US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
So 538 officially has Kamala as the nominee and she's beating Trump by 1.5 points.
I expect that lead to get even bigger over the next few weeks. She'll top out at a 4+ point lead like Biden had in 2020 and then that lead will decrease to maybe 3-2 points before the election. When the Democrats win through cheating there'll be enough poll data to point at so that normies don't ask questions.
Her poll numbers are going to sink like a stone the more the voters see her, and they will have to see her, because she's not decrepit and she's not in office yet. If they do something stupid like boot Joe entirely so they can put her in office, they'll lose the advantage of voting to make history ('Vote for the first woman President and the first black woman President' will ring hollow if she's already President) and having Kamala actually have to handle crises (which there are bound to be) will only make her less popular.

Meanwhile Donald Trump is more popular than ever since he got shot
 
538 was just biting to put a dem back in front, and that new Rasmussen poll done for some RMG group doesn't have crosstabs which is incredibly suspect. What's interesting looking at their tracker is it's just the past week, with one completely broken poll (Leger) and this new magic 5 point poll. She's surviving off two big outliers, and this is done to increase fake excitement and get more donors.

I guess Baris said something naughty on youtube so they pulled it but here is the Rumble link for today's video. One thing I forgot to mention is Trump gains with seniors with Cuntmala on the ticket. The Cook poll just taken basically copied Baris' findings. And when you compare it to Tump/Joepedo '20 Trump still has more room to pull, he's already above his previous numbers. It's the hispanic pull and the increase in black vote, mainly black men.

GT_nySSW8AUn72g.png
 
WHO THE FUCK IS IN CHARGE?
Me.
Just a question. I remember a chick sued Null like every day with no cost to her due to her being broke and jersh for some reason still had to be slightly involved in the process despite the suits always being tossed out. I remember there being something about her being so broke that a counter suits would be totally pointless.



So would it be possible for say a few thousand homeless people to be "nudged" into filing pro se litigation against people like Soros over and over and over again? Because if that's possible sounds like a good idea. Help hobos, make enemies waste time and resources for little cost, have a laugh.
Soros has enough money and counsel that it wouldn’t pose a problem for him. The reason you have to respond is because if you don’t, you end up with default judgment, meaning the opposing side wins no matter how ridiculous their suit (because you never even bothered to show up and say “no, that’s stupid.”)
Josh doesn’t have the resources to not be directly involved with the suit, Soros does.
Furthermore, you will end up in a lot of trouble if you encourage frivolous lawsuits.

Finally, don’t encourage baseless lawfare. Using the legal system as a cudgel against political opponents both clogs up resources to deal with actual cases, and erodes faith in the judiciary. That second one is particularly important, because if people no longer view the court as a legitimate remedy to their grievances, you’re on a fast track to civilizations collapse.
 
She completely flipped Trump's lead in less than three weeks. They aren't even hiding how astroturfed she is.

Anyway, dooming from me aside. Some silver linings. Republicans have pretty good odds of taking both the Senate and House. So, even if Kamala cheats her way to the presidency, she's likely to be a lameduck until mid-terms at least. Republicans will have to find someone other than Trump to run in 2028 because I personally feel he'd be too old by then. By that point Texas might flip blue though which means we're screwed.
That's a single poll, you still have other polls like Rasmussen saying Trump has a 5 point lead then most polls still have Trump ahead in swing states. She didn't flip jackshit, she's only doing slightly better than Biden despite the constant astroturfing. Betting averages still favor Trump too. Stop falling for the obvious astroturfing and keep a level-head.

Anyone I've talked too genuinely thinks she's a fucking retard(and she is).
 
Last edited:
She completely flipped Trump's lead in less than three weeks.
It's response bias. Look, most of the people who are taking these polls are people who support Harris and want to be polled. In much the same way, the Democrats hid under a rock and didn't want to talk to pollsters when A) Biden flopped at the debate and B) Trump got shot

Rich Baris put it best, Harris is more like a shot in the arm rather than a complete gamechanger. She has, at best, managed to stop the bleeding and stabilise Democratic strongholds like Minnesota and Virginia, which were leaning towards Trump
 
Me.

Soros has enough money and counsel that it wouldn’t pose a problem for him. The reason you have to respond is because if you don’t, you end up with default judgment, meaning the opposing side wins no matter how ridiculous their suit (because you never even bothered to show up and say “no, that’s stupid.”)
Josh doesn’t have the resources to not be directly involved with the suit, Soros does.
Furthermore, you will end up in a lot of trouble if you encourage frivolous lawsuits.
I’ve seen much bigger fish fall under the sword of protected class. It’s toxic publicity and ruins companies, Soros would have to settle unless if he wants the world to know he’s still alive on that new baby’s heart transplant.
 
I want to know who pulled Cheney’s strings. Bush Jr. was a fucking retard and Bush Sr. was the glownigger godfather. I want the full picture there’s a story to tell as to why the GWoT started.
Cheney became defacto President after 9/11. He ran the military show while W was allowed to keep playing in his compassionate conservative domestic sandbox. They really didn't even pretend otherwise.

Bush Sr. being some super glownigger CIA master is a myth. He was a longtime CIA asset (as in owned by the CIA) long before the politcal appointment putting him in charge of it years later.

Fun read, somewhat accurate: https://whowhatwhy.org/politics/government-integrity/cia-bush-senior-oil-venture/
 
Cheney became defacto President after 9/11. He ran the military show while W was allowed to keep playing in his compassionate conservative domestic sandbox. They really didn't even pretend otherwise.

Bush Sr. being some super glownigger CIA master is a myth. He was a longtime CIA asset (as in owned by the CIA) long before the politcal appointment putting him in charge of it years later.
Brother. Bush Sr. ran the CIA with an iron fist. Who else but he would run the poppy fields and surveillance off Zapata rigs? Just look at the Bush’s private interests and you know this to be true brother. We all know what Iraq was about. He was the puppet master in chief even when Bush Jr. was eating crayons in the Oval Office. Bush Jr.’s entire appointment list was at the call of his father’s recommendation. And you don’t go against father in the Bush household. They’ve had skin in the game since the 50’s.
 
Single moms of teenage boys often develop a weird "son husband" relationship with their son where he is "the man of the house" and it warps their perceptions of age and responsibility. Also there are a lot of middle aged women who are still mentally in highschool and see teenagers as peers subconsciously. You see REALLY disturbing stuff on tiktok with women saying stuff like "I'm a 30 year old teenager" and being 100% serious. The social media era has stunted the maturity of many. These days some people never mature, they just age. Youth is worshiped and people don't want to grow up so they don't.
It also severely fucks with the son. Thats why you can see p frequently sons of single mothers being the absolute worst low T men.
 
Soros has enough money and counsel that it wouldn’t pose a problem for him. The reason you have to respond is because if you don’t, you end up with default judgment, meaning the opposing side wins no matter how ridiculous their suit (because you never even bothered to show up and say “no, that’s stupid.”)
Josh doesn’t have the resources to not be directly involved with the suit, Soros does.
Furthermore, you will end up in a lot of trouble if you encourage frivolous lawsuits.

Finally, don’t encourage baseless lawfare. Using the legal system as a cudgel against political opponents both clogs up resources to deal with actual cases, and erodes faith in the judiciary. That second one is particularly important, because if people no longer view the court as a legitimate remedy to their grievances, you’re on a fast track to civilizations collapse.
He has the resources but the point wouldn't be to make Soros broke, it would be to wrap up some of his lawyers and resources chasing around shit that doesn't benefit him. His lawyers could be suing so troons can rape kids legally or they could be dealing with bullshit suit #362829 from a hobo they can do nothing against. There's no reason to have any faith in the judicial as it is so why not use the broken system against them?
 
Brother. Bush Sr. ran the CIA with an iron fist. Who else but he would run the poppy fields and surveillance off Zapata rigs? Just look at the Bush’s private interests and you know this to be true brother. We all know what Iraq was about. He was the puppet master in chief even when Bush Jr. was eating crayons in the Oval Office. Bush Jr.’s entire appointment list was at the call of his father’s recommendation. And you don’t go against father in the Bush household. They’ve had skin in the game since the 50’s.
Sr's daddy was also a Nazi collaborator
 
Brother. Bush Sr. ran the CIA with an iron fist. Who else but he would run the poppy fields and surveillance off Zapata rigs? Just look at the Bush’s private interests and you know this to be true brother. We all know what Iraq was about. He was the puppet master in chief even when Bush Jr. was eating crayons in the Oval Office. Bush Jr.’s entire appointment list was at the call of his father’s recommendation. And you don’t go against father in the Bush household. They’ve had skin in the game since the 50’s.
The CIA was in shambles when Bush Sr. was appointed Director after Watergate [EDIT: and Vietnam]. There wasn't much to rule with an iron fist then. You give them all far too much credit. CIA was a joke in the 70's, not that it's much better now.
 
Last edited:
I’ve seen much bigger fish fall under the sword of protected class. It’s toxic publicity and ruins companies, Soros would have to settle unless if he wants the world to know he’s still alive on that new baby’s heart transplant.
I’m not sure what bad publicity he’s going to get from “crazy homeless person sues rich jew.”
The only way you’d get dirt on soros would be if you survive a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss and get to the discovery phase. That won’t happen, because a crazy person won’t have the legal knowledge, nor the general mental capacity, to write a complaint that overcomes that hurdle.

It’s something that Soros’s lawyers could deal with in like 2 billable hours. That’s going to cost less than 10k even if they don’t farm it out to a new associate who could do it for like 2k tops. Soros is worth almost 6 billion, you’d need an unrealistic amount of pro-se complaints being filed to even begin to put a dent in that.
The economics of it just don’t work out. You’d probably run out of funds trying to amass homeless before Soros even realized something was going on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back