Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Mourning_Cloak]

Never underestimate the State's intense desire to put kids back with their parent(s) as soon as humanly possible, no matter what.

 

[RotPockets]

seethe cynthia seethe

Judging by their post history of: porn, wrestling and video games, it is more likely to be CGoody, but since all it they do is yell at topics it could also be Still Life.

 

[Lubby Smith]

"Sir, another interesting new matter of public record just hit the farms."

Out of the entire shitshow, I guarantee the thing Nick thinks about most is the identity of MNPublicRecords. TYFYS.

Re: the kids returning home soon, don't be surprised if Nick's right.
In Minnesota CHIPS cases the gubbermint must prove (1) that 1 or more of the statutory child-protection grounds exists AND (2) the child needs protection as a result. In other words, it's not enough that what's alleged in the petition is true. There also has to be a finding that something is likely to happen in the future without protective services.

If this sounds fucked up, it is. In In re Welfare of Child of S.S.W., a violent, off-and-on homeless, bipolar mother who lived with her child abusing boyfriend and who already lost parental rights to 4 kids, including her 5 and 6 year old sons whom she molested, won the case (her new kid didn't need protective services) because she was doing everything they asked (testing clean, going to therapy, clean house, etc.) and everything seemed fine with the kid (who had remained in her custody prior to trial).

In other states it's enough that whatever happened happened. They don't need to prove it's likely to happen again without CPS.

In Nick's case, the kids were in danger because the parents were wasted, there were drugs in the house that one kid seemingly ingested, the house was a dump, and they weren't being fed. If the house is clean and has food, and the parents pass 60 days of tests and do the "drugs are bad" counseling, then they're probably good.

In fairness to Nick, he hadn't seen the copy of the warrant until after arriving back at the home after they breached. He only had their word that they had one when they asked for the door code while he was stopped on the side of the road.

Every state is different, but I assume it was so nothing he did could be construed as a consent to a search. In some states, if a search warrant is determined to be deficient, then the state will argue that the defendant’s actions meant he consented to a search, which makes an illegal search legal. In other words, if Nick gave the cops the door code, then it doesn’t matter if the search warrant was valid or not because the state would argue that he consented to the search.

Late, but re: consent and making the cops force their way in...
The burden of proving consent "cannot be discharged by showing no more than acquiescence to a claim of lawful authority." Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543 (196. This means if the cops lie about having a warrant, or if the warrant gets thrown out later in court, the fact that you let them in to execute the warrant doesn't make the search lawful based on consent.

Letting the police execute a search warrant is being a good citizen and respecting lawful authority. It would be fucking retarded if the courts said "sorry, but you had to tell the police 'go fuck yourselves... break down the door if you want in' in order to preserve your constitutional rights.

There was no shrewd legal maneuvering when Nick refused to give the code. He misunderstood the law, wanted to buy time for his hoes to flush the sack, or was just being a dick.

deferred adjudication

Deferred adjudication has to be approved by the prosecutor and the court. Accusing a county social worker of perjury and a local judge of being a retarded bitch with liquor flowing from her vagina is not the greatest way to get a favor from Madame Prosecutor. She definitely wants him to eat a felony. If Barneswalker negotiates him a deferred adjudication, then he did a great job. An Alford plea is a much more realistic goal, and it would allow Nick to claim "I'm innocent but I had to do this for muh keeds."

I don't think Rekieta has the humility for a plea deal.

I bet that's outweighed by Nick not having the balls to "take it to the box" as all the brothers say before inevitably taking a plea. He's a control freak and the smartest guy in every room, so being a defendant in a criminal jury trial is possibly the most unbearable situation imaginable. Plus, he has no defense that any jury would possibly buy. If the drugs don't get suppressed for a bad warrant (they won't), then he's taking a plea. If he goes to trial, then he's legitimately insane.

 

[RotPockets]

Sorry Rekieta fag, life doesn't work out the way you pretend it does

Your delivery was too Cool Ranch, needs more ZESTY Cheese sass.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

I believe the perjury claim refers to this.

The perjury claim was in reference to her being prevented access to the master bedroom.

It appears Nick insists that telling someone "You do not need to come in here" in relation to the master bedroom and shutting the door in their face does not constitute denial of entry to the master bedroom.



This is how Rekieta characterized it:


When Nick first discussed this in June it was already super obvious what had happened:
Nick had done or said things which were as denials of entry to the master bedroom/bathroom area without explicitly saying that he was denying access. He is way less clever than he gives himself credit for.

I had predicted that he insisted on another time to do the walkthrough. Also appears to be correct, as according to the transcript they wanted to hurry up and leave to post bond, but they also insisted on counsel being present at any future meetings.

The sleight of hand from "not allowed" to "prevented" is a classic Rekieta trick. If I had to guess, I would say he insisted on another time "to do a walk through of the whole house" which was taken as a refusal to enter the master bedroom. That's if he's not straight up lying, which is always a likely possibility.

We also have a hint of why Rekieta may not have wanted her in the bedroom which is that Nick tested positive for alcohol after this all went down. If there were bottles strewn throughout the bedroom, that probably would have been frowned upon.

That said, shutting the door and saying "You do not need to come in here" is more explicit than I thought it would be.

But it's still not an explicit "I am not allowing you to come in here", in Rekieta logic it is not a denial of access at all and it's PERJURY!

Bottom line: this kind of brinkmanship doesn't work in these types of cases. All that it means is that the usual benefit of the doubt which would be allowed to parents is lost. You can see it in the case plan. Probably because of the brinkmanship with the hair follicle test release, the case plans which were posted made clear that failures to abide by testing would simply be treated as a positive test.

 

[Bepis]

Sir Rekieta would like to point out that I 'fled the country for unknown reasons', and that the Kiwi Farms is a bunch of 'loli avatars',

Bold move to make bad faith insinuations considering his and Kayla's charges. Just saying I don't think any posters here stand accused of "knowingly permitting physical or sexual abuse of a child".

 

[bookers]

I hope for all of our sakes that he does not take a plea deal.
It would be much funnier if he continues trying to fight everything.

 

[JustTheFaxcts]

I don't know why the midwit thinks he can control the narrative on the Internet. Even major world governments can't do that effectively, yet somehow Nick thinks he's better than that. He's especially dumb to try directly lying to Null, who has access to a practicing lawyer and a reputation for publicly shaming retards online.

Also, I should be thankful I can't understand his drug-ravaged brain, but I don't get what he's actually going for with his public image. Balldo wants to pretend to be wholesome, that he didn't do drugs or swing. But at the same time he admits to going to "crazy parties", using sex toys, being a drunkard, streams half-naked, and takes his wife and side-whore out to a tattoo festival dressed like skanks.

Even if I didn't known he was cucked by Aaron and caught with a bunch of coke, I still wouldn't look at him and think heckin' wholesome Christian family man. Especially after all the blasphemy streaming.

 

[owed to joy]

If he doesn't take a plea, even more of these humiliating details will surface, whether he wins at trial or not. And this ongoing saga of humiliation will continue for as long as any new occurrences emerge, regardless how minuscule. For not just him but Kayla, April and his entire family. And he will drain his and his family's wealth on this case, Kayla's case, April's case & his retarded lawsuit defense. If he pleas, all he has to do is admit to something that everyone already knows anyway, and he'll incur almost no significant consequences.

I tend to think his most retarded choices correlate with time he spends online. If he can go at least 2 consecutive months without even looking at anything online, he might be convinced by his family and lawyer to plea. I just don't think he can keep away. This is probably one of the most aggressive cases of terminal addiction to self indulgence seen in some time.

 

[ChromaQuack]

This guy is loaded with a trust fund and has his grandparents, his GRANDPARENTS, clean his house. By all means I’m not rich but I still have a professional service come out and do work on the carpet at least once a year. I’d be loathe to call my parents, much less my fucking grandparents whom I dearly love and want nothing more for them to enjoy their lives to come by and clean my shit.

Holy fuck.

Be fair to Nicky, can you imagine just how hard it is to find a cleaning lady to take up the task of making your Crack&Coom hovel presentable when she has to deal with the following?:

-Rumors that the owner of the house has two side pieces and owns an extensive collection of sex toys and BDSM paraphernalia.
-Rumors that every surface is tainted with illicit substances which may get you thrown in the slammer if even trace amounts are found on you.
-The owner of the house refusing to tell you what he would like cleaned up because on top of being his cleaning lady you are supposed to be a mentalist and read his mind. But only the part of his mind that he wants.
-No bleach or other cleaning supplies in the house, that could be dangerous to the kids that are no longer there.
-A room filled with dog poop you can always hear soft sobbing from.
-A room with a mountain of Star Trek merchandise and Legos where, inexplicably, a soft demented wail perpetually permeates the soundscape and a pair of bulging eyes, pupils dilated like twin blackholes, watch your every move.
-A room which is comprised of eight arrow-shaped corridors splitting from the center. Two corridors, they hold a collection of pornographic DVDs categorized by date, theme, length and "spicyness". Two corridors, their walls damaged beyond repair, they have the words 'INCEL PRUDES' carved on every visible surface. Two corridors, they hold nothing but unending packages of pre-boiled eggs. Two corridors, their walls, floors and ceilings wall-papered with nothing but endless, infinite tiles of a picture of a fat, bald man wearing a suit, the man is smugly smirking as his countenance slowly warps into the shape of a pug.
At the center of the room where the corridors converge there is a single pedestal upon which a silicon cage and two rings rest.

You'd have a better and easier time cleaning up R'lyeh than whatever the balldo Nightmare McMansion currently is.

 

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

“Sorry, Kiwifags teehee”

Him accepting a plea deal is not gonna fucking happen. If he can’t pay a fucking parking ticket or his own taxes, then he’s gonna step on a rake with the plea deal.

 

[bookers]

If he doesn't take a plea, even more of these humiliating details will surface, whether he wins at trial or not. And this ongoing saga of humiliation will continue for as long as any new occurrences emerge, regardless how minuscule. For not just him but Kayla, April and his entire family. And he will drain his and his family's wealth on this case, Kayla's case, April's case & his retarded lawsuit defense. If he pleas, all he has to do is admit to something that everyone already knows anyway, and he'll incur almost no significant consequences.

I tend to think his most retarded choices correlate with time he spends online. If he can go at least 2 consecutive months without even looking at anything online, he might be convinced by his family and lawyer to plea. I just don't think he can keep away. This is probably one of the most aggressive cases of terminal addiction to self indulgence seen in some time.

Yeah a plea definitely seems like the obvious action.
The famous 5 stages of grief are denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance.
I'd say at this point we are still at the bargaining stage.
He is exhausting every option possible.
As trial dates approach the potential consequences of his actions will get larger and more real in his mind, I would think.
And so we will see if that is enough to move him off of the bargaining stage and into depression ("there's no way i can win this") and acceptance - a plea deal.

But some people will go a very long time without accepting their reality. I think it's possible he wont.
He doesn't want to admit he did anything wrong and that's a big ego thing for him (obviously).

@Null perhaps there should be betting or a poll on whether or not he accepts a plea deal.

 

[Captain Manning]

Hear ye, hear ye. It is the 4th day of August in year 2024 since the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. I have been contacted by King Balldo through a series of ropes and pulleys and given a missive.

*snip*

Yeah, it's not creepy and cult-like at all that he's STILL contacting you trying to control the narrative.

All that's missing is him saying he forgives you for "betraying" him and denying his divinity.

 

[The Bunk]

You're giving him too much credit. Nick has chosen this route because he is a moron and is going to fight back anyway he can against people using force against him. Whether or not he actually wants his kids in his life, he isn't going to have people in positions of authority determine that he can't see his kids. Especially since there is a forum of people who enjoy laughing at Nick and will mock him if he dares willingly give up custody to pursue his degenerate lifestyle.

The technicalities and clever little semantic word plays that Nick is coming up with are going to look absurd before a jury, none of his defences are even close to being reasonable. Nick is the type of person who thinks that if he finds the correct magic words then he can talk his way out of anything, he can't.

The thing with narcissistic cows like Nick is that they believe they can bend objective reality and people's comprehension of it if they sperg hard enough.
It's like when Ralph believes he's winning as long as he keeps hollering and screaming "5 star days".
Nick is convinced that he can clear the record and lawsplain his way out of this shitshow. If he could find just the right words, then everyone - his judge, the Farms, his detractors would instantly forget the last 2 years. In his mind, if he beats the case, then that would mean that everything leading up to it was proven to be untrue, reality would rearrange itself and all those haters would again see him as a based traddad lawyer he's always been.
So lets conduct a little thought experiment.
Lets imagine, that Nick beats the case, like the search warrant gets thrown out, or something. What happens next? Does Null commit seppuku to wash away his dishonour? Do Warski and PPP do a 12-hour "We Were Wrong, Balldo is cool and hip, and Nick is NOT an addict " stream? No. People would still call Nick a cokehead cuck and a deadbeat dad, who weaseled out of his jail time.
Rekieta can't grasp this simple truth, that's why he keeps going with this shit and seething impotently.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

She definitely wants him to eat a felony. If Barneswalker negotiates him a deferred adjudication, then he did a great job. An Alford plea is a much more realistic goal, and it would allow Nick to claim "I'm innocent but I had to do this for muh keeds."

I think you have it backward. In a deferred adjudication, he pleads guilty and admits he committed the crime. He eats the felony. The judge then defers the sentencing with the possibility that it's dismissed in a few years. But for the prosecutor, it's a guilty felony conviction.

Importantly, Rekieta admits his guilt in open court.

An Alford plea is that he doesn't admit guilt. It's much rarer. He is much less likely to get an Alford plea after antagonizing the prosecutor and accusing them of crimes. The prosecutor is going to require he admit guilt and be unable to assert innocence in the future and that happens with a deferred adjudication plea.

An alford plea would also allow him to appeal. Deferred adjudication plea removes appeals. Barnes getting an Alford plea would be amazing. Deferred adjudication after guilty plea is much more likely to be offered.

 

[Rodeo Roadrunner]

The perjury claim was in reference to her being prevented access to the master bedroom.

It appears Nick insists that telling someone "You do not need to come in here" in relation to the master bedroom and shutting the door in their face does not constitute denial of entry to the master bedroom.

Am I misunderstanding this part, or was Nick wanting to show off his shitty artwork to the CPS worker? A CPS worker is at his house, trying to assess whether the kids can go back home, and this guy is so unserious about what is happening that he wants to show off his art to Sweep? He is actually trying to flaunt his wealth to a CPS worker, this is just unreal.

 

[Swole McPole]

Sir Rekieta would like to point out that I 'fled the country for unknown reasons', and that the Kiwi Farms is a bunch of 'loli avatars', which makes us even less deserving of seeing the divine footage.

We all know how desperate Rekieta was to try and keep this country fleer onside, and how utterly heartbroken he was when the Farms turned against him.

You can't dump somebody after you've already been dumped, Nick.

Ask Aaron Imholte.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

I laughed at the document part when Rekieta required the poor social worker to stare at his stupid shell casing art, like it was a big "gotcha" moment.
This is how I envisioned Rekieta's House Tour happening::

Spoiler: Referenced Document Fragment

 

[Tubby Aardvark]

Am I misunderstanding this part, or was Nick wanting to show off his shitty artwork to the CPS worker? A CPS worker is at his house, trying to assess whether the kids can go back home, and this guy is so unserious about what is happening that he wants to show off his art to Sweep? He is actually trying to flaunt his wealth to a CPS worker, this is just unreal.

I think he was trying to explain the shell casings as part of an art piece in his bedroom. But it just comes off as him overly explaining and acting totally not on drugs.

 

[Maraschino]

Am I misunderstanding this part, or was Nick wanting to show off his shitty artwork to the CPS worker? A CPS worker is at his house, trying to assess whether the kids can go back home, and this guy is so unserious about what is happening that he wants to show off his art to Sweep? He is actually trying to flaunt his wealth to a CPS worker, this is just unreal.

Nick was trying to say that the art piece was the explanation for the loose ammunition found in his room, because said ammunition was part of said art piece.
He's really thinking he's winning because he has an explanation for the ammunition, and not the fucking cocaine, which he now is of the opinion he "doesn't believe necessarily was in his house".

The cocaine that was literally in a safe in the room he admitted he sleeps in.