The British Summer of Discontent - The growing civil unrest of the native British population, sparked by the murder of 3 young girls in Southport

The thing about deploying the military is: what exactly are they supposed to do?

First of all, is there even a procedure for such a domestic deployment? I assume there is. Might be a lot easier than in the USA. In a pinch I am sure someone can find some 1400's provision about deploying troops to rules lawyer. But then we get into the actual objectives:

Is the plan is to have them assist the police on riot control? Because that is bad they aren't trained for that. You are asking for problems. Soldiers shoot, they don't police.

If the plan is shooting, you are asking for a escalation and a international incident. And if it does happen chances are whoever shoots is gonna find themselves the target of the waaahg and not only beaten but the gun stolen which means that 100 years of gun control starts breaking down.

If the plan is to have the military literally occupy the neighborhoods Bahgdad style see problems 1 and 2, added the hell that is the fact most of the soldiers will be seen as traitors and free game.

There is no way Starmer is retarded enough to deploy the army...

Right?
 
They havent done anything yet though.
I wonder if it's because they don't actually feel threatened? "If it gets too bad give the muzzies guns! If it gets too bad send the army!" I'd imagine that is what they're thinking anyway.

Currently we're at the "disavow and call them nazis, racists, far-right, incels, young thugs with too much time and then say we need peace not war" stage.
 
Nice to know that every major pushback has had the fear of glowies.
And that is why right wing movements seem to never amount to anything. Meanwhile, left wing movements can count on the benefits of their end of the spectrum having a monopoly on good image and good PR. Literally anything they do can be practically justified or excused if it's presented in the right way.
 
"SEND THE PAKI PACKING" should be a chant lol. Also based.

I have been wondering about this. I am not a britbong, nor do I live there. But I have a very good friend who lives in London. She is an incredibly well educated, kind, smart person. Her job involves critical thinking about problems she works on. In many ways I look up to her. I asked her what's going on in UK (partly to suss out if she is based, but in great part because I am curious about her perspective on things, as she is the only person I know who lives out there) and she said it's a bunch of people being racist toward immigrants because of a tragedy that happened recently, and how it is all very sad.
Spotted your problem. Your friend is right but its very surface level. I can't speak as definitively as a native Briton, but from what I've seen, this is the culmination of about 20 years of rising tension, systematic negligence and bad blood between the British government and the British people.

Breach the doors! Unsheathe the swords!
 
Not to dismiss her opinion but she seems to be of the middle class, and there's a massive difference between the opinion of the average working class bloke to some cunt in a suit who lives in their own protected bubble. This applies to the Norf/Souf scenario as well since the south has historically been better off while the norf gets the dregs and is neglected by the country/government
Yeah, she is absolutely middle class, maybe even upper-middle. I'd still expect her to know a bit more about what is going on in her own country, no? I do know she lives in a nice neighbourhood, but she goes to work via subway and interacts with all kinds of people on the way there. In any case, I hope to hear more info from her over time.

@Random Internet Person It's not like I am shy with my views around her, so if she had any based opinions she would be safe to share them with me. I was critical about immigration (my belief is you can mix people as long as their set of values aligns with the host country. So, a Slovenian could easily move to the UK, but you don't want to import a bunch of Saudis.) as well as the troon epidemic lately. tldr, if she had any spicy views she could share them with me. She just doesn't seem to be aware of what's up. Yet.
 
So what are the bets on this keeping momentum through out the week? A lot of people (less so in the North) have jobs so do you think it'll lose too much steam and die off?
Depends if Starmer and his cronies keeps adding fuel to the fire. Say what you want about blair but he was at least competent in a slimy way, Starmer has none of that. He's a braindead, empty husk of a man without a single belief or convinction to his name besides being a slave to the powers that be.
 
Muslims/sandniggers need to vastly outnumber you and even then they shit and piss themselves if they're met with any serious resistance, niggers are the same but to a lesser degree.
I remember someone seeing the connection that when since the Christchurch shootings happened, not even one terrorist group tried to retaliate in New Zealand. Really makes you think, huh.
It’s also funny because being cowardly before competent opposition is also a stereotype of men who beat and mistreat women, which Muslims do as well. And it makes sense when you understand how people can be driven by their insecurities.

October 7th proved it. Before Israel retaliated and killed scores of them they were openly triumphalist.
 
I wonder if it's because they don't actually feel threatened? "If it gets too bad give the muzzies guns! If it gets too bad send the army!" I'd imagine that is what they're thinking anyway.

Currently we're at the "disavow and call them nazis, racists, far-right, incels, young thugs with too much time and then say we need peace not war" stage.
I feel its more that they arent sure what will happen. Your military has had recruting shortfalls for fucking years. Yeah they'll have guns. Against a massive horde far bigger than them. Unless they bring in fucking artillery, it will get fucking messy.
 
Does anyone here know—actually know—what the common sentiment is among native Britons regarding these riots? Some of you call these riots a racewar. I don't see how a couple hundred rioting here and there in cities of hundreds of thousands or millions constitutes a real war.
As someone living in a North-Eastern city with a very high population of whites and regular graffiti such as 'fuck antifa', I feel like the majority are for it. Working in a hospital, and you can really feel the simmering hate for the immigrant workers who come in, either do piss poor work or no work (one guy was found sleeping in a store cupboard once), and the conversations I've had with cleaners, the food hostesses and such is very much in line with what these riots are trying to achieve. I feel like the higher up the chain you go though, the less of a sentiment it is, or the more secret they are about it, so it's definitely a class based thing.
Also good luck to any Muslims trying to attack anyone here, between the gypsy gangs (Irish kind) and the absolutely savage local crazies with retard strength everywhere (saw a man rip a telephone box out in a rage one night), they would take a heck of a beating.
Maybe it's a long dormant Northern thing, like, similar to what spurned on the fight against the Romans and other invaders to the North.
 
The thing about deploying the military is: what exactly are they supposed to do?

First of all, is there even a procedure for such a domestic deployment? I assume there is. Might be a lot easier than in the USA. In a pinch I am sure someone can find some 1400's provision about deploying troops to rules lawyer. But then we get into the actual objectives:

Is the plan is to have them assist the police on riot control? Because that is bad they aren't trained for that. You are asking for problems. Soldiers shoot, they don't police.

If the plan is shooting, you are asking for a escalation and a international incident. And if it does happen chances are whoever shoots is gonna find themselves the target of the waaahg and not only beaten but the gun stolen which means that 100 years of gun control starts breaking down.

If the plan is to have the military literally occupy the neighborhoods Bahgdad style see problems 1 and 2, added the hell that is the fact most of the soldiers will be seen as traitors and free game.

There is no way Starmer is retarded enough to deploy the army...

Right?
Seeing as this is Great Britian, the plan for deploying the military is simple:

"Remember Operation Banner? Do what you did in Operation Banner. And escatale when necessary."
 
Maybe it's a long dormant Northern thing, like, similar to what spurned on the fight against the Romans and other invaders to the North.
Oh I can believe that. I'm willing to bet the further south you go, and the average income gets higher, tolerance for other cultures gets higher, if only because of the restuarants you can frequent and order on Doordash. You're not gonna see any riots like these on the Curry Mile of Manchester or on the West End of London.
 
The thing about deploying the military is: what exactly are they supposed to do?

First of all, is there even a procedure for such a domestic deployment? I assume there is. Might be a lot easier than in the USA. In a pinch I am sure someone can find some 1400's provision about deploying troops to rules lawyer. But then we get into the actual objectives:

Is the plan is to have them assist the police on riot control? Because that is bad they aren't trained for that. You are asking for problems. Soldiers shoot, they don't police.

If the plan is shooting, you are asking for a escalation and a international incident. And if it does happen chances are whoever shoots is gonna find themselves the target of the waaahg and not only beaten but the gun stolen which means that 100 years of gun control starts breaking down.

If the plan is to have the military literally occupy the neighborhoods Bahgdad style see problems 1 and 2, added the hell that is the fact most of the soldiers will be seen as traitors and free game.

There is no way Starmer is retarded enough to deploy the army...

Right?
If they deploy the military it will be to defend the mosques and immigrant holes. I would expect barriers and any one crossing them is going to be shot. Might be with rubber bullets but that's my expectation. Gives more police to control the riot without leaving muslims without support.
 
I wonder if it's because they don't actually feel threatened? "If it gets too bad give the muzzies guns! If it gets too bad send the army!" I'd imagine that is what they're thinking anyway.
If they give the Muslims guns, then the politicians and their entire families will be hunted down and put in a mass grave. This isn't even hyperbole or a threat. This is my honest prediction. You don't survive committing a betrayal like that. That's like Quisling-tier backstabbing.

Also what about insurgency in the British military? In the American military there is a ton of right wing thought and friction against the left wing establishment and movements. I know this from personal experience. American soldiers, particularly white American soldiers, are the most consistently respectable men I've met. But what about Britain? Is it the same there?
 
I would be surprised if the military is deployed. It's political suicide. Labor barely got in. They would be FUCKED if they went full throttle
Not if the goal is to establish the shitlib version of INGSOC to own the chuds. Vaush-type leftoids that populate virtually all left-wing parties in the west would absolutely install an authoritarian moralfaggot nightmare to save OUR DEMOCRACY™ from Norf FC and Chud United.
 
Back