Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Fake News Anchor]

They brought their coke hoe co-defendant to their children services case. What a fucking idiot.

Nick's logic:
When the judge sees this hot gash I've been hitting, they'll understand why I did what I did and let me go.

 

[MadStan]

Interesting reading the court docs. The last question the Judge had (and there weren't many) was to clarify that Nick and co. refused to have their initial drug tests released. That was about the extent of the Judge's concern. Take it at face value.

 

[ThePhoenix]

They brought their coke hoe co-defendant to their children services case. What a fucking idiot.

What the actual fuckety fuck fuck

 

[Peace Through Power]

Maybe this "60 days of negative drug tests" is why Nick believes the kids will be coming back in under two weeks? I wouldn't be so confident considering that their strategy is to deny that they ever took drugs.

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

Whats going on in lawtube that its on fire? I dont really keep up with the other shysters.

Nick is now a regular topic on Lawtube. It has reached the point where @MNPublicRecords appearances here are tracked on Xitter.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

View attachment 6269094
Maybe this "60 days of negative drug tests" is why Nick believes the kids will be coming back in under two weeks? I wouldn't be so confident considering that their strategy is to deny that they ever took drugs.

Charging April might reset that 60 day clock if she has access to kids.

 

[Strix454]

I probably missed it due to not reading all the prior filings, but why are three of Nick's kids represented by counsel other than the GAL? Obviously the GAL is involved given the charges, but with them presumably representing the best interests of the children I'm not seeing a reason for Mr. Greiner to be needed

The GAL is not necessarily an attorney. The GAL is really intended to act as an overall guardian for the children and their interests. A substitute parent. The GAL would arrange legal representation for the children and coordinate that legal representation. But not necessarily be that legal representative.

The GAL is needed because often attorneys are not good as guardians. In particular they are too narrowly focused on legal issues rather than the overall issues involved.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

I probably missed it due to not reading all the prior filings, but why are three of Nick's kids represented by counsel other than the GAL? Obviously the GAL is involved given the charges, but with them presumably representing the best interests of the children I'm not seeing a reason for Mr. Greiner to be needed

I think it's a MN thing. Children over 10 have a right to attend hearings and to have their wishes heard. The GAL looks after the childrens interest while their lawyer represents their wishes. Rekieta's children may wish to return to their parents with their siblings and that may not align with their interest but they have a right to be heard in MN.

 

[Not Who You Think]

He doesn't see the point for releasing the footage because he doesn't know what it is people want to see.

Nick knows, of course. He just doesn't want anyone to see.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Some clips from the stream

Kids are coming back (Nick never lies obviously)
View attachment 6268851

State of his case and the thing that people are asking him to release is under protective order (Nick never lies obviously)
View attachment 6268858

Nicks view on abortion (2024 edition)
View attachment 6268866

So Nick's abortion take is 'The government can't stop it because that would mean them stepping too far into people's lives, so "oh well" (I guess no one can naysay them)'

It reads as a way to make a lolbert fantasy of the NAP a cardinal virtue.

I probably missed it due to not reading all the prior filings, but why are three of Nick's kids represented by counsel other than the GAL? Obviously the GAL is involved given the charges, but with them presumably representing the best interests of the children I'm not seeing a reason for Mr. Greiner to be needed

MN has 'McKenna's Law' that entitles any juvenile in a family case over the age of 10 the right to a state-paid attorney and presence at all hearings.

View attachment 6269094
Maybe this "60 days of negative drug tests" is why Nick believes the kids will be coming back in under two weeks? I wouldn't be so confident considering that their strategy is to deny that they ever took drugs.

This timeline is about right if we count from the week of Memorial Day on May 27th.

 

[uhoh spaghettios]

Maybe this "60 days of negative drug tests" is why Nick believes the kids will be coming back in under two weeks? I wouldn't be so confident considering that their strategy is to deny that they ever took drugs.

Or under the condition that his parents, who are unable to suggest what being under the influence even looks like, despite being glued to television all their lives like most boomers, move in and are there to supervise?

Can you imagine the shame? Meemaw, Pawpaw, the newly divorced coke fiend sidepiece, Kayla, the kids, and the Balldos all under one roof.

 

[Shiba Inu Strike Force]

So is combining coke and ketamine.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/z3nj79/mixing-cocaine-and-ketamine

Some hetti ketamolicane?

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

Well, Nick managed to exceed my expectations about his house.

Nick knows, of course. He just doesn't want anyone to see.


View attachment 6269184

Is exactly what we are going to see, down to a hole in the ceiling. I hope the jury turns this into the death penalty.

 

[TheButcherknight]

10) As reiterated in later case plans, Sweep elaborates on KCHHS' safety meeting's attempt to "plan around drug use" having been hampered by the parents having "stated they do not want to answer any questions regarding that" and KCHHS having been "unable to do any safety planning around returning the children" because they had "not been able to establish sobriety" or "establish how these substances were found and got into the home" in the first place.

He's has never lied.
This is probably the most glaring thing. Enjoy being child free i guess

 

[Long-time Lurker]

View attachment 6269057

Objection yer honor, she's a slut not a support

She's an escape and a disabler. She had her escape mechanism nerfed in the latest patch though.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

State of his case and the thing that people are asking him to release is under protective order (Nick never lies obviously)
Your browser is not able to display this video.

Sorry @Null. Nick would REALLY love to release the body cam footage himself, but unfortunately it's under a protective order which was agreed to by the parties with respect to the evidence in the CHIPS case.

Now, the body cam footage was turned over as discovery material for the criminal case (maybe also in the CHIPS, I have no idea). But, ignore that fact. The bottom line is that Nick would really love to be 100% transparent and publicly release the evidence which would show he is telling the truth about EVERYTHING.

Sadly, he can't do that. His hands are tied.

Maybe this "60 days of negative drug tests" is why Nick believes the kids will be coming back in under two weeks? I wouldn't be so confident considering that their strategy is to deny that they ever took drugs.

Note that it wasn't 60 days of negative drug tests before Nick & Kayla "get the kids back" in terms of full custody without supervision.

It was 60 days for family supervision, i.e. using grandparents who are present to supervise Nick and Kayla's time with the children rather than the kind of visitation center that Ralph goes to.

It appears to me he is going to try to pretend on his streams that family-supervised visitation is full custody. It clearly is not.

 

[Null]

The bodycam footage that exonerates him of wrong doing is protected? What exactly does protecting it do if it is perfectly ordinary footage of a respectable home?

 

[genericwhitemale]

their strategy is to deny that they ever took drugs.

Are they really? I guess that makes sense if he's planning on pleading not guilty no matter what but that is insane if he can go through the entire case saying he's never ever taken coke and retain a straight face.

 

[Hot Dog]

The bodycam footage that exonerates him of wrong doing is protected? What exactly does protecting it do if it is perfectly ordinary footage of a respectable home?

The state clearly doctored the footage, man. Nick's doing his best to save us from the big government conspiracy designed to keep him from speaking his TRUTH.

 

[Swole McPole]

Can you imagine the shame? Meemaw, Pawpaw, the newly divorced coke fiend sidepiece, Kayla, the kids, and the Balldos all under one roof.

In this week's episode of Nickbilly Elegy...