Dramacow Gabe Navarro / Moleman9000 / MolemanNineThousand / ResonX - 13 bans on Wikia

DrJonesHat said:
He probably knows about proxies and Tor and such. He does what he does because he thinks it's his right to do so, not because he's too stupid to figure out he's not wanted. He knows people hate him, but he just dismisses such people as trolls and cyberbullies. He's got money, if Wikia does IP ban him, he'll probably purchase a VPN account and go back to annoying the shit out of Geth.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't put it past Gabers to do such a thing.
 
DrJonesHat said:
Wikia needs to send Geth a nice fruit basket or something. He's pretty much a one-person infosec team at this point.
Click to expand...

And maybe provide him with free tickets to this year's Coachella Festival and the San Diego Comic-Con if he wants.
 
It's incredibly easy to make a sock account on Wikia.

Whether using an IP or a username though, I doubt Gabe's smart enough to try and cover up his identity. He's overly attached to the Moleman9000 username/persona and he's already lumped Merrystar (the Wikia staff who enacted the ban) in with the cyberbowlies and as such declared Wikia's ban invalid. Plus, wikis really matter to him and he'll want the credit for whatever it was he was doing - I don't think he can edit in anonymity any more than he can accept that his trolls aren't going to get instantly banned from every site on the internet that they follow him to.
 
Moleman thinks there's an absolute moral authority that transcends any individual website's rules. I dug a relevant bit out of his phone call with Null from a couple years ago because it's probably a big part of the reason why he feels entitled to do whatever he wants whenever he wants, damn the rules of any website if he disagrees with them.

Moleman: But that's but thatnotthat [STRESS SIGH]. OKAY. What I'm TRYING to enforce is not the US law, it is THE LAW. PERIOD. Of over everywhere... everyone... EVER!

Null: You're not fuckin' Judge Dredd! You can't decide what is the law. And no, it's not, making fun of somebody is not against any law. It's not even against US law.

Moleman: [Talking over Null] Well I would- I'm saying is... the law should (?) ... in mock I es I (??) I-I... highly to something that's very obvious. I'm not, like, judging actual contented issues. Like the abortion or gay marriage, I'm not... judging controversial issues that have two sides. This is not something that has two sides [Null stress sighs]. It's CLEARLY wrong.

......

Null: It doesn't matter. This is- this is what you absolutely have to understand before you can develop as a person. You have to have understand it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter how cruel they're being because they don't do anything you can reprimand them for. They are outside of your ability to control things.

Moleman: I- I will never accept that. Never.

In his mind, since his cyberbowlies are BAD, anything he does in response to them is GOOD, and anything any neutral parties do that isn't fully taking his side, his side entirely, and not considering any other viewpoints is as BAD as being a cyberbully which is BAD, and because of THE LAW EVERYWHERE deliberately going against what BAD people are saying and doing is GOOD.

Actually, let me rephrase that....

In his mind, since his CompleteMonster cyberbullies are AlwaysChaoticEvil, he is within his rights to PayEvilUntoEvil. Anyone on another website who can't see this or disagrees is a CorruptBureaucrat, and therefore when he decides ScrewTheRulesImDoingWhatsRight and continues to try and edit on sites he's banned from, he isn't only justified in doing so, but doing something commendable.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Splendid, Clown Doll, GandT and 9 others
Flying McDaniels said:
Moleman thinks there's an absolute moral authority that transcends any individual website's rules. I dug a relevant bit out of his phone call with Null from a couple years ago because it's probably a big part of the reason why he feels entitled to do whatever he wants whenever he wants, damn the rules of any website if he disagrees with them.

Moleman: But that's but thatnotthat [STRESS SIGH]. OKAY. What I'm TRYING to enforce is not the US law, it is THE LAW. PERIOD. Of over everywhere... everyone... EVER!

Null: You're not fuckin' Judge Dredd! You can't decide what is the law. And no, it's not, making fun of somebody is not against any law. It's not even against US law.

Moleman: [Talking over Null] Well I would- I'm saying is... the law should (?) ... in mock I es I (??) I-I... highly to something that's very obvious. I'm not, like, judging actual contented issues. Like the abortion or gay marriage, I'm not... judging controversial issues that have two sides. This is not something that has two sides [Null stress sighs]. It's CLEARLY wrong.

......

Null: It doesn't matter. This is- this is what you absolutely have to understand before you can develop as a person. You have to have understand it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter how cruel they're being because they don't do anything you can reprimand them for. They are outside of your ability to control things.

Moleman: I- I will never accept that. Never.

In his mind, since his cyberbowlies are BAD, anything he does in response to them is GOOD, and anything any neutral parties do that isn't fully taking his side, his side entirely, and not considering any other viewpoints is as BAD as being a cyberbully which is BAD, and because of THE LAW EVERYWHERE deliberately going against what BAD people are saying and doing is GOOD.

Actually, let me rephrase that....

In his mind, since his CompleteMonster cyberbullies are AlwaysChaoticEvil, he is within his rights to PayEvilUntoEvil. Anyone on another website who can't see this or disagrees is a CorruptBureaucrat, and therefore when he decides ScrewTheRulesImDoingWhatsRight and continues to try and edit on sites he's banned from, he isn't only justified in doing so, but doing something commendable.
Click to expand...
Thanks for posting that. That really sheds some light on why he keeps going back to Wikia despite being told to fuck off. He doesn't understand that yeah, private property law trumps anything else. Wikia can ban him because they don't like his name. That's why Free Republic, Democratic Underground, Daily Kos, Brietbairt, etc, can maintain ideological pureness, it's their sandbox, they get to decide who plays in it and what the rules are.
 
Moleman's Epic Rap Battles wiki is pretty much almost dead at this point, but not as dead as the Navaverse one before it was deleted, since the articles were edited by one user once every few days.

Also, just came across this when browsing his dA activity:

http://archive.is/hmWnt

TSsy1wc.jpg
 
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Clown Doll, GandT, Mister Moo and 5 others
Hey remember how we used to speculate what a nava-verse character would look like if a semi-competent artist drew it? Well now we known the answer. Like all dipshits on DA with no talent of their own, Moleman has resorted to paying other people to draw his art for him.

m3BAUv9.png


Compared to moleman's... source material.

PcY84DR.png


But of course a slightly less shit artist drawing a rendition of shit art wouldn't really be bump worthy, but what is is apparently it comes down to Moleman being a thirsty sperg trying to get a female artist's attention. Essentially because she Favorited something in his gallery (And checking their gallery, it's a case of just favoriting everything they see, as they're up to 2000+ pages of favorites), he decided to throw a bunch of pretend bucks (DA points cost real money, but AFAIK can't be taken back OUT of the system, only passed around like some weird internal currency) at her, and it resulted in this monstrosity.

O0mWMlR.png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: He Sets Me On Fire, Have a Pepsi, José Mourinho and 9 others
Strelok said:
[. . .] apparently it comes down to Moleman being a thirsty sperg trying to get a female artist's attention.
O0mWMlR.png
Click to expand...
If this really is thirst, it's some of the most inept thirsting I've ever seen. Here are all the phrases I spotted by which he puts her down:
"Proud-ishly"
"something of a filler"
"a notion that somewhat amuses me"
"majorly touched-up by myself from its original form to bring it up-to-snuff for my gallery" (I loled at this one.)
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: He Sets Me On Fire, Rana, gummy and 2 others
Does anyone still have the epic phone call Null made to Mole Man in 2014? I may have asked before but I've never seemed to actually save it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back