Approved 2024-07-25 - Stebbins: DMCA via Gimp Slave

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Do we intervene?

  • WARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!! WAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!

    Votes: 819 37.3%
  • nah

    Votes: 1,377 62.7%

  • Total voters
    2,196
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Is it impossible to make a crowd funder to raise the 1800 usd needed? Granted it gives the asshole some money but not a huge amount of money. He'll then need to find another idiot, go trough a couple of years more legal harassment before he can try again.

Feels like people are worried about things getting overextended. Definitely a difficult balance to strike between necessary and good litigation and to much.
 
You should consider the following before deciding whether to intervene:

1. Do settlements set precedent in the US? (In most places they are considered  dicta and do not, but I don't know about the US). Reason I mention this is that if there is no precedent set by this, forcing a judge to overturn it could be actively harmful should he refuse, thereby converting it into a judgement which  does set precedent.

2. What manner of intervention is considered? Would it entail sponsoring Jones appealing against an unconstitutional decision, or something else?

In the end the decision is yours. I suggest talking it over with your attorney first.
 
I say no.

Jones is a luckless, no-hope retard, but he agreed to the terms of the settlement; they were not imposed upon him by the court. The fact that he was stupid enough to agree to it is his burden to bear. So forget doing it for his sake.

As for the cons, these two are the big ones:
  • We're already involved in 3 other lawsuits
  • Entering litigation voluntarily is generally considered "fucking retarded" in legal circles.
You're already tied up in three lawsuits; don't be a fucking retard by getting into a fourth if not doing it is a reasonable option.

ETA: Jarrod Jones is fat, and not only would I not have sex with him, I would not contribute more money toward your legal fund to save him from himself.
 
:null:the direct consequence is censoring the site. That's what no means here. A retard gets he wants at the expense of the free flow of information.

My meaningless vote is changed from reluctant no to reluctant yes. I'm still unclear on exactly what angle fighting it will use but we can't let the idiots win. Or maybe somebody offers a very thorough summary of this whole spat and video while providing a large amount of commentary. Stabbins and Greer both disgust me, also because of the state's willingness to be weaponized on their behalf at the expense of regular people, retarded or no.
 
Last edited:
The fact a court is allowed to just put a man in indentured servitude like this over nothing is insane. I would support intervening if only to stop it from ever being used as a precedent to escalate shit.
Speaking of, if some noname court in California is allowing debt slavery and servitude, what's stopping me from grabbing an illegal in California and making him my own nigger?
 
While $150,000 is a lot of money, in terms of lawsuits it's not that much money. I don't think getting involved in this case is a wise choice when there are other that pose a much more direct threat.
 
The best reason to pursue this is to hurt the Misery Golem. I'm all for it.
 
As fun as it would be to whack Acertard's peepee by intervening in this case, I'm not sure if it's the highest and best use of the Farms' legal resources. There are already enough fires burning without pouring gasoline onto the smoldering waste paper basket in the corner.

I'm going to be a faggot and abstain from voting, but I support Dear Feeder in whatever course of action he chooses to take.
 
I will support Null whatever he decides.

I'd stay away from this case though. The courts are untrustworthy, unreliable and sometimes unreasonable. This could become very costly, and still not get you the outcome you want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pee Cola and Roscoe
Hard to support the guy that cow tipped on his public Gmail account and found out

One thing I would support is putting a picture of Jerrod in that place where you sign up to the site and it warns you about enrolling using an email address and user name that you've used elsewhere. Picture of the slave and a link to this thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mankirk
Which is litigation involving the Kiwi Farms. See table #1: we have been DMCA'd by Stebbins via Jarrod Jones, and pros #2, declawing this fat idiot is a direct benefit.
For what its worth I say do it.
Fuck that fly eating Gobblemonster.
As long as its not going to negatively affect us.
He shouldn't be able to abuse the system the way he does.
 
It is apparent to me that misery golem wanted this settlement with this slavery clause so he could bypass his own status as a vexatious litigant in Arkansas and continue to spread misery through his proxy slave boy.
In the sense of it affecting the Farms, this is a massive stretch; one DCMA complaint doesn´t establish a pattern. You are just pushing for a retarded slap fight because... MURICA! Knock it off.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: WonderWino
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back