Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[StannisTheMannis]

Rekieta is going live with Chrissie Mayr tomorrow night.

View attachment 6237108

Here's a teaser of the level of interview to expect today (clip on Mayr's channel about Nick and the Fleshlight at the tattoo fest.).
Typical feminine cackling, contradiction, and cover-up.

https://youtu.be/LYEkg9Gf7jg?si=0fSii2DfLjIvs6_M

 

[Procrastinhater]

I just think people wouldn't have a burning hatred of Nick if he got nailed for guns and drugs instead of for child neglect/possibly endangerment.

If he had kept that shit away from his kids and been responsible I wouldn't care if he was shooting speedballs and collecting post 1986 machineguns.
Its the fact he let his dumb shit affect his kids that makes him despicable.

Looks like he's back on the shit again, his fucking activity police video he looks as bad as he did before he got bust. He looked a little better for a while after his arrest, but he's looking pale and strung out again.
I hope he turns up in court looking like a total junkie and tries to argue with the judge.

 

[LiquidKid]

I didn't really like them at first when I first started following Rickeita's thread, But I'm a fan now. Going to start watching their other stuff

I dunno. Their show is genuinely unwatchable without it being clipped and heavily edited, you can only tolerate the entire show being interrupted by “ten subs let’s go!!!!!” “Whoaaaa buddy” etc etc for so long. it’s just two idiots yelling while taking 4 hours to get through a 15 minute video because they pause after every syllable

 

[Vernon Dozier]

The weird Bible-thumping he does is straight out of the cult leader beginner handbook. If he would just be honest and say “yeah I don’t believe a lot of the Bible” and move on, but instead he twists the Bible to suit whatever bullshit he’s currently trying to pass on to his locals. He’s such a narcissist that just disagreeing with the Bible isn’t enough he has to have the true interpretation.

 

[holyhandgrenade]

Since we are talking about Mayr again friendly reminder that she used her thong/hand to wipe her shitty ass instead of just asking an employee for more toilet paper. She's a fucking retard.

 

[Long-time Lurker]

Imagine looking at this face, and after realizing this is Nick Rekieta, and not an actual sex offender portrait, you decide this is the person you want to bring on your show for an interview.

Prove Montagraph Nick isn't a sex offender.

Even Hollyweird has some standards, and Dax is a talentless hack.

Harvey Weinstein wanted his dick sucked, but only by women? Or maybe he isn't into men dressed as cows.

 

[Mike Stoklasas Spock Ears]

Here's a teaser of the level of interview to expect today (clip on Mayr's channel about Nick and the Fleshlight at the tattoo fest.).
Typical feminine cackling, contradiction, and cover-up.

https://youtu.be/LYEkg9Gf7jg?si=0fSii2DfLjIvs6_M

I bet she put out this clip to get a feel for how her audience will react to a stream with Rekieta (judging by the comments, not well!)

 

[DuranceVile]

Here's a teaser of the level of interview to expect today (clip on Mayr's channel about Nick and the Fleshlight at the tattoo fest.).
Typical feminine cackling, contradiction, and cover-up.

https://youtu.be/LYEkg9Gf7jg?si=0fSii2DfLjIvs6_M

Keanu calling her fiancé "Bisconte" is not helping the idea that all these women have big daddy issues. It's creepy seeing her continue to talk about Aaron like he's some monster after she spent so much time gassing him up as a hero who got out of a bad and abusive situation for the sake of his kids. Imagine having a strong opinion about Aaron at all.

I bet she put out this clip to get a feel for how her audience will react to a stream with Rekieta (judging by the comments, not well!)

She doesn't think he really did anything wrong too. I think her and her ilk are of the "if it feels good, do it" mindset. I don't get the impression she's super intelligent, so she may be genuinely surprised that the simpcast audience (I shudder to think what they're like) doesn't like the fake Christian cokefiend whose little daughter had to ask a policeman for clean clothes.

 

[MNPublicRecords]

4. A false positive of the girl getting cocaine in her hair can only be definitively ruled out by checking specific metabolic ratios of the para and meta hydroxy cocaine and benzoylecgonine metabolites. Does Minnesota monitoring do this? Unknown. According to @AltisticRight it seems their specific GC/MS probably resolves the presence and concentration of these structural isomers, but whether they are actually calculating the most state-of-the-art metabolic ratios is not known.
...
If Nick maintains that his daughter did not consume cocaine he should release the full test results and/or commission an independent test that checks the above three metabolic ratios. However it is my personal opinion that Nick's daughter ingested cocaine. Prove everyone wrong Nick.

It says segmented hair tests, it sounds from that like they aren't simply re-testing the hair, they are cutting it down in segments to be tested individually, probably to try to determine whether the positive result was a result of a single "accident" or not.

This is the only study any user has put forth so far which actually investigates the difference in metabolite ratio between external contaminant cocaine and cocaine use, and its results seem suggest there can often be ambiguity between the two IF working by the pre-2021 Society of Hair Testing guideline which suggests confirmation by ratio of BE/COC which this study indicates is actually one of the least definitive metabolite ratios. ...
The question is whether Minnesota Monitoring has updated their methodology to respond to relatively recent literature, or they are still using the BE/COC standard. If they use the BE/COC standard I think Nick could get a relatively cheap expert witness (read: not charging the lying fee) to come into court and confidently state that external contamination is highly plausible in this case based on current literature.

Why would this not be a line of argument used in a myriad of drug cases? Would not the 'one simple trick prosecutors HATE!' be patched soon after?

It’s clear from the last two info-drops that the current plan is to attack the lab that did the hair testing. Nick is requesting curriculum vitae (a career summary, think of a resume synopsis,) for all technicians involved in the testing, as well as his other obnoxious requests. Obnoxious meaning just that, compared to owning up to his crimes & potentially having his kids back home asap, maybe even by now.

Nick clearly isn’t focused on getting his kids home. Attacking the lab is not going to expedite the children returning to their normal environment & routines.
It’s as if he is confusing the two matters, his children’s welfare case & his criminal possession charges case. Nick is only complicating matters more with his grandstanding requests of Omega Laboratories. He’s actively making the matter more difficult, and the only tangible result so far is that the children’s welfare case has been pushed back by a month.

His Trial isn't going to be weeks long, calling forensic experts and shit. The Judge isn't gonna go for that. The testing of and for drugs is settled science, long accepted by the courts. The Court will not long tolerate this angle of bullshit.

Interesting new matter of public record attached. As many inferred from the oddly specific discovery demands in the parents' most recent motion, Nick's comment that "good news is coming my way" doesn't appear to have referred to any hair follicle retest by the state actually having come back negative, nor to a negative result from any independent retest that defense counsel could have tried to obtain by motion and hearing, because instead the selected defense strategy appears to be resorting to the last refuge of the scoundrel that is a "battle of the experts" over the efficacy of hair follicle testing in and of itself.

So then the question becomes this: if you were absolutely 100% cocksure about MMI having produced what Nick called an "impossible result," and if you were sitting on a bygone heyday's $1.2 million in superchat revenue that surely could only ever have been increased by wise investments (with no squandering on kitschy art or Coomalot's racing wrecks or coke's $20K/mo burn rate or whatever), and if you had unfettered access to a trust fund's untold Texas oil riches on top of that just for good measure, then wouldn't you push all-in with free airfare to a litany of PhD's that wrote the book on the underlying physics of gas chromatography/mass spectrometry just to prove MMI dead-wrong to great fanfare? Or would you instead take a flyer on some rando operating out of a Hugo townhouse with an LLC registered on 1/10/24 that seems to have all the trappings of a proverbial "hired gun" on the rolodex of any given DWI attorney that wants any given DWI defendant's lazily calibrated breathalyzer's results thrown out? I'll leave it to you to evaluate which course Nick selected at that fork in the road, and what that decision may suggest about his level of confidence regarding whether it was worth it to bother throwing good money after bad:

https://www.aaronolson.expert/about

https://www.dwijournal.org/about

Prove everyone wrong, Nick!

The naming of two of the kids is noteworthy to me in the Supplemental Discovery Disclosure.

So they have video (one assumes interviews) with the ex-nanny, the 13 yo son, his 9 yo daughter (who tested positive), and possibly a new interview with Nick.
...
My overall question: why are only two of the five kids named? That indicates to me that these two kids had something important to say.

On that note it's also rather curious that another new defense expert in the attached is a shrink now being brought in solely to opine on the "psychological impact on children of involving children in negative conversations about their parents." Why would the expense of that sort of testimony even be necessary, unless there were statements in the previously disclosed interviews that were considered damaging enough to need to discredit them using allegations that the state surely must have disparaged the parents so much as to coach the children into desired answers? It's almost as though the defense strategy is gearing up to paint each KCHHS interviewer as some sort of clichéd Kee-MacFarlane-esque caricature, when in reality the subject matter should have been as mundane as simply asking about who at that age even knows what drugs even are in the first place, and if they do, then asking whether any exposure to said drugs occurred, and not a damned thing more. So odd...

On a lighter note, even though transcripts of prior hearings ordinarily aren't usable as substantive exhibits in a trial case-in-chief because the same live witnesses would be available simply direct and cross as normal, it was nice of Barneswalker Frank to nevertheless include them in the attached as intended trial "exhibits" as a reminder that we should soon pore over them line-by-line for whatever contents he thought would be useful. That ought to be a hoot!

 

[Ethan Ralph Is 5'1"]

Keanu calling her fiancé "Bisconte" is not helping the idea that all these women have big daddy issues. It's creepy seeing her continue to talk about Aaron like he's some monster after she spent so much time gassing him up as a hero who got out of a bad and abusive situation for the sake of his kids. Imagine having a strong opinion about Aaron at all.


She doesn't think he really did anything wrong too. I think her and her ilk are of the "if it feels good, do it" mindset. I don't get the impression she's super intelligent, so she may be genuinely surprised that the simpcast audience (I shudder to think what they're like) doesn't like the fake Christian cokefiend whose little daughter had to ask a policeman for clean clothes.

She's definitely aching to bring Rekieta on to try and felt Aaron.
I don't like Aaron's personality at all, but it's clear that Keanu is completely melting down over this ordeal.
There's absolutely no way that her upcoming marriage to "Bisconte" is going to last. She's childless and "if it feels good, do it" for a reason.
I never understood why her and Aaron were even compatible, seeing as she's of the same ilk as Chrissie Mayr. The worst aspects of Libertarianism, where porno whores and trannies are brought on to chit chat with them on live streams, and encouraged to live their best life.

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

Interesting new matter of public record attached.

A wonderfully delightful way to begin my weekend. Take a bow, you absolute legend.

 

[Mike Stoklasas Spock Ears]

Balldo bros...

 

[DuranceVile]

@MNPublicRecords bringing the heat right as Nick goes live.

Obviously the kids have some damning stuff to say and they're trying to get ahead of that.

And the Nick/Chrissie chat is going on. He's getting absolutely blasted by chat. He's trying to revise him talking to the cops as some grand libertarian gesture where he called the cops pussies and they all dropped their warrants and clapped. The chat keeps asking for him to release the bodycam footage to prove it. Chrissie isn't being critical at all, as expected, she's just asking questions and moving to the next question. He keeps referring to Kayla and April as "my clients" and nothing else - probably because he doesn't want to get into it. I'm sure Chrissie is going to bring April up soon.

"The internet goes with this weird theory that I was dosing my child. They blame me, of course. I don't know how that test result came to be." That sounds like slimy lawyer-speak for him blaming Kayla.

He sounds very congested and a hint of that rasp is back. He's drinking out of one of his mugs, he said "I'm out of coke so I switched to tea."

 

[Peace Through Power]

Interesting new matter of public record attached.

The trial dates are listed as July 23, 24, 25 and 26th in the attachment. Is there any information on the outcome of the case?

 

[Goatchoker]

This interview is so boring. Nick is so nasally and Chrissie isn’t asking the good questions.

He’s such a weasel.

 

[DuranceVile]

This interview is so boring. Nick is so nasally and Chrissie isn’t asking the good questions.

He’s such a weasel.

It feels like she's afraid he's going to go full ragepig if she pokes at all and is just asking softballs. This is so bizarre.

Nick just claimed he's not being charged with child neglect and she just let that slide.

Edit:
Rekieta Law hit 438k. More people checking to see if they were still subbed.

 

[NostalgicJam]

This interview is so boring. Nick is so nasally and Chrissie isn’t asking the good questions.

He’s such a weasel.

Wasn't Chrissie basically balldo guarding with GoodLawgic? doesn't surprise me she isn't asking the tough stuff like why his daughter had traces of coke in her hair samples

 

[daffodils]

Nick is asked wether he knew that his children could be taken away if there's a controlled substance in the house. Answer:"Well, sure.. but the state has to prove we're violating that statute"

Child protection law is often nonsensical and leads to weird results. "There are a lot of substances in your house that are perfectly fine to have that are dangerous to children, like... bleach."

Nick claims they went for unconditional release because random drug testing costs $75 a pop, so "you just have to do the math" to figure out that paying $10,000 bail is cheaper.

All his drug tests are clean.

Kids will be back really soon. Everything about child endangerment/maltreatment is internet fiction. Nobody in the community saw anything wrong with the kids. They see them five times a week.

People have lots of assumptions about Nick's marriage and relationships; lots of deflecting; "going outside your marriage" is a very complicated topic, what people think about it is just their perceptions


Things are good with the wife, despite constant stress and stigma of charges.

"The state doesn't have any information about that substance in our house... they don't know where it came from, they don't know who owns it... we're charged, we're not convicted... they don't know what it is, lab tests have not occured yet... they don't have positive drug tests from us... they don't have a whole bunch of interviews saying we're bad parents... they can't find testimony from people that we were intoxicated"

"They just found a shitload of laundry... because our living room is right outside the laundry room"

Kids wearing the same clothes for days is a misunderstanding

Going out is awkward, but you still have to live

He's showing off the finished tattoo, he's made the appointment a long fucking time ago

Kayla also got a tattoo

"April lives really close by, we hang out a lot, we're still friends"

Discovery conference in Quest case in a few days, 'a fun money sink"

body cam footage: people misunderstand, footage is considered confidential information, can't even be released to Nick except as part of discovery; Nick can't authorize release, neither can anyone else in it; "If someone was told they were getting the bodycam footage, they were probably not told the truth"

Nick is still religious, likes to share his musings and explorations; not an apostate, just thinking through things

"People believe there is some sort of mistress thing going on... we're all friend, like... Kayla and I are married and April is our friend"

Anecdote about drug testing, confirms it's just pee tests

Can't talk about the claims of Aaron Imholte.

Most people on drugs are not dangerous, there's unfair stigma attached

Having the kids taken away is the most painful thing that ever happened to him, especially because he knows they where never in danger from anything or anybody in his household

People judge Nick because they don't have all the information; it sucks, but he's not mad

No one's asked him to go to rehab at all

"I hope he makes a million dollars" was turned into this negative thing, but he always meant it, especially about Eric July

Has not sent Ralph after Elissa Clips

Doubles down on all the dangerous but legal substances people keep in their houses; insinuates that the coke was kept safe

Gives opinion on @MNPublicRecords : "Very interesting Kiwifarms account... seems to have access to documents before anybody knows they're around... some of them are public and some of them aren't"

When Nick looked like he was jerking off on stream he was pressing a wound on his leg so the pain response would keep him awake

He doesn't remember much of the cokestream; when he read the comments with the timestamps of all the drinks he though holy fuck

He makes it sound like the only problem with that stream was alcohol

He's usually pretty good to drink to a point of intoxication and not go further

Another chatter tries to get him to say something about Aaron; Nick is very careful to avoid any sort of comment

It's not up to Nick if his trial will be transparent and televised; he never said trials should be fully transparent

Warrant talk; people should read the affidavit and ask themselves:"What about the affidavit says that they will find evidence of crime on the date the warrant was executed?"; points out that lying in an affidavit is technically perjury

"You may not know what's in your house... you may not know what cops bring into your house either... don't ever consent to a search"

"Possession crimes require the intent to possess the drug"

"The details of my agreement with Rumble are not public"

Drug talk:"The idea that addiction is a simple process... universally applicable... is insane!", "A statute made something illegal... that doesn't mean everybody who tries it gets addicted to it"

---
That's it. I missed the first 18 minutes. This stream is a goldmine of veiled references to his case and his defense strategy.

 

[DuranceVile]

Nick is asked wether he knew that his children could be taken away if there's a controlled substance in the house. Answer:"Well, sure.. but the state has to prove we're violating that statute"

"We see our kids five times a week and they'll be back in our house real soon."

"They've created this fiction in their heads that the state thinks we abused them."

Him just flat out lying that the state isn't concerned about his kids' wellbeing is wild.

Chrissie seems very uncomfortable at having to start reading the hate superchats. I'm more convinced she's dumb and didn't realize what she was getting into here.

She admitted that she's uncomfortable with the thought that she introduced Aaron and April to Nick. I've wondered about that.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

Or would you instead take a flyer on some rando operating out of a Hugo townhouse with an LLC registered on 1/10/24 that seems to have all the trappings of a proverbial "hired gun" on the rolodex of any given DWI attorney that wants any given DWI defendant's lazily calibrated breathalyzer's results thrown out?

Interestingly, it appears slaying DWI tests doesn't pay all the bills, as after some years doing lab testing, he abruptly shifted to...content creation! Which is apparently his main gig, having added the consultancy later.

This is irrelevant but amusing (from his blog), given current day: extolling Mr. Beast.

Also from his blog: "I write books, a blog, and produce a podcast about entrepreneurship, health, fitness, nutrition, philosophy, stoicism, existentialism, and self-improvement."

On FB, he says, "9 months ago, I changed industries completely. went from being a forensic scientist working in a government lab to doing content for a B2B Saas media company. I used the @hackingcareers method to level up. Here's what I did."

Why are Millennial men like this?

All that said, he maintains his forensics-related linkedin and showcases some wins, though everything I've seen from him there or on the linked "DWI Journal," which has 2 articles, both his, is about alcohol testing. He is EIC, naturally, and the journal was started 6 months ago. Does have an editorial board, though.