Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.6%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 26.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 59 16.5%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 138 38.7%

  • Total voters
    357
It’s a police investigation. Some people on this site truly don’t know the difference between criminal and civil proceedings.
He called the police on Aaron for revenge porn rather than file a defamation lawsuit for his claims about wife-swapping and swinging. How odd that such an aggressively monogamous man doesn't want to file such a case in a state that has so little in the way of anti-SLAPP laws.
 
Wouldn't that be tampering with a witness. Which is a crime?
Sounds like a dumb move.
You're allowed to discredit a witness. You're also pretty likely to get a restraining order on a guy like Aaron who, iirc, is already either under one or has agreed not to target his ex-wife prior to April in his streams already.

It's also legal to file a police report.

It's not legal to say "if you testify against me, I'll file a police report against you," or "if you don't testify against me, I'll withdraw my complaint."

But hey, Nick is a lawyer, I'm sure he won't do anything stupid.
 
This isn't the State being a busybody. If a complaint is made, they have to investigate.
I meant by that the "state is retarded and should've not bothered with this law". Not that they shouldn't enforce laws.
There was a stream with Drexel where he told Nick that someone 'closer than [he] realise[d]' was looking for some freak shit. Nick asked who, and Drexel said he would tell him off-show. Maybe suspect this was Kayla, but it was too on-the-nose for me.
Was this the stream he had where both Nick/Drexel were ripping on Q? Because I still think that's up somewhere. Because I recall Drexel saying:
1) He don't bang the wives of his friends
2) Q said shit about someone in Nick's life he shouldn't have
It's was oddly specific but yet non specific.

EDIT Found one of the streams: https://www.youtube.com/live/Dr3_KWQzpoQ?si=L5BHXlYf2lIDHrMp
 
This isn't the State being a busybody. If a complaint is made, they have to investigate.
Unless there's a specific rule (like that a Secretary of State's office in many states has to investigate certain claims against a business, law enforcement generally has broad discretion in how they allocate their investigative priorities. They can simply choose not to investigate at all. They can't even be held liable for outright refusal to show up to an emergency call (barring state law to the contrary).

Otherwise they'd have to investigate every claim some nut like Tommy Tooter made on a daily basis instead of just fobbing him off on a tard wrangler to listen to his nonsense and then tell him to go away.
 
He called the police on Aaron for revenge porn rather than file a defamation lawsuit for his claims about wife-swapping and swinging. How odd that such an aggressively monogamous man doesn't want to file such a case in a state that has so little in the way of anti-SLAPP laws.

Easy answer. Nick believes in free speech without limits. Nick would never file a defamation lawsuit over someone's free speech. But on the other hand having a midnight shower call with a police officer or prosecutor would just be a friendly conversation. And only an autistic prosecutor or police officer not understanding human cues would think that Nick intended for charges to be filed against anyone.

If they were to file charges, it would have nothing to do with Nick. People can't make Nick responsible for fixing all the autism in the world. Beyond that, Nick would know of no means by which charges could be dropped after they happened. Thinking Nick could do that is as crazy as thinking Nick can get body cam footage released. Besides Nick is busy with driving and stuff.

People sure are weird.
 
You're allowed to discredit a witness. You're also pretty likely to get a restraining order on a guy like Aaron who, iirc, is already either under one or has agreed not to target his ex-wife prior to April in his streams already.

It's also legal to file a police report.

But if he did that in a faggy way. Would that be legal?
 
Was this the stream he had where both Nick/Drexel were ripping on Q? Because I still think that's up somewhere. Because I recall Drexel saying:
1) He don't bang the wives of his friends
2) Q said shit about someone in Nick's life he shouldn't have
It's was oddly specific but yet non specific.

I cannot recall the stream, but I remember the occurrence. It was one of those 'put it out of mind' telltale signs that I ignored...

No, and instead of Drexel, Q should've been the one to become a regular on the show. I liked the Q streams. He was interesting and seemed like he had more going to him than his dick.

He had ongoing debt cases where Nick represented him brilliantly into loss and bankruptcy. He also got into the 2020 election grift and got nuked by YouTube. He also 'borrowed' 10-15k USD from Doug Tennapel and 'forgot' to say anything for months.

Otherwise, he appeared to be what Nick pretended to be...
 
EDIT Found one of the streams:
Here's where Drexel hints at something Quinton had said about Kayla. Drexel says if he relayed a question that was asked, Nick would view the situation differently, and Nick appears uncomfortable with the conversation.



Note that this video was in 2020 and in 2021 Rekieta represented Quinton in a civil case in one of his last appearances as an attorney on MCRO. Whatever Nick was told, it wasn't enough to stop him from representing Quinton in court.

He called the police on Aaron for revenge porn rather than file a defamation lawsuit for his claims about wife-swapping and swinging. How odd that such an aggressively monogamous man doesn't want to file such a case in a state that has so little in the way of anti-SLAPP laws.
If this goes anywhere at all, how Aaron originally obtained the photo would have to come out and that would seem to almost certainly involve non-aggressive monogamy, less than tepid monogamy in fact.

It means they value getting back at Aaron more than the public denial against all evidence of swinging, two years since Hedonism II.

I cannot recall the stream, but I remember the occurrence. It was one of those 'put it out of mind' telltale signs that I ignored...
That was a separate incident.
 
But if he did that in a faggy way. Would that be legal?
There is only one man who can answer this question. gae.jpg
 
I can’t figure out which thread to put this in, but thinking out loud here:

Aaron sent Geno a titty pic of Kayla. The Qover filed a report to St. Cloud police. St. Cloud police calls Geno about it. He has to describe what the picture looks like to them because he deleted the picture.

Other than the stream when Aaron actually sent the picture and they vaguely allude to it, there is no smoking gun. Only person who currently has the picture, as far as we know, is Aaron.

Am I too :optimistic: for thinking they will probably let this one go? I imagine St. Cloud cops have much bigger fish to fry than some guy maybe sending a titty pic to someone. If it happened in Kandiyohi county, maybe. They are such a sleepy area that the balldo bunker busting was possibly their first search warrant of 2024 and they have the time to chase down silly things like this. But St. Cloud probably has more crime to which they need to dedicate time and resources.
 
Cross-posting from Imholte thread the following clip by @elb: "Keanu: Kayla Rekieta Files Revenge Porn Charges Against Aaron Imholte"


It doesn't appear to be in this clip but Keanu not just specified that April contacted both her and Geno digging for more info on the matter and confirming that they intended to file a report, but ASKED THEM IF AARON HAD SENT THEM NUDES OF NICK!

Why would he have those?????



It's at 2:42:00 of her stream. I will clip it out myself later
Is this bitch actually retarded? :stress: by filing that police report it confirms that Aaron and Kayla were in fact swinging together.

But I'm sure Nick & Kayla are very grateful for your help anyway Keanu. :story:

Keanu.png
 
Other than the stream when Aaron actually sent the picture and they vaguely allude to it, there is no smoking gun. Only person who currently has the picture, as far as we know, is Aaron.

Am I too :optimistic: for thinking they will probably let this one go?
As far as I can tell, The police would only be interested in Kayla's complain, Geno's text, and Aaron. Contrary to Keanu's 2 hour talk, police don't want to talk to Keanu or April. They are irrelevant. Keanu seems to think Geno doing the noble thing and deleting it was good. I suspect the investigation ended when Geno could not present the revenge porn. Without the picture, LE cannot determine if it meets the criteria in the statute. Geno screwed the case by deleting the evidence. Probably doesn't even know it. LE could probably recover it but since it's deleted there is little harm to be had. Aaron needs to delete it too.

Now, that said, this will piss Nick off. Wouldn't be surprised if this suddenly shows up in public in an effort to blame Aaron. April is also pissed that she can't make a complaint herself.
 
I cannot recall the stream, but I remember the occurrence. It was one of those 'put it out of mind' telltale signs that I ignored...
It was really odd and clued me in a bit but I didn't make the dots until later (Hence I'm a believer of the "Kayla was cheating on Nick" idea, esp with the massage parlor statement too). Either Q was:
1) Talking shit and just making up that he/someone else fucked Kayla. Many such instances of men doing this, not to mention for minority men where "bagging" a white woman (I cannot find a better term for this phrase, sorry!) is like an achievement to boast amongst dudes.
2) He/someone else was with Kayla somehow
3) Trying to get under Nick/Drexel's skin

The way Nick reacted made me feel there was a degree of truth behind the statement under 2) or 3).

If Kayla and Nick had such a good, "aggressively" monogamous relationship, then Nick may have been surprised (and maybe suspicious), but not that disturbed unless he's a paranoid freak (he's not, see the coke stream). To me, it seems Nick was not sufficently entrenched in whatever he beliefs he had about the person involved.
 
Last edited:
Back