- Joined
- Mar 16, 2023
A year ago the prospect of a nude being circulated of Kayla might have been a wild revelation. Now it's more like "Yeah, and?"...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He called the police on Aaron for revenge porn rather than file a defamation lawsuit for his claims about wife-swapping and swinging. How odd that such an aggressively monogamous man doesn't want to file such a case in a state that has so little in the way of anti-SLAPP laws.It’s a police investigation. Some people on this site truly don’t know the difference between criminal and civil proceedings.
You're allowed to discredit a witness. You're also pretty likely to get a restraining order on a guy like Aaron who, iirc, is already either under one or has agreed not to target his ex-wife prior to April in his streams already.Wouldn't that be tampering with a witness. Which is a crime?
Sounds like a dumb move.
Wait til he gets to "III" he'll enjoy it.*God, the name of that resort is stupid. The "II" annoys me to no end.
I meant by that the "state is retarded and should've not bothered with this law". Not that they shouldn't enforce laws.This isn't the State being a busybody. If a complaint is made, they have to investigate.
Was this the stream he had where both Nick/Drexel were ripping on Q? Because I still think that's up somewhere. Because I recall Drexel saying:There was a stream with Drexel where he told Nick that someone 'closer than [he] realise[d]' was looking for some freak shit. Nick asked who, and Drexel said he would tell him off-show. Maybe suspect this was Kayla, but it was too on-the-nose for me.
No, and instead of Drexel, Q should've been the one to become a regular on the show. I liked the Q streams. He was interesting and seemed like he had more going to him than his dick.Was Q wrong?
Unless there's a specific rule (like that a Secretary of State's office in many states has to investigate certain claims against a business, law enforcement generally has broad discretion in how they allocate their investigative priorities. They can simply choose not to investigate at all. They can't even be held liable for outright refusal to show up to an emergency call (barring state law to the contrary).This isn't the State being a busybody. If a complaint is made, they have to investigate.
Looking forward to the fallout when they inevitably leak regardless.A nude leak at this point would be less demeaning and less humiliating than her actual life.
He called the police on Aaron for revenge porn rather than file a defamation lawsuit for his claims about wife-swapping and swinging. How odd that such an aggressively monogamous man doesn't want to file such a case in a state that has so little in the way of anti-SLAPP laws.
You're allowed to discredit a witness. You're also pretty likely to get a restraining order on a guy like Aaron who, iirc, is already either under one or has agreed not to target his ex-wife prior to April in his streams already.
It's also legal to file a police report.
Was this the stream he had where both Nick/Drexel were ripping on Q? Because I still think that's up somewhere. Because I recall Drexel saying:
1) He don't bang the wives of his friends
2) Q said shit about someone in Nick's life he shouldn't have
It's was oddly specific but yet non specific.
No, and instead of Drexel, Q should've been the one to become a regular on the show. I liked the Q streams. He was interesting and seemed like he had more going to him than his dick.
Here's where Drexel hints at something Quinton had said about Kayla. Drexel says if he relayed a question that was asked, Nick would view the situation differently, and Nick appears uncomfortable with the conversation.EDIT Found one of the streams:
If this goes anywhere at all, how Aaron originally obtained the photo would have to come out and that would seem to almost certainly involve non-aggressive monogamy, less than tepid monogamy in fact.He called the police on Aaron for revenge porn rather than file a defamation lawsuit for his claims about wife-swapping and swinging. How odd that such an aggressively monogamous man doesn't want to file such a case in a state that has so little in the way of anti-SLAPP laws.
That was a separate incident.I cannot recall the stream, but I remember the occurrence. It was one of those 'put it out of mind' telltale signs that I ignored...
Is this bitch actually retarded?Cross-posting from Imholte thread the following clip by @elb: "Keanu: Kayla Rekieta Files Revenge Porn Charges Against Aaron Imholte"
It doesn't appear to be in this clip but Keanu not just specified that April contacted both her and Geno digging for more info on the matter and confirming that they intended to file a report, but ASKED THEM IF AARON HAD SENT THEM NUDES OF NICK!
Why would he have those?????
It's at 2:42:00 of her stream. I will clip it out myself later
Faggy police reports are illegal.But if he did that in a faggy way. Would that be legal?
As far as I can tell, The police would only be interested in Kayla's complain, Geno's text, and Aaron. Contrary to Keanu's 2 hour talk, police don't want to talk to Keanu or April. They are irrelevant. Keanu seems to think Geno doing the noble thing and deleting it was good. I suspect the investigation ended when Geno could not present the revenge porn. Without the picture, LE cannot determine if it meets the criteria in the statute. Geno screwed the case by deleting the evidence. Probably doesn't even know it. LE could probably recover it but since it's deleted there is little harm to be had. Aaron needs to delete it too.Other than the stream when Aaron actually sent the picture and they vaguely allude to it, there is no smoking gun. Only person who currently has the picture, as far as we know, is Aaron.
Am I toofor thinking they will probably let this one go?
It was really odd and clued me in a bit but I didn't make the dots until later (Hence I'm a believer of the "Kayla was cheating on Nick" idea, esp with the massage parlor statement too). Either Q was:I cannot recall the stream, but I remember the occurrence. It was one of those 'put it out of mind' telltale signs that I ignored...