- Joined
- Oct 29, 2019
The freedom of adulthood... but at what cost?
Unfortunately, I cannot into the twatters.
Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.
- Thread starter Billy Bob Dick
- Start date
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
At a certain age, you become unmarriable. Not because nobody will marry you, but because you simply are not fit to be married anymore. I don't know what age. Probably early thirties which is, coincidentally, also when they're pretty much too old to have kids for the most part. Weird
Mega Black
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2022
There are millions of stray cats that need adopting. Without hags projecting their empty nest syndrome onto the little furballs, who will take care of them?
I once had a foreign exchange student tell me that his mom had pneumonia and still had to go to work, almost dying in the process, because it would look bad if she called in sick.
The work to life culture is also one of the main reasons Isekai and generic fantasy is so popular there. The idea of being a normal fucking loser slumming it in some shitty job where you have no free time, then getting trucked off (often literally) to a fantasy land free of all your social and monetary restrictions is a sort of escapism that must be like mental crack to the chronically overworked jap.
This is almost making me want to create a thread to over psychoanalyze anime trends to stop shitting up the thread.
The age has gone up a bit in the modern era. I'd say 35 is the hard cut off date for marriage or at least a serious relationship that will lead to marriage. If you don't have a guy pretty much locked in by that age, where he can squeeze that last little bit of fertility out of you, then you're screwed.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2019
Why the Olive Specter avatar on a certain DMZ "joined in 2024" poster?
Yeah, the serial killer that killed men and women is such a man hater that she:
- Fucked the Grim Reaper and had a son with him
- Her final husband died of natural causes
- She kept that husband's last name
- His grave is right next to her "throne" inside her graveyard
Yeah, the serial killer that killed men and women is such a man hater that she:
- Fucked the Grim Reaper and had a son with him
- Her final husband died of natural causes
- She kept that husband's last name
- His grave is right next to her "throne" inside her graveyard
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2021
It is biology but the reason is different. Waist-to-hip ratio in women has a strong correlation with intelligence of the offspring; the lower it is, the smarter the kids. The adipose tissue around the abdomen differs from the one around the ass and thighs both in fatty acid composition and hormonal activity, with only the latter providing optimal nourishment for the fetus during gestation. This effect of "malnutrition" of the fetus is not something that can be corrected by appropriate diet once the child is born. In addition to that, pregnancy is naturally a hypercoagulative state and obesity further exacerbates the issue, so it's reasonable to expect that the overall supply of nutrients and oxygen to the fetus in obese pregnant women is impaired to a certain degree compared to women of healthy weight.
Tl;dr: BEING FAT MAKES YOU A BAD MOTHER
I picture the scene like one of those fat-girl-fucking wojaks that have been so popular lately, except the wojak in question is the same size as the girl.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
The man-hate thread has consistently abided by my request that the thread not simply be infighting and this thread has not. This is the absolute last time I'm asking people stop flinging shit at each other. Either get along, agree to disagree, or go away.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2022
eaglesfan665
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2020
My thoughts on the subject of pornography:
My position is that it is not good for us. As some of you have mentioned, it does hijack the dopamine release in your brain and you can become dependent on it (although I think cases of real physical dependence on it are not as common as we are led to believe). I don't intend to delve deep into the subject of religion and theology on the matter, but there obviously are religious reasons for classifying it as immoral as well - lest we forget that, for example, in Paul's letter to the Corinthians, the original Greek word for "sexual immorality" is "porneia" which, along with "fornication" means prostitution, or payment in exchange for sexual acts. Whether these acts are something you partake in or witness on a screen, and whether you pay for them or whether whoever produces the videos pays the "actresses" for performing in them, I'd argue that the ultimate conclusion is that pornography is sexually immoral.
Regardless, pornography exists and saying that it oughtn't, or imagining a world where it doesn't, does not make it go away. It's continued existence leads to several questions, some of which I'll lay out here:
Why do many men access it at first?
Usually, in our modern society boys first access it at the turning point of adolescence as a result of curiosity about women that is rooted in hormonal changes. This is bad because it can arguably (but doesn't necessarily) instill an unrealistic view of women from an early age.
Why do many men continue to access it throughout their adolescence and into maturity?
Besides the aforementioned dopamine response to the onanism (I am presuming that watching pornography inherently implies masturbation), it's a shortcut for erotic love. Pornography effectively simulates the physical closeness of an intimate relationship, and at times the instinctual and animal aspect of coitus, which I would argue the vast majority of men (up to 99.99% of us, including jacked genius billionaires with level 100 charisma) cannot get at a whim. Furthermore men have no shortcut for emotional love - there is nothing analogous to the onanism for, say, imagining that a woman you care for cares for you in return, that you can confide in a woman who in return confides in you, that you can share your life with a woman, etc., so in the absence of these, all of these desires get rerouted to eros, the only type of love that can be effectively simulated. In short, in the absence of real love, and a real loved one, all men can really do by themselves is nurture eros. This doesn't mean there aren't chronically horny and obsessed individuals that only care about sex, but we call those people "homosexuals", who don't really care what they're copulating with as long as they're copulating (or imagining copulation).
Why do men continue to "consume" pornography even when they are in a romantic relationship?
Could be several things. They could just be obsessively erotic as mentioned above, but it could also be that their needs aren't being met (wherein "needs" does not necessarily imply sexual needs, as stated above I believe that for men the onanism is a shortcut for all types of romantic needs, for which there are no other shortcuts). Why are these needs not being met? Possibly because the man has no ability to express what he wants, afraid that being "emotionally open", as so many women claim to want, might make him seem excessively emotionally weak, fragile and needy, but it could also be because many women tend to become complacent in relationships and realistically care very little about what "their man" may want or need.
Why rely on the "shortcut" at all? Why not just find love?
For a lot of men it's a sort of "would that I could", which is not helped by the whole incel/blackpill discourse and especially it's emergence into the mainstream. Furthermore, as mentioned above even normal men that do get into relationships today find out that being in a relationship is often harder than not being in one. Are there perfect romantic relationships? Probably so, but I have seldom witnessed any, be it in my life, in my friends or my family. I do think that, in the West, dealing with women in general has gotten harder for men over the last century (both because the previous generations have been poor at teaching men to be men and because women have generally-speaking become less feminine)
Do I mean to justify the usage of pornography by this line of questioning? No.
All I mean to do is highlight that men have needs (not just sexual ones) that should be considered by women that want a happy relationship. A happy man leads to a happy woman, a happy woman does not lead to a happy man. I'd argue that all of the happenings of the last ~100+ years that have stripped masculinity of it's meaning and it's value, that put and continue to put men in a corner of powerlessness and even weakness, have led to the world we have today. How can women expect men not to behave aberrantly in an aberrant world? Also, when many women and womanly individuals say that porn consumption leads to transgenderism, they are confusing correlation for causation. Male weakness and femininity (in general, not just pertaining to transgenderism), porn "addiction" or overreliance, transgenderism and accompanying ideology, is all fruit of the same tree - the tree of so-called equality.
The real cause is straight-up satanism or, if you'd like to avoid religious terminology, the complete reversal of all natural, normative roles. The man becomes woman, the woman becomes man. The father becomes mother, the mother becomes father. The strong become weak, and the weak - strong.
My overall message, succinctly, is less about porn and more about the screeching harpies (both women and male feminists) that want to eat their cake and have it too - to be beholden to no regular concept of femininity but to simultaneously make demands of men. You cannot attempt to take men's power away and then blame them for everything bad in this world. Perhaps they should take the log out of their own eye, before blaming or complaining about others' faults, be they logs also, or mere specks.
Regardless, pornography exists and saying that it oughtn't, or imagining a world where it doesn't, does not make it go away. It's continued existence leads to several questions, some of which I'll lay out here:
Why do many men access it at first?
Usually, in our modern society boys first access it at the turning point of adolescence as a result of curiosity about women that is rooted in hormonal changes. This is bad because it can arguably (but doesn't necessarily) instill an unrealistic view of women from an early age.
Why do many men continue to access it throughout their adolescence and into maturity?
Besides the aforementioned dopamine response to the onanism (I am presuming that watching pornography inherently implies masturbation), it's a shortcut for erotic love. Pornography effectively simulates the physical closeness of an intimate relationship, and at times the instinctual and animal aspect of coitus, which I would argue the vast majority of men (up to 99.99% of us, including jacked genius billionaires with level 100 charisma) cannot get at a whim. Furthermore men have no shortcut for emotional love - there is nothing analogous to the onanism for, say, imagining that a woman you care for cares for you in return, that you can confide in a woman who in return confides in you, that you can share your life with a woman, etc., so in the absence of these, all of these desires get rerouted to eros, the only type of love that can be effectively simulated. In short, in the absence of real love, and a real loved one, all men can really do by themselves is nurture eros. This doesn't mean there aren't chronically horny and obsessed individuals that only care about sex, but we call those people "homosexuals", who don't really care what they're copulating with as long as they're copulating (or imagining copulation).
Why do men continue to "consume" pornography even when they are in a romantic relationship?
Could be several things. They could just be obsessively erotic as mentioned above, but it could also be that their needs aren't being met (wherein "needs" does not necessarily imply sexual needs, as stated above I believe that for men the onanism is a shortcut for all types of romantic needs, for which there are no other shortcuts). Why are these needs not being met? Possibly because the man has no ability to express what he wants, afraid that being "emotionally open", as so many women claim to want, might make him seem excessively emotionally weak, fragile and needy, but it could also be because many women tend to become complacent in relationships and realistically care very little about what "their man" may want or need.
Why rely on the "shortcut" at all? Why not just find love?
For a lot of men it's a sort of "would that I could", which is not helped by the whole incel/blackpill discourse and especially it's emergence into the mainstream. Furthermore, as mentioned above even normal men that do get into relationships today find out that being in a relationship is often harder than not being in one. Are there perfect romantic relationships? Probably so, but I have seldom witnessed any, be it in my life, in my friends or my family. I do think that, in the West, dealing with women in general has gotten harder for men over the last century (both because the previous generations have been poor at teaching men to be men and because women have generally-speaking become less feminine)
Do I mean to justify the usage of pornography by this line of questioning? No.
All I mean to do is highlight that men have needs (not just sexual ones) that should be considered by women that want a happy relationship. A happy man leads to a happy woman, a happy woman does not lead to a happy man. I'd argue that all of the happenings of the last ~100+ years that have stripped masculinity of it's meaning and it's value, that put and continue to put men in a corner of powerlessness and even weakness, have led to the world we have today. How can women expect men not to behave aberrantly in an aberrant world? Also, when many women and womanly individuals say that porn consumption leads to transgenderism, they are confusing correlation for causation. Male weakness and femininity (in general, not just pertaining to transgenderism), porn "addiction" or overreliance, transgenderism and accompanying ideology, is all fruit of the same tree - the tree of so-called equality.
The real cause is straight-up satanism or, if you'd like to avoid religious terminology, the complete reversal of all natural, normative roles. The man becomes woman, the woman becomes man. The father becomes mother, the mother becomes father. The strong become weak, and the weak - strong.
My overall message, succinctly, is less about porn and more about the screeching harpies (both women and male feminists) that want to eat their cake and have it too - to be beholden to no regular concept of femininity but to simultaneously make demands of men. You cannot attempt to take men's power away and then blame them for everything bad in this world. Perhaps they should take the log out of their own eye, before blaming or complaining about others' faults, be they logs also, or mere specks.
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2019
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2022
I mean the thread's rent free in the mind of a certain corpulent male feminist.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
Maybe if the jannies were paid more we could use payroll taxes to fund the women hate threads rent.
I say we triple jannie's pay!
I say we triple jannie's pay!
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2023
I'll be nice to Null and not @ him. I'd recommend you do the same. However, with what he said:
And another thing, since I know you're reading this, Null, nobody is trying to drive you from your own site. Why do you think that? Do you think you're Lowtax now? Wrong in every detail as always, child. Nobody is looking at the hole you've dug for yourself and thinking, "Oh boy! I'd want to take his place!" I respect you for the KF, but you and I both know you fucked yourself irreversibly with it.
And while I'm at it: What happened to the "Hit it or Quit it?" thread by Quence? I looked the other day and that thread got deleted. Did some insecure bitch in BP get irritated by the sight of women under 200 pounds? There was another thread before that involving posting beautiful women, and that also got shoah'd (it was in the super secret board, you know the one).
And finally, don't fucking forget that this thread is in Mass Debates, the ass end of the site, because, again, some insecure bitch (probably named earlier in this thread) didn't like seeing it in General Discussion. I was there. I saw it happen. Mass Debates generally seems to be the board that the mods boot threads they don't like.
Josh, either shut your mouth and stop hate-reading the thread, or delete it. Or even lock it down like you did with Jim's thread you fat brat. What? You never put in functionality to suppress alerts from a thread? Sounds like a (you) problem.
When does this thread devolve into infighting? Seriously. Since I've been here, the usual reasons this thread devolves into shit flinging are:
- Null starts shit.
- His ball washers follow in and start shit.
- A woman comes in and starts shit.
And another thing, since I know you're reading this, Null, nobody is trying to drive you from your own site. Why do you think that? Do you think you're Lowtax now? Wrong in every detail as always, child. Nobody is looking at the hole you've dug for yourself and thinking, "Oh boy! I'd want to take his place!" I respect you for the KF, but you and I both know you fucked yourself irreversibly with it.
And while I'm at it: What happened to the "Hit it or Quit it?" thread by Quence? I looked the other day and that thread got deleted. Did some insecure bitch in BP get irritated by the sight of women under 200 pounds? There was another thread before that involving posting beautiful women, and that also got shoah'd (it was in the super secret board, you know the one).
And finally, don't fucking forget that this thread is in Mass Debates, the ass end of the site, because, again, some insecure bitch (probably named earlier in this thread) didn't like seeing it in General Discussion. I was there. I saw it happen. Mass Debates generally seems to be the board that the mods boot threads they don't like.
Josh, either shut your mouth and stop hate-reading the thread, or delete it. Or even lock it down like you did with Jim's thread you fat brat. What? You never put in functionality to suppress alerts from a thread? Sounds like a (you) problem.
Last edited:
Max Free
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2021
Yeah, was nice shitposting with you a little bit, but this thread definitely isn't going to make it.
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2019
As a confirmed member of the Pick Me Squad: Gentlemen, it was an honor.
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2022
Matriarchy wins another round gents.
Situation is truly critical. Quite dire, if I might say.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
Lidl Drip or whatever is consistently the most aggressive and prolific poster on the site when it comes to coming into threads where they're not wanted and starting fights with the resident posters completely unprovoked.
Why aren't they banned for "community infighting?"
Why aren't they banned for "community infighting?"
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2014
The Short Kings of this thread are just chatting and people come in to start shit. That is not the fault of the thread's intended audience.
It is in mass debates, and nobody here wants to be saddled with wrangling the ISPs to keep the farms up. We aren't after your job Dear Feeder.
Maybe Null should make this a DMZ too? They got their own thread, why can't others have their own? Very Israeli.
It is in mass debates, and nobody here wants to be saddled with wrangling the ISPs to keep the farms up. We aren't after your job Dear Feeder.
Maybe Null should make this a DMZ too? They got their own thread, why can't others have their own? Very Israeli.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2022
We're a melting pot of friendship here at Weenie Hut Jr's, all are welcome so long as they don't shit up the thread.
Cause you don't get rid of the person who pays your bills, I'd say people ITT have bought some merch here and there when it's available but consistent donations via the only means he can accept money not so much. We all know women are 80% of consumer spending so it makes sense to leave them alone so long as they don't cause shit and keep sending money. Honestly rather based, get that bag king.
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2014
Long Dong Gone must be seething. The Virgin Dong could have paid off Null to janny for him like the Chud Lidl. Just a good 2000 dollars donation per month, the google cave troll could have afforded it, him and Keffals must be swimming in donations from other troons.
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2024
I'm gonna false flag attack this thread and cause it to get shut down. Maybe android raptor will finally love me if I do...?