Lord Frogmire Appreciation Thread - The Better Brother (Formerly Known as Synthetic Man Appreciation Thread) - Might have an account here

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Later in the stream he got a superchat about the Critikal vs Sneako debate and how it makes "cunny enjoyers" look bad. Synth's response? He entertained his concerns. Just wtf. In case someone didn't know, "cunny" is a term used solely by loli pedos and refers to child's genitals. 4chan seems to foster those kind of people. Could Null's hatred towards lolicons be why Synth has a problem with KF? Is that his secret gooning material he talked about?
you got a timestamp of when this happened?
from what i remember, he just stops talking about it after he's done reading critikal's lame deflection
 
During his spergout in latest stream, he called out "kiwi trannies" and "discord trannies". No mention of 4chan which is pretty much reddit v2 nowadays. It would be understandable if his KF thread was just leftie types trying to fuck with him, but that's not the case.

Later in the stream he got a superchat about the Critikal vs Sneako debate and how it makes "cunny enjoyers" look bad. Synth's response? He entertained his concerns. Just wtf. In case someone didn't know, "cunny" is a term used solely by loli pedos and refers to child's genitals. 4chan seems to foster those kind of people. Could Null's hatred towards lolicons be why Synth has a problem with KF? Is that his secret gooning material he talked about?
Synth the guy that openly admitted to liking girls with dicks and wanting to be pegged? Usually the rabbit hole goes way deeper behind closed doors.
I wonder if we are going to witness a low point in his "career" now. It would be strange if he doesn't get shut down but rather "fades away" from being boring akin to DSP. I don't get why he would need to get annoyed at Kiwi Farms either, it was just a mildly annoyance he went through, that's fine - happens with the best of us.
Synth has all the recipes for lowcow status. He is a sensitive, sheltered neet that can't take mild bants from chat. The contrast to dsp is eventually going to become a self fulfilling prophecy. He should just stick to making game/tv show reviews instead of streaming. His reviews are what put him on the map and made the most traction with normies and the mainstream Idk what kind of revenue he has going on with streams but if he can't hold his shit together for a few hours without sperging out he's eventually gonna lose it
 
Synth the guy that openly admitted to liking girls with dicks and wanting to be pegged? Usually the rabbit hole goes way deeper behind closed doors.

Synth has all the recipes for lowcow status. He is a sensitive, sheltered neet that can't take mild bants from chat. The contrast to dsp is eventually going to become a self fulfilling prophecy. He should just stick to making game/tv show reviews instead of streaming. His reviews are what put him on the map and made the most traction with normies and the mainstream Idk what kind of revenue he has going on with streams but if he can't hold his shit together for a few hours without sperging out he's eventually gonna lose it
Honestly, this is pathetic. DSP had mishaps about "Gun Show", masturbating on stream, lying nonstop in his streams and suffering because of his narcissistic complex. As for Synth, he could try to be better. Yet being a "woman with penis" enjoyer is (to the general audience, something he doesn't want to be at least) disgusting to the eyes of others, but at least he admitted his fetish. As @Raw Onion Enjoyer said above, the question of "cunny enjoyers" is something else entirely. Lolishits are usually a bunch of losers with an insufferable attitude, and I truly hope Synth is not this type of person.

Bottom line, Synth was attacked by a bunch of people on YouTube, so I understand why he's on the "defensive" in general. If he took 1 minute to come here to see his thread, he would see opinions about him are on the constructive, however - and hoping he is NOT a total degenerate.
 
I wonder if we are going to witness a low point in his "career" now. It would be strange if he doesn't get shut down but rather "fades away" from being boring akin to DSP. I don't get why he would need to get annoyed at Kiwi Farms either, it was just a mildly annoyance he went through, that's fine - happens with the best of us.
Most right wing content providers just fade away. They like to paint it as being silenced, but usually it's the audience getting sick of them repeating themselves and seeing them falling into more and more degenerate state.

They'll then either go into a zombie channel mode or move to some other streaming site where they'll have a hugbox.
 
Synth has all the recipes for lowcow status. He is a sensitive, sheltered neet that can't take mild bants from chat. The contrast to dsp is eventually going to become a self fulfilling prophecy. He should just stick to making game/tv show reviews instead of streaming. His reviews are what put him on the map and made the most traction with normies and the mainstream Idk what kind of revenue he has going on with streams but if he can't hold his shit together for a few hours without sperging out he's eventually gonna lose it
He should stick to reviews from now on for his own good. But always remember:
1722175153157.png

During his spergout in latest stream, he called out "kiwi trannies"
And my respect for him is gone. I guess we'll get another Rackets/Gunt arc soon.
 
you got a timestamp of when this happened?
from what i remember, he just stops talking about it after he's done reading critikal's lame deflection

From this stream at 1:32:45

I want to give him benefit of the doubt and say he's being devil's advocate, but even the super chatter self- admitted to being a pedo in said message. Followed by the "would never touch a kid IRL" (which is obviously a lie) further confirming it. Why is Synth tolerating actual pedos on his stream is beyond me. And sure, you cannot control who watches you but you can at least not entertain their chats at the bare minimum.
 
Last edited:
During his spergout in latest stream, he called out "kiwi trannies" and "discord trannies". No mention of 4chan which is pretty much reddit v2 nowadays. It would be understandable if his KF thread was just leftie types trying to fuck with him, but that's not the case.

Later in the stream he got a superchat about the Critikal vs Sneako debate and how it makes "cunny enjoyers" look bad. Synth's response? He entertained his concerns. Just wtf. In case someone didn't know, "cunny" is a term used solely by loli pedos and refers to child's genitals. 4chan seems to foster those kind of people. Could Null's hatred towards lolicons be why Synth has a problem with KF? Is that his secret gooning material he talked about?
The only people I've seen use the term "kiwitranny" are Southeast Asians and White Women who like to torture baby monkeys.
 
He asked "Who are the biggest losers? DSP, Wings Of Redemption, LowTierGod or a bunch of losers making fun of lolcows all day? (Us Kiwis)" Or something like that.
The correct answer is:
Lolcows are losers
Kiwis are bigger losers than those we make fun.
The biggest losers of all are those like Synth getting annoyed about being made fun of by other losers online.
 
View attachment 6245031
From this stream at 1:32:45

I want to give him benefit of the doubt and say he's being devil's advocate, but even the super chatter self- admitted to being a pedo in said message. Followed by the "would never touch a kid IRL" (which is obviously a lie) further confirming it. Why is Synth tolerating actual pedos on his stream is beyond me. And sure, you cannot control who watches you but you can at least not entertain their chats at the bare minimum.
Wanking it to drawings of children means you are a pedo.
Espousing a Whataboutism in defense of loli makes you a pedo apologist.
Synth is being a pedo apologist, disgusting.
Most right wing content providers just fade away. They like to paint it as being silenced, but usually it's the audience getting sick of them repeating themselves and seeing them falling into more and more degenerate state.

They'll then either go into a zombie channel mode or move to some other streaming site where they'll have a hugbox.
Do you like sucking on that Big Tech boot?
Rationalizing away that all the big social media platforms shadowban, deboost, or outright ban people, saying people didn't like their content. But they love watching Lex Friedman and Tim Pool.
Do you believe that the algorithm is some mystical, super-complex, arcane system that nobody understands?
 
Do you like sucking on that Big Tech boot?
Rationalizing away that all the big social media platforms shadowban, deboost, or outright ban people, saying people didn't like their content. But they love watching Lex Friedman and Tim Pool.
Do you believe that the algorithm is some mystical, super-complex, arcane system that nobody understands?
8 years ago I believed it, but eventually it gets ridiculous thinking it's still true. As long as you don't go naming the Jew (and even that's passable as long as you repeat "In Minecraft" enough times) you can be right wing and Youtube will point other right wingers towards your content. Right wingers whining about being banned has limits before they also get to be called on their victimhood complex.
 
View attachment 6245031
From this stream at 1:32:45

I want to give him benefit of the doubt and say he's being devil's advocate, but even the super chatter self- admitted to being a pedo in said message. Followed by the "would never touch a kid IRL" (which is obviously a lie) further confirming it. Why is Synth tolerating actual pedos on his stream is beyond me. And sure, you cannot control who watches you but you can at least not entertain their chats at the bare minimum.
Yeah, this has been known for a while. I guess some people in the thread were unaware that Synth obviously doesn't care about 2D anime loli/pedophilia. I've never seen an indication from him that he approves of or is interested in porn or pedophilia regarding actual children, but obviously if he did approve of or was interested in it, he would lie about it. I think he's disinterested in and condemns actual pedophilia directed at actual kids, I also think he isn't actively interested in 2D drawn loli/pedophilia but just doesn't care about that stuff, but there's no way for me to know that's actually the case.

Either way, he's now taking big steps to being a full blown cow, which we all knew was a real possibility. This is the danger of livestreaming. Humans are not adapted to being shit-talked and criticized and not being able to do anything about it by strangers day in and day out, for 99% of our existence nobody lived like that. I think it's a rare person that can actually handle it and the cracks are showing with Synth. When you livestream, you can't edit, you can't rethink saying something, you say it and it's out there forever. Risky.
 
8 years ago I believed it, but eventually it gets ridiculous thinking it's still true. As long as you don't go naming the Jew (and even that's passable as long as you repeat "In Minecraft" enough times) you can be right wing and Youtube will point other right wingers towards your content. Right wingers whining about being banned has limits before they also get to be called on their victimhood complex.
If by "right wing" you mean people like Ben Shapiro or Steven Crowder, then yes, they don't get banned; they even get promoted.

But what do you think the "algorithm" is?
YouTube decides manually what type of content gets de-boosted, what gets boosted, and what gets outright banned, and they use the "algorithm" to enforce their decisions.
They very obviously suppress serious anti-establishment content and honest nationalist content.
There are channels that haven't said a single slur but fall into either category and end up getting banned from YouTube.

If they are actively being victimized, then it's not really a victimhood complex.
 
View attachment 6245031
From this stream at 1:32:45

I want to give him benefit of the doubt and say he's being devil's advocate, but even the super chatter self- admitted to being a pedo in said message. Followed by the "would never touch a kid IRL" (which is obviously a lie) further confirming it. Why is Synth tolerating actual pedos on his stream is beyond me. And sure, you cannot control who watches you but you can at least not entertain their chats at the bare minimum.
So instead of condemning gross pedos he decides to go for the whatabout?
It's made even worse as he's playing as a 700 year old loli in a children's game.

This is especially concerning as he's probably about 30 and lives with his mum.
 
If by "right wing" you mean people like Ben Shapiro or Steven Crowder, then yes, they don't get banned; they even get promoted.

But what do you think the "algorithm" is?
YouTube decides manually what type of content gets de-boosted, what gets boosted, and what gets outright banned, and they use the "algorithm" to enforce their decisions.
They very obviously suppress serious anti-establishment content and honest nationalist content.
There are channels that haven't said a single slur but fall into either category and end up getting banned from YouTube.

If they are actively being victimized, then it's not really a victimhood complex.
Fucking every content creator on youtube bitches constantly about the algorithm, seemingly everyone has some theory about how it's built specifically to fuck with him but not anyone else. Social media companies only care about engagement for ad revenue, if they can recommend something for you to be five more minutes they'd do it. Their favourism isn't right win/left wing but just recommending mindless content that hundreds of millions of children see every day because that's what their algorithm see is extra profitable and ad safe.
Besides the occasional witch hunt against a specific right wing channel (and even that's getting very rare), there isn't any systematic move against right wing politics.
 
Fucking every content creator on youtube bitches constantly about the algorithm, seemingly everyone has some theory about how it's built specifically to fuck with him but not anyone else. Social media companies only care about engagement for ad revenue, if they can recommend something for you to be five more minutes they'd do it. Their favourism isn't right win/left wing but just recommending mindless content that hundreds of millions of children see every day because that's what their algorithm see is extra profitable and ad safe.
Besides the occasional witch hunt against a specific right wing channel (and even that's getting very rare), there isn't any systematic move against right wing politics.
They only care about the money
extra profitable and ad safe
Alphabet sinks billions into the YouTube sinkhole to keep its claws on the narrative.
This is the most inaccurate thing one could say about Alphabet: that they really care about making money with YouTube. They basically own online advertising. They spend their money on YouTube to shape public opinion.

I always wonder what people who think it's all about the money imagine people like Larry Fink or Larry Page spend their billions of dollars on.
Do you imagine them having a giant building filled with gold coins like Scrooge McDuck?
And they only care about the number going up?
there isn't any systematic move against right wing politics.
Again, if you think of Con Inc., then yes.
YouTube promotes what the owners of YouTube want to see promoted and doesn't allow what they don't want people to look at.
It's so naive to think companies are buildings or a logo. There are people with personal beliefs who own and direct them.
 
Social media companies only care about engagement for ad revenue
You've now shown yourself to be an unambiguous certifiable verified fucking freon-huffing retard. The past 10 years are replete with evidence that directly contradicts this talking point that libertarian sludge-brains and centrist crater-skulls like to repeat. They are political partisans that feel it is their moral duty and right to tilt the scales in order to get their desired outcome, not amoral mercenaries who will do anything for a dollar. They will actively lose money to push their ideology.

1722201049555.png
Susan Wojcicki:
1722200542044.png

1722201706994.png
1722201908639.png


Key moments from the video can be found at the following timestamps:

  • (00:00:00 – 00:01:12) Google co-founder Sergey Brin states that the weekly meeting is “probably not the most joyous we’ve had” and that “most people here are pretty upset and pretty sad.”
  • (00:00:24) Brin contrasts the disappointment of Trump’s election with his excitement at the legalization of cannabis in California, triggering laughs and applause from the audience of Google employees.
  • (00:01:12) Returning to seriousness, Brin says he is “deeply offen[ded]” by the election of Trump, and that the election “conflicts with many of [Google’s] values.”
  • (00:09:10) Trying to explain the motivations of Trump supporters, Senior VP for Global Affairs, Kent Walker concludes: “fear, not just in the United States, but around the world is fueling concerns, xenophobia, hatred, and a desire for answers that may or may not be there.”
  • (00:09:35) Walker goes on to describe the Trump phenomenon as a sign of “tribalism that’s self-destructive [in] the long-term.”
  • (00:09:55) Striking an optimistic tone, Walker assures Google employees that despite the election, “history is on our side” and that the “moral arc of history bends towards progress.”
  • (00:10:45) Walker approvingly quotes former Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi’s comparison between “the world of the wall” with its “isolation and defensiveness” and the “world of the square, the piazza, the marketplace, where people come together into a community and enrich each other’s lives.”
  • (00:13:10) CFO Ruth Porat appears to break down in tears when discussing the election result.
  • (00:15:20) Porat promises that Google will “use the great strength and resources and reach we have to continue to advance really important values.”
  • (00:16:50) Stating “we all need a hug,” she then instructs the audience of Google employees to hug the person closest to them.
  • (00:20:24) Eileen Naughton, VP of People Operations, promises that Google’s policy team in DC is “all over” the immigration issue and that the company will “keep a close watch on it.”
  • (00:21:26) Naughton jokes about Google employees asking, ‘Can I move to Canada?’ after the election. She goes on to seriously discuss the options available to Google employees who wish to leave the country.
  • (00:23:12) Naughton does acknowledge “diversity of opinion and political persuasion” and notes that she has heard from conservative Google employees who say they “haven’t felt entirely comfortable revealing who [they] are.” and urged “tolerance.” (Several months later, the company would fire James Damore allegedly for disagreeing with progressive narratives.)
  • (00:27:00) Responding to a question about “filter bubbles,” Sundar Pichai promises to work towards “correcting” Google’s role in them
  • (00:27:30) Sergey Brin praises an audience member’s suggestion of increasing matched Google employee donations to progressive groups.
  • (00:34:40) Brin compares Trump voters to “extremists,” arguing for a correlation between the economic background of Trump supporters and the kinds of voters who back extremist movements. Brin says that “voting is not a rational act” and that not all of Trump’s support can be attributed to “income disparity.” He suggests that Trump voters might have been motivated by boredom rather than legitimate concerns.
  • (00:49:10) An employee asks if Google is willing to “invest in grassroots, hyper-local efforts to bring tools and services and understanding of Google products and knowledge” so that people can “make informed decisions that are best for themselves.” Pichai’s response: Google will ensure its “educational products” reach “segments of the population [they] are not [currently] fully reaching.”
  • (00:54:33) An employee asks what Google is going to do about “misinformation” and “fake news” shared by “low-information voters.” Pichai responds by stating that “investments in machine learning and AI” are a “big opportunity” to fix the problem.
  • (00:56:12) Responding to an audience member, Walker says Google must ensure the rise of populism doesn’t turn into “a world war or something catastrophic … and instead is a blip, a hiccup.”
  • (00:58:22) Brin compares Trump voters to supporters of fascism and communism, linking the former movement to “boredom,” which Brin previously linked to Trump voters. “It sort of sneaks up sometimes, really bad things” says Brin.
  • (01:01:15) A Google employee states: “speaking to white men, there’s an opportunity for you right now to understand your privilege” and urges employees to “go through the bias-busting training, read about privilege, read about the real history of oppression in our country.” He urges employees to “discuss the issues you are passionate about during Thanksgiving dinner and don’t back down and laugh it off when you hear the voice of oppression speak through metaphors.” Every executive on stage – the CEO, CFO, two VPs and the two Co-founders – applaud the employee.
  • (01:01:57) An audience member asks if the executives see “anything positive from this election result.” The audience of Google employees, and the executives on stage, burst into laughter. “Boy, that’s a really tough one right now” says Brin.
That's just a couple things I pulled up off the top of my head that I didn't have saved, let alone all the rest of the stuff I don't have saved. For years they've tried to push gay black genderqueer bipoc tranny nobodies that nobody gives a fuck about on the front page. If you really can be made to believe that they're just amoral mercenaries driven by money after knowing this, that they aren't partisans trying to push their ideology with their power, you truly are braindead subhuman nigger cattle that deserves to be enslaved in the way that you are by these people.
 
Last edited:
Back