Jackie Singh / Jacqueline Singh / Jacqueline Anne Stokes / Jax / @find_evil / HackingButLegal / @HackingButLegal / piggytomlinson - Cybersecurity "expert," wannabe journoscum, former "hacker"; gunt guards Patrick Tomlinson, currently picking a fight with ONA Forums, GNAA Groupie

Someone who started out this course knowing nothing would know even less after just listening to this street shitting subhuman.
False. He or she would know for sure that the fat, homely non-custodial mother who has literal shit under her fingernails is as retarded as the internet says she is.
 
What brain rot.

jackie_dumbshit00001.gif

The only one that won't make it to the other side of 'without Trump' is truth social. Jackie has a blue checkmark and she could have listed more rather than blah, blah.

Gab isn't really making any big profit....just like Twitter was when it was Twitter. But the 'conservative Christian' is an audience and if one can control costs it can keep going and going as that group existed before Trump and will after.

Newsmax sells ads and does this by marketing to conservatives. When Trump isn't viable the ad consumers via Newsmax will just move to the next thing. It won't be enough to kill 'em.

What prompted this post was Rumble. That was created in 2013. Yes, there are a whole lotta pro-Trump content on Rumble. But Rumble is 'what if we allowed things that are not allowed on YouTube?' and in doing that the unhinged pro-Trump shit is on Rumble.

Brainrot Jackie is also ignoring the revenue increases of media when Trump is a topic of controversy and the drop when he is out of office. Will Jackie weigh in if MSNBC takes a drop when Trump is gone? https://fortune.com/2023/10/05/msnbc-anti-trump-network-only-growing-cable-news-fox-cnn-shrink/ archive Trump content swings both ways ya dumbshit.

Every one of those sites is advertiser income driven. Truth social is outdoing Musk's money losing power and has no reason to exist if Trump doesn't and has no reason to exist if Trump got a 2nd term. Truth social going down would actually be a good thing for Trump and he could then move to X The rest have various levels of may go out of business if advertising spending broadly tanks. Jackie's position turning out to be true as she is hoping would also correspond to the economy taking a giant shit. A shit so big that even Tomlinson's Toilet on Twitter will be clogged and non functional. With a shit that big there isn't much gonna be left standing in the social media world.

Big L for Jackie. Typical.
 
What brain rot.

jackie_dumbshit00001.gif

The only one that won't make it to the other side of 'without Trump' is truth social. Jackie has a blue checkmark and she could have listed more rather than blah, blah.

Gab isn't really making any big profit....just like Twitter was when it was Twitter. But the 'conservative Christian' is an audience and if one can control costs it can keep going and going as that group existed before Trump and will after.

Newsmax sells ads and does this by marketing to conservatives. When Trump isn't viable the ad consumers via Newsmax will just move to the next thing. It won't be enough to kill 'em.

What prompted this post was Rumble. That was created in 2013. Yes, there are a whole lotta pro-Trump content on Rumble. But Rumble is 'what if we allowed things that are not allowed on YouTube?' and in doing that the unhinged pro-Trump shit is on Rumble.
That's the thing, she's got the cause and effect backwards.

Alt-media, and specifically right wing alt-media, doesn't exist because Trump invented the demand for it. The demand already existed beforehand and the market is merely indulging it.

Hell, Trump himself isn't even all that important in the grand scheme of things. He's just another product on that market for right wing alt-media, admittedly a more prominent product than others.

That's why the assassination attempt was so retarded. Had it succeeded, would all those millions of Trump voters melt away into the shadows? No, they'd still exist and they'd just be waiting there for another person to swoop in and scoop them up.

The fundamental problem isn't some sort of boogeyman that can be defeated in one go. The fundamental problem is that half the country disagrees with you. And you can't just handwave that away. (Frankly, it's a lot more than half the country. I think most loyal Democrat voters are merely ignorant about how insane the leaders of their party actually are.)
 
Alt media has existed since 2012 with long form videos finally being a thing online and not 10 minute videos that couldn't get a point across. In print form it existed well before that in the form of mail away news letters since at least the the early 80's as the media back than was just as sensationalist as it is today and that's because we had more people glued to their TV sets than we do today in the same way we see people glued to their monitors/ cellphones. Television died so MSM had to go to the internet to ply their trade of posting shit to the masses as that's where advertisers went, but unlike before there's a lot more people out there who can now call them out on their lies. Removing comments and forums from their sites don't matter because social media exists and any idiot can voice their opinion on it and destroy the current day narrative.
 
Had it succeeded, would all those millions of Trump voters melt away into the shadows? No, they'd still exist and they'd just be waiting there for another person to swoop in and scoop them up.

They would've just sat at home waiting for the death squads to come for them, of course. None of them would ever again express a thought or vote.
 
Television died so MSM had to go to the internet to ply their trade of posting shit to the masses as that's where advertisers went
TV didn’t die. We just live in a world where people are usually looking at multiple screens while consuming media. It might be declining, but TV advertising is still a healthy part of many companies’ advertising budgets. This is especially true if your products or services are targeted at an older age bracket, e.g. many financial, pharma, and food brands. Those are massive verticals and TV advertising for such brands is still the core of their marketing.

In fact, even OOH advertising has been enjoying some excitement as many brands are desperate to break out from the digital firehose and get attention. It’s all pretty interesting, but still a waste of intellect from some of our generation’s smartest people.

Jackie isn’t one of them. Jackie is fat.
 
Implausible because you would have to accurately identify social trends and this is beyond your capabilities. Looking at historical trends it stands to reason we will see a continual growth of media options rather than a sudden contraction. You're operating from the idea that YouTube and Twitter are natural longterm media when they're still incredibly recent expansions of media options and neither achieved absolute market control even remotely close to what happened in the browser wars previously. Sorry, Jackie, Gutenberg not only broke your paradigm but he probably wasn't fat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flexo and Marvin
TV didn’t die. We just live in a world where people are usually looking at multiple screens while consuming media. It might be declining, but TV advertising is still a healthy part of many companies’ advertising budgets. This is especially true if your products or services are targeted at an older age bracket, e.g. many financial, pharma, and food brands. Those are massive verticals and TV advertising for such brands is still the core of their marketing.

In fact, even OOH advertising has been enjoying some excitement as many brands are desperate to break out from the digital firehose and get attention. It’s all pretty interesting, but still a waste of intellect from some of our generation’s smartest people.

Jackie isn’t one of them. Jackie is fat.
Companies like Warner Brothers saw a 13% decrease in ad revenue for television in the third quarter 2023 with an average of like 11% decrease from many major companies. ESPN and Fox didn't see too much of a drop thanks to sports if any at all.
 
Companies like Warner Brothers saw a 13% decrease in ad revenue for television in the third quarter 2023 with an average of like 11% decrease from many major companies. ESPN and Fox didn't see too much of a drop thanks to sports if any at all.
Like I said: It’s declining, not dead.
 
That's the thing, she's got the cause and effect backwards.

That is a failure for the threat analcyst Jackie claims to be skilled at.

The worse failure is wanting to get to an outcome then picking data that matches that outcome. "Trump Bad!" - Ok Jackie. "Anyplace Trump show up is therefore bad!" - Not really Jackie, but go on. "Trump go away all the bad go away!" - No Jackie, that isn't how this works. The habit of Jackie to make data match the outcome is how that poor Swedish guy got accused by Jackie. Or even Richard Prongay.

Right now Jackie is seeking any data matching "Trump Bad!" and playing to the consumers of such a message.

Alt-media, and specifically right wing alt-media, doesn't exist because Trump invented the demand for it. The demand already existed beforehand and the market is merely indulging it.

Hell, Trump himself isn't even all that important in the grand scheme of things. He's just another product on that market for right wing alt-media, admittedly a more prominent product than others.

'The conservatives' had to have a standard bearer. Doesn't matter much who that is. Donald Trump does have an understanding of marketing and via this understanding along with Hillary Clinton's band of morons promoting Trump got him elevated to the spot he's at.

Had Trump been able to deliver on his marketing message he'd have set up an unbeatable political dynasty. Some of his messaging was never able to be a deliverable. A bit just was not worth the money one would have to spend to make it happen VS the reward. Far more seems to have been not able to be done because of Trump's own ego.

That's why the assassination attempt was so retarded. Had it succeeded, would all those millions of Trump voters melt away into the shadows? No, they'd still exist and they'd just be waiting there for another person to swoop in and scoop them up.

The presentation of search history makes it seem like the assassin wasn't interested in WHO he shot but more interested in his name being remembered. Preventing Trump from being in office via a pine box doesn't seem to have been the concern. Nor was it a zoomer fed up with boomers not retiring from jobs and letting younger people work but if that was his presentation of a motive that would have been a take that woulda kept him in the news cycles for FAR longer.

The fundamental problem isn't some sort of boogeyman that can be defeated in one go.

The 'cut the head off the snake' attitude is a very Alex Jones kind of take for Jackie to have. Trump got in power because things are not good and people were willing to try someone different. That and H Clinton sucked, sucking SO badly her crew felt the best way to win was to try and run against 'someone worse' VS having lived a life of not sucking. MBNA Joe got the job in a close win AND not appearing much in public shows how bad Trump was at the job. If Harris runs away with the win that will also show how bad Trump was at the job. The badness isn't a snake that one head chop will kill. Nor will selecting one head over another switch things from being full of suck to luxury gay space condos. Jackie, Pat and their fans are simple people who think in simple terms where everything is good when the more bad is not in charge.

The old Jackie used to say fuck biden, fuck trump, fuck hillary based on a purported twitter screenshot. The IRC Jackie was not in favor of a whole lot of the power structures of society. This new Jackie wants approval by sucking up to power because the way she used to be popular by being a power bottom doesn't work when the blush of youth is gone. Being an unpaid online shill doesn't change your past or bury it. Nor does calling anyone pointing out your past as some kind of enemy of the state just because you are sucking up to elements of the state. This online shill state where saying 'Trump bad!' no matter the reality WILL get you some people publicly repeat the framing of 'this critique of my past is due to Trump followers'. Such a position won't be tenable when Trump is gone. Calling you out as the failure you are over

To Jackie: The battle of fist VS asshole was never really ongoing. The asshole in you was always gonna be the victor.
 
View attachment 6266896

Some brutal comments:

View attachment 6266900
View attachment 6266901

They're just kids, you don't have to go that hard on them...
So she can afford $75 for a test or whatever it is now plus the what? $1000 a year fees but she can't afford to pay her debts? I call bullshit and just wants another thing to pretend at.
Mensa is normally for nerds who didn't get enough swirlies in high school.

But IQ is even less meaningful for children that young because of the narrow span you're comparing against. Many "gifted", high IQ kids grow up to be mediocre adults with a massive ego.
Tests aren't that hard now as it's just a way to scam retards out of money.
 
kids grow up to be mediocre adults with a massive ego.
Seems like mommy did that for Jackie so now snackie is repeating the same mistake. And if narcissism has a genetic component these kids have an uphill fight with Jackie being their guide to adulthood. Anything bad said to these kids are gonna get 'they mad because they not smart like you' as the cope for the kiddo.

I look forward to the day the kids or the kids friends show up in this thread and let us know how insufferable the people mommy created are.
 
One job I'm thankful that Blacks are taking is looking after people with down syndrome. It was a shit job for shit pay so may as well get shit people or people who shit on the streets to do it. However I do see more and more daycares bringing in these things so it's to never take your children to any. Just save yourself the money and buy a bonobo monkey to look after your children instead. Smarter and less likely to rape your children. Sadly they'll still expose themselves in front them, but at least not as often.
 
Last edited:
Back