Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

[Helvetia]

fucking goys!

 

[Judge Holden]

Yes. Here you go:

That file contains the entirety of their argument.

Happy to help.

The specific section I found interesting (aside from the amusing asides over the legitimacy of them standing on the porch given fat's fixation with the sovereignty of his porch) was the domestic abuse angle of why they kicked down the door as the demeanour of nikkki and the pig made them suspect he may be violently abusing her, thus necessitating their forced entry and subsequent forced sodomy of fatrick and forced fumigation of nikkki as she acted like an archetypical battered housewife in their eyes

 

[Well Intentioned]

I find it amusing that the motion to dismiss refers to each swatting incident as 'alleged.'

I understand why they're doing it, but I can't help but think of Patty seething at that language.

Also, the motion only makes reference to 7 specific (alleged) swatting incidents. Anyone know if there's a correlation between Sir Oinksalot's Twitter squealings and these incidents?

EDIT: It's all Joever for Patty:

To survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to “state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.”

 

[John Andrews Stan]

For those interested in reading the brief without unzipping files, it’s web-accessible here: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68293540/28/robinson-v-city-of-milwaukee/

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Also, the motion only makes reference to 7 specific (alleged) swatting incidents. Anyone know if there's a correlation between Sir Oinksalot's Twitter squealings and these incidents?

Patrick sued for 7 counts, they replied as to the same seven counts

 

[Well Intentioned]

Patrick sued for 7 counts, they replied as to the same seven counts

I thought his initial complaint made reference to 'other swattings' or some other vague phrasing, no?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I thought his initial complaint made reference to 'other swattings' or some other vague phrasing, no?

Yes. Feel free to peruse them here:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wied.107055/gov.uscourts.wied.107055.13.0.pdf

 

[grapeshark77]

This is a disaster for Pat. All they had to do was throw his own words back at him to show how absurd they sound.

It says he has three weeks to respond from today so his lawyers are going to be getting some angry texts from Scotland.

 

[bile demon]

Who are these black friends he claims to have?

He's probably on a first name basis with the local basketball team by now considering how often they come over to the half-hovel to top off Nikky's gas tank.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I find it strange that they never referenced that Patrick admitted that the Police did take efforts to accommodate him. To me it would have strengthened their argument. Otherwise this is pretty good if standard motion to dismiss.

 

[Well Intentioned]

Who are these black friends he claims to have?

You've never 'had a steak' or 'had breakfast' or 'had some pepperoni'?

 

[Judge Holden]

He's probably on a first name basis with the local basketball team by now considering how often they come over to the half-hovel to top off Nikky's gas tank.

*Lil NaSneed charges towards Nikkki's snatch with a lit boof after the rest of the basketball team have finished venting into her*

 

[Well Intentioned]

I find it strange that they never referenced that Patrick admitted that the Police did take efforts to accommodate him. To me it would have strengthened their argument. Otherwise this is pretty good if standard motion to dismiss.

I'm guessing that there's either contradictory or unverifiable details and they're choosing to err on the side of caution and not bring it up as it lets them sidestep it and not get bogged down needlessly.

Maybe Pat talked to a responding officer. Maybe he did go to the PD and 'notify' them. What's strange is that Patty is very meticulous with dates, except when he tries to talk to the police, which was 'in 2022.'

Also, going through the complaint again (thanks for re-linking it) I find it hilarious that Patty, masculine man that he is, relied on Niki going to the FBI to report this. You'd think for all the times he oinked about the FBI being involved that he might've, oh, I don't know, been actually involved himself.

 

[lindsayfan]

It'd be double hilarious if he tried to go local and be like "Naw lad".

nay, wee bairn. enjae Barlinnie

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I'm guessing that there's either contradictory or unverifiable details

Take this for example (this is both a referenced swatting, and the one he sued over):

The police clearly know whether their dispatch told the officers to be careful because they were being called in to a "known swatting location". If Patrick lied, that's worth pointing out (and would be judicially noticeable for the courts in evaluating 12(b)(6)). If Patrick is truthful here, that also helps the police. Addressing that would have been a win win from my view.

 

[Jackie's Abortion]

Maybe Pat talked to a responding officer.

MPD: Can we verify your number please?
Pig: FUCK YOU

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Pat seems oddly silent about this. He's just tweeting about how great Biden is and how everyone should ignore how bad the Olympics were because they were secretly great

 

[Sneedfully and Peacefully]

And now the shoe has dropped. Can't wait to read this.

Edit: It was indeed very dry and went through obvious and solid reasons for dismissal, not least of which is qualified immunity. Judge Holden mentioned that they see Niki as an archetypal battered wife but I didn't see anything direct even on a second search. They did cite several cases involving domestics which is usually where these "Suspect said everything's fine but officers still have to confirm safety" situations occur. I suppose they're at least implying that Niki does indeed appear as the depressed zonked out pillhead with nothing going on behind her eyes that she is, but didn't want to say it.

This is the meat, but the potatoes (my favorite part of dinner fuck you) are gonna be Pat's reply: an ""eloquently"" crafted rendition of "No, officer child, you're wrong. Enjoy giving me money."

Also I took a brief look through of the jury instructions. On the left is plaintiff (fat)'s proposed language. On the right is defendant (City)'s.


Even when writing a court document bitch tits has to bust out that thesaurus and be the smarty boy his mama said he is.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

And now the shoe has dropped. Can't wait to read this.

It's alright. Be prepared, though, as it may feel a bit dry

 

[MavisBeaconTeachesSnipin]

the tldr is in the intro. "we have to respond to 911 calls, even plaintiff admits in his own filings we have to respond to 911 calls, here is 20 pages of court precedent that we have to respond to 911 calls and 911 calls are not violations of the constitution."


seeing all his complaints, and each claim requires a preponderance of evidence to get a jury trial, I can't imagine a judge won't consider pat's original filing to be very thin on facts. this isn't twitter where rick can conflate his accusations with evidence.

only other interesting part is they seem to want to head off a possible response

"perhaps plaintiffs believe their case is that case" is probably only way a judge lets them get a trial.

idk pat's filing was way more fun to read, 5/10