Biden Admin Demands $78 Trillion to Fund ‘Net Zero’

Link/Archive

Democrat President Joe Biden’s administration is demanding a staggering $78 trillion to allegedly fight “climate change” by funding the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) “Net Zero” agenda.

The eye-watering price tag of the globalists’ green agenda was revealed by Biden’s Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen during a speech in Belem, Brazil, on Saturday.

Yellen announced that taxpayers will need to cough up $78,000,000,000,000 before 2050 to fund a “global transition” to a so-called “low-carbon economy.”
In order to comply with the WEF’s “Net Zero” goals, Yellen said there would need to be $3 trillion globally in annual financing for the agenda.

“Net Zero” is a list of unrealistic goals laid out by the WEF, with backing from the United Nations (UN), that seeks to advance a globalist collectivism agenda.

Thinly veiled as environmentalism, the unachievable goals of “Net Zero” would bankrupt society and make the public dependent on an unelected corporatocratic elite.

Yellen declared that meeting the “Net Zero” targets is a top priority for the Biden administration, according to the speech.

In order to contribute to this, Yellen vowed to use American tax dollars to finance green agenda initiatives in developing countries.

The taxpayer money will be funneled to multilateral development banks to develop “clean energy technologies,” Yellen pledged.

“The transition will require no less than $3 trillion in new capital from many sources each year between now and 2050,” Yellen said during the speech.
“This can be leveraged to support pathways to sustainable and inclusive growth, including for countries that have historically received less investment.”

“Neglecting to address climate change and the loss of nature and biodiversity is not just bad environmental policy,” Yellen said during the speech.

“It is bad economic policy.”

Yellen boasted in her speech about the commitments the Biden administration has put forth toward forwarding these green initiatives to achieve their “climate goals.”

She openly admitted that the Democrats’ “Inflation Reduction Act” was a thinly-veiled green agenda legislation.

“At home, we are implementing the Inflation Reduction Act, the most significant climate legislation in our nation’s history,” Yellen said during the speech.

“It is driving hundreds of billions of dollars of investments in the clean energy technologies and industries that will propel us toward our climate goals and fuel our economic growth.”

The Inflation Reduction Act allocated $370 billion to subsidize climate initiatives like electric vehicles and other technologies that are essential to Biden’s green agenda.

“Climate change is literally an existential threat to our nation and to the world,” Biden said during a speech addressing “climate change” in July of 2022.
“As President, I’ll use my executive powers to combat climate — the climate crisis in the absence of congressional actions, notwithstanding their incredible action.”

During her speech, Yellen advocated for these climate initiatives to be implemented “beyond our borders.”

“Our ambitions at home are matched by our ambitions abroad,” Yellen asserted.

“We know that we can only achieve our climate and economic goals — from reducing global emissions to adapting and building resilience, from strengthening markets to bolstering supply chains — if we also lead efforts far beyond our borders.”

Biden is not the only world leader seeking to bankrupt their nation to comply with the WEF’s “climate” agenda, however.

As THAIMBC News previously reported, Britain’s King Charles III demanded late last year that taxpayers around the globe cough up $5 trillion every year in order to advance the globalist “Net Zero” agenda.

King Charles made the call while delivering a speech at the opening ceremony of COP28.

He said that “they” needed $4.5 to $5 trillion per year to drive the “transformation” that’s allegedly needed because of “climate change.”

Many may question why Charles is demanding such extraordinary amounts of money to fight the so-called “climate crisis.”

However, it is clear that the “transformation” to the “sustainable future” the King speaks of is one where the general public owns nothing and “they” own and control everything.

WEF founder Klaus Schwab calls this plan “The Great Reset.”
 
The end of fossil fuels will literally lead to the collapse of civilization. They say that humanity began with invention of fire, but we are trying to ban fire. Harnessing ultra low density green energy that requires massive amounts of rare earth elements at extremely high cost to generate, then another massive amount of rare earth elements to store at low density. How many resources are needed to cook piece of meat over a wood fire, vs 100% renewable energy? The difference is thriving civilization vs one that is collapsing and will not be able to meet basic needs.
 
These are just made up numbers, there's no way someone has come up with an itemised list of every expense and added it up to 78 trillion.
I think they tried, and that's just where they stopped caring/counting, since that's their calculated point where the majority of people start to question where the money to pay for it is going to come from... .

$78 million? That's a rounding error!
$78 billion? Congress spends that just on lunch!
$78 trillion? Wait, with a "T" - uh, that's literally more money than our GDP.....


the ACTUAL cost is probably 2 or 3 time as much, and they probably know it.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Miller
Bankrupt billions of people, so that millions of people can starve to death, so that a country can take a large step toward the future, like, some kind of great leap forward...
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: pot of sneed
The end of fossil fuels will literally lead to the collapse of civilization. They say that humanity began with invention of fire, but we are trying to ban fire. Harnessing ultra low density green energy that requires massive amounts of rare earth elements at extremely high cost to generate, then another massive amount of rare earth elements to store at low density. How many resources are needed to cook piece of meat over a wood fire, vs 100% renewable energy? The difference is thriving civilization vs one that is collapsing and will not be able to meet basic needs.
That is pretty much the point. The retarded elites don't want you to live in comfort and abundance. They want you to suffer and starve, they want to troon out your children and they want you sick and broke and constantly scrambling for basic necessities. They also don't want any sort of competition. That is why the middle class has to go, entirely.
 
The great taking

Crash the economy
have a few companies buy up everything for pennies on the dollar
switch everything to a rental economy.

idk. I don't think these old geezers know either.
....So what's going to stop people from just squatting, stealing, and killing? The people they pay to enforce will have more incentive to take given that they're only ones that can at that point.
god, we're run by nigger cum guzzling retards
I hope everyone involved in this dies a horrifyingly painful death.
they're practically begging for it
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Bugman's Burden
That's not how funding works. It's like saying we want a Mars colony by 2150 and demanding it be immediately be paid for with the estimated requisite 6 quadrillion dollars. There's this little thing called 'pay as you go'-- which I know is a lost art in this age of debt but it allows for agile adjustments to plans and even abandonment if priorities shift.
 
Remember a couple years ago when the Green New Deal was too expensive and none of the homosexuals in the Senate voted for it?

Well guess what! At least the GND pretended to be a jobs program. This won't even bother with the pretense of being beneficial.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bugman's Burden
When AOC revealed her "new Green Deal" plan a number of years back, I explained in a post that I can't find now what it would cost how long it would take to implement (240 or so years) and what the environmental damage done by it would be (a dump the size of california, 3' deep in construction waste from all of the "old" buildings you'd have to knock down).

I didn't expect some democrat operative to forward my post as a suggested BLUEPRINT

These maniacs are really going to do it aren't they? They're going to set up the infrastructure to frogmarch future generations into Blade-Runner like city hives where you'll own nothing, eat the bugs, and accept the trans dick.

Holy fucking God I'm glad I'll be dead in 10-15 years.

EDIT: here we go:

 
Last edited:
I guess the grifters are seeing the end of the line at last so are aiming for one last big push to grab as much as they can before the whole house of cards that is the US economy comes tumbling down.

Might as well grab as much as you can as quick as you can right? It's not like there is anyone to stop you after all.
 
You make that sound like Colonialism was something bad.
Oh no, that wasn't my intention at all. People like Yellen condemn colonialism in one breath and in the next advocate it under a new name. It's not that colonialism was bad, it's that is wasn't directed by Yellen and her ilk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TowinKarz
Back