Elaine April Gertler-Miller / Elaine Georgie Gertler-Miller / Elaine Miller / Trollcow / "Pissminge" / Z3R6 / Echo - Pisswhore, liar, future fed, faildoxxer, swatter, Imageboard apostate, sektur bicycle, sock enthusiast, linked her nudes to a 14 year old, cut "Josh Moon" into her thighs, genuine cautionary tale about wanting Internet fame, Torswats orbiter, drug addict

[Axiom.]

I found this shit, this is too funny

Report her assholes, we stopped giving a shit.

 

[chromebookgamer]

I found this shit, this is too funny
View attachment 6203786
Report her assholes, we stopped giving a shit.

I am willing to bet this is Peelaine herself trying to score more money for whatever drug she is addicted to this week.

 

[Sprate Header]

A well-overdue post about who exactly Elaine is working with on Telegram.

You may remember these posts of her's, bizarrely claiming I'm somebody by the name of "Perfidious One / Melungeon Menace":
(a)

Spoiler: Schizo Screencap Dump

Spoiler: More Screencaps

(https://archive.ph/1dXA5)

(a)



It's clear to anyone who isn't mentally ill that these accusations are coming from one of the Telegram groups that Elaine has attached herself to. But what exactly can we glean about this group from Elaine's posts? Well, shortly after posting the above tweets, Elaine began to use these accusations as a means to attack BxBullet, a 764 investigator that I've interacted with in the past, showing that the Telegram anon who was feeding her this narrative likely did it purely with the intent of attacking Bx:


Elaine also sent the below threat to Bx on behalf of this Telegram group later that day:

(https://archive.ph/IVxIt)

However, about a week later, Elaine accidentally leaked a bit too much info about who she was working with:
(a)
>Forwarded from Mercury the Megafed
>also falsely labeling another person as 764 (i.e. "BX764")

This Mercury person just so happens to be someone Bx is already familiar with:
(a)

And in case there was any doubt, Elaine confirms that she is indeed involved with this Mercury person:

(https://ghostarchive.org/archive/QQPFt)

So who is Mercury?

Let's start with a frankly wild horrorcow crossover, with this old 2021 tweet from notorious zoophile Toggle the Rat / Buck Riley:


(https://archive.ph/oGeB2)

It seems that back in 2021, Mercury was sending people meme edits of the animal snuff video Shovel Dog and what appears to be an animal crush video. But surely this is just an isolated incident, right?

(a)

>Mercury used to spam beastiaity in my inbox back [in 2021]
>[Mercury] keeps slandering me

This Mark Bauermeister person appears to be claiming the same thing as Toggle (that Mercury used to openly distribute zoosadistic material in 2021), and also appears to corroborate this claim with an example of Mercury attempting to frame Bauermeister as a zoophile, similarly to how he's recently attempted to smear both myself and Bx as members of 764.

But surely both Toggle and Bauermeister must be randomly maliciously lying about this specific individual Telegram anon who wouldn't reach any notable level of relevancy for another two to three years and that they both have no other identifiable personal relations to, right?


(https://archive.ph/IlEro)
>[Mercury hangs] out in telegram channels where Niners [O9A] and 764 kids spam bestiality and child abuse.

Okay, so what if three separate people who have nothing to do with each other all independently claim Mercury is heavily involved with animal gore / animal abuse / child abuse in various ways? Surely his Telegram channel is squeaky clean - Elaine said he's a pedophile hunter after all, and we all know how reliable Elaine is! But what exactly is Mercury's current Telegram channel?



>Exposing Rejects 3: 333 Edition

Let's take a look at this argument between someone named SkuntPunch and Mercury's channel:

<You even admitted to enjoying animal cruelty.
>I enjoy all sorts of cruelty.


<You yourself have asked people to send you cruelty vids
<you have spammed animal cruelty in chats out of rage
>The difference is I'm not a hypocrite about it
>I never said I don't like animal cruelty.

Spoiler: Video proof of these messages

This is a plain-English admission that all of the above claims about Mercury are true, all said in the exact same Telegram channel that Elaine herself shares to her Twitter. Elaine is demonstrably working with open animal gore-sharing zoosadists to sexually harass, dox, and threaten a woman who is investigating the pedophilic sextortion ring that Elaine has attached herself to. There is no "anti-pedo 764" - Elaine is just blatantly repeating the lies of an open, proud zoosadist to cover her and her new child molester friends' asses.

Spoiler: Individual Attachments

(https://archive.ph/EpjAl)

How many children do you think Elaine has watched get extorted into cutting themselves?
How many times do you think Elaine participated?



(https://archive.ph/0aOTL)

---

Anyway, Elaine's new Twitter account is @cowtrolls:

(All Tweets Viewable Here) (Followers)

 

[Axiom.]

Damn, I really thought she fucked off this time.

In all seriousness, wow, it's almost as if my prediction of either dying young or going to prison will be in her future. Well, I'm glad to know that she took a break from flicking her bean to Dear Sneeder to telling people to cut themselves, and protect pedophile sadists like the true poster child for Ruben Sim Derangement syndrome other than @Peppermint Swirl she is. I like she continually talks shit on Bx and Jim, calling them pedophile sadists, while they didn't leak any nudes to a 14 year old or being on cocaine during the photoshoot.

Ahh, yes, it is other people that are pedophiles and not dear sweet Elaine @LoreFlexer I'll take my autistic sticker now please.

 

[AnOminous]

It seems that back in 2021, Mercury was sending people meme edits of the animal snuff video Shovel Dog and what appears to be an animal crush video, which is a federal crime to distribute.

Found facially unconstitutional 8-1 in United States v. Stevens, 559 U.S. 460 (2010).

 

[Sprate Header]

Found facially unconstitutional 8-1 in United States v. Stevens, 559 U.S. 460 (2010).

Informative! So are the laws that the monkeyfuckers were charged under when they distributed their torture videos something different? Or can you only get in trouble for distribution if you had a direct hand in its creation?

 

[everybody in Portugal]

I see Elaine read that we got bored of her and got assmad and decided to dance for us again. She's so predictable.

Great rundown @Sprate Header, idk how you have the patience to wade through all these retard chat groups and animalkiller messages threads. Semper fi, brother.

Looks like she's so fixated on taking down her perceived enemies that she will believe and parrot basically anything these people tell her. Can't tell if actually paranoid or just supermegatard. She couldn't even wait until September the whateveritwas that she said she'd be away 'til to do all this, because without a bunch of internet eyes on her apparently she will wither and die...

 

[Sprate Header]

I see Elaine read that we got bored of her and got assmad and decided to dance for us again. She's so predictable.

Great rundown @Sprate Header, idk how you have the patience to wade through all these retard chat groups and animalkiller messages threads. Semper fi, brother.

Looks like she's so fixated on taking down her perceived enemies that she will believe and parrot basically anything these people tell her. Can't tell if actually paranoid or just supermegatard. She couldn't even wait until September the whateveritwas that she said she'd be away 'til to do all this, because without a bunch of internet eyes on her apparently she will wither and die...

To be clear, these messages are from last month. They just haven't been covered to this extent yet (I put this post off for a while, lol).

 

[AnOminous]

Informative! So are the laws that the monkeyfuckers were charged under when they distributed their torture videos something different? Or can you only get in trouble for distribution if you had a direct hand in its creation?

Looks like the monkeyfucker got prosecuted under 18 U. S.C. § 48(f)(l). Stevens invalidated § 48(c)(1). They haven't ruled on (f)(1) but they wouldn't since he pled guilty. Same section, different law. Simply prohibiting distributing video of animal cruelty for profit is overbroad, because it could arguably even cover things like horse racing or rodeos, which will a significant minority of people view them as cruelty that should be outlawed, this doesn't mean it can be outlawed.

(f)Definitions.—In this section—
(1)the term “animal crushing” means actual conduct in which one or more living non-human mammals, birds, reptiles, or amphibians is purposely crushed, burned, drowned, suffocated, impaled, or otherwise subjected to serious bodily injury (as defined in section 1365 and including conduct that, if committed against a person and in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, would violate section 2241 or 2242);

This doesn't necessarily even mean this is constitutional, just that the defendant pled guilty so they aren't going to get to whether it would be constitutional in this case. So the specific ban on "crush" videos hasn't been attacked yet.

There's more though:

(2)the term “animal crush video” means any photograph, motion-picture film, video or digital recording, or electronic image that—
(A)depicts animal crushing; and
(B)is obscene; and
(3)the term “euthanizing an animal” means the humane destruction of an animal accomplished by a method that—
(A)produces rapid unconsciousness and subsequent death without evidence of pain or distress; or
(B)uses anesthesia produced by an agent that causes painless loss of consciousness and subsequent death.

Specifically "is obscene[.]"

Needless to say obviously producing such material would be illegal and could be evidence that you participated in producing it, which would just straight constitute animal cruelty and conspiracy to commit the same.

And "obscene" material is not constitutionally protected.

However, this is some of the specific detail of the case:

According to court documents, Bedra conspired with others to create and distribute the videos which depicted acts of sadistic violence against baby and adult monkeys, including having digits and limbs severed and being forcibly sodomized with a heated screwdriver.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/ohio-man-pleads-guilty-creating-and-distributing-videos-depicting-monkey-torture-and

https://archive.ph/qzs4W

I'd say that would almost certainly count as obscene.

(I think the (f)(1) language comes from the 2019 amendment.)

 

[everybody in Portugal]

The @cowtrolls Xitter doesn't appear anymore, but she does seem to be using @trollcowonIine as recently as this week. How many alts does she bloody have

 

[Sprate Header]

The @cowtrolls Xitter doesn't appear anymore

Still does for me
(https://ghostarchive.org/archive/CFm1I)

she does seem to be using @trollcowonIine

That's an impersonation account, not actually her

 

[everybody in Portugal]

Still does for me
(https://ghostarchive.org/archive/CFm1I)


That's an impersonation account, not actually her

Very odd, I wonder why it doesn't show up at my end.

Sorry for fake newsing you all, then. How do you even tell the difference between her and the fakes? She's basically a self-satirising engine at this point anyway!

 

[Kosher Salt]

Found facially unconstitutional 8-1 in United States v. Stevens, 559 U.S. 460 (2010).

How is this different from the distinction between "fucking a child" and "depictions of fucking a child"?

(I skimmed the rest of the order, so if they tried to dance that fine line somewhere I must've missed it.)

 

[AnOminous]

How is this different from the distinction between "fucking a child" and "depictions of fucking a child"?

Society has decided to make that distinction. While I'm not going to argue against it, as it's a losing argument, there's really no principled distinction other than the social consensus that that is the one crime that is uniquely abhorrent. It's sort of like how I'm not really a fan of capital punishment, but if they fry a sexually sadistic serial killer, I'm not going to care enough to protest it.

Also the current prohibition on "crush" requires it be "obscene" to be criminally punishable, which imports the relevant tests that have at least in theory preserved the First Amendment against anything beyond a narrow carve-out.

 

[Axiom.]

>Gender traitor that won't get picked


She is too fucking easy, I swear to god.

 

[Sprate Header]

View attachment 6238019View attachment 6238020

Yep, she's active again:


(https://ghostarchive.org/archive/jXz7e)

 

[Axiom.]

Yep, she's active again

Does England have special programs for the mentally retarded?

Uh oh, someone wants to be Lidl Drip again to get attention from Slavic American Pizza Man


Huh, I wonder who screenshots from the site and uses them for her arguments and self admittedly watches MATI, sorry gorl, looks likes he won't pick you either.

 

[everybody in Portugal]

Does England have special programs for the mentally retarded?

Provision is patchy since we broke the NHS and have cheerfully underfunded SEN all schools and social care for the past however long.

I'm sure her super rich aristo family can afford a privately hired tard wrangler for her though, they just don't love her enough to bother.

 

[Just A Butt]

so i guess she got "fired" from "interpol" or whatever?
do you think she even remembers that's why she was "leaving forever" again?

 

[Vesperus]

Can't tell if actually paranoid or just supermegatard.

¿Porque no los dos?