Again Nick can't resist the chance to hear the sound of his own voice despite his own attorney sitting there who is supposed to do the talking, this time taking a simple question of whether the parents have "been cooperating with drug testing" as the time to belt out his own "objection...to the introduction of the drug test evidence" that wasn't even the call of the question, as if panicking at the thought of ever discussing the parents' own hair follicle tests on May 30th, for which they'd swiftly revoked consent to release results to any county officials, and which their later July 13th motion sought to suppress altogether for the sole reason that the GAL shouldn't have gotten her hands on the results. This time the different judge was having none of it and asked Nick's attorney whether she'd like to make an objection for him.