Ava Chris Tyson / Christopher Stephen Tyson / “Christine Tyson” / “Chris The Meme God” - MrBeast’s litigious troon sidekick & divorcé. Lolicon-loving narcissistic queer

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
judegdubey said:
Tom being unable to comprehend theirs more than one type of grooming while his fans are busy stating how the whole cp issue is being blown out of the water... Cause it's drawings guys!
Click to expand...
Onetime as a kid, I went to a sleepover at a friends house. We wanted to stream a movie, and in the search history for her Dads PC was “loli”. Neither of us knew what that was. The only reason I remembered it was because there was a porn hub link directly under it, which made us cringe, but we awkwardly laughed it off and immediately moved on.
Fast forward many years, I catch up with my old friend, who tells me she found out her Dad repeatedly raped his daughter from a previous marriage when she was under 10. Immediately that forgotten memory of his search history came to mind, knowing what term meant as an adult.
It is never just a drawing. They ensure from the neck down these drawings are 1:1 representations of real children. It harms real children, being sexualised at that age is tramatic, I remember the tumblr days where 13 y/o kids had their BDSM kinks in their bio, thats why the “Daddy” stuff in his discord is so disturbing. People like Chris are why this happens. It’s grooming.
 
Last edited:
  • Horrifying
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Core Theorist, dfsdsfdsadsa, Norman B. Normal and 163 others
Musashi's Son said:
DogMeat's response.
Click to expand...
@Chucky replying to DogPack404´s video.png
DogPack404s response.png

Frankensteined the tweets for easy posting
 
  • Winner
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Drama Trauma, Coo Coo Bird, wopirish and 71 others
postfeetpls said:
Are there any internet celebrities popular amongst children who aren't pedophiles or at the very least perverse sex pests?

It's weird how that thing that never happens keeps happening over and over again.
Click to expand...
No, because a normal and healthy adult does not have an interest in creating content for and engaging with kids for hours and hours on end (unless it's your own family, and even then rarely will any adult but the parents and grandparents have more than a passing interest in a child). Because we have nothing in common. These "celebrities" and "influencers" spin their entire lives around kids. if you are an adult that is not normal.
 
  • Disagree
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Vetinari, Commonwealth Caterpillar, Coo Coo Bird and 34 others
sheepworldvizor said:
This is a pedo’s wife thing in many cases:

Children’s author Mem Fox

Wife of children’s entertainer Rolf Harris

Anna Duggar

The wife enablers and excusers are part of the whole pedo eco system.
Click to expand...
Sometimes they're not just enablers, but also active participants like Marion Zimmer Bradley. I pray that isn't the case here.
1722264335933.png1722264435933.png
 
  • Horrifying
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Vetinari, Coo Coo Bird, fake farts and 12 others
Lieutenant Rasczak said:
The Internet was generally segregated by age, and that was a good thing. Now a days, both are intermixed and you now have a bigger pedo problem then existed since before 2015.
Click to expand...

You're only partially correct, because:

Lieutenant Rasczak said:
I remember 2019 very clearly. It was immoral back then, it was immoral back in the 2000s, it's immoral now. When people browsed 4chan, Encyclopedia Dramatica or Something Awful it was presumed that everyone looking at these sites were 18 or older.
Click to expand...

However many people who grew up on 4chan would tell you that this is bullshit, underb& posting was always rampant. And unless the kid outed themselves by directly stating their age or acting retarded they would've flied under the radar. Source: yours truly posting stupid shit on chans and reading ED in my teens 1 gorillion years ago.

The real difference nowadays is that back then you had TS and Skype for communicating. Those weren't integrated with every brain rot content farm alliance, and hanging out in someone's Skype group with older people was seen as weird (shit used to make sense). Discord and Twitter these days are so edgy it's basically 4chan if everybody was a tripfag, and it's not like kids stopped posting on the internet. Thus, predators lurking in Popular Thing Discord #28094 or Dating Discord #43942 have easy access to children if kids aren't banned on sight.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Coo Coo Bird, Quoth The Raven, Oddity and 19 others
keke said:
Onetime as a kid, I went to a sleepover at a friends house. We wanted to stream a movie, and in the search history for her Dads PC was “loli”. Neither of us knew what that was. The only reason I remembered it was because there was a porn hub link directly under it, which made us cringe, but we awkwardly laughed it off and immediately moved on.
Fast forward many years, I catch up with my old friend, who tells me she found out her Dad repeatedly raped his daughter from a previous marriage when she was under 10. Immediately that forgotten memory of his search history came to mind, knowing what term meant as an adult.
It is never just a drawing. They ensure from the neck down these drawings are 1:1 representations of real children. It harms real children, being sexualised at that age is tramatic, I remember the tumblr days where 13 y/o kids had their BDSM kinks in their bio, thats why the “Daddy” stuff in his discord is so disturbing. People like Chris are why this happens. It’s grooming.
Click to expand...
I always laugh when lolifags insist there is no link between jerking off to lolicon and jerking off to real children. It’s one thing to argue that loli isn’t real and therefore does not cause harm to an actual child but they also argue that lolicon is completely different from pedophilia which is the dumbest thing I’ve heard and they argue that point a lot.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: pixel_lion, Commonwealth Caterpillar, fake farts and 31 others
Everyone knows paedos grooming kids was wrong back in the 2000s, Chris Hansen made an entire TV show about finding and catching them. It was funny to watch him confront the nonces, but it was mainly about educating parents about the sort of sick fucks online and how to keep an eye on their children's internet use and talk to them about safety. Yeah the internet culture was very different (the decoys type shit like "rawr xD!!!1" and teenagers really did talk like that back then) but some things were constant, including groomers are bad.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Coo Coo Bird, Quoth The Raven, The Motorizer and 20 others
Terfmaster9000 said:
No, because a normal and healthy adult does not have an interest in creating content for and engaging with kids for hours and hours on end (unless it's your own family, and even then rarely will any adult but the parents and grandparents have more than a passing interest in a child).
Click to expand...
I'd hate to be proven wrong and I don't generally disagree but I think the existence of Mr. Rogers refutes your point. From all accounts, the guy was virtually a saint. They may be few and far between, but they do exist.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Lizard Pope, Bellevegas Tire Slasher, fake farts and 33 others
deadtofaunus said:
I'd hate to be proven wrong and I don't generally disagree but I think the existence of Mr. Rogers refutes your point. From all accounts, the guy was virtually a saint. They may be few and far between, but they do exist.
Click to expand...
Agreed. There are women and a few men who live to teach kindergarten and run daycares; they do it for the kids in the purest sense.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Lizard Pope, Bellevegas Tire Slasher, Mellorine and 22 others
Skid McMarks said:
View attachment 6248329
View attachment 6248322

Frankensteined the tweets for easy posting
Click to expand...
This feller is great. His video was very informative and well presented. There's the older days of low-effort aesthetics (like Murdoch Murdoch shit) that stands out because nowadays YouTube slop is all corporate bullshit with a budget. His points were brilliantly explained and leads well into the proceeding arguments. I hope he makes more of these. It was better presented than any commentary grifting pronouns-respecting "her prostate" types, despite being very low budget.

I hope he makes more of these. I can see him having over 1 million subscribers in a year if he keeps this up. I just hope he doesn't implode like all the other stinkditch sapping nonce shields.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: totallyfersher, 8656k67d, The Motorizer and 25 others
ibeatmywife said:
Sorry bro

Click to expand...
I know you deleted this, but to clarify in case anyone else saw this and believed it: This court case was about a man named John Rogers whereas the children's entertainer is named Fred Rogers.

Not preserving this to admonish you, but to correct the record in case others saw it before you deleted it.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: pixel_lion, Lizard Pope, Exterminatus and 17 others
Harm said:
I know you deleted this, but to clarify in case anyone else saw this and believed it: This court case was about a man named John Rogers whereas the children's entertainer is named Fred Rogers.
Click to expand...
Yea sorry I didn't realize it was the wrong guy it linked that case when I tried to see if the actual Mr Rodgers was ever implicated in anything nefarious.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Allakazam223, Hongourable Madisha, Factual OST Aficionado and 3 others
I've one too many run ins with pedos so I'm gonna give a bit of info and hints on how you can potentially spot one, as well as giving my insight and knowledge on both the similarities of Chris, but other incidents like this. I remember being in a server with someone who was an artist for another creator and he came back and mentioned how his devices were "seized by police" and he mentioned the word "contraband." I immediately caught on and called him out and said that someone doesn't just have their devices seized for "contraband." After calling him out on it, and even making the claim that it was because he had child porn, immediately went on the defensive and left the server. The dude went by UltimosNSFW and UltimateLewd18 and apparently was a creep to many female voice actresses online.

As a moderator for many a forum and server (not just Discord, TF2, CS, and even some IRC stuff), pedos can and will use words like "Contraband", "littles", and more to describe child porn. Gooners that use images to say "Send me anything no matter how illegal" are honey trapping people to send them child porn, as well as getting in contact with others who've responded to network a way to find and share more of it. The worst part is, it's very open and up front on twitter, and even a simple report isn't enough anymore.

To those who've braved themselves to go into these discord logs and catalogue what's been said, bravo. I'm getting flashbacks to the zoosadism thread where the first thing you see when you click the evidence link, was a genuine warning from Null saying that this is not only your last chance but also how highly illegal the content was, but it was the only way to show proof. No one wants to believe us and yet we HAVE the source, we HAVE the proof, and we CONTINUE to be CORRECT. I do believe Kiwifarms can be evil, but it's a necessary evil at times. 8 Years later, we're watch dogs, still.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Coo Coo Bird, Bellevegas Tire Slasher, fake farts and 38 others
Tbh I can totally see why the NSFW channel wasn't leaked to the general public. I'm just happy to know it was part of the initial leak and will (hopefully) be forwarded to proper law enforcement channels. There is so much in all the other logs that I'm confident the NSFW channel is the nail in the coffin for them all.

Alot of messages from other channels explicitly mention how bad the NSFW channel was up until 2017 or so and even then they described it as a minor cleaning of the channel so didn't make it much more tame from the sound of it just maybe cleaned some of the most incriminating stuff. Daddylog was the one user I specifically remember in the logs I read talking about it.

Edit: This is mods arguing because even though the NSFW channel was locked down to 18+ only eventually there were mods who were underage expected to mod the channel. Eventually Chris decided it was all just fine based on what I read and none of the underage mods were removed including Lava who seemed pretty upset at the milk person for pointing out they could view the channel at anytime despite also being a minor.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240729_084844_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20240729_084844_Chrome.jpg
    352.7 KB · Views: 26
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Sgt. Bidwell_9, BlueTiles, Dyl505 and 5 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back