Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 52 16.3%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.4%

  • Total voters
    319
I wouldn't be surprised that he has manic episodes.
He's a crack fiend. Manic is part of it. A hallmark of the glass cocksucker, some would say.

Now that I think about it, the throuple Cracket should go all in on IP2. TTS, Superchat, the whole shebang. Qayla can trawl for fresh meat, and Cokey can ride the crack rocket as the new Stop Speeding. With Vegan just full out insane and Dex becoming painful to watch, the crown needs to pass. Crackets had worn the Sonichu medallion, he should be IP2 royalty in days.
 
You niggers talking about Nick's blasphemy are just falling for his troll, and he's getting off on reading the thread, watching you all BURY the talk about the transcript from the CPS trial. He's figured out he can get all you to start sperging about his blasphemy, which gets him hard enough to try to get it in April for a good 30 seconds. He has done this consistently I think to change the narrative on the farms, and you people fall for it. Heck, he probably gets off on the ill-informed blasphemy on its own, he might even last a full minute without a balldo!

Look back when the Bible streams pop up. When has Nick ever followed through on something? When it serves an end for him. What possible end could there be for Bible blasphemy? Changing the narrative on the Farms (which he completely does read).

If there was ever a need for a separate Nick thread, it was one to document his blasphemy.
 
So Balldo and Our Wife and Our Fleshlight spent the weekends CLEANING THE HOUSE????? I thought Aleisha Sweep was lying. I thought Balldo Den was clean and pristine.
Remember when Balldo accused Ms. Sweep of perjury? Well now he confirmed one of the claims from the CHIPS report. Nice going Balldo.

balldo4.jpg
1722542197688.png
 
'The kids would only test positive for someone else's drugs' he said before the test results even came back.

So it’s really fucked that Nick is attempting life ruination on him via revenge porn accusations he clearly is digging for, and him streaming the zoom court hearing.
Seems like Nick is attempting to setup Aaron.

"This guy distributed revenge porn, streamed my court hearing, he's admitted he and his wife do coke, and his wife, our live-in nanny, has been stashing their coke here because they're going through a divorce. I had no idea this was going on."
 
You niggers talking about Nick's blasphemy are just falling for his troll, and he's getting off on reading the thread, watching you all BURY the talk about the transcript from the CPS trial. He's figured out he can get all you to start sperging about his blasphemy, which gets him hard enough to try to get it in April for a good 30 seconds. He has done this consistently I think to change the narrative on the farms, and you people fall for it. Heck, he probably gets off on the ill-informed blasphemy on its own, he might even last a full minute without a balldo!

Look back when the Bible streams pop up. When has Nick ever followed through on something? When it serves an end for him. What possible end could there be for Bible blasphemy? Changing the narrative on the Farms (which he completely does read).

If there was ever a need for a separate Nick thread, it was one to document his blasphemy.
Okay...

But the thing is... it's actually not working.

We still got our "Interesting new matter of public record." Every time that happens, it gets plenty of attention.

As far as I can tell, the only difference between him doing the blasphemy crap, and not doing it, is that 50 new pages are added, instead of like 30 or whatever. I think Nick's views on religion aren't just a troll, but also speak to his psychology.

But I would certainly not object to a "Nick religion thread" if that's what enough people want. We still have the separate subforum. For a while anyways.

One thing I would suggest is that all of the drops MNPublicRecords has made also be reproduced in a single thread, for easy reference.

Remember when Balldo accused Ms. Sweep of perjury? Well now he confirmed one of the claims from the CHIPS report. Nice going Balldo.

View attachment 6260321
View attachment 6260224
Reminder that Sean had also said on one of his streams that he had seen pictures of the house himself, and that it was a disaster.

I don't think there was ever any doubt that Sweep was telling the truth.
 
All of his statements make me legitimately MATI. I know people said he was in a pretty progressive church... but I had no idea it was this bad.

I wouldn't call it "progressive" in the modern sense of the word. He goes to a church that is part of the "Evangelical Covenant Church" which is a scandinavian pietist "offshoot" of the Swedish Lutheran Church (though they might disagree with that). I would describe them as being easy-going but somewhat conservative.
 
You niggers talking about Nick's blasphemy are just falling for his troll, and he's getting off on reading the thread, watching you all BURY the talk about the transcript from the CPS trial. He's figured out he can get all you to start sperging about his blasphemy, which gets him hard enough to try to get it in April for a good 30 seconds. He has done this consistently I think to change the narrative on the farms, and you people fall for it. Heck, he probably gets off on the ill-informed blasphemy on its own, he might even last a full minute without a balldo!

Look back when the Bible streams pop up. When has Nick ever followed through on something? When it serves an end for him. What possible end could there be for Bible blasphemy? Changing the narrative on the Farms (which he completely does read).

If there was ever a need for a separate Nick thread, it was one to document his blasphemy.
The CPS transcript has been talked about. The Religious stuff is fun because it was an obvious red flag at the start. It does annoy people, but it’s something that gives insight into how fucked up Nick’s psychology is. It’s like a new “I am so angry my teacher took my doll away when I was 8” -tier story every other day.


The fact that his Church fired him from Bible Study and his teaching job stem from his bad Bible takes and poor moral education very obviously pissed him off. Either because it was a source of authority for him to occupy or because he could act like a know-it-all.
 
The CPS transcript has been talked about. The Religious stuff is fun because it was an obvious red flag at the start. It does annoy people, but it’s something that gives insight into how fucked up Nick’s psychology is. It’s like a new “I am so angry my teacher took my doll away when I was 8” -tier story every other day.


The fact that his Church fired him from Bible Study and his teaching job stem from his bad Bible takes and poor moral education very obviously pissed him off. Either because it was a source of authority for him to occupy or because he could act like a know-it-all.
I would also argue that because he STILL considers himself the role model Christian, his thread that he seethes about breaking down why he's a fraud, and not a real Christian, I believe that too upsets him, as it ruins his entire "Christian" image.
 
The CPS transcript has been talked about. The Religious stuff is fun because it was an obvious red flag at the start. It does annoy people, but it’s something that gives insight into how fucked up Nick’s psychology is. It’s like a new “I am so angry my teacher took my doll away when I was 8” -tier story every other day.

The fact that his Church fired him from Bible Study and his teaching job stem from his bad Bible takes and poor moral education.
I agree. Nick's views on Christianity provide an enormous amount of insight into his psychology.

I get that not everybody here is a believer, but if you can use his views here show how fucked up he is, I would think that would be of interest to believers and non-believers alike. How he uses the trappings of Christianity to prey upon the ignorant and try to make himself look better is a part of who he is.

I imagine people who aren't Christian probably still found Chris-chan's assertion they are Jesus interesting and funny.
 
I had a theory that his lawyer is really a LINO, and that Nick told them he's a lawyer, he doesn't need advice, and this case shouldn't require much actual counseling because he understands how the law works and what to do, not to do. He can totally handle it, just needs them to do paperwork and sign their names and stuff. As a result, his lawyer simply is leaving this case on the back burner. His lawyer probably figured out by watching the footage that this guy is fucked and Nick is a nut job. So he's more than happy to go up on the stand and half-heartedly argue the broken logic Nick wants for a beautiful payday. With an advanced deposit, of course.

The reality is only scummy lawyers will deal with a client like Nick who thinks he knows everything and wants to run the show. So his only fate is to be permanently shafted and swindled by lawyers better than him that are happy to let Nick burn his own life to the ground.

Your money is always good here, sir.


Yesterday I said I want Nick to die a little. Now I want Nick to die a lot.

That would be unethical, so unless Nick got a lawyer as dumb as he is, I doubt they are willing to sign on when their name is attached to the responsibility for the case.

@Himedall All-seeing Waifu @DuranceVile

Someone mentioned this earlier (like a 1000 or 4000 pages ago), but Nick applies Critical Theory to the Bible and shilled a Bible Study that was the same thing. He has a shit understanding of the Bible and I’m like 90% sure it’s an attempt to try to gain control in social situations when he married Kayla at his Protestant Church.

He’s an English Major Creative Writing nigger. If he was actually good at writing or understanding literature he probably would be a successful writer rather than going to law school to get more money out of his Trust Fund/ tug boat

Nick got a lot of pushback from the devout and the boomer Trumpers/DeSantis fans for that CRT quip. It really kicked off this heresy arc.

I would add that it is imperative that those of us who claim Sola Scriptura should be experts at interpreting the Bible. For all of Nick's claims, I notice a distinct lack of supporting verses.

If he claims Jesus was never supposed to die, what verses made him come to this conclusion? A few users have already pointed out from the old and new testaments that Jesus was always supposed to die for us.

His bible takes are as half baked as his legal ones.... This leads me to think, has he ever talked about his performance during his undergrad and law school work? Like with everything that I've seen, I have NO idea how on earth he passed any of his courses.

His self-admitted approach was that he did the bare minimum work to pass. He wrapped it up in the edgy 'fight the man' guise, but it was childish opposition.

I believe that was indicative that he knew he would be coddled his while life.

How he ever thought he could gain the knowledge and experience to even scrape by professionaly when he did not take his education seriously is a mystery.

You niggers talking about Nick's blasphemy are just falling for his troll, and he's getting off on reading the thread, watching you all BURY the talk about the transcript from the CPS trial. He's figured out he can get all you to start sperging about his blasphemy, which gets him hard enough to try to get it in April for a good 30 seconds. He has done this consistently I think to change the narrative on the farms, and you people fall for it. Heck, he probably gets off on the ill-informed blasphemy on its own, he might even last a full minute without a balldo!

Look back when the Bible streams pop up. When has Nick ever followed through on something? When it serves an end for him. What possible end could there be for Bible blasphemy? Changing the narrative on the Farms (which he completely does read).

If there was ever a need for a separate Nick thread, it was one to document his blasphemy.

I could see a separate thread being of use if Nick demenonstrates that he is committed to regular heresy. If he generates more content than cna be followed in this thread, I advise to split it off.

However, given the long lapses between news and his streams, I believe the better representation of the situation is that the thread has cyclic topics du jour--some of which are irritating to various segments of the readers. Topics recycle organically based on the interests of the thread, but they are not often derailing--more that they stray broadly from time to time away the interests of some.

My advice would be to ignore the topics that you don't care to engage when it crops up as the main topic of discourse. I don't think Nick is producing enough varieties of milk to warrant a bifurcation of discussion.
 
I don’t think they got as far for asking for the money, did they?
Last time Null talked about it he said they didn't ask for payment yet. I don't think that changed, Josh would tell us because asking for money would be final confirmation that they'll give it to him.

If they don't and it gets released on trial that would be at no cost. Wonder why other data is late tho.
 
>The children were not aware
>One of them tests positive for cocaine &/or associated metabolites at 5000pg/ml with 500 as cutoff
Let me ask you, why would he say that? The document dates to the 28th of May. When did the tests take place?
Before or after the 28th? If it was before, he's fucking done. He knows, he's guilty as fuck. If it was after that day, then he's coping and also done.
Fuck this guy.
The statements at the hearing by Nick indicate he seemed to have knowledge that a test of his children would bring back a positive test. If he had that knowledge, he had to have know the child was using cocaine.

At that point you are left with:
1) The child was regularly using coke without the parents knowledge and was caught using cocaine just a short time before Nick was arrested.
2) The child was regularly using coke with the parents knowledge.
This is what I understand to be the timeline based on the documents which have been posted publicly on the forum so far.

May 24, 2024

On May 24 (one day post-arrest) the petition was filed where information from initial interviews was provided, which was later posted by @MNPublicRecords, described as a "matter of public record" and attached to the post linked here.

At this point, which (being only one day after the arrest) would presumably be before any drug tests were completed, it was learned from initial interviews that "the children did not know there were drugs in their home. It was confirmed by the older children that if their drug tests were positive, it was because they were exposed to someone else using drugs." As was pointed out when this document was first posted publicly on the forum, this is very odd to say and, with only a two sentence summary of what was said, almost sounds coached.

Unfortunately, the sentence is constructed passively ("It was confirmed by the older children that if ..." ) and the passive voice makes it unclear whether they volunteered the "confirmation" on their own volition. which would sound extremely sus, or whether the question was directly put to them by the county employee, which would be much less so.

documents02.png

That said, what is being "confirmed" is a scientific nonsense. As everyone who has read the Rekieta thread(s) now well know, the standard for hair follicle tests is to probe not merely for the presence of a drug itself but for the presence of associated metabolites as well. The presence of the metabolites imply the actual introduction of the drug into the body rather than some putative passive environmental exposure.

It's possible that such a question would be posed by county investigators with the intent to elicit information from the children, but in any case the older kids may well have had no idea since it was the second youngest child who eventually tested positive.

May 28, 2024

At the hearing on May 28, Rekieta cites this directly in his courtroom diatribe, stating that "the petition drafted by the county itself indicates that [...] any testing of the children that would result in drug use according to the children would be because of secondary exposure from some other source."

It's worth nothing that the actual child who tested positive was the 4th child and not one of the "older children" cited above.

This comes from the latest transcript described as an "interesting new matter of public record" by @MNPublicRecords and attached to the post linked here.

documents01.png

To my knowledge, there is no information on when the test took place. But from the context, it appears that the results were not available at the time of the hearing. Throughout the transcript, the judge presses county employees on why they insist that Nick and Kayla use supervised visitation at a specialized center (of the sort where people like Ethan Ralph are allowed visitation). He wanted to know why the parents couldn't have visitation supervised by family instead. This is the part of the transcript about where the foster parents need education in recognizing drug use in the parents. According to county staff, it could take a week or two [from May 28] for the appropriate safety meeting to take place.

documents04.png

In any event, from later in the transcript, there is an expectation that it would be sorted out by the time of the next hearing on June 6.

documents05.png

June 7, 2024

From the order following the hearing on June 6, described as an "interesting new matter of public record" by @MNPublicRecords and attached to the post linked here, they were ordered to use the visitation center. At this point the drug tests had already happened since they were mentioned earlier in the document. This appears to be the case in other documents dated to late June posted by @MNPublicRecords.

Did something happen between May 28 and June 6 to make the county insist on supervised visitation at a specific facility?

The document from June 7 specifically mentions the existence of the then-eight-year-old's positive drug test but the transcript from May 28 makes no reference of that at all. At that time the county's biggest concern with visitation supervised by the foster parents was that the grandparents may not recognize signs of drug use.

It stands to reason that if they had reason to believe one of the children had or would test positive way above the threshold for hard drugs, one would imagine it would have been mentioned in the hearing as a concern.

documents06.png
 
You niggers talking about Nick's blasphemy are just falling for his troll, and he's getting off on reading the thread, watching you all BURY the talk about the transcript from the CPS trial. He's figured out he can get all you to start sperging about his blasphemy, which gets him hard enough to try to get it in April for a good 30 seconds. He has done this consistently I think to change the narrative on the farms, and you people fall for it. Heck, he probably gets off on the ill-informed blasphemy on its own, he might even last a full minute without a balldo!
It is about as obvious as a kitten trying to bury it's shit on a tile floor, and I'm saying that as one who enjoys reading Biblical arguments and musings.
 
"Why am I being prosecuted for breaking a bunch of criminal laws? They're only STATUTES man!"
I would guess his behavior in court is at least part of the reason neither of those attorneys are representing them anymore. I also remember Nick complaining in a subsequent document about those attorneys convincing him to do a drug test (results unreleased) around that time. You can see even this early that he legal ideas about his case that were going to require a barneswalker.

I don't know which is worse. All the nonsense where he as much as tells everyone that he expects a drug test for one of the children to come back positive OR his non-accusation accusation against Aaron trying to see if the judge will bite and go after Aaron for contempt of court. Everything he is doing is utterly stupid, self-destructive and obvious.
It's so beyond stupid. He actually said "there is no indication other than simply a statute that these children have ever been in danger".

Exact words.

"No indication other than simply a statute" :story:

Imagine this. Nick is a LITERAL LAWYER and his amazing courtroom argument is that the only thing not on his side is THE LAW while having his actual original lawyer representing him in this matter who probably was trying not to facepalm like PPP being ordered to review DSP's latest meal.

pppfacepaplm.png

Not to mention his wife and his wife's former attorney.

You just know Nick's former attorney who was present here felt like he won the lottery when Nick informed him he wanted to be represented by Frank the Barneswalker instead.

Look back when the Bible streams pop up. When has Nick ever followed through on something? When it serves an end for him. What possible end could there be for Bible blasphemy? Changing the narrative on the Farms (which he completely does read).

If there was ever a need for a separate Nick thread, it was one to document his blasphemy.
He also admitted that he's doing the streams to piss people off. I don't know why people are giving him what he wants but whatever.
 
Back