Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

Useful_Mistake said:
Pat seems oddly silent about this. He's just tweeting about how great Biden is and how everyone should ignore how bad the Olympics were because they were secretly great
Click to expand...
I mean, we could have seen a biological man kill a biological woman in the ring so the Olympics couldn't have been all that bad for people like Patrick. He's "into things" after all.
Useful_Mistake said:
as it may feel a bit dry
Click to expand...
That doesn't stop @Judge Holden why should it stop him?
 
  • Feels
  • Horrifying
  • Like
Reactions: Dr. Jaime Reyes, Wright, Pobblebonk and 14 others
Useful_Mistake said:
I find it strange that they never referenced that Patrick admitted that the Police did take efforts to accommodate him. To me it would have strengthened their argument. Otherwise this is pretty good if standard motion to dismiss.
Click to expand...
this filing seems very focused that pat's accusation lacks enough substance for trial instead of defending how reasonably the police acted in each specific situation. he'll get fucking smoked if it does go to trial. pat says almost daily that a terrorist cult is trying to kill him. he even once tweeted something like the fake calls might be an effort so police stop responding, and then the alt-right boogeymen will get him. that alone should btfo his transparent cash grab.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Wright, Pobblebonk, Wild Wild Sonichu and 14 others
Useful_Mistake said:
Take this for example (this is both a referenced swatting, and the one he sued over):
View attachment 6260479
The police clearly know whether their dispatch told the officers to be careful because they were being called in to a "known swatting location". If Patrick lied, that's worth pointing out (and would be judicially noticeable for the courts in evaluating 12(b)(6)). If Patrick is truthful here, that also helps the police. Addressing that would have been a win win from my view.
Click to expand...

I think they preemptively shut that down with this:

Call center operators and first responders have a duty to treat all emergency calls for service as true emergencies and to route and respond to them
accordingly.

Case precedent is clear that calls for emergency service should be treated as emergencies, and that it is not the place of the call center operators or first-responders to speculate about the
veracity of the report: United States v. Richardson, 208 F.3d 626, 630 (7th Cir. 2000) held “911 calls reporting an emergency can be enough to support warrantless searches under the exigent
circumstances exception, particularly where, as here, the caller identified himself.” Id.

It noted, “The efficient and effective use of the emergency response networks requires that the police (and other rescue agents) be able to respond to such calls quickly and without unnecessary secondguessing. As then-Circuit Judge Burger stated in Wayne, “[T]he business of policemen and firemen is to act, not to speculate or meditate on whether the report is correct. People could well
die in emergencies if police tried to act with the calm deliberation associated with the judicial process.” Id. (quoting Wayne v. United States, 318 F.2d 205, 212 (D.C. Cir. 1963)).
Click to expand...

My interpretation is that they're saying it doesn't matter what Patty did or did not oink to the police, they are still obligated to treat all calls as serious until determined otherwise. It's why first responders will still respond to a call if a literal child makes a 911 call because they want a cookie or whatever. A concept most folks learn at about 5 or 6 years of age but is one that eludes Patty.

E, again: Also, another foreign concept to Patty is that people lie. If a murder or shooting has gone on at a place does he really think people are going to be telling the god's honest truth to law enforcement? And does he really think that simply saying 'No, I'm Niki, I'm fine' is enough to satisfy the police? (The answer is yes, because he's a retarded porcine mockery of a man.)

E: Fixed formatting.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: suspended animation, Wright, Glowing In The Streets and 12 others
Well Intentioned said:
My interpretation is that they're saying it doesn't matter what Patty did or did not oink to the police
Click to expand...
You misunderstood my post. My post wasn't about Patrick's talks with the police. My post was that according to Pat, each and every time they sent a police crew to his house, the police was informed by their dispatcher that the house was a swatting risk. Patrick cannot allege both that they did not inform their officers of this, and that they did. Those sort of claims can be interpreted against him by the Judge. And that is something the police could have raised in addition to all the other points they raised.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Pedophobe, suspended animation, Wright and 13 others
Useful_Mistake said:
You misunderstood my post. My post wasn't about Patrick's talks with the police. My post was that according to Pat, each and every time they sent a police crew to his house, the police was informed by their dispatcher that the house was a swatting risk. Patrick cannot allege both that they did not inform their officers of this, and that they did. Those sort of claims can be interpreted against him by the Judge. And that is something the police could have raised in addition to all the other points they raised.
Click to expand...

Oh, yes. I thought that the reason the dispatchers knew it was a 'known swatting place' came as a result of Patty's oinkings, but yes, I see what you're saying.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Wright, Glowing In The Streets, An automatic clown and 5 others
Meanwhile, the Pig:

Screenshot 2024-08-01 at 22.42.41.png
Screenshot 2024-08-01 at 22.56.13.png
Screenshot 2024-08-01 at 22.56.35.png

Clearly something worth posting not just once, but on three different social media sites.
 
  • Lunacy
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: TheGuntinator, UncleTusky, Pohatu Nuva and 54 others
Something Awful said:
Meanwhile, the Pig:

View attachment 6260230
View attachment 6260232
View attachment 6260233

Clearly something worth posting not just once, but on three different social media sites.
Click to expand...
Smile and wave, fat. Smile and wave. Also I edited my original post since it was a nothing/filler post with my observations. But I'll reiterate:
-Pat's response is gonna be the fun part
-This is a very dry and obvious motion with a lot of citations to cover every angle
-Plaintiff's very fat.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Wright, Glowing In The Streets, An automatic clown and 11 others
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: suspended animation, Glowing In The Streets, An automatic clown and 13 others
Something Awful said:
Meanwhile, the Pig:

View attachment 6260230
View attachment 6260232
View attachment 6260233

Clearly something worth posting not just once, but on three different social media sites.
Click to expand...
Dunno if I have mentioned it before but I strongly suspect that fat previously scoring a book deal was largely down to him and his SFWA pederastamigos leveraging his lazy "TRUMP BAD - BOOGIEMAN FUCKYWUCKYDORK BAD" xeets which went viral with the right agents into spinning him as an enormously popular personality due to how much "love" his xeets were getting

That literal and unironic retards getting hundreds of thousands of updoots and redoots for the dumbest and most factually incorrect shit imaginable was (and still is) commonplace was ignored due to how hilariously pozzed the sci-fi/fantasy literature sphere was (and still is) and how desperately credulous various boomers within it were (and still are) whenever they hear about internet things "going viral" or such, along with the fact many of its bigwigs included web 1.0 hacks like doctorow and scalzi who had (and still have) an active stake in protecting the notion that "big number internet updoots = definite literary hits and financial dividends" along with aggressively gatekeeping anyone who does not jump on whatever bandwagons they are grifting off

This explains his autistic obsession with spamming all his social media with the same shit and desperately trying to pander to MSNBC/Colbert tier liberal trends along with loudly declaring how vital his xitter is for his career as his excuse for the perpetual NOCHILD-ENJOYPRISON cycle, alongside his perpetual baiting for media coverage. He feels that in the wake of his hilariously costly failed lawsuits (funded by SFWA coffers) and his books selling worse than expired melanated wurst in the east Milwaukee ghetto, his only chance of getting another contract is either to go viral enough times or receive enough media coverage for the sci-fi/fantasy powers that be to give him another shot.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Pohatu Nuva, Glowing In The Streets, An automatic clown and 16 others
Sneedfully and Peacefully said:
Even when writing a court document bitch tits has to bust out that thesaurus and be the smarty boy his mama said he is.
Click to expand...
It's directly from a case. Pat didn't write this.
Useful_Mistake said:
It's alright. Be prepared, though, as it may feel a bit dry
Click to expand...
It's dry because it's a very cut and dry issue. It's not even at the outer limit of qualified immunity, but smack dab in the middle of it.
Rimanah said:
Huh, kind of surprised we didn’t just see a request for an extension. Doesn’t look to like the motion contains anything too surprising.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't be surprised if you look for § 1983 cases involving the same lawyers, you'd get multiple versions of this brief complete with identical blocks of text articulating the same standards, because there's nothing fatty-pig-pig brings up in this hack lawsuit that hasn't been tried time and time again, by people with better cases (who still lost).
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Kane Lives, monstrous bubo, Vecr and 12 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back