Ava Chris Tyson / Christopher Stephen Tyson / “Christine Tyson” / “Chris The Meme God” - MrBeast’s litigious troon sidekick & divorcé. Lolicon-loving narcissistic queer

That's my point, most fuckasses don't know the added context that Chris is a sex pest, so if one of the only things they see on their little tweet app is that video being deleted as some kind of proof of Chris *being* sex pest, they'll just assume everyone on this side of the debate are fucking insane.
i think you're overestimating how much stuff from here enters the main discourse. we're usually months ahead of the conversation, and it's not like well meaning and confused boomers are reading our posts thinking we're jumping the shark.

worst case scenario it's incumbent on us to share why we find it concerning, which is what we've been doing.
 
At the end of the day, I really hope his son gets to live a relatively normal life. Hope that Katie gets full custody and changes their surname to clear any association from this faggot. God willing Chris never actually touched him and Katie can find a charitable father figure that can provide a good life for her son.
God willing, Katie will shield him from all of this bullshit, say his dad went to prison or something (hey, it’s not like that’s entirely out of the cards at this point) and keeps him away from the internet, maybe a name change and they can go incognito.

I get that the point of the farms is to document everything, but unless I missed something, she’s not a cow, she just married one. A trans widow sure, lost her husband to the AGP coom-brain mind virus, from where I am standing it seems like they’re the victims more than anything.

He doesn’t deserve his son, he definitely didn’t deserve anything in his life, but to deprive a father from his son, that has to be the greatest punishment of all. Maybe he’ll reflect on that while he’s getting spit-roasted by Jamal and Tyrone for being a degenerate pedophile.
 
View attachment 6251499

Reasons nothing happened between LavaGS and Chris Tyson
-Lava says nothing happened
-Knows both of them
-Was present when Lava visited
-Chris wanted lava to work for the channel and Lava was competent
-Mr Beast job is cooler than working at ice cream shack

Reasons Prism is untrustworthy
-Has clear agenda
-Is a republican
-Spoke about Drake releasing dick pics
-Didn´t speak about pedo allegations made by Kendrick in a song
-Went to a republican convention
-Claims Prism said he didn´t care about Drake pedo
-Released info to EDP, who is a right wing whistleblower and anti trans
-"We must protect our kids" is something closeted peds say
-Infiltrated Trey Yates discord server

This retard goes on to condemn Chris based on the obviously fake dms that were from "Today"
Then goes over discord clips of Chris wilding out in voice chat downplaying them as not growing out of edgy teenage phase. Don´t worry he´s improved since then and that discord server is gone so she can no longer talk to minors in such a way.
There are definitely o more sexual messages with minors now.
The allegations of Chris grooming a 14 year old are very damning and should be addressed
People hate on Chris every day missgendering him :(
I can´t believe the evidence when people are being transphobes and disrespecting a community unjustly based on the actions of a single member, Chris
CURRENT YEAR
Sex and gender are super different.
Lava so brave for denying allegations (after undeniable proof surfaced)
Chris treats me well and gets along with his kid.

View attachment 6251520
View attachment 6251521
Coomer had to edit out his porn search

Edit: UH OOOOHView attachment 6251535
Holy shit this guy is literally the living breathing coomer meme
 
That's my point, most fuckasses don't know the added context that Chris is a sex pest, so if one of the only things they see on their little tweet app is that video being deleted as some kind of proof of Chris *being* sex pest, they'll just assume everyone on this side of the debate are fucking insane.
if you don't think taking videos of naked infants pooping in bathtubs and posting it for millions of people to see is already on its own a disgusting thing to do, you deserve the fucking wall.
 
100%
Single Persistent Kiwi Farms Water Mark 100.png
Persistent Kiwi Farms Water Mark 100.png

15%
Single Persistent Kiwi Farms Water Mark 15.png
Persistent Kiwi Farms Water Mark 15.png


I made some Kiwi Farms Watermarks that are hard to remove.
 
if you don't think taking videos of naked infants pooping in bathtubs and posting it for millions of people to see is already on its own a disgusting thing to do, you deserve the fucking wall.
I can assure you that if someone is going to jerk their shit to a baby, whether or not it's nude is probably irrelevant. Assuming that's your concern, anyways. If that's the logic you're using, then hopefully you're consistent and think videos and images of children shouldn't be on the internet at all, on social media or otherwise, because there's pedos everywhere.

Good luck though, since the average well meaning human being wants to be as social as possible and doesn't hang around places where how depraved some people can actually be is revealed to others, like here. It probably doesn't even cross the average mother's mind that some sicko could be masturbating to a video of their baby in the bath because that level of depravity is unthinkable to them.
 
Yeah who would wanna talk about some drama around a nobody like Mr. Beast if there are icky Kiwi Farms watermarks involved.
You make a good point. Watermarks may do the opposite, and cause issues further for the spread of information. Kiwis are so stigmatized that whatever evidence we collect because “it’s from kiwi farms” normies will dismiss it. There might also be benefits to watermarks where normies will be forced to accept that good archived info is from the farms. Content Creators may also have to be honest that their information/research comes from here.

The idea itself should not be 100 % dismissed. There may be some value. I wonder if a function could be added by Null where we can add optional kiwi farms watermarks to certain images/videos. Then it won’t be forced on people, but optional. What do you all think?
 
Last edited:
Doomposting is cringe and gay.

The pendulum is swinging back right in front of our eyes and here you are trying to tell people that it isn't happening. You faggots and your lack of optimism are part of the problem.

Chris saw his life and said "Nope!"
Gave up his trad wife like a dope
Addicted to porn
A tranny is born
Oh what a slippery slope!
These are the same people who thought no big scandal would stop Chris from appearing on Mr. Beast's channel and Jimmy would of kept him on even after these accusations popped up.
Unfortunately I don't think society is going to collectively come together in 5 or 10 years and agree troons are bad and need to be watched. I started getting blacklisted from social media for telling MTF trannies they aren't women all the way back in 2012 and it's only gotten worse year after year. I think the fight is going to be a fight of attrition. Hopefully this does take down Chris but even if it does, society isn't going to turn on troons as a result. I don't think it matters how many are exposed but I think they still need to be exposed anyway. Even if society never comes together to denounce it they still need to be weeded out one by one.
You do know support for LGBT has continued to drop as the years went by? This whole Chris thing is just going to accelerate it. Even my own mother who used to be pro TRA has started to realize how disgusting the T community is.
 
You make a good point. Watermarks may do the opposite and cause issues further for the spread of information. Kiwis are so stigmatized that whatever evidence we collect because “it’s from kiwi farms” normies will dismiss it. There might also be benefits to it where normies will be forced to accept that good archived info is from the farms. The idea itself should not be 100 % dismissed. There may be some value. I wonder if a function could be added by Null where we can add optional kiwi farms watermarks to certain images/videos. Then it won’t be forced on people, but optional.
The only reason the idea that "it's from Kiwi Farms, it's not reliable" even exists is because it's so easy for all the drama nigger with millions of clicks to avoid crediting the Farms.

If they want to keep where they get their information from hidden, they should at least have to work for it.

And when we talk about normies, there is so little chance you can change a view that MSM and MAM perpetuate that it's not worth thinking about them.

I operate on hate and I hate most drama faggots and want them all to suffah.
 
The only reason the idea that "it's from Kiwi Farms, it's not reliable" even exists is because it's so easy for all the drama nigger with millions of clicks to avoid crediting the Farms.

Optional watermarks for images/images should be a feature that if Null wants too (as it is his site so he can do whatever he wishes) can be added. These lazy content creators rip off from the farms so watermarks would force them to credit us. They are lazy so I doubt they would have the energy to remove such watermarks.
 
These are the same people who thought no big scandal would stop Chris from appearing on Mr. Beast's channel and Jimmy would of kept him on even after these accusations popped up.

You do know support for LGBT has continued to drop as the years went by? This whole Chris thing is just going to accelerate it. Even my own mother who used to be pro TRA has started to realize how disgusting the T community is.
Every gay that has more than a Neanderthal amount of brain cells hates this shit now. The term Pooner is also now hitting mainstream dicksucker discourse.
 
You make a good point. Watermarks may do the opposite, and cause issues further for the spread of information. Kiwis are so stigmatized that whatever evidence we collect because “it’s from kiwi farms” normies will dismiss it. There might also be benefits to watermarks where normies will be forced to accept that good archived info is from the farms. Content Creators may also have to be honest that their information/research comes from here.
This is really good but I see this as a double-edged sword too. Maybe adding "archived by" before Kiwifarms would help PR a bit. This would make content creators have to be honest about where they're getting their info from (here)!

The idea itself should not be 100 % dismissed. There may be some value. I wonder if a function could be added by Null where we can add optional kiwi farms watermarks to certain images/videos. Then it won’t be forced on people, but optional. What do you all think?
I think adding a function to put a small watermark at the bottom of the image (much like Reddit or iFunny watermarks) would be great too. It's less obtrusive and still lets people know the photo/video came from here. And watermarks should not be optional for PDFs and such - just a small watermark that says "downloaded from kiwifarms.st" in the bottom right corner of each page of a PDF let's say, would be good at catching people's attention and also increasing KF traffic.

This could really change public perception of KF!!
 
I'm not doomposting, simply pointing out that I've been around awhile and the shift has only been in one direction the entire time. Thinking this will change the course is naive. However I will be delighted to be proven wrong because I'd love for everyone to wakeup and say fuck troons.
I reckon I am older than you because what I see is a typical pendulum swing, which happens in everything. Politics, social trends, fashion, even hobbies. If you zoom out a bit you will notice it more clearly.
 
I can assure you that if someone is going to jerk their shit to a baby, whether or not it's nude is probably irrelevant. Assuming that's your concern, anyways. If that's the logic you're using, then hopefully you're consistent and think videos and images of children shouldn't be on the internet at all, on social media or otherwise, because there's pedos everywhere.
i do, and not just for that reason, but also because it's pretty shitty to have your opsec/privacy invaded by your retard fag parents before you're even old enough to deserve your own dox being posted anywhere, let alone understand what that shit means. that's what photo albums are for.

you remind me a lot of ross, the pedophile who was outed because he admitted to looking up videos of kids playing in bathtubs on youtube.

edit:
Good luck though
you pissed me off enough that i felt like looking around, and yeah, as far as i'm concerned you're either a pedophile yourself, or you heavily sympathize with them, according to the post you made about how you felt so bad for zoophile Connor Roundy, AKA Hypnotist Sappho

I used to be in contact with Sappho years ago, prior to them coming out as a Zoophile actually. I initially met them on VRChat and felt some pity towards them after they came out about their degenerate sexual views on animals, and they had promised me at the time they would get help and that they had never personally engaged in sexual acts with any animals of their own or of others.

I wasn't even necessarily against their "hypnosis sessions" either. People have their proclivities, whatever. It wasn't hurting anyone at the time I knew them.

Of course, only months after I met them, they began engaging in basically everything seen in the OP, and I couldn't engage with them any further. Clearly any vows to improve were broken. As I said previously, I initially took pity on them since they seemed ashamed of their zoophile feelings.

If you still read this thread, Valerie, which you likely still do, I hope you are trying to better yourself, despite all your transgressions. I don't forgive you, necessarily, but unless you are actively grooming children or fucking animals, I see no point in crucifying you further. These people have clearly done that enough.

Valerie probably doesn't know who I am since I don't go by this handle anywhere else, but my pfp might be somewhat recognizable. If you know who this is, Valerie, then read this and reflect on what I told you years ago.

If you continue spiraling down as you have in the past, time will not be on your side.

kill yourself you absolute degenerate freak.
 
Last edited:
I think this argument is very emotional and it's leading to a few misunderstandings. I'm not saying that there is no hope or that gains can't be made. I can see a scenario where trump wins and more people like this on the left are called out and they go into relative hiding. Does that mean I think society is going to suddenly collectively come together to banish them? Nah. Would I love that? Yes.
 
Back