US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
This is how women exert power in society. You’re not strong enough to exert power with physical might. if women wanted power (and women have done, don’t doubt that) you do it using males as proxies if you want to control males and society, and you do it via consensus to control females.

In the older world, this is Agrippa, or a matriarch controlling her daughters in law because her mother in law made her life hell. In the modern world, you’ll get groups of women. One queen bee, a subgroup of women below that who are enforcers, and below them, the mass. Always a few outcasts to really flex in as well. The bee will set the tone of what’s allowed and sic her enforcers hard on anyone who objects or challenges. This ends up with the mass auto policing and also going after dissenters in the hope that they will go up the hierarchy. Women who are not outcasts but do not play along are met with quite astonishing amounts of vitriol. If you’d like a Hollywood version, go watch Heathers. We wear pink on Wednesdays, Gretchen.

Our problem now is that this power mode is being used across the whole of society, rather than mummies groups and church committees in small villages. Women care desperately about fitting in because ostracism is social death. There’s work done in some primates that have these hierarchies as well, and the lower down females get so stressed they actually get sick. It’s clearly deeply embedded in us
Basically what you're saying.. These types of women are ruining the world irl and should never be in power, and that frankly means all women with much power. All bitter, destructive, and hateful behind the sheen.

 
In the modern world, you’ll get groups of women. One queen bee, a subgroup of women below that who are enforcers, and below them, the mass. Always a few outcasts to really flex in as well. The bee will set the tone of what’s allowed and sic her enforcers hard on anyone who objects or challenges. This ends up with the mass auto policing and also going after dissenters in the hope that they will go up the hierarchy. Women who are not outcasts but do not play along are met with quite astonishing amounts of vitriol. If you’d like a Hollywood version, go watch Heathers. We wear pink on Wednesdays, Gretchen.
I feel bad for women. There's very little in this world more satisfying than disrupting a harmonious groupthink session with "that's fucking retarded and if you don't like me saying so, you can suck my diiiiiiiiiiiiick."
 
They really don’t for all the things they want to do. Well run cities with well planned budgets can prioritize what needs to be done and they can sometimes get most of it taken care of.

The pothole cities (almost always Leftist) keep electing the same types of people (Leftists) to lead them because ideology is more important to them than competency.
They do have plenty of tax revenue. The reason those cities are shitholes is because those tax dollars aren't used to run the city. They're used for the official's personal pet projects. Budgeting? Lol city maintenance is the bare minimum they're allowed to get away with. They don't give a FUCK. It's all corrupt from the top down.
 
Basically what you're saying.. These types of women are ruining the world irl and should never be in power, and that frankly means all women with much power. All bitter, destructive, and hateful behind the sheen.

View attachment 6233799
I have no idea what they're saying but I'm convinced they're summoning demons
 
I would like to remind everybody that YOU DON'T HAVE TO TELL THE WORLD HOW YOU PLAN TO VOTE. Hell you can even lie about it before and after the fact. WHY IS ANYONE TELLING PEOPLE HOW THEY ARE GOING TO VOTE?
Jesus Herbert Walker Christ, people.
Sorry but I yelled at folks all over the damn place last couple elections because it was causing so much unnecessary IRL drama.
Keep your shit private, including what comes out of your real-life physical mouth.
 
Basically what you're saying.. These types of women are ruining the world irl and should never be in power, and that frankly means all women with much power. All bitter, destructive, and hateful behind the sheen.

View attachment 6233799
The first HR girl is just the dissolution of this phenotype.

 
Our problem now is that this power mode is being used across the whole of society, rather than mummies groups and church committees in small villages. Women care desperately about fitting in because ostracism is social death. There’s work done in some primates that have these hierarchies as well, and the lower down females get so stressed they actually get sick. It’s clearly deeply embedded in us
It's because it's part of a necessary societal and evolutionary function. Women are agents of change and as much as I hate their conformist behavior, the world can't exist without it. Change is an important element to keep society functional.

Basically what you're saying.. These types of women are ruining the world irl and should never be in power, and that frankly means all women with much power. All bitter, destructive, and hateful behind the sheen.
They can be in power, just not on the scale and as long as they have been. The West has been a primarily feminist society for far too long.
 
These types of women are ruining the world irl and should never be in power,
Nobody who wants power should be allowed anywhere near it.
Can’t remember who said that but I think of it often.
When you think about historically ‘strongmen’ taking power, there’s a payoff in that if you lived in a scenario of bands of warring tribes, you want the biggest strongest bastard you can in charge. Even better if he’s a humane but deadly philosopher king (highest form of government?)

It’s not just women ruining the world - nowadays you don’t need physical power to do the power thing, and that’s allowed people who would never have had a chance at it to get hold of it. Those people are of lesser quality.
Back to the philosopher warriors, you can see why that was the ideal. You had the strength tempered with a strict moral code. Your big man would fight to keep the group safe but not abuse the group. Now we have neither of those things. The selectors for power are purely how far you will go and base cunning. Neither of those guarantee quality.
Base cunning has always been a factor of course - back to a biology analogy, in deer the big stag who is the best quality gets the harem and fathers the majority of the offspring, but there’s a bit of sneaking around the edges by smaller more cunning stags of lower quality. What happens to the group if the big stags are all gone and the weedy sneaky ones gather all the babies for a few generations? Clearly nothing good, because deer grow those massive (and they’re a big drag on them) antlers and fight to the death to be the best.

TPTB love the sex wars because if men and women realised that strong communities and families were the way out of this mess, we’d all start working together
 
View attachment 6233514

Statement from US Park Police on why they were unable to stop the flag burnings yesterday.

TL;DR They only had 29 officers and were given no assistance by Department of Interior. They were vastly outnumbered.
I pilled someone yesterday with that shit. It was the video of that poor park cop being drug to the ground while they were trying to arrest one of the violent protestors and they were just going at them all like zombies.

All the security personnel was too busy keeping Netanyahu safe, I'm sure. God forbid someone didn't clap when he used a vowel or uttered "Israel".
Do you have any references for this? I've been led to believe that Catholics, which I assume you mean by "the church," have always taken the stance that abortion is immoral, but as a non-Catholic, I can't say for certain. My quick research suggests that abortion has been condemned since the 1st century. And you just stated that abortion is murder. Obviously, murder has always been considered a sin. Is there a distinction you're making when you say "allowed"? Or are you just making shit up?
Okay, I should have said "permissible" but I found this all very interesting myself. Early Church found abortion to be wrong, but the timeline was different than now. Check this article out. They thought ensoulment was delayed (when the soul entered the fetus, a 40-day period after conception), so you had a period of time where the child could leave the body, and it was acceptable. No soul, not a person. It was debated for centuries.

Abortion didn't become murder until the late 16th century. And even then, under certain circumstances, you could have an abortion during the pre-ensoulment period (to save a woman's life, for example.)

As we moved through time the rules evolved, they weren't monsters.

E.g.: in the early 20th century, they would make workarounds like you couldn't remove an ectopic embryo, but you COULD remove an infected ectopic tube, which included the embryo, to save her. It would indirectly kill the child, and was an indirect abortion.

People act like it's been a consistent message throughout time, but Catholics have developed with their understanding of science and the world.

Which I think is how it should be.
 
@Sniperwoof is correct. If you wanted to, and if you scraped certain thread clusters and fed them through an AI, you could probably recreate the flow charts and decision trees / conversation leading trees they have been given, there’s so much of it. They all sound the same, use the same phraseology, the same keywords and keyword linking patterns and respond to the same triggering keywords or concepts, with the same deboonking or arguments. Some are clearly bots, from the limited stimulus response and others are clearly very much human (poor sods, I wonder how long they last before going native…)

It’s not just Reddit either. There are people embedded in every reasonable sized comment section or message board. There’s your military intel types like Elgin, there’s the Uks 88th and behavioural nudge people and there’s political policy staffers and big standard journalists as well. The former take the temperature, they try to flood places (4chan has been very damaged by this.) They also start threads in very specific ways to gauge public sentiment on issues.
Ive personally been in multiple threads in bloody mums net of all places where one has popped up and you think, ‘aye aye, here’s a policy gauge thread’ and two weeks later it pops up in the media as a concept with tweaking based on ‘the blindingly obvious ’ stuff that was pointed out to them.
A huge amount of public behavioural manipulation is done like this.
Here are a few counterpoints to consider:

1) It is extremely difficult to tell the difference between an extremely stupid human and a bot. Bots that masquerade as teenagers routinely pass the Turing Test.

2) According to my smol brain zero reading comprehension of his source, “most addicted” is calculated by the average time spent in Reddit. Did you know that military families are housed on Air Force bases? I wonder what those military wives do with themselves all day while their husbands are out flying airplanes? Obviously, that means they work a side-gig for the NSA because no woman ever would sip wine and browse Reddit for free.

3) Eglin AFB has zero association with the NSA. The NSA is headquartered in Fort Meade, situated comfortably between Washington DC and Baltimore. There were data centers in Texas, Georgia, Colorado, Hawaii, and Tennessee but they were all replaced by their CNCI data center in Camp Williams, Utah.

4) @Sniperwoof is a tranny
 
Nobody who wants power should be allowed anywhere near it.
Can’t remember who said that but I think of it often.
When you think about historically ‘strongmen’ taking power, there’s a payoff in that if you lived in a scenario of bands of warring tribes, you want the biggest strongest bastard you can in charge. Even better if he’s a humane but deadly philosopher king (highest form of government?)

It’s not just women ruining the world - nowadays you don’t need physical power to do the power thing, and that’s allowed people who would never have had a chance at it to get hold of it. Those people are of lesser quality.
Back to the philosopher warriors, you can see why that was the ideal. You had the strength tempered with a strict moral code. Your big man would fight to keep the group safe but not abuse the group. Now we have neither of those things. The selectors for power are purely how far you will go and base cunning. Neither of those guarantee quality.
Base cunning has always been a factor of course - back to a biology analogy, in deer the big stag who is the best quality gets the harem and fathers the majority of the offspring, but there’s a bit of sneaking around the edges by smaller more cunning stags of lower quality. What happens to the group if the big stags are all gone and the weedy sneaky ones gather all the babies for a few generations? Clearly nothing good, because deer grow those massive (and they’re a big drag on them) antlers and fight to the death to be the best.

TPTB love the sex wars because if men and women realised that strong communities and families were the way out of this mess, we’d all start working together
My default position is not to be anti-women, but Goddammit they're pushing me all my life. Sometimes they're like trying to deal with radical islam.

Bitches be crazy isn't just a cozy saying. More women then men have mental illness when they have much easier lives than the dudes do. It's a fundamental genetic/hormone flaw with them, and we need to apply jobs and voting power accordingly.

Historically women vote -> more gibs -> more 'feels' -> more insanity and commie -> Hate Men (above all).

Look at all this going on now, women in power wrecks things. I don't see how they're any different than have blacks running things.
 
Last edited:
Way too much doomposting in this thread. Welcome to the honeymoon phase, where Kamala gets a PR blitz from the DNC and their lapdogs. Give it time.

One big mistake the GOP needs to cut the fuck out right now is harping on her "DEI hire" status. It's true, but it's normie poison and makes her look vaguely sympathetic.
DEI is extremely unpopular across broad sections of the populace. Just because people have been bullied into resentful silence doesn't mean they suddenly clutch pearls about calling out DEI. People keep forgetting that the loudest wine aunt voices are being artificially inflated and don't represent a majority.
You need normies to pay attention to what a detestable person she is, how she stands for nothing other than whatever is convenient in the moment, how bad her existing record is as Cali AG and VP, how she has absolutely no charisma or poise, how unprepared and unserious she is when dealing with the actual issues.
People are very much looking for an honest politician above all else. Almost everyone knows they are being lied to, most of them just aren't willing to burn down their established lives to do something drastic about it. Calling her out as a DEI hire from the beginning will hit harder with every mistake she makes and word salad she spews. People want answers and solutions, and Trump offers that. Kamala offers empty "But Trump! Racism!" and people, especially normies are sick to death of hearing it. Every time woke shit gets inserted into any form of entertainment, people tune out. Period. For all the crying about mainstream media, lefty nightly news only draws 1 in 1000 Americans.
Showing people why she's incompetent is infinitely more effective than boomering about "DEI". Show her trying to explain Ukraine-Russia and failing to rise above a 2nd grade response that would have gotten a C-. Highlight her hyena-cackling when asked any question she doesn't want to answer in a press gaggle. Push for her to do debates or have press conferences. After all, she's "young and sharp", there's no excuse for not doing a ton of unscripted appearances. Push hard for her to be in front of cameras without a script. Especially since she's already floating the "Trump's age" issue.
Trump at this point has a long track record of being correct in the long term. Start the DEI calls now, it puts pressure on Kamala's ego to prove she's not just an empty suit. It also stands out that the DEI Democrats are having a shitshow of a convention, contrasted to the RNC which was smoothly run and radiated unity amongst the party. People are watching infrastructure fall apart around them. People are watching air planes falling apart because of shitty maintenance, crime increasing along with raging inflation. People voted for Biden because he was supposed to be a return to normal. It's clear the Democrats will only lead to more chaos. Most people don't want a revolution or political chaos. Calling out DEI as people watch it happen makes sure they don't forget.
She's an infinitely beatable candidate, but going "HURR DURRR DEI HIRE" isn't going to win the independent vote.
The coastal states no longer matter in politics. DEI is poison in the midwest, (where most of the battleground states are) because it's poor whites who have disproportionately suffered from the last 4 years of it.
 
When both SS and FBI are so incompetent, they look to each other for information.
Its a circle of bureaucracy, for show. They have no intention of doing a proper investigation because it would come out they allowed security to be lax for months in order to assassinate trump.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back