will not only be the Democratic nominee, she will be the next president.

2. Biden will outlive Carter and live for at least another ten years, enjoying retirement while also serving as a key advisor for Harris.

3. Obama is withholding his endorsement for after the convention in order to respect his office as a former president.

4. Trump will not only lose, but also die in prison, alone, and without a penny left to his name.

5. Harris will win by a landslide:
IMG_1704.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back