The real problem with Kamala Harris. - She's a whore.

[Preacher ✝]

The real problem with Harris, and one that would probably flip a lot of left leaning moderates if they actually thought about it, is that she's a whore.

I mean that literally and in every sense of the word. She got where she is not through merit but by taking Willie Brown's brown willy, among others.
Even her political beliefs are that of a whore as in she will believe whatever her donors tell her to believe. Like a good, well trained, whore she does so without question or hesitation.

Now you might be saying "Preacher, that's all par for the democratic course, why would that change any left leaning minds?"
Well, hypothetical fellow Kiwi, I'll tell you. The problem with Kamala being a whore is that she could be the first female president. If she succeeds that would be telling every little girl in America that yes, you can be president, but you have to be a whore to do it. Even at the highest level of politics, women can only succeed by using their bodies instead of their minds.

I want to know if that's something moderate left leaning people are okay with. However bad they think 4 more years of Trump might be, is it worth an eternity of the first female president being a whore?

 

[Meriasek]

The problem with THAT is that it assumes that Harris' history will be taught like that. Memoryholing unwanted knowledge is pretty easy. Sure, some might know, but there's always a level of control among the public.

 

[Preacher ✝]

The problem with THAT is that it assumes that Harris' history will be taught like that. Memoryholing unwanted knowledge is pretty easy. Sure, some might know, but there's always a level of control among the public.

That's a defeatist argument to make while we still have the opportunity to preach the truth. Imagine the impact if Willie Brown or one of her other Johns leaked a sex tape.

 

[The Early 2000s]

Personally, I think the problem is that she's part Pajeet.

 

[Xentor]

Well but ofcourse the (((banker))) overlords need someone obedient, this is just clean and simple Bioleninism.
But women shouldn't be leaders in the first place, because you're bound to end up with a witch (Hillary) or an obedient slut (Kamala). Also name one woman that's an actual inspirational figure.

I want to know if that's something moderate left leaning people are okay with. However bad they think 4 more years of Trump might be, is it worth an eternity of the first female president being a whore?

Well "eternity" in this case is a bit of stretch, seeing how things are going in the US political landscape. ESPECIALLY if they "fortify" her into office.

 

[Preacher ✝]

Also name one woman that's an actual inspirational figure

How about two?

And by eternity I meant in the historical sense. Even if her election is later deemed invalid and nullified the next woman to become the "real" first female president will be haunted by her footnote.

 

[Xentor]

Good that there's been 2 whole women in the history of the whole collective Christian-European civilization. I'm sure there are many saints who'd apply as inspirational, but most of them wouldn't apply as leaders and I'm afraid that includes Queen of the Heaven. Not that there really are any inspirational men around besides maybe a few BRICS leaders...

And by eternity I meant in the historical sense. Even if her election is later deemed invalid and nullified the next woman to become the "real" first female president will be haunted by her footnote.

I doubt any regime would undermine itself in such a way to ever admit such vulnerabilities. Maybe if the whole democratic system got upturned, but then all kinds of shit would be flung at the previous order - and it'd hardly be the USA as we know it today.

 

[Magicicada_septendecula]

True, and way more than that. She's a fraud, a tyrant, a liar, and just plain evil. The fact that she even appears to have a chance is a very bad sign of our country becoming browner and more retarded, our media as a propaganda organ, the team sport nature of our politics, and a totally ineffective opposition party.

 

[Preacher ✝]

most of them wouldn't apply as leaders and I'm afraid that includes Queen of the Heaven.

Naturally I disagree however I understand its a contentious assertion which is why I also included Joan of Arc. No one can deny she was both inspirational and a leader.

It wouldnt necessarily be seen as an undermining of the entire government if its successfully painted as an issue with the Democratic Party.

 

[The Ugly One]

If she succeeds that would be telling every little girl in America that yes, you can be president, but you have to be a whore to do it.

Feminists have long celebrated any woman who gets into power by sucking dick. It's only sexual harassment if you regret it later, like the whores who sucked Harvey Weinstein's dick in exchange for fame & fortune.

 

[Ughubughughughughughghlug]

Good that there's been 2 whole women in the history of the whole collective Christian-European civilization. I'm sure there are many saints who'd apply as inspirational, but most of them wouldn't apply as leaders and I'm afraid that includes Queen of the Heaven. Not that there really are any inspirational men around besides maybe a few BRICS leaders...


I doubt any regime would undermine itself in such a way to ever admit such vulnerabilities. Maybe if the whole democratic system got upturned, but then all kinds of shit would be flung at the previous order - and it'd hardly be the USA as we know it today.

How about Theodora, also a whore and played a major role in helping Justinian to save an empire in distress.
How about Deborah, the Old Testament judge.

Also:
Boudicca (lead her people against the Romans)
Cleopatra (prevailed over her enemies by being the first of the Ptolemies to appeal directly to the Egyptian people)
Enlightened despot Maria Theresa
Nancy Ward, Cherokee diplomat and councilwoman during the early American wars
Mother Jones, Christian socialist organizer of union workers

And I strongly disagree that a saint can't be considered a leader. Even without ecclesiastical titles they are still leaders of opinion/instructional figures.

 

[Bubba Hernandez]

New 'tosses

 

[Whiskey]

Does the left even see whoring as a negative? I figured its seem as a position to aspire to. Granted I might be getting lead astray by the noisiest ones rather then the majority.

 

[Xentor]

How about Theodora, also a whore and played a major role in helping Justinian to save an empire in distress.
How about Deborah, the Old Testament judge.

Theodora - questionable
Deborah - meh

Boudicca (lead her people against the Romans)
Cleopatra (prevailed over her enemies by being the first of the Ptolemies to appeal directly to the Egyptian people)
Enlightened despot Maria Theresa
Nancy Ward, Cherokee diplomat and councilwoman during the early American wars
Mother Jones, Christian socialist organizer of union workers

Boudicca - failure
Cleopatra - failure
Maria Theresa - ok, I'll give you this one
Nancy Ward & Mother Jones - nobodies, who cares

And I strongly disagree that a saint can't be considered a leader. Even without ecclesiastical titles they are still leaders of opinion/instructional figures.

I never said they can't be, I just said it doesn't automatically qualify and most of them aren't. Also even if one is a exceptional guide/councilor, that doesn't make them a solid leader - not a figure nor a strategist.

I guess you just aren't immune the feminist propaganda and truly belive in "muh equal opportunity", that you get your panties all in a twist over a realistically few dozen examples over a few millenia.
It's insane not to gatekeep literally 1 in billions and keep entertaining the notion that "there could be a Jeanne d'Arc in every girl". Talking about being part of the problem, seriously.

 

[Equal Rights for Androids]

The real problem is that she's a female. Women should not hold positions of power. An inch of power and they go psycho if they lose it.

Does the left even see whoring as a negative? I figured its seem as a position to aspire to. Granted I might be getting lead astray by the noisiest ones rather then the majority.

No, unless it's the right doing it. Then they kinkshame you about it and call you weird.

 

[Kulee Baba]

In my view the Biden administration was the least transparent administration of our lifetimes. And it horrifies me that we as a nation could affirm that we're okay with that. I believe full heartedly that if Kamala Harris is the next President she will be just be as evasive and dishonest as Biden was.

The thing about the US Presidency is that it should be ruthlessly attacked and questioned. All the way up to Biden pretty much all Presidents would answer to the press. Sure they lied, told half truths or in Trump's case just outright insulted them but we did get a response. The Biden admin took advantage of a dolting Mainstream Press and just blatantly lied and many times just refused to answer a single question. Karine Jean-Pierre is going to go down in history as one of the biggest disgraces.

You can say whatever you want about Trump, but he responds to basically anything you throw his way. Leftists will say he just lied but a lie is still an answer where the Biden admin is built on bullshit. This simply cannot continue.

Look no further than Trump's assassination attempt, the biggest failure in national security in decades. And the Secret Service/FBI is covering that up so well that Mr.Beast is green with envy. It's terrifying if that becomes the new normal.

 

[TheNoseKnows]

How about two?
View attachment 6263956 View attachment 6263958
And by eternity I meant in the historical sense. Even if her election is later deemed invalid and nullified the next woman to become the "real" first female president will be haunted by her footnote.

I think John of Arc was fake. And likely also just a whore. No 16 year old girl is wearing armor and hanging out in a camp of battle hardened men and doing anything other than being passed around. Let alone doing any "fighting".

 

[Xentor]

Look no further than Trump's assassination attempt, the biggest failure in national security in decades. And the Secret Service/FBI is covering that up so well that Mr.Beast is green with envy. It's terrifying if that becomes the new normal.

That's probably a general symptom DEI-caused competency crisis tbh.

I think John of Arc was fake. And likely also just a whore. No 16 year old girl is wearing armor and hanging out in a camp of battle hardened men and doing anything other than being passed around. Let alone doing any "fighting".

Well back when Europeans weren't limp-wristed degenerates, even men's promiscuity was frowned upon.

 

[Cherry Eyed Hamster]

However bad they think 4 more years of Trump might be, is it worth an eternity of the first female president being a whore?

Trump’s a whore too, but that doesn’t bother most Republicans.

 

[Preacher ✝]

Trump’s a whore too, but that doesn’t bother most Republicans.

I mean in a sense all politicians are whores but Kamala literally took dick for money.