Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
IMG_4252.jpeg
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: socketmaster, The bearer of arms, TORtlEMUStRaNSUS and 57 others
Kiwi Lime Pie said:
What they also don't get is that the average person hates people who share their depravity in the most public, unfiltered ways possible without regard to who or what they are. They can cry about transphobia all they want, but their loathsome behavior is disliked by many without regard to who or what they may be or identify as.
Click to expand...
They confuse a phobia for a natural and right sense of disgust and revulsion.
Our society started to rot from the inside out when the idea of "kink shaming" began to be pushed.
Deviant behavior should be fucking shamed.
Mockery and ridicule of abhorrent perversion serves as a safeguard against the open moral decay and outright filth and deviance that has infested the West.
rusty shackleford 1 said:
View attachment 6208810
lol, dumb bitch probably thought period meant blood. Tuh! Imagine being that ignorant. Extra style points for the absurdity atrocity comment.
View attachment 6208814
These women have no idea what the trans period experience is, so they can’t speak on it. That’s why I as a man can say with certainty I experience periods. There was more funny in the comments, a few who almost got it lamenting that people think they’re all just coping and experiencing psychosomatic symptoms.
Click to expand...
I'll never forget that post with those sick fucks that were freezing tomato juice icicles to shove up their assholes so they could LARP at being "on their periods" or the sick fuck that was bragging about going through the fucking trash in the womens bathroom at a gas station to dig out used tampons.
These sick fucks should be burned.
SnergenFlergen said:
Also I'm choosing to believe that 'rather than sniffing child' was a Freudian slip there and not a typo. I wouldn't be surprised.
Click to expand...
We found Bidens anonymous alt account.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Arkin O'Brien, SofondaCox, Larry Trainor and 19 others
Hassou Tobi said:
View attachment 6249362
Click to expand...

It's not fucking surprising.

Murder-suicide by plane is an overlooked means of committing mass murder. It's actually a frequent cause of commercial passenger plane crashes.

Who wants to get on a plane flown by an unstable pervert, who at best is probably in the cockpit wanking to his new laydee uniform, or at worst might tank the whole plane if a passenger misgenders him?
 
  • Like
  • Horrifying
  • Agree
Reactions: DopeAddictKittenV2, 90 Seconds, maebynot and 26 others
Adrenochrome Dreams said:
Murder-suicide by plane is an overlooked means of committing mass murder. It's actually a frequent cause of commercial passenger plane crashes.
Click to expand...

I got: three solids - EgyptAir, Germanwings, Pacific Southwest (disgruntled employee), one probable - MH370, and one A-for-Effort (FedEx 705, though not a passenger plane). Do you know of others?

(Was gonna try to debate you on the "frequent" but ... um ... that is kind of a lot.)
 
  • Like
  • Horrifying
  • Feels
Reactions: TORtlEMUStRaNSUS, JudyTester, Pedophobe and 16 others
Deer Warts said:
I got: three solids - EgyptAir, Germanwings, Pacific Southwest (disgruntled employee), one probable - MH370, and one A-for-Effort (FedEx 705, though not a passenger plane). Do you know of others?

(Was gonna try to debate you on the "frequent" but ... um ... that is kind of a lot.)
Click to expand...

A few more:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Eastern_Airlines_Flight_5735
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LAM_Mozambique_Airlines_Flight_470
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SilkAir_Flight_185
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Air_Maroc_Flight_630
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Air_Lines_Flight_350
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barra_do_Garças_air_disaster

Given the rarity of plane crashes, I think it's fair to say that in modern times, deliberate crashes are at least not an uncommon cause of major disasters.
 
  • Horrifying
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Oh Sugar, TORtlEMUStRaNSUS, Oughtism and 35 others
Your_deadname_here said:
Here is an actual intersex person tired of being co-opted into the trans movement.

View attachment 6249019
This means I have XY chromosomes but no testosterone in my body, so I couldn’t develop into a typical male. I struggle with this because I wish I could have developed as male. I don’t grow body hair and cannot reproduce. I have no uterus, so I can’t get pregnant, and I have underdeveloped testicles in my torso that need regular scans to ensure they don’t become cancerous. This condition is very different from being transgender, and I dislike how some people group it with transgender issues, as they are distinct.
Archive
Reddit
Click to expand...
Imagine posting on Reddit about your incredibly rare, terrible medical condition, and the comments are full of people discussing a fictional medical drama show.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Horrifying
Reactions: The bearer of arms, DopeAddictKittenV2, Piss Bear and 41 others
Non-binary person worried about terminological purity (or something). 8)
Link Archive
1722299408106.png
I came out as non-binary a few months ago. But now that I'm a few months in, I feel that I may be using the non-binary label as a "stepping stone". The main reason for me is that I'm not on any HRT yet and being non-binary makes it easier for me to socially transition while not "passing".

But I know that the whole "stepping stone" theory is frowned upon and may be detrimental to the non-binary community. Is it still okay if I identify as non-binary now and maybe move to the (binary) trans label if/when I'm ready for it?

Update (2024-07-29)

I want to thank everyone for their contributions. I want you to know that I've read everyone of them, also the ones with the criticism. To address this, please let me elaborate on my initial post.

I realise that the way I framed it in my initial post makes it seem that I assumed the non-binary label just for practical reasons and that I'm actually a binary trans person. That is not the case. When I came out a few months ago I identified as non-binary because I knew that I wasn't male, but at the same time I didn't identify as female either. And that is still pretty much the situation today.

But I asked this question because I noticed my identity shifting. So when I asked this question, I was wondering if there will be a day that my identity will be so much aligned with the binary identity (I don't know if 100% is a thing here) that I will be essentially a binary trans woman. I don't know if and when that day will come, but if it is, it will most likely be years from now.

Also there is a common secondary point being made which is that being non-binary trans is actually more challenging than being binary trans. I must say, this is a good point and I didn't really consider that until I read some of the comments.

Besides the shared challenges for the whole LGBT+ community, each label has their own set of challenges. And for the non-binary people a common challenge is that other people (even those in the LGBT+ community) think that gender is a binary construct and so non-binary people do not exist (to say it bluntly). And the whole "stepping stone" theory plays into that by assuming that a lot of non-binary trans people are actually binary trans people. And I don't have to tell you that this isn't true, gender is non-binary and it always has been.

In hindsight, I don't think the term "stepping stone" is the correct term for my situation, it's more like a gender fluidity/shift. This works both ways, from non-binary to binary and the other way around. I personally know people that identified as binary trans at some time but now identity as non-binary. And all this validates that gender is a spectrum.

That is what I wanted to add to my post. I love a good discussion even if I get called out sometimes. Thanks again.
Click to expand...
So far 53 comments of bizarre casuistry on the question.
General tone is sympathetic.
You can tell this crowd has given it a lot of thought. :lit:
 
  • Like
  • Lunacy
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Pedophobe, Arkin O'Brien, ConSluttant and 19 others
Syikeblade said:
View attachment 6247666

It's never enough for these sociopaths
Click to expand...

This speaks to my brain cramping aspect to trying to understand this. As I'm someone who views the world by how I make sense of it. Not blind ideology. If they are referring to themselves as transgender, doesn't that mean they don't actually consider themselves a woman? That they acknowledge there's a difference between a trans women and a women.

Trans women are women. Yet, what about non trans women? Are they not a thing?

I had a buddy who is a straight cis guy, married. Somehow he got radicalised on trans issues. Smart guy. I stumped him on this. So trans women are women, but that doesn't mean there still isn't a group of women who aren't trans. Aren't they still their own group within women? When talking about women's sport.

He was literally yelling at me for gentle pushback on trans. Mentioning this was brain-stumping to him. Whatever cult wormhole he fell though, he had never even considered that point. Just adopted a bunch of slogans and ideas as true uncritically.

It seems so many issues Trans people have is this detachment from reality. If you want to cut off your dick or not, dress as a girl. Whatever. Just stay grounded with basic reality and not make believe. This attachment to wanting to live in a fantasy land seems to be the cause of so many of their mental anguish.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: socketmaster, Vetinari, 90 Seconds and 24 others
Poonocchio said:
It was moving in favour of LGB rights... the T has busted down the doors, shat all over the floors and undone 15+years of progress for LGBs within a few years. Good job, trannies! I'm glad they see the tide turning. Now they can see what they had and ruined by being pushy autistic retards.
Click to expand...
"Lgb rights" already were undoing western society's progress. Especially gays. I don't care how much they try to sell the "we just want to get married and adopt and have a family like straights do". The entire "gay culture" revolves around fucking around and getting nutted inside by as many strange men as possible, having to take a pill to not get aids because conscious abstinence is clearly too difficult, and being groomed as a child as a rite of passage of sorts.
Lesbians abuse and beat the shit out of each other.
Bis seem to be the most sane ones but they still largely participate in the retarded "pride" mindset.
I have no doubt some normal lgb exist but they are way WAY less of a percentage of the populations than they want you to believe.
 
  • Agree
  • Dumb
  • Like
Reactions: orangecat, Vetinari, Beef Void and 95 others
Sebben Crudele II said:
"Lgb rights" already were undoing western society's progress. Especially gays. I don't care how much they try to sell the "we just want to get married and adopt and have a family like straights do". The entire "gay culture" revolves around fucking around and getting nutted inside by as many strange men as possible, having to take a pill to not get aids because conscious abstinence is clearly too difficult, and being groomed as a child as a rite of passage of sorts.
Lesbians abuse and beat the shit out of each other.
Bis seem to be the most sane ones but they still largely participate in the retarded "pride" mindset.
I have no doubt some normal lgb exist but they are way WAY less of a percentage of the populations than they want you to believe.
Click to expand...
Bro, this is both off topic for this thread and dumb as shit. The allegation against lesbians you refer to is completely fake shit that was deliberately misinterpreted by right wing homophobes (to push their "gays are evil" agenda) and trannies (to push their "our abuse rates aren't that bad!" agenda). The survey in question asked lesbian women whether they had ever been the victim of IPV (intimate partner violence), not whether they'd ever perpetrated it, and ~40% of the lesbian women surveyed reported that they had only ever been victimized by previous male partners before they had come out; The study did not in any way ask about or clarify the sexuality of these women's abusive partners, either. So it would be more accurate to say that lesbian women are often victims of domestic violence. But the surveys in question do not in any way prove that lesbians are prone to abusing more than other sexualities or groups.

Screamer_2 said:
This speaks to my brain cramping aspect to trying to understand this. As I'm someone who views the world by how I make sense of it. Not blind ideology. If they are referring to themselves as transgender, doesn't that mean they don't actually consider themselves a woman? That they acknowledge there's a difference between a trans women and a women.

Trans women are women. Yet, what about non trans women? Are they not a thing?

I had a buddy who is a straight cis guy, married. Somehow he got radicalised on trans issues. Smart guy. I stumped him on this. So trans women are women, but that doesn't mean there still isn't a group of women who aren't trans. Aren't they still their own group within women? When talking about women's sport.

He was literally yelling at me for gentle pushback on trans. Mentioning this was brain-stumping to him. Whatever cult wormhole he fell though, he had never even considered that point. Just adopted a bunch of slogans and ideas as true uncritically.

It seems so many issues Trans people have is this detachment from reality. If you want to cut off your dick or not, dress as a girl. Whatever. Just stay grounded with basic reality and not make believe. This attachment to wanting to live in a fantasy land seems to be the cause of so many of their mental anguish.
Click to expand...
The answer, according to troons, is absolutely always that sure, "cis" women do exist, but they don't matter and shouldn't be considered their own separate group with their own needs, accommodations, desires, etc. because that is hurtful to trans-identified males. "Cis" women have "cis privilege" and as such don't get to be a distinct group anymore.

(Strangely, somehow, the same doesn't apply to men at all - they aren't expected to blur all boundaries and drop all their accommodations and needs to make trans-identified females feel comfortable and like they belong. Hmm. Wonder what that's all about.)

The Cunting Death said:
I have no idea what the fuck you're going on about considering I loathe pride stuff.
Click to expand...

But have you had the formative normie lgb experience of thinking about going to Pride, getting within a mile of the local Pride fest and turning around and going home? Because that's super important.

(Sorry for OT!)
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Silence of the Troons, Magicite, WhiteBoySummer and 93 others
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: JudyTester, Owner of a Lonely Hole, Arkin O'Brien and 25 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back