Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.7%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 53 15.4%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 133 38.6%

  • Total voters
    345
Aggressively monogamous I'm fairly sure was during the struggle session with Nick screaming at Sean, or at least during the stream it occurred.

It was a two-parter. Q (1) allegedly said suspect things about Kayla, and (2) Q had Drex on for a stream, which he then proceeded to "ambush" him by bringing on multiple women who decided to shit on Drexel's lifestyle, with Q's mom saying something about Drexel's mother failing to raise him properly. The first incident strained it, but the second fucked it completely.
"Agressively monogamous" is just a flex to suggest that he has to fight off all the bitches who want to have sex with him.
 
Even if we never see them, I totally believe they exist. For both of them. I mean, for Kayla, they would HAVE to if they think they have a shot at criminal charges. Right?

Somewhere, Claire is cackling. He gave her so much shit for the private pictures she and her husband took that were hacked and leaked.
........Guys, I think we were wrong. The timeline is just fine. Forget splitting, my entire torso will flat out rip in half from laughter if Aaron gets dragged back into this because of posting Nick's nudes.
 
Nick, I know you are reading this. Why are you filing a lawsuit against Aaron over revenge porn? That is weak gay shit, I thought you hated the evil government? You know what would really own Aaron? Post a video of your sextape with April and Kayla, with April saying you are a better lover than Aaron. Take a page from your mensch Ethan Ralph's book and post your own sextape on cow or onion farms or something.
 
I think this all boils to the attempt to connect the unanswered questions of 'What was his "worst day"' and 'who started the swinging?' The evidence we have does not seem to point in one direction or the other, but we still try to find a place for it.
Is there any actual reason to connect the two? Post hoc, but I don't see any distress from Nick about opening up their marriage/swinging. He has a concubine, ffs, and not even having his whole life turned upside-down has made him back away from her.

I personally think this is just more busy-bodying by the state, there's about a billion things more important to deal with but they choose this because there's not much political blowback.
This isn't the State being a busybody. If a complaint is made, they have to investigate.

And I haven't watched the clip where Aaron sends the pic (what a fucking idiot), but I plan to bc I want to know the context. The statute doesn't seem to have an intent requirement, except for increased penalties if the intent was to harass the pictured person, but I'm curious nonetheless about what he was saying about it.

I think it goes to show a pattern of behavior that sharing nudes is not something you find offensive or unacceptable, its just a matter of who is sharing them now that you wish to punish. Not to mention Kayla's own words around that post that she's proud of her body and sees no problem with sharing that. It just comes off as blatant hypocrisy you can use to punish something you would have never otherwise. I would see a difference if you had never shared anything like that before and that happened to you vs. This scenario.
It is categorically different to decide to share photos of yourself vs to have someone else decide for you.

Television/Movies/Art/etc already delineate backshot from full frontal.
The statute refers to "intimate parts." "Intimate parts" is defined as, "the genitals, pubic area, or anus of an individual, or if the individual is female, a partially or fully exposed nipple."

So no, the Hedonism II* photos are not of "intimate parts." And even if they were, consent is consent, and lack of it is lack.

*God, the name of that resort is stupid. The "II" annoys me to no end.

Realistically, the court is almost always going to side with the woman in this scenario. Revenge porn laws are just that shit.
{trashcan}

If it's a proper police report and process probably not. It's somewhat akin to extortion vs demand letter.
The MN witness tampering statute includes causing (not just threatening) a legal claim, true or false, to be filed as a potential tampering act (provided intent is met). However, it is a harder case to make that the complaint was made for tampering purposes if made timely and an actual crime occurred.

Public interest: Public figure swinging allegations
Public purpose: To inform the INCEL PRUDE SCANDIAVIANS about hypocrisy.
You don't have to go there if Nick already posted it publicly.
 
Cross-post from Imholte thread:

This is the clip of Keanu saying that April asked her whether Aaron had sent revenge porn of Nick Rekieta and that April relayed that they intended to file a report.
Wait, am I wrong to get the implication that Nick shared his nudes with Aaron when he was part of the Qover at some point?
:story:
 
Q (1) allegedly said suspect things about Kayla
My memory is there were accusations about Kayla having jungle fever (which fed into the Drex fucking), and that Kayla would score drugs at the local bar in exchange for favors. My memory may be off on the specifics. The accusations were denied by the Balldo camp, certainly by Drex. I don't remember if Nick ever addressed them.
 
Wait, am I wrong to get the implication that Nick shared his nudes with Aaron when he was part of the Qover at some point?
:story:
Keanu specifically said that April probed about whether Aaron had sent any images of Nick or herself (April).

That question would seem to imply at a minimum April believed it was possible that Aaron had access to images/videos of a nude Rekieta or of him engaged in a sexual act. It would not make sense that she would be asking about things not covered by the statute. And she, by Keanu's own description, appeared to be operating on behalf of the polycule as a whole.
 
I can’t wait for Nick to explain to us how letting other men have access to sexually explicit images of himself is all part of a healthy Christian marriage.

I’m sure he’ll also tell us how it’s 5D underwater Boggle and we’re all just too stupid to be on his level of wise, sober decision-making.

Someday the whole story will come out and we’ll realize how smart it was for Nick to spend months wasted on coke, molly and whiskey and let other men capture images of him nude.
 
I’m sure he’ll also tell us how it’s 5D underwater Boggle and we’re all just too stupid to be on his level of wise, sober decision-making.
I reviewed his Boggle and it checks out:
1722284231158.png
 
Early on I would have disagreed with this due to thinking that Nick really had changed a lot. He has changed, but given the evidence, the change was much smaller than any of us thought after re-examining his older content. but I digress.
I now think this makes the most sense. The way he reacted would fit with how he was viewed at just the suggestion, but clearly how he was viewed was not in line with who he was and portrayed himself to be. This leads to a need to ask why the reaction then, and this is the best explanation fitting with Nick and even what we know of Kayla's personalities.

I have a question for anyone who was watching at the time I'm going to mention. I don't know if the content even exists anymore but what was the beef between Q and Drex the groomer? The stream had been deleted and people mentioned it had something to do with Kayla, but the thread was in defend the Rekietas mode at the time, myself included. So if anyone actually watched it, that could possibly shed some light on the situation.

Is Nick even trying to deny the swinger shit anymore?

I assumed he was on the "I did, but it's not like it's harmful, stop being prudes" phase of the Nick liar cope script by now

Yes. He has just stopped talking about it a lot. He has other strawman to knock down.

You lose the expectation of privacy when you publish the material yourself.

Court are behind technology. *I* know that posting a picture online is the surest way to get it archived somewhere (see Coe doxxes), but does the 67 year old magistrate Horatio Harrington?

I posted this in the STMS thread but I'll post it here as well. If Nick reported Aaron for sharing revenge porn he's really painted himself into a corner. Nick is still claiming to be monogamous, but this guy somehow has nudes of his wife? Is he going to claim super-hacker Aaron Imholte somehow got access to Kayla's phone and stole them? What's his play going to be here?

Guys. *Dramatic sigh* As some of you may be aware, there have been some... images... released of me... Those were released without my consent by another party. They were taken at a time where I thought I could trust the people involved, but... you know... stuff happeneds. There are people out there running with a story... which is OK, I guess... Have fun with your little theories!..., but let me tell you that you do not have all the facts. I WISH my life really were as interesting as you think!

That said, now there is litigation involved, so i have to be very careful about what i say. I hope that I can tell you all about it one day, and you can laugh about how stupid ans crazy my life is. But that isn't today. Until then, people are going to day what they want to say... which is fine... I guess...? I just think it is very interesting that people who were once SO anti-government are now so eager to slobber on its cock like 'Uhrgh! Ugh! Give it to me harder, government! You're so big! Unghhh!' I wish then all... genuinely... a million dollars, and I hope... I HOPE... that they are never in the position that I am right now where the GOVERNMENT... the literal worse thing on he planet... is looking into every little detail of their life. *Smirk* I have a feeling a few of then might not like that... maybe some of them have some things in their past that people don't know about... *Shrug* I don't know...

That's about all I can say right now. I won't spend muh time on it on the show becuase the show is supposed to be FUN! Why can't we have FUN, Chat!? Why do people have a problem with that!? Weird... Anyway... to my supporters, I love you, thank you for all the messages of kindness and support. I can't respond to all of them, but know that they are seen ans appreciated... To everyone else... *picks up glass* have fun eith your little theories! *Smirk*.

Is there any actual reason to connect the two? Post hoc, but I don't see any distress from Nick about opening up their marriage/swinging. He has a concubine, ffs, and not even having his whole life turned upside-down has made him back away from her.

There is not, as you say, any reason, but these are two of the longest unresolved questions ITT, and it is easier to connect two dots (even if unrelated) when they are few. It is probably not as closely related as some think unless Nick has managed to keep a single secret.

There is also the proximity of time from Depp (mid-summer) and his holiday to Hedonism (late summer), so that played a correlating factor for many.

I am content to wait. Nick usually spills the beans in a hilarious fashion. Given hoe long this question has been unanswered, I hope it is equally entertaining in degree.

My memory is there were accusations about Kayla having jungle fever (which fed into the Drex fucking), and that Kayla would score drugs at the local bar in exchange for favors. My memory may be off on the specifics. The accusations were denied by the Balldo camp, certainly by Drex. I don't remember if Nick ever addressed them.

There was a stream with Drexel where he told Nick that someone 'closer than [he] realise[d]' was looking for some freak shit. Nick asked who, and Drexel said he would tell him off-show. Maybe suspect this was Kayla, but it was too on-the-nose for me.
 
Cross-posting from Imholte thread the following clip by @elb: "Keanu: Kayla Rekieta Files Revenge Porn Charges Against Aaron Imholte"


It doesn't appear to be in this clip but Keanu not just specified that April contacted both her and Geno digging for more info on the matter and confirming that they intended to file a report, but ASKED THEM IF AARON HAD SENT THEM NUDES OF NICK!

Why would he have those?????



It's at 2:42:00 of her stream. I will clip it out myself later
That thot *does not* have big enough boobs to pull off a boob window.
I've seen her OF... it was pretty sad.

I think he does practice,but he practices shipping and transactional law, not something exactly on point here.
That's why I classified him as "slightly more practicing than rekieta". While yes he does practice some form of law it has nothing at all to do with Rekieta's situation and he has very little to no experience in practicing in the criminal area. He's also just a slimy slimebag in general.
Sean, Andrea, etc. would have much better input on it.
 
They are still monogamous, Aaron just took some creepshots at their biweekly naked hot tub night. What? Do you Scandinavian prudes not do that?
It boggles my mind that Nick would fully confirm all of Aaron's lurid gossip doing this. And for what? I'm not a lawyer, but with a plain text reading of the statute, I don't see how any of the aggravating factors under subdivision 2 apply. This means if a prosecutor even bothers, Aaron is facing a gross misdemeanor. Which is less than a regular misdemeanor. Meaning a maximum penalty of a $3000 fine. No potential jail time.

Granted, "The Toe" would need to meet quite a few goals to cover that, but just filing this complaint confirms all the gross poly shit that Nick has been gaslighting the world about since day one. Is being able to technically call Imholte a revenge pornographer even worth it?

I do not understand the coke addled coomer brain.

Somewhere, Claire is cackling. He gave her so much shit for the private pictures she and her husband took that were hacked and leaked.
I know Claire DFE'd and will never come back, but a gloat stream for us all to enjoy would be the chef's kiss.
 
This is another arrow in the quiver of the incel prudes to call Nick a boomer-coomer cuck.
Reading the word 'quiver' here made me think: "Nick Rekieta, founder of the Qoverful movement"

Truly, god gives his most busted out hoes to his shittiest attempted cult leaders.
 
Is there any actual reason to connect the [worst day and swinging]? Post hoc, but I don't see any distress from Nick about opening up their marriage/swinging. He has a concubine, ffs, and not even having his whole life turned upside-down has made him back away from her.
In my view, people conflate the two things because signs of a swingin' new lifestyle appeared shortly after the "worst day," and for most people hearing "let's become swingers" would be a bad day. On the other hand, drama does follow drama, so even without projecting it's still reasonable to assume some causal link.

Nick's worst day couldn't have been about anything Kayla did, because that would require his caring about someone other than Nick. And what we know about Nick's activities at the time is that he was frequenting escorts and massage parlors. Being confronted with potential consequences for those antics could easily make a narcissist's list of "worst days ever," especially if it was done in a particularly faggy way.

Responding to this upheaval by proposing swinging makes a great deal of sense: Nick was never cheating, the two of them just hadn't discussed opening the relationship yet. Voila, worst day transmuted into a million cocks, massive Rackets W!
 
In my view, people conflate the two things because signs of a swingin' new lifestyle appeared shortly after the "worst day," and for most people hearing "let's become swingers" would be a bad day. On the other hand, drama does follow drama, so even without projecting it's still reasonable to assume some causal link.

Nick's worst day couldn't have been about anything Kayla did, because that would require his caring about someone other than Nick. And what we know about Nick's activities at the time is that he was frequenting escorts and massage parlors. Being confronted with potential consequences for those antics could easily make a narcissist's list of "worst days ever," especially if it was done in a particularly faggy way.

Responding to this upheaval by proposing swinging makes a great deal of sense: Nick was never cheating, the two of them just hadn't discussed opening the relationship yet. Voila, worst day transmuted into a million cocks, massive Rackets W!
Nick was constantly hinting at terrible shit happening to him pre-arrest. I’m pretty sure it’s all bullshit at this point, except for stuff this year eg the timeline of him sucking his own dick on stream about how great a father he is around the time people theorise his daughter got into the coke stash.
 
Last edited:
Nick, I know you are reading this. Why are you filing a lawsuit against Aaron over revenge porn? That is weak gay shit, I thought you hated the evil government? You know what would really own Aaron? Post a video of your sextape with April and Kayla, with April saying you are a better lover than Aaron. Take a page from your mensch Ethan Ralph's book and post your own sextape on cow or onion farms or something.
I don't understand. Is this a lawsuit or police investigation? Of course I'm sure Nick & Whore Co made the complaint to police about it, which just goes to show that lispy little faggot is working harder to win at Internet against Aaron than he is at preparing his criminal case or getting his kids back. Meanwhile he's trying to play coy about maybe we weren't swinging hehehe...
Bro you just hard confirmed that Aaron has nudes of your wife. Anyway who'd care about any of their gross nudes exchanging hands between old coomers. They'd have shared it themselves and then have Nick gaslight us on how prude we are for being disgusted. She's literally on video saying she likes showing off her body, they go to a nudist cuck resort, now they're in a swinger cult & the police are calling an OnlyFans hag & her sugar daddy for details on this nude that's probably been seen by hundreds of men in Vegas, Tennessee & Jamaica. Something tells me this case ends up embarrassing Nick & our wife more than it damages an already forgotten NPC Aaron.
 
Back